Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1967 > October 1967 Decisions > G.R. No. L-23566 October 31, 1967 - ELENA L. GARCIA v. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-23566. October 31, 1967.]

ELENA L. GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, City Mayor of Manila, ET AL., Respondents-Appellees.

Marcial Desiderio for Petitioner.

Fernando P. Agdamag for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. STATUTES; REP. ACT 557; SECTION 1 THEREOF DOES NOT PRECLUDE CITY MAYOR FROM CONDUCTING PRIOR INQUIRY ON MERIT OF COMPLAINT AGAINST POLICEMEN. — While Section 1 of Republic Act No. 557 provides that for the purposes of securing disciplinary action against a member of the city police force, charges shall be preferred by the city mayor and investigated by the city council, this provision does not preclude the city mayor from conducting a prior inquiry in order to ascertain whether the complaint lodged in his office, is prima facie meritorious or sham, before he himself files formal charges with the city council or municipal board, and in so ascertaining, he can delegate the investigation of the case to any capable person or group of persons subordinate to him. Indeed, to hold that it is the ministerial duty of the city mayor to file charges everytime he receives complaint from private citizens, regardless of whether the charges have prima facie merit, is to make the office of the mayor an instrument for persecution if the case turns out later on to be without basis and reason.

2. ID.; SEC. 14, REP. ACT 4864, EXPLAINED. — Under Section 14 of Republic Act 4864, it is not a requirement that charges against the peace officer be preferred by the city or municipal mayor or provincial governor. Section 24 of the law makes provision for the repeal or modification of the provisions of Republic Act 557 which are inconsistent with the Act, and the saving clause thereof decrees (Sec. 24) that "all pending administrative cases involving police service and personnel shall be absorbed by the Police Commission one hundred days after the publication of the Police Manual containing rules and regulations relative to such matters."


D E C I S I O N


ANGELES, J.:


The petitioner appealed from a decision of the court of First Instance of Manila dismissing her petition for mandamus and prohibition with preliminary injunction, which seeks to compel the respondent City Mayor to file, with the Municipal Board of Manila, administrative charges against certain members of the Manila Police Department without having the matter first investigated by the Inspection Division of the Manila Police Department.

Sometime in 1963, the petitioner, Elena L. Garcia, allegedly the victim of an illegal arrest committed by Sgt. Patrocinio Sembrano and Pat Nazario de Vera of the Manila Police Department (referred to hereinafter as the MPD), lodged a complaint against the latter in the office of the City Mayor of Manila. Acting upon the complaint, the Mayor endorsed it to the Inspection Division of the MPD "in order to determine whether there is a cause of action." Appearing before said office, the petitioner contested its jurisdiction to investigate her complaint, but the objection was overruled upon an opinion given by a legal officer of the MPD.

Hence, petitioner instituted the instant proceedings.

Petitioner takes the view that upon receipt by the City Mayor of her complaint against the two policemen, it became the Mayor’s ministerial duty, under section 1 of Republic Act 557, to prefer and file charges against them with the Municipal Board of Manila, based on the allegations of her complaint.

In dismissing the petition, the lower court upheld the contention advanced by the respondents that "the City Mayor is not duty bound to prefer and file the corresponding charges with the Municipal Board, for the law gives him the discretion to prefer and file or refuse to prefer and file, the corresponding charges, depending on whether or not he finds a probable or prima facie case against the policemen."cralaw virtua1aw library

The view of the trial court is sound and persuasive. While section 1 of the law provides that for the purposes of securing disciplinary action against a member of the city police force, charges shall be preferred by the city mayor and investigated by the city council, this provision does not preclude the city mayor from conducting a prior inquiry in order to ascertain whether the complaint lodged in his office, is prima facie meritorious or sham, before he himself files formal charges with the city council or municipal board, and in so ascertaining, he can delegate the investigation of the case to any capable person or group of persons subordinate to him, Indeed, to hold that it is the ministerial duty of the city mayor to file charges everytime he receives complaint from private citizens, regardless of whether the charges have prima facie merit, is to make the office of the Mayor an instrument for persecution if the case turns out later on to be without basis and reason.

The case relied upon by the petitioner-appellant (Covacha v. Amante, 99 Phil. 1037), is not squarely in point. In that case, the investigation of a member of the police force, after the charges were formally filed, was conducted by a committee created by the city mayor of Bacolod. Instead of the city council, it was the committee that was assigned to determine whether the policeman was going to be suspended or removed or otherwise punished. In the case at bar, however, no charges had as yet been filed by the City of Mayor of Manila. The inquiry that was to be conducted by the Investigation Division of the MPD was only for the mayor’s own purposes and not in substitution for the investigation contemplated in section 1 of Republic Act 557, which would be conducted by the municipal board should charges be filed by the City Mayor himself.

Be that as it may, the question, however, has become academic with the enactment of the Police Act of 1966 1 creating the Police Commission, which provides in its section 14 that —

"Members of the local police agency shall not be suspended or removed except upon written complaint filed under oath with the Board of Investigators herein provided for misconduct or incompetency, dishonesty, disloyalty to the Government, serious irregularities in the performance of their duties, and violation of law."cralaw virtua1aw library

Under this provision of the law, it is not a requirement that charges against the peace officer be preferred by the city or municipal mayor or provincial governor. Section 24 of the law makes provision for the repeal or modification of the provisions of Republic Act 557 which are inconsistent with the Act, and the Saving Clause thereof (sec. 25) decrees that `all pending administrative cases involving police service and personnel shall be absorbed by the Police Commission one hundred days after the publication of the Police Manual containing rules and regulations relative to such matters."cralaw virtua1aw library

Wherefore, the decision is affirmed. No costs at this instance.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Dizon, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro and Fernando, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Republic Act No. 4864, approved Sept. 8, 1966.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1967 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-27583 October 10, 1967 - MARGARITO J. LOFRANCO v. JESUS JIMENEZ, SR.

  • Adm. Case No. 528 October 11, 1967 - ANGEL ALBANO v. PERPETUA COLOMA

  • G.R. No. L-16315 October 10, 1967 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HAWAIIAN-PHILIPPINE COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-23124 October 11, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-23638 and L-23662 October 12, 1967 - DIONISIO FERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. ISMAELA DIMAGIBA

  • G.R. No. L-27394 October 13, 1967 - ARMANDO V. AMPIL v. CORAZON JULIANO- AGRAVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27516 October 19, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28071 October 13, 1967 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 736 October 23, 1967 - MANUEL R. GO v. ROMULO CANDOY

  • G.R. No. L-19804 October 23, 1967 - LEON BALBAS, ET AL. v. MELECIO R. DOMINGO

  • G.R. No. L-24693 October 23, 1967 - ERMITA-MALATE HOTEL AND MOTEL OPERATORS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. CITY MAYOR OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-25162 October 23, 1967 - CHAMPION AUTO SUPPLY CO., INC. v. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS, ETC.

  • G.R. No. L-25362 October 23, 1967 - HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25477 October 23, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. 25478 October 23, 1967 - AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25784 October 23, 1967 - FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25871 October 23, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26618 October 23, 1967 - FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27077 October 23, 1967 - NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23181 October 24, 1967 - IN RE: TAN SEN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18440 October 25, 1967 - HAWAIIAN-PHILIPPINE COMPANY v. AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-24757 October 25, 1967 - MARCOS B. COMILANG v. GENEROSO A. BUENDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28089 October 25, 1967 - BARA LIDASAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. L-21069 October 26, 1967 - MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY COMPANY, INC. v. RODOLFO R. VELAYO

  • G.R. No. L-22488 October 26, 1967 - MATEO C. BACALSO, ET AL. v. MODESTO R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22371 October 26, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANO DAGA

  • G.R. No. L-22392 October 26, 1967 - RURAL TRANSIT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION v. BACHRACH MOTOR CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-24844 and L-24853 October 26, 1967 - MACARIO AROCHA v. MARTINIANO VIVO, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19012 October 30, 1967 - VICTORIA JULIO v. EMILIANO DALANDAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20175 October 30, 1967 - MARIA A. GARCIA, ET AL. v. RITA LEGARDA, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-20432 October 30, 1967 - JOSE MANALANG, ET AL. v. ARTEX DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20911 October 30, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SULPICIO DE LA CERNA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22082 October 30, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISABEL P. DEL CARMEN

  • G.R. No. L-23715 October 30, 1967 - STATE BONDING & INSURANCE CO., INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23797 October 30, 1967 - JUAN E. SEVILLA v. LEONCIO PARINA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23811 October 30, 1967 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO., INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27341 October 30, 1967 - IN RE: P.J. KIENER COMPANY, LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28055 October 30, 1967 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. DELFIN MONTANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21258 October 31, 1967 - FILIPINAS LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22459 October 31, 1967 - ANTONIO V. ROQUE v. BIENVENIDO P. BUAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22555 October 31, 1967 - PHILIPPINE IRON MINES, INC. v. TOMAS ABEAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23090 October 31, 1967 - PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. NICASIO A. YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20303 October 31, 1967 - REPUBLIC SAVINGS BANK v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20346 October 31, 1967 - CITY MAYOR, ET AL. v. CHIEF PHILIPPINE CONSTABULARY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21473 October 31, 1967 - PERFECTO D. KORDOVEZ v. SOFRONIO C. CARMONA

  • G.R. No. L-21556 October 31, 1967 - PHILIPPINE SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC. v. BEATRIZ ZABAL

  • G.R. No. L-22206 October 31, 1967 - FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHIL. v. FLORENCIO DIAMANTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22538 October 31, 1967 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. PRIMITIVA MALLORCA

  • G.R. No. L-22576 October 31, 1967 - ALPHA INSURANCE & SURETY CO. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23566 October 31, 1967 - ELENA L. GARCIA v. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23636 October 31, 1967 - TABACALERA INSURANCE COMPANY v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23848 October 31, 1967 - PORFIRIO RILLORAZA v. PEDRO ARCIAGA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24154 October 31, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22357 October 31, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE GUMAHIN

  • G.R. No. L-23196 October 31, 1967 - LAUREANO OLIVA v. NICOLAS V. LAMADRID, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23300 October 31, 1967 - ANDRES MANARPAAC, ET AL. v. ROSALINO CABANATAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23395 October 31, 1967 - AUYONG HIAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-25945 October 31, 1967 - NORBERTO B. PAA v. QUINTIN CHAN

  • G.R. No. L-24106 October 31, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. WARNER, BARNES & CO., LTD., ET AL.