Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1967 > September 1967 Decisions > G.R. No. L-23936 September 13, 1967 - IN RE: HAO GUAN SENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-23936. September 13, 1967.]

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF HAO GUAN SENG TO BE ADMITTED A CITIZEN OF THE PHILIPPINES. HAO GUAN SENG, Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellant.

Carlos Dominguez for Petitioner.

Solicitor General for Oppositor-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. NATURALIZATION REQUIREMENT AS TO PROPER AND IRREPROACHABLE CONDUCT FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF RESIDENCE. — Where attesting witnesses testified as to petitioner’s proper and irreproachable conduct starting from the year 1951 only and thereafter, could not supply any evidence about his conduct from 1933 to 1950; said witnesses were not in a position to know whether or not petitioner had the qualification demanding a proper and irreproachable conduct "during the entire period of his residence." Petitioner, therefore, failed to establish this qualification.

2. ID.; ATTESTING WITNESSES; REQUISITE. — The attesting witnesses must be "credible persons." To fall under this category it must be satisfactorily proven not only that they are not police characters, but, also, that they have such a well-known reputation for honesty and integrity, in the community in which they live, that their word can be taken on its face value.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


Appeal by the Government from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Davao, granting the petition of Hao Guan Seng for naturalization as Philippine citizen.

Appellant maintains that the lower court erred: (1) in finding that petitioner is exempt from filing a declaration of intention; and (2) in granting the petition for naturalization, despite petitioner’s failure to state in his petition one of his former places of residence.

The first alleged error is predicated upon the fact that, although petitioner has resided in the Philippines since 1933, or more than 30 years before he filed the petition for naturalization, on April 22, 1963, he went abroad three (3) times during said period of time, namely: (a) in 1946, when he went to China, and stayed there for six (6) months; (b) in 1958, when he went to Malaya, via Hongkong, to visit his wife who is domiciled in the crown colony, where he stayed for three (3) months; and, (c) in 1959, when he visited his wife in Hongkong, although the record does not show how long he was away this time.

It is urged by appellant that petitioner is not exempt from the obligation to file a declaration of intention, because the 30-year residence required therefor must be "continuous," whereas appellee’s residence in the Philippines has been, it is averred, interrupted by his aforementioned trips abroad. Upon the other hand, appellee asserts that these trips did not legally affect the continuity of his residence in the Philippines, which is not necessarily dependent upon physical presence therein.

As regards the second alleged error, petitioner’s application alleges that his residences in the Philippines have been: Zamboanga City, from 1934 to 1941; Ipil, Zamboanga del Sur, from 1942 to 1945; Zamboanga City, from 1945 to 1950; and, eventually, the City of Davao, Philippines. It appears, however, that he arrived at the port of Manila, coming from China, on January 3, 1933, so that, appellant concludes, he must have stayed in Manila from that date to the year 1934 when he moved to Zamboanga City, and his failure to mention such former place of residence in his petition for naturalization warrants the dismissal thereof.

We do not deem it necessary, however, to pass upon these two specific questions, for the following reason:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Section 2 of Commonwealth Act No. 473 provides that a petitioner for naturalization must have, inter alia, the following qualification:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Third. He must be of good moral character and believe in the principles underlying the Philippine Constitution, and must have conducted himself in a proper and irreproachable manner during the entire period of his residence in the Philippines in his relation with the constituted Government, as well as with the community in which he lives."cralaw virtua1aw library

Moreover, Section 7 of the same Act provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . The petition must be signed by the applicant in his own handwriting and supported by the affidavit of at least two credible persons stating that they are citizens of the Philippines and personally know the petitioner to be a resident of the Philippines for the period of time required by this Act, and a person of good repute and morally irreproachable and that said petitioner, in their opinion, has all the qualifications necessary to become a citizen of the Philippines, and is not in any way disqualified under the provisions of this Act."cralaw virtua1aw library

Inasmuch as one of the requisite qualifications is that petitioner "must have conducted himself in a proper and irreproachable manner during the entire period of his residence in the Philippines," it follows necessarily that his attesting witnesses must be in a position to establish this circumstance.

In the case at bar, the attesting witnesses were Dr. Benjamin Lacsamana and Mr. Pantaleon Jayme, both of whom claimed to have known the petitioner in the year 1951, and testified to his good behavior since then only, for they could not supply any evidence about his conduct from 1933 to 1950. In other words, they were not in a position to know whether or not petitioner had the qualification demanding a proper and irreproachable conduct "during the entire period of his residence."cralaw virtua1aw library

Furthermore, we have repeatedly declared that the attesting witnesses must be "credible persons," and that to fall under this category, as said term is used in Section 7 of Commonwealth Act No. 473, it must be satisfactorily proven, not only that the witnesses are not police characters, but, also, that they have such a well-known reputation for honesty and integrity, in the community in which they live, that their word can be taken on its face value. 1 No proof to this effect, as regards petitioner’s aforementioned witnesses, has been introduced.

Accordingly, the decision appealed from should be, as it is hereby, reversed, and another one entered, dismissing the petition, with costs against the petitioner. It is so ordered.

Reyes, J.B.L., Dizon, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Ong v. Republic, 103 Phil., 964, 971, May 10, 1958; Antonio Go v. Republic, L-18068, October 30, 1962; and O Ku Phuan v. Republic, August 31, 1967.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1967 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 492 September 5, 1967 - OLEGARIA BLANZA, ET AL. v. AGUSTIN ARCANGEL

  • G.R. No. L-19831 September 5, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FORTUNATO BUCO

  • G.R. No. L-21184 September 5, 1967 - SIMEON CORDOVIS, ET AL. v. BASILISA A. DE OBIAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22146 September 5, 1967 - SVERIGES ANGFARTYGS ASSURANS FORENING v. QUA CHEE GAN

  • G.R. No. L-22492 September 5, 1967 - BASILAN ESTATES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26703 September 5, 1967 - IN RE: MARMOLITO R. CATELO v. CHIEF OF THE CITY JAIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26734 September 5, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PANFILO PADERNAL

  • G.R. No. L-27515 September 5, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26090 September 6, 1967 - ISIDRO B. RAMOS v. ABELARDO SUBIDO, ET. AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26951 September 12, 1967 - PHILIPPINE FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17587 September 12, 1967 - PHILIPPINE BANKING CORPORATION v. LUI SHE

  • G.R. No. L-23936 September 13, 1967 - IN RE: HAO GUAN SENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-24092 September 13, 1967 - GENATO COMMERCIAL CORPORATION v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24836 September 13, 1967 - YEK TONG LIN FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18722 September 14, 1967 - CATALINA M. DE LEON, ET AL. v. HERMOGENES CALUAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19570 September 14, 1967 - JOSE V. HILARIO, JR. v. CITY OF MANILA

  • A.C. No. 540 September 15, 1967 - PEDRO C. RELATIVO v. MARIANO DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21504 September 15, 1967 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22734 September 15, 1967 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MANUEL B. PINEDA

  • G.R. No. L-27125 September 15, 1967 - ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING & DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. PROGRESSIVE LABOR ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21166 September 15, 1967 - BONIFACIO GESTOSANI, ET AL. v. INSULAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27515 September 15, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21691 September 15, 1967 - RAMON V. MITRA v. ABELARDO SUBIDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19713 September 18, 1967 - IN RE: BONIFACIO SY v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22645 September 18, 1967 - CARLOS CALUBAYAN, ET AL. v. CIRILO PASCUAL

  • G.R. No. L-23174 September 18, 1967 - CONCEPCION MACABINGKIL v. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27934 September 18, 1967 - CONSTANTE PIMENTEL v. ANGELINO C. SALANGA

  • G.R. No. L-23927 September 19, 1967 - TALLER BISAYAS EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS ASSOCIATION v. PANAY ALLIED WORKERS UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23716 September 20, 1967 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO., INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24091 September 20, 1967 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION COMPANY, INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20812 September 22, 1967 - IN RE: DOMINGO PO CHU SAM v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20942 September 22, 1967 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. A. D. GUERRERO

  • G.R. No. L-19892 September 25, 1967 - GERONIMO GATMAITAN v. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20706 September 25, 1967 - MARIANO LAPINA v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21804 September 25, 1967 - TERESA ELECTRIC AND POWER CO., INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20055 September 27, 1967 - NATIONAL WATERWORKS AND SEWERAGE AUTHORITY v. NWSA CONSOLIDATED LABOR UNIONS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 500 September 27, 1967 - TAHIMIK RAMIREZ v. JAIME S. NER

  • G.R. No. L-21209 September 27, 1967 - CHIENG HUNG v. TAM TEN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22456 September 27, 1967 - FRANCISCO SALUNGA v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20303 October 31, 1967 - REPUBLIC SAVINGS BANK v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23233 September 28, 1967 - LUIS ENGUERRA v. ANTONIO DOLOSA

  • G.R. No. L-24384 September 28, 1967 - MARGARITA IÑIGO v. ADRIANA MALOTO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23463 September 28, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS CLEMENTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20827 September 29, 1967 - ADELA C. SALAS-GATLIN v. CORAZON AGRAVA

  • G.R. No. L-21749 September 29, 1967 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. LUZON STEVEDORING CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-21879 September 29, 1967 - SAN MIGUEL BREWERY, INC. v. FRANCISCO MAGNO

  • G.R. No. L-21876 September 29, 1967 - PHILIPPINE AMUSEMENT ENTERPRISES INC. v. SOLEDAD NATIVIDAD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21985 September 29, 1967 - AMPARO CRUZ v. ROSA HERNANDEZ NALDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22261 September 29, 1967 - ENRIQUE BALDISIMO v. CFI OF CAPIZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23599 September 29, 1967 - REYNALDO C. VILLASEÑOR v. MAXIMO ABAÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23666 September 29, 1967 - EUSTAQUIO AMOREN, ET AL. v. HERNANDO PINEDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24591 September 29, 1967 - CALTEX (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27266 September 29, 1967 - FEDERICO G. REAL, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19978 September 29, 1967 - CECILIO RAFAEL v. EMBROIDERY AND APPAREL CONTROL AND INSPECTION BOARD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20865 September 29, 1967 - ASELA P. TACTAQUIN v. JOSE B. PALILEO

  • G.R. No. L-20940 September 29, 1967 - BERNARDO LONARIA v. PASTOR L. DE GUZMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21911 September 29, 1967 - NATIONAL WATERWORKS & SEWERAGE AUTHORITY v. HOBART DATOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21979 September 29, 1967 - NATIONAL MARKETING CORPORATION v. ATLAS TRADING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22096 September 29, 1967 - TALISAY-SILAY MILLING CO., INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22119 September 29, 1967 - PHILIPPINE AIR LINES, INC. v. MELANIO SALCEDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22523 September 29, 1967 - IN RE: EDWIN M. VILLA, JR. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22621 September 29, 1967 - JOSE MARIA RAMIREZ v. JOSE EUGENIO RAMIREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27420 September 29, 1967 - RENATO L. AMPONIN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21655 September 29, 1967 - FERNANDO CORPUZ v. DAMIAN L. JIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22107 September 30, 1967 - CONSTANTINO TIRONA, ET AL. v. ARSENIO NAÑAWA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23655 September 30, 1967 - EMILIA GABON, ET AL. v. NICANOR G. JORGE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27535 September 30, 1967 - FELIX LOMUGDANG v. PATERNO JAVIER