Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1968 > March 1968 Decisions > G.R. No. L-26185 March 13, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WILFORIANO CESAR:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-26185. March 13, 1968.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILFORIANO CESAR alias JUNIOR, Defendant-Appellant.

Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Agapito Hontanosas, for Defendant-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; COMPLEX CRIME; ASSAULT UPON A PERSON IN AUTHORITY WITH HOMICIDE; PENALTY. — The assault upon a person in authority with homicide being a complex crime, the penalty for the more serious crime should be imposed, the same to be applied in its maximum period. The more serious is homicide punishable by reclusion temporal.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; METHOD OF DETERMINING PENALTY. — The proper method is to start from the penalty imposed by the Revised Penal Code, i.e., reclusion temporal; then apply the privileged mitigating circumstance of minority and determine the penalty immediately inferior in degree, i.e., prision mayor; and finally apply the same in its maximum degree but within the minimum range thereof because of the ordinary mitigating circumstance of plea of guilty. Prision mayor being the maximum of the indeterminate sentence, the minimum of the indeterminate penalty next lower to it as prescribed by the Revised Penal Code, i.e., prision correccional. Applying now the Indeterminate Sentence Law, Accused-appellant should be sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of not less than six (6) years of prision correccional, to not more than ten (10) years and eight (8) months of prision mayor.


D E C I S I O N


BENGZON, J.P., J.:


This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Bohol in Criminal Case No. 4258.

The record bears out, the counsel de oficio does not challenge, and the Office of the Solicitor General agrees with, and adopts, the following findings of fact of the trial court:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Accused was a student of St. Anthony’s Academy in Carmen, Bohol. On March 9, 1966, during the first period in the afternoon, he went out to buy a notebook from the store of a certain Emil Andres and there he met his friend, Vidal Torrefranca, who offered him tuba. He drank two glasses and returned to his classes. He was able to attend all his classes and could remember the subjects he attended. After classes, he stood by the flagpole where he met and stabbed with a knife 1 Segundo Sarce, Jr., Acting Principal Teacher of St. Anthony’s Academy. Accused fled after the stabbing. According to the autopsy report, 2 the victim died minutes after the wound was inflicted.

Upon being informed of the incident, the Chief of Police and five policemen went to St. Anthony’s Academy, where they were informed that the accused had escaped. From the Carmen Extension Hospital where they proceeded and saw the victim already dead, the policemen went to the house of the accused and found the latter’s father who informed them that he was going to town to look for his son whom he would surrender. While accused’s father was putting on his trousers in order to go with the policemen, a knife fell from his trousers’ pocket. Replying to the query of the Chief of Police, Accused’s father stated that it was the knife (Exh. "A") that accused had used in stabbing his victim. The policemen and accused’s father went to the house of Teodorico Cabanag, Accused’s grandfather, where the policemen found the accused in a room. The accused was brought to the municipal jail and locked therein.

Charged with direct assault with murder in the Municipal Court of Carmen, Bohol, Accused waived his right to preliminary investigation and moved that his case be remanded to the Court of First Instance of Bohol at Tagbilaran. This was granted and the accused was charged with the same complex crime in the latter court.

Upon arraignment on April 12, 1966, the accused pleaded not guilty. However, on the date set for trial on the merits, he manifested thru counsel his intention to plead guilty to the lesser offense of direct assault with homicide and to pay damages. With the Fiscal’s conformity and upon petition of the accused, the latter was allowed to withdraw his former plea of not guilty, the information was amended accordingly, and the accused pleaded guilty to the charge of direct assault with homicide.

With leave of court, and in order to mitigate his liability, Accused proved that he was born in the Municipality of Carmen, province of Bohol, on May 27, 1948 (Exhibits 1 and 1-A), and therefore on the date of the commission of the crime, he was only 17 years, 9 months, and 12 days old.

The trial court connected the accused of direct assault upon a person in authority with homicide in its decision dated April 30, 1966, the dispositive portion of which is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, Accused Wilforiano Cesar alias Junior is found guilty of the complex crime of direct assault upon a person in authority with homicide, as defined under Article 48 in relation with Articles 148 and 249 of the Revised Penal Code, with a special or privileged mitigating circumstance of minority (Article 68, paragraph 2) and spontaneous plea of guilty (Article 13, paragraph 7) and is hereby sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of from TWELVE (12) years and ONE (1) day of reclusion temporal, as minimum, to FOURTEEN (14) years, EIGHT (8) months and ONE (1) day of reclusion temporal, as maximum, (Article 27 in relation to Articles 76 and 77 of the Revised Penal Code; People v. Pao, 58 Phil. 545; People v. Gayrama, 60 Phil. 796) with all the accessory penalties provided by law, and to pay damages to the heirs of the deceased Segundo Sarce, Jr. in the amount of P7,500.00, including expenses for embalming, tomb, prayers, wick, but without subsidiary personal liability in case of insolvency in view of the nature of the penalty (Article 39, Revised Penal Code). The accused must pay the costs of this proceeding. He is, however, credited one-half of his preventive imprisonment from March 10, 1966, until this decision becomes final (Article 29, Revised Penal Code).

"The lethal weapon, Exhibit ‘A’, is hereby confiscated in favor of the Government of the Philippines." 3

In this appeal, the accused raises as sole issue the correct penalty under the circumstances.

Accused-appellant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of the crime of direct assault upon a person in authority with homicide. This being a complex crime, the penalty for the more serious crime should be imposed, the same to be applied in its maximum period. 4 The more serious crime is homicide punishable by reclusion temporal.

Accused has to his credit two mitigating circumstances: the special or privileged mitigating circumstance of minority 5 and the ordinary mitigating circumstance of plea of guilty. 6 Therefore, under Art. 64, par. 5 of the Revised Penal Code, the penalty imposable is the penalty next lower to that prescribed by law. Under Art. 71, Revised Penal Code, the penalty next lower to reclusion temporal is prision mayor. Because of the complex nature of the crime committed by accused-appellant, the penalty of prision mayor is to be applied in its maximum period. However, having in his favor the ordinary mitigating circumstance of plea of guilty without any offsetting aggravating circumstance, applying Art. 64, par. 2 of the Revised Penal Code, the penalty of prision mayor maximum should be imposed in its minimum range.

Parenthetically, We must state that the lower court erred in the imposition of the correct penalty — despite its proper appreciation of the privileged mitigating circumstance of minority and the ordinary circumstance of plea of guilty in favor of the appellant — because it applied first the imposable penalty to its maximum degree, i.e., reclusion temporal, maximum, and then imposed the penalty immediately inferior to it, i.e., reclusion temporal medium. This latter penalty it imposed as the maximum of the indeterminate sentence, but applied in the minimum range because of the ordinary mitigating circumstance of plea of guilty. As the minimum of the indeterminate sentence, it imposed the minimum of the penalty next lower, i.e., reclusion temporal minimum.

The proper method 7 is to start from the penalty imposed by the Revised Penal Code, i.e., reclusion temporal; then apply the privileged mitigating circumstance of minority and determine the penalty immediately inferior in degree, i.e., prision mayor; and finally apply the same in its maximum degree but within the minimum range 8 thereof because of the ordinary mitigating circumstance of plea of guilty. Prision mayor being the maximum of the indeterminate sentence, the minimum of the indeterminate penalty is within the range of the penalty next lower to it as prescribed by the Revised Penal Code, i.e., prision correccional.

All told, and applying now the Indeterminate Sentence Law, Accused-appellant should be sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of not less than six (6) years of prision correccional, to not more than ten (10) years and eight (8) months of prision mayor. 9

WHEREFORE, the judgment appealed from is hereby modified as to the personal penalty so as to sentence the accused to an indeterminate penalty of not less than six (6) years of prision correccional to not more than ten (10) years and eight (8) months of prision mayor; in all other respects, the judgment is hereby affirmed. No costs. So ordered.

Reyes, J.B.L., Actg. C.J., Dizon, Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Exhibit "A"

2. Principal Record, page 3.

3. Record on Appeal, pp. 2-4. 3 Principal Record, pp. 39-40.

4. Art. 48, Revised Penal Code.

5. Art. 68, par. 2, Ibid.; People v. Fulgencio, L-5570, Nov. 10, 1952; People v. Aragon, L-13222, Apr. 22, 1960.

6. Art. 13, par. 7, Revised Penal Code.

7. See People v. Gonzales, 73 Phil. 549.

8. People v. Mape, 77 Phil. 809.

9. Prision Mayor maximum Max. range — 11 yrs. 4 mos. 1 day to 12 years (10 yrs. 1 day Med. range — 10 yrs. 8 mos. 1 day to 12 yrs.) to 11 yrs. 4 mos. Min. range — 10 yrs. 1 day to 10 yrs. 8 mos.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1968 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-21738 March 1, 1968 - IN RE: CHOA EK YONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21881 March 1, 1968 - PACIFIC OXYGEN & ACETYLENE COMPANY v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. L-23066 March 1, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE S. UMALI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23426 March 1, 1968 - LEOPOLDO SY-QUIA, ET AL. v. MARY MARSMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22667 March 1, 1968 - JOSE DE ASIS, ET AL. v. ANGELINA DUMADAUG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24115 March 1, 1968 - EUFEMIA V. SHAFFER v. VIRGINIA G. PALMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25175 March 1, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIMPLICIANO SORIA

  • G.R. No. L-26082 March 1, 1968 - NORBERTO DE LA REA v. ABELARDO SUBIDO

  • G.R. No. L-27030 March 6, 1968 - PABLO GONZAGA, ET AL. v. MARTINIANO P. VIVO

  • G.R. No. L-28473 March 6, 1968 - TAHIR LIDASAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28598 March 12, 1968 - NAGA TAGORANAO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28725 March 12, 1968 - BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY v. JOSUE L. CADIAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20865 March 13, 1968 - ASELA P. TACTAQUIN v. JOSE B. PALILEO

  • G.R. No. L-22485 March 13, 1968 - CONSUELO V. CALO v. AJAX INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED

  • G.R. No. L-23351 March 13, 1968 - CIRILO PAREDES v. JOSE L. ESPINO

  • G.R. No. L-23718 March 13, 1968 - JUSTINO LUCERO v. LEON P. DACAYO

  • G.R. No. L-24213 March 13, 1968 - VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25420 March 13, 1968 - PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY v. FREE TELEPHONE WORKERS UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25460 March 13, 1968 - INOCENCIO C. TAN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26185 March 13, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WILFORIANO CESAR

  • G.R. No. L-26437 March 13, 1968 - RAQUEL G. DOCE v. BRANCH II OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF QUEZON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26585 March 13, 1968 - NATIONAL MARKETING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-25738 March 14, 1968 - SILVERIO CAGAMPANG v. FLAVIANO MORANO

  • G.R. No. L-25001 March 15, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO B. ALBAPARA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21610 March 15, 1968 - CENTRAL AZUCARERA DON PEDRO v. DON PEDRO SECURITY GUARDS UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23912 March 15, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JOSE CONCEPCION

  • G.R. No. L-19911 March 15, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SERVICE v. JOSE S. BAUTISTA

  • G.R. No. L-22997 March 15, 1968 - PABLO C. MONTALBAN, ET AL. v. GERARDO MAXIMO

  • G.R. No. L-25052 March 15, 1968 - DATU MARIGA DIRAMPATEN v. HADJI MADKI ALONTO

  • G.R. No. L-25302 March 15, 1968 - ABUNDIO MATILLANO, ET AL. v. SEVERIANO DE LEON

  • G.R. No. L-25403 March 15, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUIS A. CATALINO

  • G.R. No. L-26331 March 15, 1968 - BALBINO PAMINTUAN, ET AL. v. EMMANUEL M. MUÑOZ

  • G.R. Nos. L-20662 & L-20663 March 19, 1968 - PHILIPPINE MARlNE OFFICERS’ GUILD v. COMPAÑIA MARITIMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24466 March 19, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAIME CAPITO @ JIMMY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22486 March 20, 1968 - TEODORO ALMIROL v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF AGUSAN

  • G.R. No. L-23586 March 20, 1968 - A.D. SANTOS, INC. v. VENTURA VASQUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-24826 March 20, 1968 - ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MACONDRAY & CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24918 March 20, 1968 - FELIX DE VILLA v. ANACLETO TRINIDAD, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25939 March 20, 1968 - REPARATIONS COMMISSION v. JESUS P. MORFE

  • G.R. No. L-27106 March 20, 1968 - PALANAN LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO., INC., ET AL. v. MANUEL ARRANZ

  • G.R. Nos. L-20589-90 March 21, 1968 - ERNESTO DEL ROSARIO v. VICTORINO DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22231 March 21, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELO PAAT

  • G.R. No. L-23565 March 21, 1968 - INSULAR LIFE INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25640 March 21, 1968 - VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26538 March 21, 1968 - MELECIO ROSARIO, ET AL. v. TAYUG RURAL BANK, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-26922 and 26923 March 21, 1968 - EUFRACIO FAGTANAC, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 101 March 27, 1968 - EMETERIO A. BUYCO, ET AL. v. MARIANO A. ZOSA

  • G.R. No. L-19378 March 27, 1968 - ACOJE MINING COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20046 March 27, 1968 - ROMEO PAYLAGO, ET AL. v. INES PASTRANA JARABE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22265 March 27, 1968 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GOODRICH INTERNATIONAL RUBBER CO.

  • G.R. No. L-22984 March 27, 1968 - MARGARITO SARONA, ET AL. v. FELIPE VILLEGAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23467 March 27, 1968 - AMALGAMATED LABORERS’ ASSOCIATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23489 March 27, 1968 - JULIAN ABANA v. FRANCISCO QUISUMBING

  • G.R. Nos. L-24123, L-24124, L-24125 & L-24126 March 27, 1968 - GREGORIO ROBLES v. CONCEPCION FERNANDO BLAYLOCK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25471 March 27, 1968 - BENGUET CONSOLIDATED, INC., ET AL. v. BCI EMPLOYEES & WORKERS UNION-PAFLU, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25513 March 27, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSAURO C. DIONISIO

  • G.R. No. L-25676 March 27, 1968 - ROSENDA A. DE NUQUI, ET AL. v. ILDEFONSO D. YAP

  • G.R. No. L-26213 March 27, 1968 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS (PAFLU), ET AL. v. PIO R. MARCOS

  • G.R. Nos. L-28550 to L-28552 March 27, 1968 - PEDRO R. DIZON v. TITO V. TIZON

  • G.R. No. L-28563 March 27, 1968 - GOV. PEDRO R. DIZON v. HON. TITO V. TIZON

  • G.R. No. L-21196 March 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELPIDIO BELCHEZ

  • G.R. No. L-22535 March 28, 1968 - ALFREDO VILLARUEL v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24440 March 28, 1968 - PROVINCE OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE v. CITY OF ZAMBOANGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24660 March 28, 1968 - PEDRO VIDAL, ET AL. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-27757 March 28, 1968 - RICARDO DEQUITO v. LEOPOLDO LOPEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20477 March 29, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX B. ACEBEDO

  • G.R. No. L-20802 March 29, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. REPUBLIC SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-21890 March 29, 1968 - MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22062 March 29, 1968 - GREGORIO Y. ROMERO v. MUNICIPAL MAYOR OF BOLJOON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22759 March 29, 1968 - MANUEL R. JIMENEZ v. ALBERTO V. AVERIA

  • G.R. No. L-25366 March 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE BUAN

  • G.R. No. L-25475 March 29, 1968 - FELICIDAD REYES-TALAG v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF LAGUNA

  • G.R. No. L-26830 March 29, 1968 - CIPRIANO A. FALCON, ET AL. v. FELICIANO OROBIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23375 March 30, 1968 - FRANCISCO ORFIDA v. PEDRO PANUELOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28539 March 30, 1968 - SALVADOR Q. PEDIDO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.