Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1968 > May 1968 Decisions > G.R. No. L-24560 May 21, 1968 - CONSUELO S. CALALANG v. ENRIQUE MEDINA, ETC., ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-24560. May 21, 1968.]

CONSUELO S. CALALANG, Petitioner, v. ENRIQUE MEDINA, ETC., ET AL., Respondents.

Maximo Calalang for Petitioner.

G. O. Almario and P.H. del Pilar for respondent PSC.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; MANDAMUS WITH INCIDENTAL CLAIM FOR DAMAGES; ACTION FOR MANDAMUS BECOMES MOOT; EFFECT ON THE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES. — Where in an action filed against the Commissioner of the Public Service Commission to compel them to act on petitioner’s motion for reconsideration and supplemental motion for reconsideration of the decision in case No. 126911, as well as to recover the sum of P100,000 as damages, the principal action for mandamus becomes moot by reason of the issuance by the Commission of an order setting aside its decision in said case, no action is herein taken on the claim for damages because it is debatable, to say the least whether or not the court can pass upon said claim since the principal action for mandamus has become moot. Besides, in this case, there is, as yet, no means to ascertain the amount of damages sustained by the petitioner assuming that respondents may be held liable therefor.


D E C I S I O N


CONCEPCION, J.:


This is a petition for mandamus against the Commissioner of Public Service and the Associate Commissioners of Public Service, as well as for the recovery of damages.

It appears that, on June 19, 1959, Republic Act No. 2290, granting Consuelo S. Calalang a franchise to construct, operate and maintain an ice plant and cold storage in Hagonoy, Bulacan, subject to certain conditions, was approved. Accordingly, on August 17, 1959, Mrs. Calalang filed with the Public Service Commission — hereinafter referred to as PSC — n application docketed as PSC Case No. 126911, for the corresponding certificate of public convenience. Prior thereto, or on July 17, 1959, Aurora Tanjangco, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband Gervacio Tanjangco, operator of an old ice plant in the same town of Hagonoy, had filed with the Commission an application, docketed as PSC Case No. 126537, for increase in the capacity of said old ice plant, from ten (10) to forty (40) tons daily. Mrs. Calalang objected to this petition for increase and prayed that the two cases — nos. 126537 and 126911 — be jointly heard. By an order dated September 10, 1959, PSC Associate Commissioner Aspillera overruled Mrs. Calalang’s opposition to said petition and denied the motion for a joint hearing.

Her motion for the reconsideration of said order having, likewise, been denied by Commissioner Aspillera, Mrs. Calalang instituted in this Court Case L-16068, against the Intestate Estate of Gervacio Tanjangco and Commissioner Aspillera, for a writ of certiorari, upon the ground that said Commissioner had gravely abused his discretion and exceeded his jurisdiction in overruling said opposition and in denying the motion for a joint trial, as well as the motion for reconsideration, without submitting the latter to the Commission en banc. Upon the posting of the bond required therefor, we issued an order restraining Commissioner Aspillera from promulgating any decision in Case No. 126537, until further orders from this Court. This order, however, came too late, for on September 28, 1959, Commissioner Aspillera had rendered his decision in said case, authorizing Mrs. Tanjangco to increase the capacity of her ice plant from ten (10) to thirty (30) tons daily. Accordingly, on November 21, 1959, Mrs. Calalang filed with this Court a supplemental petition praying for another injunctive order, to restrain the execution of said decision until the final disposition of case L-16068. Upon the filing of an additional bond by Mrs. Calalang, the writ of preliminary injunction prayed for in the supplemental petition therein was issued on December 3, 1959.

Meanwhile, on or September 26, 1960, her application in Case No. 126911 was denied by the Commission. Pending resolution of Mrs. Calalang’s motion for reconsideration of the decision therein rendered, or on November 29, 1960, this Court rendered judgment in L- 16068 reversing the order of the Commission in Case No. 126537 dated September 10, 1959; setting aside the hearing held and the judgment rendered in that case; declaring that Mrs. Calalang’s opposition to the petition therein should be admitted; and ordering the Commission to jointly try cases Nos. 126537 and 126911 and to thereafter render a new judgment in accordance with the law and the evidence, as well as making permanent the writ of preliminary injunction issued on December 3, 1959.

Relying upon our aforementioned decision in L-16068, Mrs. Calalang subsequently filed in Case No. 126911 a supplemental motion for reconsideration of the decision therein rendered on September 26, 1960. After due hearing and the filing of memoranda by the parties therein, said motion was submitted for resolution on August 15, 1963. The Commission having taken no action on said motion for reconsideration, despite her petitions of December 7, 1963 and April 7, 1964, urging the resolution thereof, on May 24, 1965, Mrs. Calalang commenced the present action against the Commissioner of Public Service and the Assistant Commissioners of Public Service to compel them to act on her aforementioned motion for reconsideration and supplemental motion for reconsideration of the decision in Case No. 126911, as well as to recover the sum of P100,000.00 as damages allegedly suffered by her from 1962 to the present. Twenty (20) days later, or on July 14, 1965, the Commission issued an order setting aside its decision in Case No. 126911 and setting said case and Case No. 126537 for joint trial. As a consequence, the herein petition for mandamus has become moot.

This notwithstanding, Mrs. Calalang presses her claim for damages allegedly incurred on account of the undue delay in the resolution of her motion for reconsideration and supplemental motion for reconsideration in Case No. 126911.

It should be noted, however, that her claim for damages is incidental to the petition for mandamus, without which we would have no original jurisdiction to entertain said claim. It is thus debatable, to say the least, whether or not we can pass upon said claim, once the principal action for mandamus has become moot. At any rate, there is, as yet, no means by which to ascertain the amount of the damages allegedly sustained by Mrs. Calalang, assuming that respondents may be held liable therefor, on which we need not and do not express any opinion. Indeed, unless and until a final judgment has been rendered fixing the conditions under which Mrs. Calalang may operate the ice plant and cold storage covered by her franchise, and, particularly, the capacity thereof, it is legally impossible to determine the amount of said damages.

WHEREFORE, the petition herein is hereby dismissed, without special pronouncement as to costs.

Reyes, J.B.L., Dizon, Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro and Angeles, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1968 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-25668 May 2, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMAN JUGILON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22005 May 3, 1968 - JESUSA LACSON VDA. DE ARROYO, ET AL. v. EL BEATERIO DEL SANTISSIMO ROSARIO DE MOLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26065 May 3, 1968 - GERONIMO P. ZALDIVAR v. NUMERIANO ESTENZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21743 May 4, 1968 - FEDERICO CAÑETE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23458 May 4, 1968 - NATIONAL SHIPYARDS AND STEEL CORP. v. NATIONAL SHIPYARDS EMPLOYEES & WORKERS ASSOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24264 May 4, 1968 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19829 May 4, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO COKENG

  • G.R. No. L-24538 May 4, 1968 - IN RE: PONCIANO B. FLORES v. ROSALINA SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28469 May 7, 1968 - UNA KIBAD v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25345 May 13, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMULO GARCELLANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24247 May 13, 1968 - COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. ACTG. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. Nos. L-21583 and L-21591-92 May 20, 1968 - DANIEL BULANTE v. CHU LIANTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23758 May 20, 1968 - MAXIMINA OYOD DE GARCES, ET AL. v. ESMERALDA BROCE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24983 May 20, 1968 - FLORENTINO GENATO, ET AL. v. FELISA GENATO DE LORENZO

  • G.R. No. L-24560 May 21, 1968 - CONSUELO S. CALALANG v. ENRIQUE MEDINA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20952 May 22, 1968 - IN RE: CHUA UAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22250 May 22, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EULOGIO BALAO

  • G.R. No. L-22320 May 22, 1968 - MERCEDES RUTH COBB-PEREZ, ET AL. v. GREGORIO LANTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23640 May 22, 1968 - REMEDIOS MALUPA VDA. DE LAYAG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-24192 May 22, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. CALTEX (PHILIPPINES), INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25308 May 22, 1968 - ELISEO EGUIA DUMAPIG v. GERONIMO R. MARAVE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25819 May 22, 1968 - VITALIANO B. VALDES v. LUCIO C. GUTIERREZ, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27252 May 22, 1968 - FELIPE IMPERIAL v. ROMAN CATHOLIC OF ARCHBISHOP OF CACERES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20891 May 23, 1968 - TOMAS B. TADEO v. ROMULO VISPERAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24665 May 23, 1968 - TIBURCIO ALCOBER, ET AL. v. HONORATO GARCIANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24805 May 23, 1968 - IN RE: YAP PUEY ENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-25165 May 23, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REFUGIO DEVARAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23017 May 23, 1968 - LA SUERTE CIGAR & CIGARETTE FACTORY v. CENTRAL AZUCARERA DEL DANAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24173 May 23, 1968 - PROCTER & GAMBLE PHILIPPINE MFG. CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-24410 May 23, 1968 - BERNARDA NAZAL v. FELICIANO BELMONTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22347 May 27, 1968 - FILIPINAS INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, ET AL. v. LOURDES P. SAN DIEGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22611 May 27, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. VISAYAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22943 May 27, 1968 - IN RE: TEH SAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-23056 May 27, 1968 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24280 May 27, 1968 - EUNARIA B. VDA. DE GUILAS, ET AL. v. ANANIAS DAVID, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24564 May 27, 1968 - AMADO L. MENDOZA v. RODRIGUEZ & COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24581 May 27, 1968 - MIGUEL PEREZ RUBIO v. SAMUEL REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24772 May 27, 1968 - RUPERTO G. CRUZ, ET AL. v. FlLIPINAS INVESTMENT & FINANCE CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-24800 May 27, 1968 - IN RE: PIO NERIA v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-26077 May 27, 1968 - SURIGAO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26797 May 27, 1968 - REYNALDO JIMENEZ, ET AL. v. ARTURO JIMENEZ

  • G.R. No. L-27598 May 27, 1968 - ELISA MEDINA CUE v. PILAR DOLLA

  • G.R. No. L-24288 May 28, 1968 - LEONOR MANUEL CASTILLO UDAN v. QUIRICO C. AMON, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24484 May 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON C. NARCISO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25942 May 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX FERNANDO

  • G.R. No. L-25997 May 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MONICA ANINO

  • G.R. No. L-27951 May 28, 1968 - PABLO C. SANIDAD v. CRESCENCIANO L. SAQUING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28955 May 28, 1968 - USO DAN AGUAM v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19867 May 29, 1968 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. CALSONS, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20322 May 29, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PERFECTO R. PALACIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22030 May 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DARIO ROLDAN

  • G.R. No. L-22426 May 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PELAGIO CONDEMENA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23021 May 29, 1968 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MARIANO RIVERA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24490 May 29, 1968 - CIRIACO LANDA v. FRANCISCO TOBIAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24664 May 29, 1968 - CORAZON ALEGRE, ET AL. v. VICTORINA G. DE LAPERAL

  • G.R. No. L-24677 May 29, 1968 - YAP TECK SUY v. MANILA PORT SERVICE ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25551 May 29, 1968 - IN RE: CHAN DE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26364 May 29, 1968 - MARIANO A. ALBERT v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE, ET AL.