Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1969 > June 1969 Decisions > G.R. No. L-22481 June 30, 1969 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PHILIPPINE AIR LINES, INC.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-22481. June 30, 1969.]

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILIPPINE AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Solicitor General Arturo A. Alafriz, Assistant Solicitor General Antonio A. Torres, and Solicitor Jorge R. Coquia for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ponce Enrile, Siguion Reyna, Montecillo, & Belo, for Defendant-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; JUDGMENTS; COMPROMISE AGREEMENTS; COMPROMISE AGREEMENT IN INSTANT CASE SUPERSEDES APPEALED JUDGMENT. — Where during the pendency of the appeal in the instant case before this Court, the parties submitted a compromise agreement in a pleading entitled Joint Petition for Judgment in Accordance with Agreement, superseding and novating the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila in Civil Case No. 47365, from which the defendant-appellant had appealed, said compromise agreement should be approved and the instant appeal disposed of. The decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila in said civil case shall be deemed superseded and of no further force and effect.


R E S O L U T I O N


FERNANDO, J.:


In this appeal from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila of December 23, 1963, in Civil Case No. 47365, plaintiff-appellee, Republic of the Philippines, and defendant-appellant, Philippine Air Lines, Inc. submitted, on June 14, 1969, a compromise agreement in a pleading entitled Joint Petition for Judgment in Accordance with Agreement.

The Joint Petition reads thus:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"COME NOW the plaintiff-appellee Republic of the Philippines and the defendant-appellant Philippine Air Lines, Inc., by undersigned counsel, and to this Honorable Court respectfully state that:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. The parties have arrived at an amicable settlement of their dispute in the above-numbered case and have executed a Compromise Agreement, a copy of which (signed by the parties and their respective counsel) is hereto attached as Annex "A."cralaw virtua1aw library

2. It is the mutual agreement of the parties that the attached Compromise Agreement shall supersede and novate the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila in Civil Case No. 47365 dated December 23, 1963 from which the defendant-appellant appealed.

3. The attached Compromise Agreement is fair to all concerned and is not contrary to law, morals, public order or public policy.

4. The parties, therefore, respectfully submit herewith the Compromise Agreement (Annex "A" hereof) for the approval of this Honorable Court.

PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is respectfully prayed that the Compromise Agreement embodied in Annex "A" hereof be approved and that an order issue setting aside the judgment of the lower court and dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and defendants’s counterclaim, without costs.

The parties pray for such other relief as may be deemed just and proper in the premises.

Manila/Makati, Rizal, Philippines, June 9, 1969.

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PHILIPPINE AIR

[Plaintiff-Appellee] LINES, INC.

[Defendant-Appellant]

By By

(Sgd) FEDERICO B. ABLAN, JR (Sgd) BUENAVEN-

Acting Director of Civil Aviation TURA M. VELOSO

Senior Vice-President"

The Compromise Agreement, Annex A of the above joint petition, is worded in the following manner:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREAS, on June 23, 1961, the Republic of the Philippines filed a complaint against the Philippine Air Lines, Inc. for the recovery of the principal sum of P1,357,686.14 representing the unpaid balance of take-off, terminal, landing, parking fees and rents due from the latter for the use of government air navigation facilities during the period September 2, 1947 to June 30, 1950, which case was docketed as Civil Case No. 47365 of the Court of First Instance of Manila;

WHEREAS, Philippine Air Lines, Inc. filed an answer alleging that (a) the demand of the plaintiff had been fully and completely released by virtue of a compromise agreement entered into on September 13, 1950 with the National Airports Corporation under which Philippine Air Lines, Inc. paid the amount of P587,641.36; (c) Philippine Air Lines, Inc. is exempt from payment of landing charges or fees under the provisions of its franchise and (d) the rates charged were unreasonable, confiscatory and had been fixed arbitrarily;

WHEREAS, Philippine Air Lines, Inc. asserted a counterclaim on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to provide for and maintain radio communications systems for inter-island service, airport buildings and navigation facilities, facilities and equipment which Philippine Air Lines, Inc. had to acquire, operate and maintain on its own account, and which expenses should be properly charged against the Republic of the Philippines and paid to Philippine Air Lines, Inc.;

WHEREAS, on December 23, 1963 the Court of First Instance of Manila decided the case against Philippine Air Lines, directing the latter to pay the amount of P1,357,686.14 with legal interest from August 10, 1960 until paid;

WHEREAS, Philippine Air Lines promptly appealed the decision to the Supreme Court where the case is now docketed as Case G.R. No. L- 22481, with the Republic of the Philippines as plaintiff-appellee and the Philippine Air Lines, Inc. as defendant-appellant;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to settle the disputes and claims being litigated in the above-numbered case under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties have agreed and covenanted, each with the other, as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. For and in consideration of the sum of ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX AND 14/100 PESOS (P1,357,686.14), Philippine Currency, to be paid and delivered in the following manner:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(a) TWO HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX AND 14/100 PESOS (257,686.14) upon the approval of this Compromise Agreement by the Supreme Court;

(b) The balance of ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P1,100,000.00), in eleven (11) monthly installments at ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND (P100,000.00) per installment commencing thirty (30) days from the approval of this Compromise Agreement by the Supreme Court,.

as full and complete payment, settlement and discharge of any and all claims or causes of action of the Republic of the Philippines which are involved or being litigated in G.R. No. L-22481, the Republic of the Philippines hereby relinquishes and waives any and all rights arising out of the award in Civil Case No. 47365 of that Court of First Instance of Manila entitled "Republic of the Philippines, plaintiff v. Philippine Air Lines, Inc., Defendant."cralaw virtua1aw library

2. It is expressly understood that this Compromise Agreement novates and supersedes the judgment rendered by the Court of First Instance of Manila in the said Civil Case No. 47365 of the court, and that upon complete payment of the total amount of ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX AND 14/100 PESOS (P1,357,686.14) aforesaid, all disputes and claims between the parties hereto in G.R. No. L-22481 of the Supreme Court shall stand released, discharged and fully settled.

3. Upon the failure of Philippine Air Lines, Inc. to pay any installment, the judgment approving this compromise shall become immediately executory.

4. The parties hereto agree and undertake to file with the Supreme Court a joint petition for the approval of this Compromise Agreement.

5. The parties hereto further agree to hear their respective attorney’s fees and costs of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance and the Supreme Court.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, on their own behalf, assisted by their duly authorized attorneys, have signed this Compromise Agreement on the 9th day of June 1969 at Manila/Makati, Philippines.

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINE AIR LINES, INC.

PHILIPPINES By

By

(Sgd) FEDERICO B. ABLAN, JR. (Sgd) BUENAVENTURA M.

Acting Director of Civil Aviation VELOSO

Senior Vice-President"

WHEREFORE, the compromise agreement as embodied in the joint petition for judgment is approved, and the parties enjoined to comply strictly with terms thereof. With this disposition of this appeal, the decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila in Civil Case No. 47365 dated December 23, 1963 is deemed superseded and of no further force and effect. Without costs.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Capistrano, Teehankee and Barredo, JJ., concur.

Dizon, J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






June-1969 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-22970 June 9, 1969 - SURIGAO CONSOLIDATED MINING CO., INC., ET AL. v. PHIL. LAND-AIR-SEA LABOR UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30317 June 9, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO RO. CUPIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23215 June 9, 1969 - SUSANA GALA DE ENRIQUEZ, ET AL. v. EL HOGAR FILIPINO

  • G.R. No. L-26462 June 9, 1969 - TERESITA C. YAPTINCHAY v. GUILLERMO E. TORRES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21025 June 14, 1969 - LIANGA BAY LOGGING CO., INC. v. NARCISO LANSANG, ET AL.

  • UDK Administrative Case No. 69-28 June 14, 1969 - PRAXEDES LIMALIMA v. ALBERTO SANJURJO

  • G.R. No. L-22337 June 14, 1969 - PHIL. TOBACCO FLUE-CURING AND REDRYING CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30306 June 20, 1969 - JOSE C. LUCIANO v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28949 June 23, 1969 - JIBIN ARULA v. ROMEO C. ESPINO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23675 June 27, 1969 - PHIL. AMERICAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22402 June 30, 1969 - CLEMENTE ALVIAR v. CESAREO ALVIAR, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 840 June 30, 1969 - JOAQUIN G. GARRIDO, ET AL. v. NORBERTO QUISUMBING

  • G.R. No. L-23153 June 30, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULIO CRISOLOGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23922 June 30, 1969 - RAYMUNDO V. ADLE v. MUNICIPALITY OF LA CASTELLANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24440 June 30, 1969 - PROVINCE OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE v. CITY OF ZAMBOANGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24877 June 30, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GAUDENCIO MONGADO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25401 June 30, 1969 - IN RE: JOSE MARIA CARLOS TARRAGA BULL ZABALETA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-25951 June 30, 1969 - FILIPINAS INVESTMENT & FINANCE CORPORATION v. JULIAN R. VITUG, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26255 June 30, 1969 - PABLO BASBAS v. RUFINO ENTENA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26340 June 30, 1969 - JESUS GANCHERO v. ANACLETO BELLOSILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26397 June 30, 1969 - TOMASA BULOS VDA. DE TECSON v. VICENTE TECSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26601 June 30, 1969 - IN RE: LIM SIONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22481 June 30, 1969 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PHILIPPINE AIR LINES, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-22608 June 30, 1969 - MACKAY RADIO & TELEGRAPH CO., INC. v. JOHN W. RICH

  • G.R. No. L-22988 June 30, 1969 - FERMIN SARE v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-27232 June 30, 1969 - BELEN CRUZ v. EXEQUIEL CASTILLO

  • G.R. No. L-27346 June 30, 1969 - ANATOLIO VALENCIA v. MANILA YACHT CLUB, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-27441 June 30, 1969 - GERMAN E. VILLANUEVA v. NATIONAL MARKETING CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-29328 June 30, 1969 - SY OH v. GREGORIO N. GARCIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26706 June 30, 1969 - IN RE: YU CHUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26776 June 30, 1969 - DANIEL MANALO, ET AL. v. PAMPANGA SUGAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.