Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1969 > September 1969 Decisions > G.R. No. L-23032 September 30, 1969 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. LEOPOLDO C. PALAD, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-23032. September 30, 1969.]

THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner, v. LEOPOLDO C. PALAD, Ex- officio Provincial Sheriff of Bulacan, PAG-ASA LABOR UNION (PLU), THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Respondents.

Tomas Besa and Manuel E. Estimo for Petitioner.

Mercado & Vargas Law Offices for respondent Pagasa Labor Union.

Assistant Provincial Fiscal P. C. Kliatchko for respondent Leopoldo C. Palad.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS; PETITION FOR PROHIBITION WITH PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; DISMISSAL THEREOF; PETITION WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER. — Where petitioner has moved to withdraw the main petition and the P10,000.00 cash bond it had earlier posted for the issuance of the preliminary injunction prayed for in the petition, and respondent PAGASA LABOR UNION (PLU) has signified its assent to such withdrawal of petitioner’s petition and cash bond, and has manifested that the case had been amicably settled to its complete satisfaction, the petition for prohibition with preliminary injunction should be dismissed.


R E S O L U T I O N


MAKALINTAL, J.:


To forestall the sale at public auction of several personal properties earlier levied upon by the provincial sheriff of Bulacan by virtue of a writ of execution issued by the then presiding Judge of the Court of Industrial Relations. Hon. Jose S. Bautista, to satisfy the judgment in case No. 1544-ULP (Pag-asa Labor Union v. Roxas-Kalaw Textile Mills, Inc., Et. Al.), petitioner filed with this Court on June 8, 1964 an urgent petition for prohibition with preliminary injunction.

It was alleged in the petition that the properties subject of the levy were covered by a duly registered mortgage in favor of petitioner, in view of which it filed a third-party claim with respondent provincial sheriff; that the latter in turn filed a motion with respondent Judge to fix the bond pursuant to Section 17, Rule 39, but that said Judge nevertheless directed the Sheriff to proceed with the sale of the properties, in effect denying the Sheriff’s motion and dismissing petitioner’s third-party claim; and that petitioner moved to reconsider the order to sell, but respondent Sheriff scheduled the sale just the same even before any resolution on the motion.

We issued the writ of preliminary injunction prayed for in the petition upon a cash bond of P10,000. The case was thereafter set for hearing, but the parties asked that they be allowed to file written memoranda in lieu of oral argument. However, neither of them did so.

On January 18, 1965 petitioner moved to withdraw the main petition and the P10,000.00 cash bond it had earlier posted for the issuance of the preliminary injunction upon the following grounds, to wit:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. That the purpose upon which the Petition for Prohibition with Preliminary Injunction was filed is already accomplished;

"2. That the claim of the PAG-ASA LABOR UNION (PLU) against the Roxas-Kalaw Textile Mills was already settled as per their compromise agreement and was already resolved by the Court of Industrial Relations, . . .;

"3. That the petitioner has already acquired the levied properties of the Roxas-Kalaw Textile Mills by virtue of an extrajudicial foreclosure;"

Required to comment, respondent PAG-ASA LABOR UNION (PLU) signified its assent to the withdrawal of petitioner’s cash bond and manifested that the case had been amicably settled to its complete satisfaction.

By resolution dated February 9, 1965, the cash bond of P10,000 was allowed to be withdrawn.

WHEREFORE, the petition is hereby dismissed without pronouncement as to costs.

Concepcion, C.J., Dizon, Zaldivar, Castro, Fernando, Capistrano, Teehankee and Barredo, JJ., concur.

Reyes, J.B.L., and Sanchez, JJ., are on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1969 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-27159 September 17, 1969 - IN RE: TERESITA CHAN, ET AL. v. LOCAL CIVIL REGISTRAR OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-24334 September 30, 1969 - CONCEPCION CORNELIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22355 September 30, 1969 - ANTOLIN GALENO v. REINERIO TICAO

  • G.R. No. L-23032 September 30, 1969 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. LEOPOLDO C. PALAD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24308 September 30, 1969 - LEOPOLDO VENCILAO v. CLETO CAMARENTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24491 September 30, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUFINO GENSOLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26079 September 30, 1969 - PORFIRIO COMIA, ET AL. v. NICANOR P. NICOLAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27549 September 30, 1969 - JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29675 September 30, 1969 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. PIO R. MARCOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29743 September 30, 1969 - BLUE BAR WORKERS’ UNION v. LAKAS NG MANGGAGAWANG MAKABAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25989 September 30, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARMINGOL Y. HANASAN

  • G.R. No. L-21551 September 30, 1969 - FERNANDEZ HERMANOS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29381 September 30, 1969 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL RAILWAYS, ET AL. v. VALERIANO A. DEL VALLE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23670 September 30, 1969 - ANGEL ENCISO v. DEOGRACIAS REMO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23849 September 30, 1969 - VIRGILIO M. LAYNO v. I & I EQUIP. & SERVICE CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24476 September 30, 1969 - PATRICIO G. DUMLAO v. RAMON A. DIAZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26386 September 30, 1969 - PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INS. CO. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19337 September 30, 1969 - ASTURIAS SUGAR CENTRAL, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26844 September 30, 1969 - FELIPE DE LEON, ET AL. v. PAMPANGA SUGAR

  • G.R. No. L-23081 September 30, 1969 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ILAGAN ELECTRIC & ICE PLANT, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24794 September 30, 1969 - ISABEL G. CABUNGCAL, ET AL. v. TEOFISTO M. CORDOVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25743 September 30, 1969 - NATIONAL MKTG. CORP., ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ARCA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26371 September 30, 1969 - MOBIL OIL PHIL., INC. v. RUTH R. DIOCARES, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-27615-16 September 30, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO BARBA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29177 September 30, 1969 - ERNESTO VILLALON v. ABUNDIO Z. ARRIETA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23123 September 30, 1969 - HEALD LUMBER COMPANY v. BENJAMIN N. TABIOS

  • G.R. No. L-23710 September 30, 1969 - ANTONIO PAREDES, ET AL. v. SIMEON M. GOPENGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-26611-12 September 30, 1969 - DOLORES NERIA, ET AL. v. MARTINIANO P. VIVO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30069 September 30, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANASTACIO BULAWIN

  • A.C. No. 652 September 30, 1969 - HIPOLITO BALBARONA v. HERMINIO SANTOS

  • A.C. No. 812 September 30, 1969 - GREGORIO CONDE v. NICOLAS SUPERABLE, JR., ET AL.