Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1975 > November 1975 Decisions > G.R. No. L-32120 December 17, 1975 - GERTRUDES I. VDA. DE OLIB v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-32120. December 17, 1975.]

GERTRUDES I. VDA. DE OLIB, in her own behalf and in behalf of her minor children, namely, ROLANDO, VIRGILIO, VIRGINIA, CRISTINA, RODOLFO, NUNILON, JR. and OLIVIA, all surnamed OLIB, Petitioners, v. CITY OF MANILA, WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION AND REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES (Department of Education and Culture and Bureau of Public Schools), Respondents.

Pico & Abrogena, for Petitioners.

Gregorio A. Ejercito for respondent City of Manila.

Solicitor General Estelito P. Mendoza, Assistant Solicitor General Jose F. Racela, Jr. and Solicitor Josefina D. de Leon respondent Republic of the Philippines, etc.

SYNOPSIS


In its Resolution dated November 12, 1975, the Supreme Court upheld respondent Commission’s setting aside the original award of September 9, 1966 by Regional Office No. 3 because petitioner’s counsel filed the claim against the wrong party, the city of Manila instead of the National Government; but in the interest of justice, ordered that the Republic of the Philippines, specifically the Bureau of Public Schools and the Department of Education and Culture be impleaded as respondents against the claim and that they state their stand with regard thereto through the Solicitor General on behalf of respondent National Government recognized the compensability of deceased’s death, and offered no objection to the enforcement of award granted in favor of claimants against the National Government, specifically the Department of Education and Culture.

Accordingly, the respondent Republic of the Philippines, specifically the Department of Education and Culture as employer of deceased was adjudged liable to pay the award made by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission.


SYLLABUS


1. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION; COMPENSATION CASE SHALL BE RESOLVED WITHOUT REGARD TO TECHNICALITIES. — The hearing, investigation and determination of any question or controversy in workmen’s compensation cases shall be without regard to technicalities legal forms and technical rules on evidence. Substantial evidence, whenever necessary, shall be sufficient to support a decision, order or award. (Sec. 7-A) Workmen’s Compensation Act.


D E C I S I O N


TEEHANKEE, J.:


As noted in our Resolution of November 12, 1975, petitioners appear to have a valid claim for compensation arising from the death on June 22, 1961 of the deceased Nunilon Olib, a janitor-watchman at the Mapa High School, for tetanus as a result of a wound inflicted during the discharge of his duties at the school building, but their counsel filed the claim against the wrong party, the City of Manila, rather than against the national government (the Bureau of Public Schools under the Department of Education and Culture).

The Court accordingly upheld respondent commission’s setting aside of the original award of September 9, 1966 by Regional Office No. 3 but in the interest of justice and so as not to unduly delay the final disposition of the claim, ordered that "the Republic of the Philippines, specifically the Bureau of Public Schools and the Department of Education and Culture be impleaded as respondents against the claim and that they state their stand with regard thereto through the Solicitor General."

The Solicitor General on behalf of respondent national government filed with commendable dispatch their comment of November 28, 1975 recognizing the compensability of the deceased’s death. Correctly invoking the mandate of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (section 7-A) that "the hearing, investigation and determination of any question or controversy in workmen’s compensation cases shall be without regard to technicalities, legal forms and technical rules on evidence. Substantial evidence, whenever necessary, shall be sufficient to support a decision, order or award," and in consonance with the rule’s fundamental objective of the promotion of substantial justice and equity (Rule 28, section 1 of the Commission rules), the Solicitor General expressly "offers no objection to the enforcement of the award granted in favor of herein claimants against the National Government, specifically the Department of Education and Culture."

The record shows that the original decision and award of September 9, 1966 of the Manila regional office of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission found that the employer’s liability was as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. To pay the claimant, Gertrudes Vda. de Olib, thru this Office, the amount of FOUR THOUSAND (P4,000.00) PESOS, as death compensation benefits;

"2. To reimburse the claimant-widow, also thru this Office, the amount of TWO HUNDRED (P200.00) PESOS, as burial expenses;

"3. To pay claimant’s legal counsel, Atty. Francisco Pico, the amount of TWO HUNDRED (P200.00) PESOS, as attorney’s fee; and

"4. To pay this Office the amount of FORTY-ONE (P41.00) PESOS, as fee, pursuant to Section 55 of the Act, as amended."cralaw virtua1aw library

ACCORDINGLY, respondent Republic of the Philippines, specifically the Department of Education and Culture, as employer of the deceased Nunilon Olib is hereby adjudged liable to pay the above-quoted award and in view of its express acceptance of its liability therefor, is enjoined to satisfy the same forthwith upon receipt of this decision.

Makasiar, Esguerra, Muñoz Palma and Martin, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1975 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-40895 November 6, 1975 - MILAGROS DE LA CRUZ v. BIENVENIDO EJERCITO

  • G.R. No. L-41313 November 6, 1975 - ALIPIO MONDIGUING, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO MEN ABAD

  • G.R. No. L-21998 November 10, 1975 - CALIXTO PASAGUI, ET AL. v. ESTER T. VILLABLANCA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41225 November 11, 1975 - ROSENSONS, INC., ET AL. v. JOSE JIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 1347 November 12, 1975 - BETTINA B. YANGSON v. EDGARDO M. SALANDANAN

  • G.R. No. L-32120 December 17, 1975 - GERTRUDES I. VDA. DE OLIB v. CITY OF MANILA, ET AL

  • G.R. Nos. L-30464-5 November 13, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALBERTO N. DOMINGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37884 November 14, 1975 - VICENTE B. CHUIDIAN v. RICARDO C. PUNO, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 203-J November 18, 1975 - SECRETARY OF JUSTICE v. ALFREDO CATOLICO

  • G.R. No. L-29364 November 21, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELINO PAYAO, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 704 November 24, 1975 - MERCEDES R. VDA. DE GUERRERO v. HAROLD M. HERNANDO

  • A.M. No. 177-MJ November 27, 1975 - CONCEPCION DIA-AÑONUEVO v. BONIFACIO B. BERCACIO

  • G.R. No. L-23785 November 27, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS ADILLO

  • G.R. No. L-29274 November 27, 1975 - QUIRICO P. EVANGELISTA v. HILARION U. JARENCIO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 6-MJ November 28, 1975 - PUAHING PAWAKI v. NABDAR J. MALIK

  • A.M. No. P-25 November 28, 1975 - MURILLO O. OMADTO v. FRANCISCO G. EVANGELISTA

  • G.R. No. L-20400 November 28, 1975 - CITY OF ZAMBOANGA v. JUAN S. ALVAREZ

  • G.R. No. L-24003 November 28, 1975 - HADJI MOHAMAD DAUD v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS OF THE PORT OF ZAMBOANGA CITY

  • G.R. No. L-25320 November 28, 1975 - UNITED STATES LINES CO. v. ASSOCIATED WATCHMEN AND SECURITY UNION

  • G.R. No. L-27043 November 28, 1975 - AGUSTIN SANCHEZ, ET AL. v. MARIANO A. ZOSA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27594 November 28, 1975 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL. v. SALVADOR C. REYES

  • G.R. No. L-28126 November 28, 1975 - VITA UY LEE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29587 November 28, 1975 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. LUZON SURETY CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29719 November 28, 1975 - MARIA VILLANUEVA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30175 November 28, 1975 - PAPER INDUSTRIES CORP. OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE SAMSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30839 November 28, 1975 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. CFI OF MANILA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33270 November 28, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE DEL ROSARIO

  • G.R. No. L-36153 November 28, 1975 - ALFONSO V. LEGASPI v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37522 November 28, 1975 - FRANCISCO G. RODRIGUEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38850 November 28, 1975 - IN RE: REGINA PAZ LOPEZ, ET AL. v. BOB GARON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40488 November 28, 1975 - JOSEFA BENTAJA FIGUEROA v. JOSE B. JIMENEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40779 November 28, 1975 - EPICHARIS T. GARCIA v. FACULTY ADMISSION COMMITTEE

  • G.R. No. L-41045 November 28, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CFI OF QUEZON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41054 November 28, 1975 - JOSE L. GAMBOA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.