Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1976 > January 1976 Decisions > A.M. No. 171-MJ January 30, 1976 - MUNICIPALITY OF QUIRINO, ILOCOS SUR v. FELIX MANUEL:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[A.M. No. 171-MJ. January 30, 1976.]

RESIDENTS OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF QUIRINO, ILOCOS SUR, Complainants, v. MUNICIPAL JUDGE FELIX MANUEL of Quirino, Ilocos Sur, Respondent.

Felix Bello, Jr., for the complainants.

Filomeno B. Balbin for the Respondent.

SYNOPSIS


Respondent judge was charged with having frequently disturbed complainants in the barrio hall by uttering insulting and challenging words to the public, with having challenged barrio officials and leaders and with having frequently roamed the streets of the poblacion under the influence of liquor.

The investigating judge recommended the dismissal of the charges for lack of evidence to substantiate the same, which recommendation was concurred in by the judicial consultant. Finding the appraisal of the investigating judge to be correct, the Supreme Court dismissed the charges for lack of merit.


SYLLABUS


1. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINTS; JUDGES, ENTITLED TO PROTECTION AGAINST UNJUSTIFIED SLURS ON THEIR REPUTATION. — It is a truism that there is an added incentive to good behavior if a judge is ever conscious of the adverse consequences that may result from an administrative complaint for any misstep or misconduct on his part. At the same time while the right to the charges for an alleged dereliction of duty on the part of a member of the judiciary is embraced in the constitutional right to petition, the latter is entitled to protection against unjustified slurs on his reputation, especially so if it can be shown to be motivated by personal spite or ill will.


R E S O L U T I O N


FERNANDO, J.:


It is a truism that there is an added incentive to good behavior if a judge is ever conscious of the adverse consequences that may result from an administrative complaint for any misstep or misconduct on his part. At the same time, while the right to file charges for an alleged dereliction of duty on the part of a member of the judiciary is embraced in the constitutional right to petition, 1 the latter is entitled to protection against unjustified slurs on his reputation, especially so if it can be shown to be motivated by personal spite or ill will. This observation is prompted by what did transpire in this administrative complaint against Judge Felix Manuel of the Municipality of Quirino, Ilocos Sur.

In a report submitted by the then Judicial Consultant Manuel P. Barcelona, the charges as well as the specific offenses imputed to respondent Judge were set forth as follows: "In an unverified petition signed by some sixty-four residents of the different sitios and municipality of Quirino, province of Ilocos Sur, respondent Felix Manuel, municipal judge of Quirino, was denounced for the following: ‘That he frequently disturbs the complainants in their barrio hall (Abong) by uttering insulting and challenging words to the public; that in many instances respondent challenged barrio officials and barrio leaders; that he came to barrio Lagpat bringing with him a caliber .22 rifle saying, ‘I am ready to kill’; that he frequently roams the streets of the poblacion under the influence of liquor; and that the people in general have lost their confidence and honor due to the respondent as a municipal judge.’" 2 The matter was then referred for investigation by Judge Jack Soriano of the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Sur, Second Judicial District, Branch IV. He submitted his report recommending the dismissal of the charges against respondent Judge in view of the lack of evidence to substantiate them. Moreover, as to one of the only four residents of that place who showed interest in the matter, a person named Felix Padao, it was shown that he had entertained a long grudge against Respondent. The report of Judge Soriano was then submitted for the appraisal of the Judicial Consultant, who was in agreement. As he pointed out: "Considering the facts, that of the 64 original signatories in the said petition only four appeared and testified despite the notices sent to all of them before every hearing; that the declaration of said four witnesses which were contradictory in some respects, failed to substantiate the charges, the admission of the principal witness that he had a long-standing grudge against respondent, the manifestation of the counsel for complainants that their complaint be dismissed; the affidavits of expression of continued trust and confidence in respondent, signed by hundreds of residents of the different sitios and municipality of Quirino, province of Ilocos Sur, and the desirability and normality of possessing a firearm in a far-flung barrio in Ilocos Sur, before the advent of martial law, I find the recommendation of District Judge Lack Soriano, of the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Sur, Branch IV, well taken." 3

A reading of the record persuades us of the correctness of such appraisal. Its recommendation should be accepted. Nor is this all. It would be a gross disservice to judicial independence if, after an investigation duly had, and in the absence of any showing of guilt by respondent Judge, no mention is made of the disapproval that this Court visits on the harassment to which a member of the bench is subjected from a party who, for one reason or another, may entertain a grudge against him.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

WHEREFORE, the charges against respondent Judge Felix Manuel are dismissed for lack of merit. Let a copy of this resolution be entered on his record.

Barredo, Antonio, Aquino and Concepcion, Jr., JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. According to Article IV, Section 9 of the Constitution: "No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the Government for redress of grievances."cralaw virtua1aw library

2. Memorandum for Chief Justice Querube C. Makalintal, November 28,1975.

3. Memorandum for Chief Justice Querube C. Makalintal, November 28, 1975.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1976 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-29078 January 9, 1976 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. ESSO STANDARD EASTERN, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-42032 January 9, 1976 - MANUEL DE GRACIA v. THE WARDEN, MUNICIPAL JAIL

  • G.R. No. L-39598 January 13, 1976 - PEOPLE’S BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. PEOPLE’S BANK AND TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEES UNION

  • G.R. No. L-31048 January 20, 1976 - LUCENA MAGALLANES v. UNION KAYANAN

  • G.R. No. L-35401 January 20, 1976 - PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC. v. TOMAS M. ESPIRITU, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41063 January 20, 1976 - FRANK RAYMOND KRUEGER v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23818 January 21, 1976 - EMILIO PURUGGANAN v. FELISA PAREDES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33850 January 22, 1976 - DEMETRIO MANALO v. HERMINIO C. MARIANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40666 January 22, 1976 - POLARIS MARKETING CORPORATION v. ANDRES B. PLAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29972 January 26, 1976 - ROSARIO CARBONELL v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-42115 January 27, 1976 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS, ET AL. v. BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-30635-6 January 29, 1976 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE C. RAMIREZ

  • G.R. No. L-40027 January 29, 1976 - WELLINGTON QUE REYES v. FIDEL RAMOS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 104-MJ January 30, 1976 - MAURICIO REGASPI, ET AL. v. EDILBERTO CASTILLO

  • A.M. No. 171-MJ January 30, 1976 - MUNICIPALITY OF QUIRINO, ILOCOS SUR v. FELIX MANUEL

  • A.M. No. 257-MJ January 30, 1976 - FELIPE MOLINA v. NATIVIDAD SABATER-DONATO

  • G.R. No. L-26458 January 30, 1976 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO PAJENADO

  • G.R. No. L-29906 January 30, 1976 - RODOLFO GENERAL v. LEONCIO BARRAMEDA

  • G.R. No. L-30079 January 30, 1976 - MATILDA GOROSPE v. DOLORES M. SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-30245 January 30, 1976 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONARDA LEGONES

  • G.R. Nos. L-32820-21 January 30, 1976 - DOROTEA DE OCAMPO VDA. DE DELIZO v. URBANA DELIZO

  • G.R. No. L-36740 January 30, 1976 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PRESIDING JUDGE, CFI OF LANAO DEL NORTE

  • G.R. No. L-37034 January 30, 1976 - JACQUELINE INDUSTRIES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-39832 January 30, 1976 - ILUMINADA T. TORREDA v. ALEJANDRO R. BONCAROS

  • G.R. No. L-40570 January 30, 1976 - TEODORO C. UMALI v. ANGEL BACANI

  • G.R. No. L-40739 January 30, 1976 - SECURITY SERVICES UNLIMITED, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. Nos. L-41381-82 January 30, 1976 - FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, JR. v. ROMULO RODRIGUEZ, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-41825 January 30, 1976 - GLORIA M. ESTIPONA v. MIGUEL R. NAVARRO

  • G.R. No. L-42399 January 30, 1976 - RAFAELA G. VDA. DE CASTRO v. FABIAN VER