Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1977 > May 1977 Decisions > G.R. No. L-27019 May 6, 1977 - TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. BARBER STEAMSHIP LINES, INC., ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-27019. May 6, 1977.]

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BARBER STEAMSHIP LINES, INC., MACONDRAY & CO., INC., REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES and CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees.

Quasha, Asperilla, Zafra, Tayag & Ancheta, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Salcedo, Del Rosario, Bito & Misa for defendant-appellee Barber Steamship Lines, Inc.

Solicitor General Antonio P. Barredo, Assistant Solicitor General Felicisimo R. Rosete and Solicitor Buenaventura J. Guerrero for defendant-appellee Republic of the Philippines & Customs Arrastre Service.


D E C I S I O N


AQUINO, J.:


The Court of First Instance of Manila in Civil Case No. 62976 found that a cargo of nylon and cotton piece goods was damaged before it was discharged from the vessel Tagaytay in the port of Manila in February, 1965. The damage amounted to S18.50 (equivalent to fifty pesos).

The lower court ordered defendants Barber Steamship Lines and Macondray & Co., Inc., as agents of the carrying vessel, to pay fifty pesos to plaintiff Travelers Indemnity Company. That entity had insured the cargo against all risks. It had paid to the consignee, Royal Undergarment Corporation of the Philippines, Inc., the sum of $807.68, which was the amount of the loss and damage claimed by the said consignee. The insurance company was subrogated to the consignee’s right to claim the damage (Exh. H).

The lower court also found that the Customs Arrastre Service failed to deliver to the consignee a part of the said cargo. The value of the missing cargo was $56.23.

But the lower court did not order defendants Republic of the Philippines and Customs Arrastre Service to pay the Travelers Indemnity Company the sum of $56.23. The court sustained the government’s contention that the State is exempt from suit. The court further observed that the Customs Arrastre Service, an agency of the Bureau of Customs in the port of Manila, is not a juridical person and that any suit against it is a suit against the State.

The Travelers Indemnity Company appealed from the lower court’s decision to this Court "insofar only as it dismisses the case against defendants Republic of the Philippines and Customs Arrastre Service"

Appellant Travelers Indemnity Company did not confine its brief to that legal issue. It is insisted that the consignee had suffered a loss in the sum of $807.68 and that the arrastre operator should pay the sum of $789.18 which is the difference between $807.68 and the sum of $18.50 that was adjudged against the agents of the carrying vessel.

We hold that appellant insurance company is precluded from raising in its third assignment of error the factual issue of whether the liability of the arrastre operator for the missing cargo is $789.18 and not $56.23, as found by the trial court.

Appellant company is bound by the fact found by the trial court that the loss occasioned by the shortage or nondelivery amounts only to $56.23 (Sec. 2, Rule 42, Rules of Court; Millar v. Nadres, 74 Phil. 307).

As to the question of the suability of the State (the arrastre operator), which is the legal issue raised in appellant’s first and second assignments of error, the trial court did not err in dismissing the company’s action for the recovery of loss or damage amounting to $789.18.

It is settled that the Bureau of Customs, acting as part of the machinery of the national government in the operation of the arrastre service, is immune from suit under the doctrine of non-suability of the State. The claimant’s remedy to recover the loss or damage to the goods under the custody of the customs arrastre service is to file a claim with the Commission on Audit as contemplated in Act No. 3083 and Commonwealth Act No. 327 (Gloren, Inc. v. Republic, L-26811, July 31, 1970, 34 SCRA 26 and cases cited in Vol. 1, SCRA Quick Index Digest, pp/165-7).

WHEREFORE, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Fernando (Chairman), Antonio, Muñoz Palma and Martin, JJ., concur.

Barredo and Concepcion Jr., JJ., did not take part.

Muñoz Palma and Martin, JJ., were designated to sit in the Second Division.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1977 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 727 May 5, 1977 - MIGUELA R. LUYON v. JUAN G. ATENCIA

  • G.R. No. L-25291 May 5, 1977 - INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO., LTD., ET AL. v. INSULAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO., LTD., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27095 May 5, 1977 - CARLOS ALFARO, ET AL. v. LLANES & COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27019 May 6, 1977 - TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. BARBER STEAMSHIP LINES, INC., ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-895 May 24, 1977 - ROSALINA BASA v. EMMA C. ONA

  • G.R. No. L-27230 May 24, 1977 - JOSE R. CATIBOG v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28999 May 24, 1977 - COMPAÑIA MARITIMA v. ALLIED FREE WORKERS UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43813 May 24, 1977 - FRANCISCO C. HERNANDEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44579 May 24, 1977 - NATIONAL MINES AND ALLIED WORKERS’ UNION v. RONALDO B. ZAMORA

  • G.R. No. L-22257 May 25, 1977 - GO YU TAK WAI v. MARTINIANO P. VIVO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31760 May 25, 1977 - IN RE: GIL GO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-41539 May 25, 1977 - GUADALUPE J. VDA. DE UCANG, ET AL. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43652 May 25, 1977 - MARIA SAMBAJON, ET AL. v. EDUARDO TUTAAN

  • G.R. No. L-23197 May 26, 1977 - PEDRO PASCUA, ET AL. v. MARIANO COPUYOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24501 May 26, 1977 - TESTATE ESTATE DON ALFONSO DE CASTELLVI, ET AL. v. JOSE CASTELLVI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24803 May 26, 1977 - PEDRO ELCANO, ET AL. v. REGINALD HILL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29022 May 26, 1977 - PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29882 May 26, 1977 - PEDRO HORARIO v. JOSE F. FERNANDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-30719 May 26, 1977 - CITY OF DAVAO, ET AL. v. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES

  • G.R. No. L-32709 May 26, 1977 - DI’MARK’S INC. v. G. A. BUENDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33520 May 26, 1977 - CYPHIL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION-NATU v. PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-34418 May 26, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAVIER GONZAGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-35234 May 26, 1977 - AMADEO GARCIA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43821 May 26, 1977 - INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION v. PEDRO A. RAMIREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23875 May 27, 1977 - TESTATE ESTATE OF GREGORIO VENTURA, ET AL. v. MERCEDES VENTURA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24554 May 31, 1967

    MATIAS S. CARILLO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24965 May 31, 1977 - FAR EAST REALTY INVESTMENT, INC. v. JOSE N. LEUTERIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24975 May 31, 1977 - MANILA PENCIL COMPANY, INC. ET AL. v. CONCORDIO TRAZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-5440 May 31, 1977 - SANTIAGO SYJUCO, INC. v. CITY ASSESSOR OF PASAY CITY

  • G.R. No. L-26083 May 31, 1977 - CONSUELO MALALUAN VDA. DE RECINTO v. RUPERTO INCIONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27665 May 31, 1977 - PHILIPPINE VIRGINIA TOBACCO ADMINISTRATION v. ANDRES REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29067 May 31, 1977 - JAMES A. KEISTER v. PEDRO C. NAVARRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29345 May 31, 1977 - ARTURO F.W. TANTOCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29912 May 31, 1977 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ASTERIO MARCINA

  • G.R. No. L-30683 May 31, 1977 - CELESTINA GUMABAY v. JULIANA BARALIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33146 May 31, 1977 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, ET AL. v. PEDRO C. NAVARRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-34381 May 31, 1977 - LORETO SEARES v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-34436 May 31, 1977 - BIENVENIDO A. EBARLE, ET AL. v. VICENTE M. CARILLES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40185 May 31, 1977 - TING PING LAY v. JOSE C. COLAYCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-41281-82 May 31, 1977 - EDILBERTO DELIMA, ET AL. v. PEDRO P. GALLARDO

  • G.R. No. L-43099 May 31, 1977 - TEOFILA GUEVARRA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-43112 May 31, 1977 - PEDRO CARREON v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43154 May 31, 1977 - DAVID MONDEJAR v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43202 May 31, 1977 - RODRIGO LANDAYAN v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43309 May 31, 1977 - ATANACIA M. CALING v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43325 May 31, 1977 - DOLORES A. POBRE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-44251 May 31, 1977 - FELIX MONTEMAYOR v. ARANETA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44653 May 31, 1977 - CATALINA V. VDA. DE LABUCA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44779 May 31, 1977 - FRANCISCO VALDES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.