Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1978 > July 1978 Decisions > G.R. No. L-33019 July 1, 1978 - MANUEL B. SYQUIO v. ALBERTO J. FRANCISCO, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-33019. July 1, 1978.]

MANUEL B. SYQUIO, in his capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Public Work and Communications, Petitioner, v. HONORABLE ALBERTO J. FRANCISCO, in his capacity as Judge of the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch IX, EMIGDIO FERNANDEZ, JESUS MACROHON, BELEN FERNANDEZ, and MARIA PUNO, Respondents.

Solicitor General Estelito P. Mendoza Assistant Solicitor General Nathanael P. de Pano, Jr. and Solicitor Concepcion T. Agapinan for Petitioner.

Julio T. Baldonado & Benjamin Y. Garcia for Respondents.

SYNOPSIS


In this proceeding petitioner challenged respondent Judge’s order preventing him from directly conducting an inquiry into an administrative complaint filed against private respondents, employees of the then Bureau of Public Highways.

After the case was heard on oral arguments and deemed submitted for decision, the Court, in view of the fact that petitioner and respondent have ceased holding their respective positions, required the former to inform it as to the status of the civil case, the orders therein having given rise to the instant petition, and to inform the Court as to whether or not the matter in issue has become moot and academic.

In compliance therewith, the Court was apprised of the intervening circumstances which have taken place since the filing of the case which have made the subject of the present action moot and academic.

Petition dismissed.


SYLLABUS


1. CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION; DISMISSAL; CASE MOOT AND ACADEMIC. — A petition will be dismissed where intervening circumstances have taken place since the filing of the case which have made the issues raised therein moot and academic.


R E S O L U T I O N


FERNANDO, Acting, C.J.:


In this certiorari and prohibition proceeding, petitioner Manuel B Syquio, the then Acting Secretary of the Department of Public Works and Communications, sought to nullify an order of the then respondent Judge Alberto J. Francisco, restraining the investigator designated by petitioner as such Acting Secretary, to proceed with his inquiry into an administrative complaint filed against private respondents, all of whom were employed in the then Bureau of Public Highways. Respondent Judge based his restraining order on the ground that the Commissioner of Public Highways had already started his own investigation of the above individuals. Petitioner’s main contention was that as department head, he was authorized by law to take over the investigation of administrative charges against employees connected with the Bureau of Public Highways. The mere fact that there was then a pending investigation being conducted by the then Commissioner of Public Highways was no legal obstacle to his directly conducting the inquiry, so it was asserted. Respondent Judge was, however, of the opinion that the latter official having acquired jurisdiction over such administrative complaints, Petitioner, as department head, was precluded from conducting the investigation. The answer submitted by respondents did not meet squarely the issue of constitutional power of a department head as an alter ego of the President, implemented by the appropriate Administrative Code provision, to conduct the aforesaid investigation. Instead, stress was laid on the alleged unfairness to private respondents who, "as permanent employees in the competitive service, [were entitled under the due process clause to] orderly proceedings according to established rules which do not violate basic rights." 1

Thereafter, the case was heard on oral argument and deemed submitted for decision. In the meanwhile, the case remained pending in the docket, the successive retirement of Justices to whom this case had been assigned preventing a final verdict from being rendered. On November 11, 1977, this Court issued the following resolution: "It being apparent on the face of the petition that petitioner Manuel B. Syquio is no longer the Acting Secretary of the Department of Public Works and Communications and respondent Judge Alberto J. Francisco had ceased to be a member of the judiciary, the Court Resolved to require petitioner to [inform], this Court as to the status of Civil Case No. 80677 of the Branch IX of the Court of First Instance of Manila, the issuance of certain orders in such case giving rise to this certiorari and prohibition petition, and more specifically to inform this Court as to whether or not the matter in issue has become moot and academic." 2

There was a Compliance from Solicitor General Estelito P. Mendoza dated April 20, 1978. 3 It was stated therein that the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch VII, thereafter presided by Judge Amante Purisima, deferred action on the pending case before him until this matter would be settled by this Court. More specifically, with reference to the private respondents who were proceeded against administratively, the Compliance of Solicitor General Mendoza had the following to say: "Coming now to the information desired by this Honorable Court, and after verification with the Department of Public Highways as regards the present status of its employees named respondents herein, it was disclosed that Emigdio Fernandez and Jesus Macrohan are no longer connected with said Office, the first, having retired from the service and already dead, while the second, has never reported to work after the filing of the case, and information gathered shows that he had accepted employment abroad. With respect to respondents Belen Fernandez and Maria Puno, they have long been reinstated, and have voluntarily submitted themselves to a formal administrative investigation by the Department of Public Highways, and their cases are now pending decision." 4 Its concluding paragraph reads as follows:chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

"Considering the intervening circumstances which have taken place since the filing of this case, undersigned counsel are of the view that the present case has now become moot and academic." 5

WHEREFORE, as prayed for, the petition is dismissed for having become moot and academic.

Barredo, Aquino, Concepcion Jr., and Santos, JJ., concur.

Antonio, J., then, the Solicitor-General when this petition was filed, did not take part.

Endnotes:



1. Answer, 11.

2. Resolution of this Court dated November 11, 1977.

3. He was assisted by Assistant Solicitor General Nathanael P. de Pano, Jr. and Solicitor Concepcion T. Agapinan.

4. Compliance, 6.

5. Ibid.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1978 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-33019 July 1, 1978 - MANUEL B. SYQUIO v. ALBERTO J. FRANCISCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38695 July 1, 1978 - EUGENIO SURIA v. FILEMON O. JUNTEREAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29949 July 6, 1978 - MISAMIS LUMBER, INC. v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32126 July 6, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NEMESIO TALINGDAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40603 July 13, 1978 - PALMARIN Q. HURTADO v. ISABEL G. JUDALENA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45347 July 13, 1978 - LUSTIANO FLORES v. MOISES F. DALISAY, SR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26295 July 14, 1978 - SALVACION A. CATANGCATANG v. PAULINO LEGAYADA

  • G.R. No. L-33798 July 14, 1978 - SENECIO M. DURAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36637 July 14, 1978 - GENEROSO MENDOZA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38606 July 14, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO MARAÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47196 July 14, 1978 - ANTONIA C. CARTAS v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • A.M. No. P-133 July 20, 1978 - ESPERANZA MALANYAON v. RUFINO L. GALANG

  • G.R. No. L-44060 July 20, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO PARAGSA

  • A.M. No. 707-MJ July 21, 1978 - RURAL BANK OF BAROTAC NUEVO, INC. v. SERGIO CARTAGENA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 917-MJ July 21, 1978 - CRISPIN BARTIDO v. CESAR LARROBIS

  • A.M. No. P-941 July 21, 1978 - JOSE G. ARELLANO v. JESUS AGUSTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25087 July 21, 1978 - SHELL COMPANY OF THE PHIL. LIMITED v. NEDLLOYD LINES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26054 July 21, 1978 - LUZON SURETY CO., INC. v. JESUS PANAGUITON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30668 July 21, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32754-5 July 21, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL I. PILONES

  • G.R. No. L-35910 July 21, 1978 - PURITA BERSABAL v. SERAFIN SALVADOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41961 July 21, 1978 - MARCELINO CALUZA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43468 July 21, 1978 - ISABEL LOPEZ ELISEO v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46542 July 21, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HERMENEGILDO A. PRIETO, SR.

  • G.R. No. L-47482 July 21, 1978 - ANGELITO TAN, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31948 July 25, 1978 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL RAILWAYS v. UNION DE MAQUINISTAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42767 July 25, 1978 - JUSTINO PASCUA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47342 July 25, 1978 - NICOLAS GALDO v. EULALIO D. ROSETE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47753 July 25, 1978 - ANTONIO A. CUDIAMAT v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42946 July 26, 1978 - JUAN ORILLANEDA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-1015 July 28, 1978 - FEDERICO JAVINES v. ADRIANO MARZON

  • A.M. No. P-60 July 31, 1978 - MELBA C. AMOLADOR v. JUAN FELICIDARIO

  • A.M. No. 326-CJ July 31, 1978 - PEDRO VILLA v. FRANCISCO LLAMAS

  • A.M. No. P-985 July 31, 1978 - EUGENIO DELA CRUZ v. ROBERTO MUDLONG

  • A.M. No. P-1161 July 31, 1978 - VICTORIA PRIETO, ET AL. v. CRISPIN PERALTA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-1391 July 31, 1978 - MILAGROS PEÑALOSA v. FELIX VISCAYA, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-26861 July 31, 1978 - ERNESTO D. BOHOL, SR., ET AL. v. FRANCISCO L. TORRES

  • G.R. No. L-27914 July 31, 1978 - ROBERTO A. PASCUAL v. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28979 July 31, 1978 - RAFAEL BARICAN v. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30014 July 31, 1978 - GREGORIO ARINES, ET AL. v. EMILIO CUACHIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32552 July 31, 1978 - PEDRO MIRASOL v. RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33089 July 31, 1978 - STA. CLARA LUMBER CO., INC. v. ARSENIO MARTINEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37051 July 31, 1978 - ANITA U. LORENZANA v. POLLY CAYETANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-39089-90 July 31, 1978 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINADOR PAY-AN

  • G.R. No. L-40295 July 31, 1978 - ABRAHAM C. SISON v. EPI REY PANGRAMUYEN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42319 July 31, 1978 - B. F. GOODRICH PHILIPPINES, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42485 July 31, 1978 - BONIFACIO L. SOLIS, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43073 July 31, 1973

    FRANCISCO ABORDO v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43204 July 31, 1978 - RODITO T. SARIL, ET AL. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43575 July 31, 1978 - MARCIANO LAMCO v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-43668-69 July 31, 1978 - POTENCIANO MENIL, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44108 July 31, 1978 - BENJAMIN Z. VILLANUEVA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45719 July 31, 1978 - GENERAL TEXTILES ALLIED WORKERS ASSO. v. DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-47711-12 July 31, 1978 - BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM GMBH v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47752 July 31, 1978 - CONSOLIDATED FARMS, INC., II v. CARMELO C. NORIEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48088 July 31, 1978 - GOTARDO FLORDELIS v. EDGAR R. HIMALALOAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48198 July 31, 1978 - PRUDENCIA GLORIA-DIAZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.