Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1981 > September 1981 Decisions > G.R. No. L-48992 September 4, 1981 - TOWERS REALTY CORPORATION, ET AL. v. FERNANDO CRUZ, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-48992. September 4, 1981.]

TOWERS REALTY CORPORATION, RICARDO CONSUNJI, SR., FERNANDO M. ARANDA, RICARDO C. ARANDA, IGNACIO C. ARANDA and CONCEPCION C. ARANDA, Petitioners, v. THE HONORABLE FERNANDO CRUZ, JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF CALOOCAN CITY, THE MUNICIPALITY OF MALABON, RIZAL, THE METRO MANILA COMMISSION, ABRAHAM RAMIREZ and THE SHERIFF OF CALOOCAN CITY, and THE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents.

Luis S. Topacio for Petitioner.

Victor S. Paez for respondents Municipality of Malabon and MMC.

SYNOPSIS


Pending the appeal from an order of the Court of Appeals dismissing a prohibition and certiorari petition against an order of respondent judge, the parties, assisted by their respective counsel, filed a pleading entitled "Stipulation of Facts and Compromise Agreement" agreeing on points to settle their pending dispute, among which was the inclusion of the National Housing Authority as an indispensable party to the case. This agreement was submitted for the Court’s consideration and approval with a prayer for a decision to be rendered pursuant thereto.

The Supreme Court approved the compromise agreement amicably settling the controversy between the parties with the observation that the pleading, particularly the first paragraph thereof relating to the intervention of the indispensable party, was defective, as the same may be misinterpreted to mean that the Supreme Court is without power to deny the motion to intervene and that a party may just intrude into any suit at whatever stage on his own assumption that he is an indispensable party. For this reason, Atty. Claudio, the Legal Director of the National Housing Authority, and one of the co-signers of the agreement, was admonished to exercise greater care and prudence in the discharge of his responsibilities as a member of the bar.


SYLLABUS


REMEDIAL LAW; CIVIL PROCEDURE; ACTIONS; COMPROMISE AGREEMENT; APPROVAL THEREOF TO TERMINATE THE PENDING DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES. — As the Compromise Agreement appears to be the will of the parties to this case and the propriety of the National Housing Authority being allowed to intervene quite apparent, the Compromise Agreement is approved. That would terminate the pending dispute between the parties and thus amicably settle the matter.


R E S O L U T I O N


FERNANDO, C.J.:


On August 6, 1981, the parties, assisted by respective counsel, filed with this Court a pleading entitled Stipulation of Facts and Compromise Agreement. The Compromise Agreement reads as follows: "The Parties hereto have agreed on the following Compromise Agreement: 1. That the National Housing Authority shall be joined in the instant case as an Indispensable Party and the proper motion will be filed with this Honorable Court; 2. That, the instant Agreement shall be binding and have full effect only on the lots described and listed in Annex ‘A’ hereof consisting of One Hundred Six (106) lots with a total area of Fifty Two Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Nine (52,799) square meters or a total cost of Five Million Two Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Nine Hundred (P5,279,900.00) Pesos, Philippine Currency; 3. That upon the approval of this Compromise Agreement by the Supreme Court, the Petitioners herein will execute the corresponding Deeds of Sale of all the lots, subject of this Compromise Agreement, in favor of the National Housing Authority. All expenses in the preparation of the deeds of sale, registration expenses, documentary stamps and all such expenses necessary to transfer title in favor of the National Housing Authority shall be for the sole account of the latter; 4. That within three (3) weeks from the registration of the titles in favor of the National Housing Authority, payment of the sum of Five Million Two Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Nine Hundred (P5,279,900.00) Pesos, Philippine Currency, plus 6% interest on the sum of One Million Three Hundred Seventy Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty (P1,370,830.00) Pesos, representing the deposit with Philippine National Bank, Caloocan Branch, computed from January 3, 1978, when actual possession was made, up to and including the date of the signing of this Compromise Agreement at the rate of 6% per annum; 5. The National Housing Authority hereby agrees and guarantees payment of the total sum of Five Million Two Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Nine Hundred (P5,279,900.00) Pesos, to petitioners as just compensation for the 52,799 square meters of subdivision lots, subject to government accounting and auditing rules and regulations within a period of three (3) weeks after the Register of Deeds had issued to the National Housing Authority the new Transfer Certificates of Titles over the condemned subdivision lots and the sum equivalent to 6% interest on the P1,370,830.00 deposited with PNB, as mentioned above, from January 3, 1978 up to the signing of this agreement; 6. It is further agreed and covenanted herein that all expenses in the preparation of the documents involving the transfer and sale of the lots, together with the notarization thereof, the payment of the transfer taxes, all expenses in the registration of the documents to transfer ownership of the lots to National Housing Authority shall be for the exclusive account of the National Housing Authority; 7. That Petitioner herein hereby agrees and promises to execute any instrument or document in favor of National Housing Authority as may be necessary and requisite to transfer and perfect the title to the Subdivision Lots in its favor which are the subject of this Compromise Agreement; 8. That this Compromise Agreement will be submitted to this Honorable Supreme Court for its consideration and approval." 1 The prayer is for the Compromise Agreement to be approved and a decision to be rendered pursuant thereto.

The above pleading suffers from a flaw in that prior to the approval of the motion for leave to intervene, the National Housing Authority, through its General Manager, Major General AFP (Retired) G. V. Tobias and presumably with the assistance of a member of the Bar as its Legal Director, Antonio Claudio, was one of the co-signers. General Manager Tobias, not being a member of the Bar, may be excused for his failure to realize that the first paragraph of the Compromise Agreement may be misinterpreted. As worded, it would appear that this Court is without power to deny the motion to intervene and that a party may just intrude into any suit at whatever stage on his own assumption that he is an indispensable party. There is no such excuse for Attorney Claudio. He is hereby admonished to exercise more care and prudence in the future in the discharge of his responsibilities as a member of the bar.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

As the Compromise Agreement appears to be the will of the parties to this case and the propriety of the National Housing Authority being allowed to intervene quite apparent, the above Compromise Agreement is hereby approved. That would terminate the pending dispute between the parties and thus amicably settle the matter, the decision under review being limited to the dismissal by respondent Court of Appeals of a prohibition and certiorari petition against an order of respondent Judge Fernando Cruz granting and directing the issuance of the writ of possession in favor of the other respondents.

WHEREFORE, the Court renders a decision approving the terms of the above Compromise Agreement and ordering the parties to observe strictly the terms thereof, constituting as it does the judgment of this Court in this appeal by certiorari from the decision of the Court of Appeals of July 28, 1978. Insofar as such appealed decision lifted the restraining order issued by it and dismissed the petition for certiorari and prohibition, it is affirmed. No costs.

Aquino, Concepcion Jr., Guerrero and De Castro, JJ., concur.

Barredo and Abad Santos, JJ., are on official leave.

Endnotes:



1. Stipulation of Facts and Compromise Agreement, 5-7.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1981 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.M. Nos. 2367-CAR & 2373-CAR September 3, 1981 - JULIO E. QUIZ v. AMADO B. CASTAÑO

  • G.R. No. L-28266 September 4, 1981 - PHILIPPINE AIR LINES EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION v. FRANCISCO DE LA ROSA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43861 September 4, 1981 - FILIPINO METALS CORPORATION v. BLAS OPLE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48992 September 4, 1981 - TOWERS REALTY CORPORATION, ET AL. v. FERNANDO CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 56572 and 57481 September 4, 1981 - JUAN ANG, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-56989 September 4, 1981 - RODOLFO B. SOQUE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 269-J September 10, 1981 - SECRETARY OF JUSTICE v. GREGORIO A. LEGASPI

  • A.M. No. 1648-CFI September 10, 1981 - ALEJANDRO GALAN and CARMEN T. GALAN v. JUDGE DIMALANES B. BUISSAN

  • A.M. No. 2519-MJ September 10, 1981 - ESTHER MONTEMAYOR v. FRANCISCO COLLADO

  • G.R. No. L-27482 September 10, 1981 - GRACE PARK ENGINEERING CO., INC. v. MOHAMAD ALI DIMAPORO

  • G.R. No. L-28135 September 10, 1981 - JOSE MATIENZO v. MARTIN SERVIDAD

  • G.R. No. L-28486 September 10, 1981 - FRANCISCO MAGNO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-32515 September 10, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANO CAÑIZARES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38016 September 10, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELICIANO MUÑOZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41161 September 10, 1981 - FEDERATION OF FREE FARMERS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-51997 September 10, 1981 - INOCENCIO H. GONZALES, ET AL. v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-54886 September 10, 1981 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 1938-CFI September 11, 1981 - CONCEPCION FONACIER-ABAÑO v. CONSTANTE A. ANCHETA

  • A.M. No. 2271-MJ September 18, 1981 - FRANCISCO M. LECAROZ v. SEGUNDO M. GARCIA

  • G.R. No. L-36208 September 18, 1981 - AMBO ALILAYA v. MARCELA DE ESPAÑOLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-56532 September 21, 1981 - CUSTODIO O. PARLADE v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-2234-MJ September 25, 1981 - BERNARDO O. LAMBOLOTO v. ZACARIAS Y. GARCIA

  • G.R. No. L-32853 September 25, 1981 - JUAN S. BARRERA, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-56656-60 September 25, 1981 - MARCELO STEEL CORPORATION v. MARCELO STEEL WORKERS UNION, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 1648 September 26, 1981 - PABLITO IBAÑEZ, ET AL. v. GUILLERMO R. VIÑA

  • G.R. No. L-52413 September 26, 1981 - MELITON C. GERONIMO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 1646 September 30, 1981 - MARIO HERNANDEZ v. SERGIO VILLAREAL

  • A.M. No. 1733-CFI September 30, 1981 - IRENEO CABREANA, ET AL. v. CELSO AVELINO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-2089 September 30, 1981 - FELBET’S TIMBER, INC., ET AL. v. GLICERIO LUMUTHANG, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-2374 September 30, 1981 - VIRGILIO SURIGAO v. MARINO V. CACHERO

  • G.R. No. L-27042 September 30, 1981 - JOVENCIO CONCHA, ET AL. v. JOSE C. DIVINAGRACIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27761 September 30, 1981 - BISIG NG MANGGAGAWA NG PHILIPPINE REFINING CO., INC. v. PHILIPPINE REFINING CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-33358 September 30, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MACTAN PEÑARANDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38068 September 30, 1981 - ELISA O. GAMBOA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38674 September 30, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO REGULAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46892 September 30, 1981 - HEIRS OF AMPARO DEL ROSARIO v. AURORA O. SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47011 September 30, 1981 - FEATI BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-50555 September 30, 1981 - BARANGA MANUFACTURING AND EXPORT CORPORATION v. MINISTER OF LABOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-52237 September 30, 1981 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERTO V. LAGTU

  • G.R. No. L-54097 September 30, 1981 - ROMEO N. GUMBA v. JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT OF CAMARINES SUR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-56133 September 30, 1981 - ANTONIO ESTABAYA v. PRISCILLA C. MIJARES, ET AL.