Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1983 > February 1983 Decisions > G.R. No. L-44674 February 28, 1983 - AVENUE ARRASTRE AND STEVEDORING CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

205 Phil. 770:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-44674. February 28, 1983.]

AVENUE ARRASTRE AND STEVEDORING CORPORATION, INC., as successor to Puerto Princesa City Arrastre and Stevedores’ Union, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF FINANCE, THE PRUDENTIAL CUSTOMS BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC., Respondents.

Paredes & De los Reyes Law Offices for Petitioner.

The Solicitor General for Respondents.

Eladio B. Samson for Private Respondent.


SYLLABUS


REMEDIAL LAW; SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION; MANDAMUS; WILL NOT LIE TO REVIEW THE EXERCISE OF DISCRETION. — Even conceding that petitioner, as successor of PPCASU, has the privilege of obtaining renewal of the latter’s permit after its expiration, such privilege rests on the sound discretion on the part of respondent public officials, and refusal to grant continuance of the privilege, especially upon their findings of PPCASU’s gross inefficiency and flagrant violation of the Labor Laws, can not be the subject of an action for mandamus. The rule consistently adhered to in this jurisdiction is that mandamus will not lie to control or review the exercise of discretion of a public officer where the law imposes upon him the right or duty to exercise judgment in reference to a matter in which he is required to act.


D E C I S I O N


ESCOLIN, J.:


This petition raises anew the question of whether an order of the Commissioner of Customs, affirmed by the Secretary (now Minister) of Finance, on a matter involving the exercise of his discretion may be reviewed and set aside by mandamus.chanrobles virtualawlibrary chanrobles.com:chanrobles.com.ph

The Puerto Princesa City and Stevedores Union, PPCASU for short, was the original operator of the arrastre and stevedoring service in the Port of Puerto Princesa, Palawan, under a temporary permit issued by the respondent Commissioner of Customs for a period of six (6) months starting December 20, 1974. Despite poor and inefficient operations and resource problems on the part of PPCASU, the permit was renewed four times, covering the period from December 21, 1974 to March 19, 1976, to enable PPCASU to make good its repeated commitment to improve its service and procure needed equipment.

On March 18, 1976, respondent Commissioner finally terminated PPCASU’s permit and at the same time authorized respondent Prudential Brokerage Services Inc., to operate arrastre and stevedoring service in the Port of Puerto Princesa starting March 19, 1976. Basis of the order of respondent Commissioner is the report of the Collector of Customs of Puerto Princesa with the following findings:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1) PPCASU, at present has practically no capitalization at all. This fact has been made known to that office thru Mr. Quiray. I’ve informed him personally about the withdrawal from the group of the chinese capitalists who had a misunderstanding with the President, Mr. Paredes. This is one main reason why the corporation could not update its accounts with this office, the employees and laborers and above all, the claims for damages and/or losses of goods.

"2) PPCASU, practically, has no equipment at all. Although it has acquired a second hand forklift six months ago, it is out of order for the last four months due to lack of spare parts. It has only two pieces of canvass which are actually worned out and thorned and cannot protect the goods from the rain. There are less than twenty pieces of pallets in use most of which are with broken parts and do not serve the purpose effectively.

"3) In spite of our oral and written directives to the contrary, the laborers are paid up to the present on a ‘Pakway System’ which actually is against the labor law. This was brought personally to the knowledge of Mr. Quiray on his stay here during the seminar on arrastre.

"4) No record of PPCASU could show that they have remitted any amount to the SSS as their counterpart. All employees and laborers are not covered by any sort of protection.

"5) PPCASU has paid its Mayor’s Permit for the purpose during the period from January to March, 1975 only. I am surprised why the City government does not go after them.

"6) No bond has been filed during the current year.

Meanwhile, petitioner Avenue Arrastre and Stevedoring Corporation, Inc., claiming to have been merged with PPCASU and as successor of the latter, moved for reconsideration of the above order. The motion was denied. Petitioner’s appeal to the Secretary of Finance was likewise dismissed. Hence, this petition for mandamus.

The petition is devoid of merit.

Even conceding that petitioner, as successor of PPCASU, has the privilege of obtaining renewal of the latter’s permit after its expiration, such privilege rests on the sound discretion on the part of respondent public officials, and refusal to grant continuance of the privilege, especially upon their findings of PPCASU’s gross inefficiency and flagrant violation of the Labor Laws, cannot be the subject of an action for mandamus. The rule consistently adhered to in this jurisdiction is that mandamus will not lie to control or review the exercise of discretion of a public officer where the law imposes upon him the right or duty to exercise judgment in reference to a matter in which he is required to act.

Moreover, mandamus will not issue in doubtful cases. In the case at bar, petitioner has not shown a clear and certain right to warrant the grant thereof.

ACCORDINGLY, the petition is hereby dismissed, with costs against petitioner.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

SO ORDERED.

Makasiar (Chairman), Concepcion Jr., Guerrero, Abad Santos and De Castro, JJ., concur.

Aquino, J., on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1983 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-34105 February 4, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIMOTEO CABURAL

    205 Phil. 450

  • G.R. No. L-37235 February 5, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUILLERMO PORCARE

    205 Phil. 469

  • G.R. No. L-24153 February 14, 1983 - TOMAS VELASCO v. ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS

    205 Phil. 480

  • G.R. No. L-30917 February 14, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LOPE TABIAN

    205 Phil. 483

  • G.R. No. L-32106 February 14, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AGUINALDO REANA

    205 Phil. 494

  • G.R. No. L-41909 February 14, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PASTOR PASCO

    205 Phil. 506

  • G.R. No. L-50296 February 14, 1983 - RICARDO ALZOSA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

    205 Phil. 521

  • G.R. No. L-58183 February 14, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO SALIENTE

    205 Phil. 526

  • G.R. Nos. L-52781 and 53658 February 16, 1983 - ANASTACIO C. GOMEZ v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

    205 Phil. 530

  • G.R. No. L-60174 February 16, 1983 - EDUARDO FELIPE v. HEIRS OF MAXIMO ALDON

    205 Phil. 537

  • G.R. No. L-41336 February 18, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO DISNEY

    205 Phil. 545

  • G.R. No. L-55988 February 18, 1983 - CECIL DIGMAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    205 Phil. 558

  • G.R. No. L-61355 February 18, 1983 - MAXIMO G. RODRIGUEZ v. SANDIGANBAYAN

    205 Phil. 567

  • G.R. No. L-62753 February 18, 1983 - LWV MANAGEMENT, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

    205 Phil. 579

  • G.R. Nos. L-29479 & 29716 February 21, 1983 - CLARA E. VDA. DE SAYMAN, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    205 Phil. 581

  • G.R. No. L-34220 February 21, 1983 - HEIRS OF PEDRO GUMINPIN v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 590

  • G.R. No. L-36458 February 21, 1983 - FRANCISCA ALIMAGNO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    205 Phil. 602

  • G.R. No. L-41299 February 21, 1983 - SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 609

  • G.R. No. L-43008 February 21, 1983 - JUAN DE LOS SANTOS v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

    205 Phil. 635

  • G.R. No. L-49903 February 21, 1983 - MUNICIPALITY OF SANTIAGO, ISABELA v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 638

  • G.R. Nos. L-55834-35 February 21, 1983 - ALEJANDRO MONTANER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

    205 Phil. 650

  • G.R. No. L-59866 February 22, 1983 - ONOFRE D. MANALAD v. JESUS DE VEGA

    205 Phil. 653

  • G.R. No. L-61420-21 February 22, 1983 - JUAN HERNANDEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 659

  • G.R. No. L-61998 February 22, 1983 - ROGELIO DE JESUS v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    205 Phil. 663

  • G.R. No. L-55035 February 23, 1983 - GENARO CUBAR v. RAFEL T. MENDOZA

  • G.R. No. L-56363 February 24, 1983 - MARCELINO OCHOCO v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

    205 Phil. 677

  • G.R. No. L-30666 February 25, 1983 - ANDRES ABAN v. MANUEL L. ENAGE

    205 Phil. 681

  • A.M. No. 1094 February 28, 1983 - PETRA SANTOS v. ARTEMIO V. PANGANIBAN, JR.

    205 Phil. 702

  • G.R. No. L-28554 February 28, 1983 - UNNO COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GENERAL MILLING CORP.

    205 Phil. 707

  • G.R. No. L-29119 February 28, 1983 - CO CHIN LENG v. CO CHIN TONG

    205 Phil. 716

  • G.R. No. L-30554 February 28, 1983 - PLARIDEL SURETY & INSURANCE CO. v. ARTEX DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.

    205 Phil. 722

  • G.R. No. L-32895 February 28, 1983 - EUSEBIO BABANTO v. MARIANO A. ZOSA

    205 Phil. 728

  • G.R. No. L-35241 February 28, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERVILLANO VELASQUEZ

    205 Phil. 741

  • G.R. No. L-35872 February 28, 1983 - FERTILE MINES, INC v. FEVA MINING CORP.

  • G.R. No. L-39641 February 28, 1983 - METROPOL (BACOLOD) FINANCING & INVESTMENT CORP. v. SAMBOK MOTORS CO.

    205 Phil. 758

  • G.R. No. L-42282 February 28, 1983 - HERMENEGILDO R. ROSALES v. PEREGRIN YBOA

    205 Phil. 763

  • G.R. No. L-44674 February 28, 1983 - AVENUE ARRASTRE AND STEVEDORING CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

    205 Phil. 770

  • G.R. No. L-50437 February 28, 1983 - SPOUSES GEORGE BARRAZA v. JOSE C. CAMPOS, JR.

    205 Phil. 773

  • G.R. No. L-51263 February 28, 1983 - CRESENCIANO LEONARDO v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 781

  • G.R. No. L-54070 February 28, 1983 - HEIRS OF ENRIQUE ZAMBALES v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-54083 February 28, 1983 - REYNALDO E. FEGURIN v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

    205 Phil. 801

  • G.R. No. L-55176 February 28, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NAPOLEON BERNAT

    205 Phil. 810

  • G.R. No. L-61083 February 28, 1983 - DANIEL GUSTILO v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 818

  • G.R. No. L-62169 February 28, 1983 - MINDANAO PORTLAND CEMENT CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 821

  • G.R. No. L-62542 February 28, 1983 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. COURT OF APPEALS

    205 Phil. 825