Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1983 > June 1983 Decisions > G.R. No. L-52709 June 24, 1983 - MANILA PRESS, INC. v. AMADO G. INCIONG

207 Phil. 747:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-52709. June 24, 1983.]

MANILA PRESS, INC., Petitioner, v. HON. AMADO G. INCIONG, in his capacity as Deputy Minister of Labor, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, RICARDO CAJUCOM and ROGELIO ROLDAN, Respondents.

Caparas, Tabios, Ilagan, Alcantara & Gatmaytan Law Offices for Petitioner.

Patricio Balao-Ga for Private Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. LABOR LAWS; EMPLOYMENT; TERMINATION INDUCED BY MISCONDUCT ON THE PART OF EMPLOYEE. — We hold that as to Cajucom the dismissal was proper. The labor agencies acted with, grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or jurisdiction in ordering his reinstatement. He committed perjury to favor a fellow employee. He is guilty of misconduct.

2. ID.; ID.; THOUGH NON-CONVICTION IN A CRIMINAL CASE MAY STILL WARRANT DISMISSAL OF AN EMPLOYEE, RE-INSTATEMENT GRANTED UNDER PLEA OF COMPASSIONATE JUSTICE. — With respect to the case of Roldan, who was convicted by the lower court of perjury and ultimately acquitted by the Court of Appeals on the ground of reasonable doubt in its 1980 decision, Roldan pleads for compassionate justice. It is true that conviction of an employee in a criminal case is not indispensable to warrant his dismissal by his employer (National Labor Union Inc. v. Standard Vacuum Oil Company, 73 Phil. 279; Nevans v. Court of Industrial Relations, L-21510, June 29, 1968, 23 SCRA 1321, 1328), nevertheless, considering Roldan’s plea for compassion, we think that the ends of justice would be served by allowing his reinstatement without backwages.


D E C I S I O N


AQUINO, J.:


This is a case of dismissal of workers. There is no dispute as to the facts. On September 24, 1974, Mariano Rodrigo, a laborer of the Manila Press, Inc., while on his way out of the press compound, was caught by the security guard carrying ten envelopes. Rodrigo was charged with frustrated theft in the city court of Caloocan City in Criminal Case No. 96084. He was convicted.

In connection with Rodrigo’s case, his four co-employees, named Ricardo Cajucom, Rogelio Roldan, Felix Lozano and Marcelino Perucho, in order to exculpate him, executed a joint affidavit dated October 7, 1974 wherein they stated that they witnessed and heard the factory supervisor, Yat Chang Chuan, giving Rodrigo permission to take out the several pieces of envelope. That was denied by Yat Chang Chuan.

Manila Press, Inc. lodged in the city court of Caloocan City a complaint for perjury against Cajucom, Roldan Lozano and Perucho in Criminal Case No. 97362. In the meanwhile, or on December 26, 1974, Manila Press filed with the Ministry of Labor an application for clearance to terminate the employment of the said employees (p. 164, Rollo).chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

The city court convicted Cajucom of perjury. He failed to perfect his appeal. So, the judgment against him became final. Roldan and Perucho appealed their judgment of conviction for perjury. The Court of Appeals acquitted them on the ground of reasonable doubt (People v. Roldan, CA-G.R. No. 22352-CR., August 22, 1980).

With respect to the labor case, Manila Press, Inc. terminated the services of Cajucom and Roldan on October 8, 1975 (p. 165, Rollo). On June 17, 1976, Cajucom and Roldan filed another complaint, charging Manila Press, Inc. with illegal dismissal, unfair labor practice and nonpayment of sick and vacation leaves.

The Labor Arbiter in his decision of July 11, 1977 ordered the reinstatement of Cajucom and Roldan to their jobs with backwages from October 8, 1975 up to the time of the actual reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other benefits (p. 166, Rollo).

The National Labor Relations Commission affirmed that decision on March 17, 1978. The Deputy Minister of Labor affirmed that decision in his order of September 10, 1979 (pp. 43 and 168, Rollo).

We hold that as to Cajucom the dismissal was proper. The labor agencies acted with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction in ordering his reinstatement. He committed perjury to favor a fellow employee. He is guilty of misconduct. This is admitted by the Solicitor General.

With respect to the case of Roldan, who was convicted by the lower court of perjury and ultimately acquitted by the Court of Appeals on the ground of reasonable doubt in its 1980 decision, Roldan pleads for compassionate justice. In his letter to the Chief Justice dated August 26, 1982, he said:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Sir, I am invoking your kindness to have the aforementioned case decided already as my family and I are already suffering from abject poverty. I do not have the proper education to use for looking for work. Besides, due perhaps to lack of food, I am suffering from constant dizziness and premature aging. But most of all, I pity my seven children and my wife who, despite her effort also of selling fish, what she earns is not even enough for our single meal, this, despite the little help I am making."cralaw virtua1aw library

It is true that conviction of an employee in a criminal case is not indispensable to warrant his dismissal by his employer (National Labor Union, Inc. v. Standard Vacuum Oil Company, 73 Phil. 279; Nevans v. Court of Industrial Relations, L-21510, June 29, 1968, 23 SCRA 1321, 1328), nevertheless, considering Roldan’s plea for compassion, we think that the ends of justice would be served by allowing his reinstatement without backwages.

WHEREFORE, the judgment of the National Labor Relations Commission dismissing Cajucom is affirmed but the dismissal of Rogelio Roldan is reversed and set aside. The Manila Press, Inc. is ordered to reinstate Roldan immediately to his former position or to any other similar job. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Makasiar (Chairman), Concepcion, Jr., Guerrero, De Castro and Escolin, JJ., concur.

Abad Santos, J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






June-1983 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-47331 June 21, 1983 - PABLO DE LOS REYES v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE

    207 Phil. 574

  • G.R. No. L-46131 June 22, 1983 - EPIFANIA V. LAVILLA v. SECRETARY OF LABOR

    207 Phil. 578

  • G.R. No. L-47739 June 22, 1983 - SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. v. ERNANI CRUZ PAÑO

    207 Phil. 585

  • G.R. No. L-49069 June 22, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PROTACIO AMONCIO

    207 Phil. 591

  • G.R. No. L-52133 June 23, 1983 - NORMA B. NAJERA v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

    207 Phil. 600

  • G.R. No. L-60364 June 23, 1983 - BRITTA B. QUISUMBING v. COURT OF APPEALS

    207 Phil. 607

  • G.R. No. L-28841 June 24, 1983 - RAFAEL YAPDIANGCO v. CONCEPCION B. BUENCAMINO

    207 Phil. 615

  • G.R. No. L-31442 June 24, 1983 - BHAGWANDAS GIDWANI v. DOMESTIC INSURANCE COMPANY

    207 Phil. 623

  • G.R. No. L-32244 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO SORIANO

    207 Phil. 630

  • G.R. No. L-33522 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCIANO LOJO

    207 Phil. 643

  • G.R. No. L-34915 June 24, 1983 - CITY GOVERNMENT OF QUEZON CITY v. VICENTE G. ERICTA

    207 Phil. 648

  • G.R. No. L-35171 June 24, 1983 - FRANCISCO DE LA ROSA v. ALEJANDRO ESPIRITU

    207 Phil. 658

  • G.R. No. L-35853 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LIBRADO CARIAS

    207 Phil. 664

  • G.R. No. L-37483 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO OQUIÑO

    207 Phil. 676

  • G.R. No. L-37792 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONARDO MAALA

    207 Phil. 690

  • G.R. No. L-39049 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS ALVIS

    207 Phil. 693

  • G.R. No. L-40103 June 24, 1983 - ARCADIO DUAY v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    207 Phil. 710

  • G.R. No. L-46495 June 24, 1983 - ANDREA C. DECOLONGON v. COURT OF APPEALS

    207 Phil. 718

  • G.R. No. L-46894 June 24, 1983 - TERESA M. ARMEÑA v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

    207 Phil. 726

  • G.R. No. L-47686 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN BALBAS

    207 Phil. 734

  • G.R. No. L-49781 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CATALINO CASTAÑEDA, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-52709 June 24, 1983 - MANILA PRESS, INC. v. AMADO G. INCIONG

    207 Phil. 747

  • G.R. No. L-54753 June 24, 1983 - MARIETTA E. DAKUDAO v. FRANCISCO Z. CONSOLACION

    207 Phil. 750

  • G.R. No. L-56340 June 24, 1983 - ALVARO PASTOR, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS

    207 Phil. 758

  • G.R. No. L-58414 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIEGO HERMOSILLA

    207 Phil. 775

  • G.R. No. L-58613 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO RHODA

    207 Phil. 780

  • G.R. No. L-58635 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO VALMORES

    207 Phil. 792

  • G.R. No. L-59951 June 24, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMILIO AQUINO

    207 Phil. 800

  • G.R. No. L-60151 June 24, 1983 - SALVADOR L. BUDLONG v. AQUILES T. APALISOK

    207 Phil. 804

  • G.R. No. L-61438 June 24, 1983 - ERDULFO C. BOISER v. COURT OF APPEALS

    207 Phil. 814

  • G.R. No. L-63135 June 24, 1983 - GLORIA DARROCHA DE CALISTON v. COURT OF APPEALS

    207 Phil. 827

  • A.C. No. 1596 June 28, 1983 - MAXIMA MURILLO VDA. DE GARBE v. RODRIGO A. LIPORADA

    208 Phil. 1

  • G.R. No. L-27294 June 28, 1983 - ALFREDO ROA, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS

    208 Phil. 2

  • G.R. No. L-29141 June 28, 1983 - MANUEL L. LIMSICO v. JOSE G. BAUTISTA

    208 Phil. 49

  • G.R. No. L-29141 June 28, 1983 - MANUEL L. LIMSICO v. JOSE G. BAUTISTA

    208 Phil. 16

  • G.R. No. L-33216 June 28, 1983 - TAN CHING v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    208 Phil. 57

  • G.R. No. L-33305 June 28, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTAQUIO LAMPITAO

    208 Phil. 64

  • G.R. No. L-33431 June 28, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICOLAS LOBATON

    208 Phil. 70

  • G.R. No. L-33899 June 28, 1983 - MUNICIPALITY OF LA TRINIDAD v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF BAGUIO-BENGUET

    208 Phil. 78

  • G.R. No. L-35247 June 28, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PROMENCIO TOME

    208 Phil. 85

  • G.R. No. L-38278 June 28, 1983 - GREGORIO LOBETE v. CARLOS SUNDIAM

    208 Phil. 90

  • G.R. No. L-45645 June 28, 1983 - FRANCISCO A. TONGOY v. COURT OF APPEALS

    208 Phil. 95

  • G.R. No. L-48424 June 28, 1983 - CONSTANCIO MANZANO v. MEYNARDO A. TIRO

    208 Phil. 124

  • G.R. No. L-51304 June 28, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTIN MANDOLADO

    208 Phil. 125

  • G.R. No. L-54114 June 28, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARSENIO BORJA

    208 Phil. 146

  • G.R. No. L-58961 June 28, 1983 - SOLEDAD SOCO v. FRANCIS MILITANTE

    208 Phil. 151

  • G.R. No. L-59330 June 28, 1983 - MANUEL GUANZON v. PATERNO D. MONTESCLAROS

    208 Phil. 171

  • G.R. No. L-63130 June 28, 1983 - GUILLERMO ROBES v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    208 Phil. 179

  • G.R. No. L-63372 June 28, 1983 - RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORP. v. ABELARDO M. DAYRIT

    208 Phil. 188

  • G.R. No. L-31330 June 29, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR REMOLLO

    208 Phil. 196

  • G.R. No. L-37518 June 29, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GERONIMO SURBAN

    208 Phil. 203

  • G.R. No. L-38002 June 29, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIRGILIO VEGA

    208 Phil. 221

  • G.R. No. L-49439 June 29, 1983 - NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY v. PASTOR P. REYES

    208 Phil. 227

  • G.R. No. L-62737 June 29, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOAQUIN BORROMEO

  • G.R. No. L-63398 June 29, 1983 - LEONCIO P. VILORIA v. COURT OF APPEALS

    208 Phil. 193

  • G.R. No. L-34202 June 30, 1983 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON BARCENA

    208 Phil. 239