Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1985 > January 1985 Decisions > G.R. No. 56588 January 17, 1985 - SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA NG PACIFIC MILLS, INC. v. CARMELO C. NORIEL:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 56588. January 17, 1985.]

SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA NG PACIFIC MILLS, INC., Petitioner, v. HON. CARMELO C. NORIEL, as OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS, Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. LABOR AND SOCIAL LEGISLATIONS; LABOR CODE; LABOR RELATIONS; CERTIFICATION ELECTIONS; CONDUCT THEREOF MANDATORY; PETITION HAS WRITTEN CONSENT OF MORE THAN 30% MEMBERS OF THE BARGAINING UNIT. — With both the employer and the majority of the rank-and-file workers in agreement that a certification election should be held, so be it. In this connection it is worthwhile to note the following: The last certification election was held on September 26, 1977. There is no existing CBA. The petition for a certification election has the written consent of more than 30% of the members of the bargaining unit. In the light of these facts, Art. 258 of the New Labor Code makes it mandatory for the Bureau of Labor Relations to conduct a certification election. See also Federation of Free Workers v. Noriel, L-47182-83, Oct. 30, 1978, 86 SCRA 132.)


D E C I S I O N


ABAD SANTOS, J.:


This is about a certification election among the workers in Pacific Mills, Inc.

In a certification election held on September 27, 1977, among the workers in Pacific Mills, Inc., the Philippine Association of Free Labor Unions (PAFLU) won over the Confederation of Citizens Labor Unions (CCLU). Out of 451 votes which were cast PAFLU obtained 254.

CCLU contested the certification of PAFLU as the workers bargaining agent with Pacific Mill, Inc. The contest did not succeed at the administrative level nor before this Court. (Confederation of Citizens Labor Unions, Et. Al. v. Noriel, Et Al., L-46933, June 30, 1980, 98 SCRA 474.)

While the CCLU-PAFLU case was pending, 347 members in the same bargaining unit disaffiliated from PAFLU and organized the Samahang Manggagawa Ng Pacific Mills, Inc., the petitioner herein. The union was registered with the Ministry of Labor and Employment (MOLE) on February 26, 1980.chanrobles lawlibrary : rednad

On August 6, 1980, the petitioner filed with MOLE a request that a certification election be held among the workers in Pacific Mills, Inc. It claimed that it commanded the majority of the workers in the corporation; that there had been no certification election for more than 12 months and no existing collective bargaining agreement (CBA); and that more than 30% of the bargaining unit had given their consent thereto.

The company objected to the petitioner’s request for a certification election. It alleged that there was a pending certification case between CCLU and PAFLU in the Supreme Court. In point of fact, the case had been dismissed on June 30, 1980, as above stated or more than a month before the request was filed. In fact also, CCLU had filed a motion to dismiss on March 7, 1980, alleging, inter alia, lack of interest.

CCLU and PAFLU were given an opportunity to be heard. PAFLU filed a motion to dismiss or deny the certification election. It pointed to this Court’s decision in L-46933, supra. CCLU kept quiet.

On October 20, 1980, Med-Arbiter Willie E. Rodriguez, dismissed the petition for certification election. He cited the decision of this Court in favor of PAFLU.

The petitioner appealed to the public respondent herein who sustained the Mid-Arbiter’s decision. In dismissing the appeal, the public respondent said, inter alia, that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"While recognizing the existence of disaffiliation of former members of PAFLU, this fact should not be considered as the sole factor to induce this Office to disregard the historical propensity of selecting PAFLU as the current bargaining agent, and order outrightly another certification election to determine which union now commands a majority following. To have a contrary view would be to threaten democratic industrial stability as it tends to open doors for unions composed of members splitting from the majority union, whenever personal whims and caprices arise under the cloak of being an exercise of their constitutional right to self organization." (Rollo, p. 34.)

The issue at hand is whether or not the public respondent committed a grave abuse of discretion in deciding against the petitioner. An affirmative answer is implicit insofar as the petitioner is concerned. The Solicitor General is in agreement with the petitioner. (Rollo, p. 65.) Pacific Mills, Inc. which was later impleaded is for "giving due course to the instant petition and ordering the public respondent to conduct a certification election among the regular rank-and-file within the bargaining unit of Pacific Mills, Inc." (Rollo, p. 143.) Only the public respondent, Director Carmelo C. Noriel, is for the dismissal of the petition. (Rollo, p. 124.)

With both the employer and the majority of the rank-and-file workers in agreement that a certification election should be held, so be it. In this connection it is worthwhile to note the following:chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

The last certification election was held on September 26, 1977. There is no existing CBA. The petition for a certification election has the written consent of more than 30% of the members of the bargaining unit. In the light of these facts, Art. 258 of the New Labor Code makes it mandatory for the Bureau of Labor Relations to conduct a certification election. See also Federation of Free Workers v. Noriel L-47182-83, Oct. 30, 1978, 86 SCRA 132.)

WHEREFORE, the petition is granted; the decision of the public respondent is hereby set aside and he is ordered to conduct a certification election among the rank-and-file workers of Pacific Mills, Inc. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Makasiar, Aquino, Concepcion, Jr., Escolin and Cuevas, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1985 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-67215 January 4, 1985 - RAFAEL LAZATIN, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. R-4-RTJ January 17, 1985 - MANUEL T. UBARRA v. JOSE H. TECSON

  • G.R. No. L-28520 January 17, 1985 - IN RE: SATURNINA VDA. DE CASTRO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-34803 January 17, 1985 - TRIFONA SEECHUNG-FEDERIS v. DELFIN VIR. SUÑGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36130 January 17, 1985 - LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, ET AL. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-41176 January 17, 1985 - RODOLFO ECHAUS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42394 January 17, 1985 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43642 January 17, 1985 - SOLFRIDO FEDILLO v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43693 January 17, 1985 - ESTELITA VDA. DE CARDIENTE v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46775 January 17, 1985 - SILVERIO PARAGES v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 51602 January 17, 1985 - GEORGE & PETER LINES, INC. v. ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-53334 January 17, 1985 - CARMELITA LIMJAP v. PEDRO SAMSON C. ANIMAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 54719-50 January 17, 1985 - LORENZO GA. CESAR v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 55998 January 17, 1985 - RAMON MAGSAYSAY AWARD FOUNDATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 56588 January 17, 1985 - SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA NG PACIFIC MILLS, INC. v. CARMELO C. NORIEL

  • G.R. No. 56718 January 17, 1985 - ACME SHOE RUBBER & PLASTIC CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 57821 January 17, 1985 - SEGUNDINO TORIBIO, ET AL. v. ABDULWAHID A. BIDIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64313 January 17, 1985 - NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION v. BENJAMIN JUCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64591 January 17, 1985 - RUFINO CO v. EFICIO B. ACOSTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 66040 January 17, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NORBERTO CASUNDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 66427 January 17, 1985 - EMILIO DAYAG v. JUAN A. ALONZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 67540 January 17, 1985 - FLORENDA SALCEDO v. ESTHER NOBLES BANS

  • G.R. No. 67635 January 17, 1985 - JUAN ALBERTO SUMANDI v. VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-42669 January 21, 1985 - FERNANDO MACAWILI v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 50473 January 21, 1985 - JOSE TAN KAPOE, ET AL. v. SILVESTRE MASA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 62306 January 21, 1985 - KAPISANAN NG MANGGAGAWANG PINAGYAKAP, ET AL. v. CRESENCIANO TRAJANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 63194-96 January 21, 1985 - EDITHA T. DALMAN v. CITY COURT OF DIPOLOG CITY, BR. II, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 38338 January 28, 1985 - IN RE: SIMEON R. ROXAS, ET AL. v. ANDRES R. DE JESUS, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-44388 January 30, 1985 - VICTORIANO BULACAN v. FAUSTINO TORCINO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25715 January 31, 1985 - HEIRS OF RAYMUNDO C. BAÑAS, ET AL. v. HEIRS OF BIBIANO BAÑAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38251 January 31, 1985 - PABLO ARCEO v. JOSE OLIVEROS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38711 January 31, 1985 - FRANCISCO SYCIP v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39044 January 31, 1935

    MANOTOK REALTY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-39288-89 January 31, 1985 - HEIRS OF ABELARDO V. PALOMIQUE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-43453 January 31, 1985 - NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION v. WORKMENS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45252 January 31, 1985 - TIMOTEO LAROZA, ET AL. v. DONALD GUIA

  • G.R. No. L-46524 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONARDO BANIA

  • G.R. Nos. L-47381 & L-47420 January 31, 1985 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 51858 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO CABRERA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 52713 January 31, 1985 - GELACIO I. YASON v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 53620 January 31, 1985 - PEDRO LONZAME v. AUGUSTO M. AMORES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 59311 January 31, 1985 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES INC. v. JAIME M. LANTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 61126 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELECIO ASTURIAS

  • G.R. No. 61129 January 31, 1985 - ESPIRIDION TERUÑEZ, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 63612 January 31, 1985 - SERAFIN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 64190 January 31, 1985 - POLYMEDIC GENERAL HOSPITAL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 65832 January 31, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO P. QUEBRAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 67143 January 31, 1985 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. EMILIO A. JACINTO, ET AL.