Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1985 > June 1985 Decisions > G.R. No. L-44823 June 27, 1985 - VICENTE OUANO v. COURT OF APPEALS:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-44823. June 27, 1985.]

VICENTE OUANO (Deceased) Substituted by Querina Arraz Ouano and Vicente Arraz Ouano, Jr., Anna Loraine Ouano, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, and HON. RAFAEL T. MENDOZA, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Cebu, FE JUSTINIANA ESPINA-CABRERA, CRISTOBAL, CESAR, ISIDRO, FULGENCIO, ROLANDO, EDIPOLO, LILIAN, EDILBERTO, RAYMUNDO and LUCIA, all surnamed ESPINA and ARSENIO OUANO, Respondents.

Manuel M. Crudo, for Petitioners.

Jesus P. Garcia for Private Respondents.


R E S O L U T I O N


MELENCIO-HERRERA, J.:


Petitioner Vicente Ouano, now deceased, filed during his lifetime, with the then Court of First Instance of Cebu, Branch VI, an action against his father Arsenio Ouano, and his uncles and aunts, all private respondents herein, for the recovery of the paraphernal property of his late mother (Civil Case No. R-14254). After trial, the lower Court dismissed the complaint. He then filed a petition for leave to appeal as pauper, which was granted. He did not file a record on appeal.chanrobles.com:cralaw:red

Private respondents moved to dismiss the appeal for failure of petitioner to file his record on appeal within the reglementary period. The lower Court granted the motion and disallowed the appeal.

Petitioner then filed with respondent Appellate Court a petition for Certiorari and Mandamus contending that as a pauper litigant he was not required to submit a separate record on appeal under Section 16, Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, and prayed that the trial Court be ordered to elevate the entire original records of Civil Case No. R-14254 for purposes of his appeal. Respondent Appellate Court dismissed the petition and denied reconsideration as well.

Petitioner elevated the case to this Court in a petition for review on certiorari filed in forma pauperis. This First Division treated the petition as a special civil action, required the parties to submit simultaneous memoranda, and referred the case to the Court en banc. 1 The court en banc referred the case back to this Division.

On May 17, 1980, petitioner died and was substituted by his surviving spouse Querina Arraz Ouano, and their two (2) minor children, Vicente Ouano, Jr. and Anna Loraine Ouano. The widow was subsequently appointed guardian-ad-litem of the minors by this Court. 2

The sole issue for consideration is whether or not a party litigant allowed by the lower Court to appeal as a pauper is exempt from filing a record on appeal.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

Under Section 16 of Rule 41, 3 taken together with Section 22, Rule 3 of the Rules of Court, 4 a pauper litigant is only exempt from filing a printed record on appeal. That was the ruling of this Court in Toribio v. Bidin, 96 SCRA 361 [1980].

"As will be seen, a pauper litigant is exempted from submitting a printed record on appeal. Both in appeals by paupers and non-paupers, a record on appeal should be submitted. The only difference is that in the case of the pauper, the latter need not print it. Typewritten or mimeographed copies of the record on appeal will suffice."cralaw virtua1aw library

Be that as it may, considering that a record on appeal is no longer required for an appeal under Section 39 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129 5 and Section 18 of the Interim Rules and Guidelines issued by this Court on January 11, 1983, 6 which being procedural in nature, have a retroactive effect, 7 petitioners may be allowed to appeal specially in order that, as pauper litigants, they may be granted their fullest day in Court.

ACCORDINGLY, the assailed Decision of the respondent Appellate Court of September 1, 1976 and its Resolution of September 27, 1976 denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of said decisions are hereby set aside, and the Branch of the Regional Trial Court of Cebu to which this case will be assigned is directed to elevate the entire record of Civil Case No. R-14254 to the Intermediate Appellate Court for purposes of petitioners’ appeal.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (Chairman), Plana, Relova, Gutierrez, Jr., De la Fuente and Alampay, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Resolution of December 10, 1976, p. 31, Rollo.

2. Resolutions of September 25, 1980 and March 17, 1983, pp. 70 & 80, Rollo.

3. "SEC. 16. Appeal by pauper. — Where a party desiring to appeal shall establish to the satisfaction of the trial court that he is a pauper and unable to pay the expenses of prosecuting the appeal, and that the case is of such importance, by reason of the amount involved, or the nature of the questions raised, that it ought to be reviewed by the appellate court, the trial judge may enter an order entitling the party to appeal as pauper. The clerk shall transmit to the appellate court the entire record of the case, including the evidence taken on trial and the record on appeal and the case shall be heard in the appellate court upon the original record so transmitted without printing the same.

A petition to be allowed to appeal as pauper shall not be entertained by the appellate court." (Italics supplied)

4. "SEC. 22. Pauper litigant. — Any court may authorize a litigant to prosecute his action or defense as a pauper upon a proper showing that he has no means to that effect by affidavits, certificate of the corresponding provincial, city or municipal treasurer, or otherwise. Such authority once given shall include an exemption from payment of legal fees and from filing appeal bond, printed record and printed brief. The legal fees shall be a lien to any judgment rendered in the case favorably to the pauper, unless the court otherwise provides." (Italics ours)

5. "SEC. 39. Appeals. — . . .

"No record on appeal shall be required to take an appeal. In lieu thereof, the entire original record shall be transmitted with all the pages prominently numbered consecutively, together with an index of the contents thereof.

"This section shall not apply in appeals in special proceedings and in other cases wherein multiple appeals are allowed under applicable provisions of the Rules of Court." (B.P. Blg. 129).

6. "E. APPELLATE PROCEDURE

x       x       x


"18. Elimination of record on appeal and appeal bond. — The filing of a record on appeal shall be dispensed with, except in the cases referred to in subparagraph (b) of paragraph 19 hereof.

"No appeal bond shall be required for an appeal."cralaw virtua1aw library

7. Alday v. Camilon, 120 SCRA 522 (1980).




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






June-1985 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-61231 June 18, 1985 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-65418 June 18, 1985 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS OF MANILA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-68374 June 18, 1985 - HORACIO LUNA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • A.M. No. R-54-RTJ June 19, 1985 - FRANCISCO FAGTANAC v. ODON YRAD, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-38012 June 19, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO BASELOY

  • G.R. No. L-45824 June 19, 1985 - VOLKSCHEL LABOR UNION v. BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS

  • G.R. No. L-50248 June 19, 1985 - ARCADIO ESPIRITU v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-50992 June 19, 1985 - NATIVIDAD SAMPANG v. AMADO G. INCIONG

  • G.R. Nos. L-51923-25 June 19, 1985 - ALICIA V. ALVIA v. SANDIGANBAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-55102 June 19, 1985 - GORGONIO TEJERO v. EULALIO D. ROSETE

  • G.R. No. L-56451 June 19, 1985 - JUAN LAO v. MELECIO A. GENATO

  • G.R. No. L-60149 June 19, 1985 - MARINDUQUE MINING AND INDUSTRIAL CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-62297 June 19, 1985 - CARMELO A. ARREZA v. GREGORIO ARANETA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION

  • G.R. No. L-62387 June 19, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AVELINO REYES

  • G.R. No. L-67573 June 19, 1985 - TRADE UNIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES AND ALLIED SERVICES v. BLAS. F. OPLE

  • G.R. Nos. L-69810-14 June 19, 1985 - TEODULO RURA v. GERVACIO A. LOPENA

  • G.R. No. L-40422 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIRSO CANOY

  • G.R. No. L-45083 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGEL SUNGA

  • G.R. No. L-45715 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LIBERATO PASCO, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-48360 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO BARACA

  • G.R. No. L-55417 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NAPOLEON M. PACABES

  • G.R. No. L-61165 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRED PELIAS JONES

  • G.R. No. L-65676 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUFEMIO EGAS

  • G.R. Nos. L-66570-71 June 24, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PABLING TUSCANO

  • G.R. No. L-70230 June 24, 1985 - TEODORICO CASTILLO v. PROCORO J. DONATO

  • G.R. No. L-39181 June 27, 1985 - DELFIN JASMIN v. MIGUEL VALERA

  • G.R. No. L-43179 June 27, 1985 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILS. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-44051 June 27, 1985 - EUFRACIA VDA. DE CRISOLOGO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-44823 June 27, 1985 - VICENTE OUANO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-45157 June 27, 1985 - MELY TANGONAN v. ERNANI CRUZ PAÑO

  • G.R. No. L-48814 June 27, 1985 - REYNOLDS PHILIPPINE CORP. v. GENARO A. ESLAVA

  • G.R. No. L-53427 June 27, 1985 - CESAR ARICA v. MINISTER OF LABOR

  • G.R. No. L-56866 June 27, 1985 - EDEN TAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-63737 June 27, 1985 - PEDRO BISNAR v. JOSE G. ESTRADA

  • G.R. No. L-69885 June 27, 1985 - FRANCISCO ESGUERRA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-41615 June 29, 1985 - CENTRAL AZUCARERA DEL DANAO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-43828 June 29, 1985 - BALTAZAR C. REYES v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-44616 June 29, 1985 - MARIA U. ESPAÑOL v. BOARD, PHILIPPINE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION

  • G.R. No. L-63658 June 29, 1985 - JAMES A. STRONG v. JOSE P. CASTRO

  • G.R. No. L-66870-72 June 29, 1985 - AGAPITO MAGBANUA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT