Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1985 > October 1985 Decisions > A.M. No. R-70-P October 8, 1985 - ALFREDO DE CHAVEZ v. JESUS R. LESCANO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[A.M. No. R-70-P. October 8, 1985.]

ALFREDO DE CHAVEZ, Complainant, v. JESUS R. LESCANO, Respondent.

Marquez & Gozos for Respondent.


D E C I S I O N


MELENCIO-HERRERA, J.:


In a letter complaint, dated September 5, 1983, addressed to the Office of the President, therefrom referred to the Tanodbayan, and eventually indorsed to this Court as being within our competence, complainant Alfredo de Chavez of Barangay Talisay, Lipa City, Batangas, asked for help "in bringing justice to us by completely compelling one Jesus R. Lescano, Clerk of Court of Municipal Trial Court of Lipa City, and residing at Barangay Sabang, Lipa City, (to) redeem our real property."cralaw virtua1aw library

In a 3rd Indorsement, dated October 29, 1983, respondent commented:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"While undersigned admits that he and one Pablo Tolentino borrowed the torrens title of Alfredo De Chavez and mortgaged the same with the Philippine National Bank, Lipa City Branch, it was with the consent and conformity of the said Alfredo De Chavez. In fact, said De Chavez had voluntarily executed a Special Power of Attorney in favor of Pablo Tolentino granting him the power to mortgage the above-mentioned real property. As proof that it was not through alleged machinations that we were able to mortgage the property and as further proof that we have no intentions whatsoever of defrauding Alfredo De Chavez, my spouse and I even executed an Affidavit dated September 1, 1974, acknowledging that we borrowed the torrens title of Alfredo De Chavez which we used as collateral for our loan with the Philippine National Bank, Lipa City Branch.

"The undersigned further admits that his loan account with the Philippine National Bank has been past due. It is so because he has encountered some financial difficulties. However, be is not reneging on his obligation with the bank. In fact, he has requested the Philippine National Bank to grant him up to December of this year within which to make a substantial payment and for the bank to defer any legal action against the account."cralaw virtua1aw library

Referred for investigation and report to Executive Judge Demetrio M. Batario, Jr. of the Regional Trial Court of Batangas, the latter, on June 18, 1984, recommended "outright DISMISSAL because the undersigned finds no legal grounds for its existence." chanrobles.com : virtual law library

We disagree.

It is true that respondent had executed an Affidavit on March 2, 1984 acknowledging the fact of mortgage and promising to pay the sum of P1,000.00 a month from his salary until fully paid, and that complainant was apparently satisfied as he no longer appeared for the scheduled hearing.

However, it appears that even ten (10) years ago, in September of 1974, respondent had already executed an Affidavit of a similar tenor but without any fixed commitment to pay an amount certain. Notwithstanding, it would appear that respondent had made no substantial payments since then, for on June 1, 1982, the PNB, Lipa City Branch, wrote complainant a letter demanding payment and threatening to foreclose judicially or extrajudicially ten days upon receipt of notice. In fact, the obligation to the Bank had apparently doubled from P10,000.00 to P20,000.00.

The damage and prejudice to complainant is beyond question. Not only was he exposed to the risk of losing his property but in the meantime, he is also unable to make use of his own title. Respondent has taken advantage of his friendship with complainant, and possibly the latter’s lack of education, and has dragged his feet in repaying his indebtedness to the PNB, notwithstanding his promise to complainant to pay as soon as possible. Although complainant, as found by the Investigating Judge, may apparently have been satisfied with respondent’s acknowledgment of the indebtedness and his commitment to pay, that will not prevent this Court from exercising vigilance for complainant’s protection who is obviously at a disadvantage on account of ignorance or lack of education. 1

As provided in Section 36(b) (22) of Presidential Decree No. 807, willful failure to pay just debts is one of the grounds for disciplinary action against an employee in the Civil Service. And Section 19(n), Rule XVIII, B, of the Civil Service Rules defines just debts as:" (1) claims adjudicated by a court of law, or (2) claims the existence and justness of which are admitted by the debtor." Also, under Civil Service Commission Memorandum Circular No. 8, Series 1970, such administrative offense of willfull failure to pay just debts is classified as a light offense calling for a fine or suspension of one (1) day to thirty (30) days.

Respondent’s excuse that his failure to pay was due to prevailing economic conditions does not exculpate him. His commitment to pay P1,000.00 monthly, neither. As in the cases of AM No. P-1808 entitled Aurora Flores v. Rosario Tatad, 2 and AM No. 2758-P entitled Sol M. Sipin v. Gloria Gironella, 3 we find that respondent’s suspension of fifteen (15) days for willful failure to pay just debts is in order. Respondent’s improper conduct unavoidably tarnishes the image of the judiciary. Court personnel must comply with just contractual obligations, act fairly and adhere to high ethical standards to preserve the Court’s integrity. 4

WHEREFORE, respondent Jesus R. Lescano is hereby suspended for fifteen (15) days, without pay, and is admonished to pay his indebtedness to the PNB, Lipa City Branch, in accordance with the terms and conditions stated in his Affidavit dated March 2, 1984. Respondent shall inform this Court, within ten (10) days from notice, of the balance of the indebtedness as of the date of promulgation of this Decision and henceforth, he shall furnish complainant and this Court with xerox copies of receipts of payment issued by the PNB each time he makes payment to the bank. Respondent is likewise STERNLY WARNED that his failure to make regular installment payments to the bank pursuant to his commitment will call for more drastic disciplinary action.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (Chairman), Plana, Relova, Gutierrez, Jr., De la Fuente and Patajo, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Article 24, Civil Code.

2. 96 SCRA 676 [1980].

3. 114 SCRA 607 [1982].

4. Garciano v. Oyao, AM No. P-208, 102 SCRA 195 [1981].




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1985 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-54016 October 1, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUCIO LUMAYOK

  • G.R. No. L-38178 October 3, 1985 - ERNESTO G. GONZALES, ET AL. v. CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE TARLAC LABOR UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45710 October 3, 1985 - CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-45830 October 3, 1985 - TEOPISTO S. SALCEDO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48656 October 3, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NORMAN AMPARADO

  • G.R. No. L-64325 October 3, 1985 - CMS INVESTMENTS AND MANAGEMENT CORP. ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-55347 October 4, 1985 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL RAILWAYS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-62030-31 October 4, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NESTOR CABANIT

  • A.M. No. R-70-P October 8, 1985 - ALFREDO DE CHAVEZ v. JESUS R. LESCANO

  • A.C. No. R-273-P October 8, 1985 - JUAN FRANCISCO v. ROGER SPRINGAEL

  • G.R. No. L-62833 October 8, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENIGNO ANG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-66240 October 8, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PAULINO SAROL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-67888 October 8, 1985 - IMELDA ONG, ET AL. v. ALFREDO ONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68470 October 8, 1985 - ALICE REYES VAN DORN v. MANUEL V. ROMILLO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69803 October 8, 1985 - CYNTHIA D. NOLASCO, ET AL. v. ERNANI CRUZ PAÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69932 October 8, 1985 - ANTONIO S. CALIMBAS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46307 October 9, 1985 - PACIENCIA VIZCONDE SERRANO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-49264-66 October 9, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO M. CATIPON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-62952 October 9, 1985 - SOFIA J. NEPOMUCENO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68160 October 9, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODRIGO ESCOLTERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-49084 October 10, 1985 - MATILDE ALAVADO, ET AL. v. CITY GOVERNMENT OF TACLOBAN

  • G.R. No. L-67889 October 10, 1985 - PRIMITIVO SIASAT, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-50508-11 October 11, 1985 - VICENTE S. ORAP v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-59096 October 11, 1985 - PACITA F. REFORMINA v. TOMOL, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-60346 October 11, 1985 - JOSE P. MERCADO, JR. v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-67598 October 11, 1985 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS D. CANTURIA

  • G.R. No. L-65284 October 14, 1985 - PHILGRECIAN MARITIME SERVICES, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48575 October 15, 1985 - HEIRS OF DEOGRACIAS RAMOS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-54181-82 October 15, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MONGA GANI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69270 October 15, 1985 - GERRY TOYOTO, ET AL. v. FIDEL RAMOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 70681 October 16, 1985 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. MANUEL V. ROMILLO, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33158 October 17, 1985 - VALENTINA G. VILLANUEVA, ET AL. v. ALFREDO C. FLORENDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-66046 October 17, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARTURO PAMPANGA

  • G.R. No. L-69273 October 18, 1995

    LEONILA REYES, ET AL. v. ISABEL CANIVEL REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71178 October 18, 1985 - MILA P. TOLENTINO v. TEODORO G. BONIFACIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 70748 October 21, 1985 - LAURENTE ILAGAN, ET AL v. HON. JUAN PONCE ENRILE

  • G.R. No. L-40007 October 23, 1985 - LORENZO TAÑADA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68482 October 23, 1985 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDGARDO BERALDE

  • G.R. No. L-60372 October 29, 1985 - BUENAVENTURA FELISILDA, ET AL. v. NAPOLEON D. VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68118 October 29, 1985 - JOSE P. OBILLOS, JR., ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.