Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1986 > August 1986 Decisions > A.M. No. 141-MTJ August 26, 1986 - RE: AMANDITO D. ARANETA:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[A.M. No. 141-MTJ. August 26, 1986.]

RE: CONVICTION OF MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT JUDGE AMANDITO D. ARANETA BY THE SANDIGANBAYAN IN CRIMINAL CASE NO. 7220.

[A.M. No. R-478-MTJ. August 26, 1986.]

SANCHO BALAYON, ET AL., Complainants, v. HON. AMANDITO D. ARANETA, Municipal Trial Court, Norala, South Cotabato.


SYLLABUS


1. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OVER COURTS; JUDGES; INFIDELITY IN THE CUSTODY OF PRISONERS; PENALTY; CASE AT BAR. — On June 6, 1984, the Ministry of Justice referred to this Court copy of the Decision of the Second Division of the Sandiganbayan in Criminal Case No. 7220 entitled "People of the Philippines v. Judge Amandito D. Araneta" finding the latter guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Infidelity in the Custody of Prisoners. In respondent Judge’s conviction beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Infidelity in the Custody of Prisoners, it was found that he had misused and abused the powers of his office in that, for a period of about five (5) months, he had asked for the assignment of detention prisoners to perform domestic chores and/or to do carpentry work in a store owned by him beside his house; that those prisoners were never under guard and went back and forth from respondent’s house to the jail, which was about 500 meters away from said place; that the entries in the logbook kept by the Norala Police Station showed that the custody of those prisoners were transferred to respondent Judge: that on December 1, 1979, in particular, after the conclusion of the work at his place, he ordered three detention prisoners to return to jail by themselves and that one of the three, against whom serious charges for Murder and Double Frustrated Murder were still pending preliminary investigation before the sala of respondent Judge, was thus able to escape. Such conduct on the part of respondent Judge, was highly prejudicial to the service, gravely inimical to the interest of justice, and has rendered him miserably unfit for continuance in office. It is rather obvious that the prayer for respondent Judge’s immediate relief from the service in Adm. Matter No. R-478-MTJ can and should be granted without need for delving into the reasons advanced therein. Respondent Judge is hereby ordered dismissed from the service, with forfeiture of all retirement benefits and pay, and with prejudice to reinstatement in any branch of the government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities.


D E C I S I O N


PER CURIAM:



On June 6, 1984, the Ministry of Justice referred to this Court copy of the Decision of the Second Division of the Sandiganbayan in Criminal Case No. 7220 entitled "People of the Philippines v. Judge Amandito D. Araneta" finding the latter guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Infidelity in the Custody of Prisoners and sentencing him "to suffer an indeterminate penalty ranging from three (3) months and one (1) day of arresto mayor, as minimum, to one (1) year, eight (8) months and one (1) day of prision correccional, as maximum; to suffer temporary special disqualification from six (6) years and one (1) day to eight (8) years; and, to pay the costs."cralaw virtua1aw library

In a Resolution, dated July 10, 1984, this Court "Resolved to DIRECT the Office of the Court Administrator to file an administrative case against Respondent." Accordingly, on July 19, 1984, respondent Judge was administratively charged in Adm. Matter No. R-141-MTJ with neglect of duty and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service, and was directed to file an answer/explanation. No answer/explanation has been submitted by Respondent.

The records show that the Sandiganbayan had suspended respondent Judge, pendente lite, from office as of July 1, 1983; and that after conviction, he was placed under probation by that Court.

In the meantime, in Adm. Matter No. R-478-MTJ, this Court received Resolution No. 83-01 unanimously approved by the Peace & Order Council of Norala, South Cotabato, requesting for the immediate relief or dismissal from the service of respondent Judge for Ignorance of the Law, Oppressive Act and Partiality and other acts prejudicial to the interest of justice.

The mentioned Resolution alleged that respondent Judge had dismissed Criminal Case No. 1014 of his Court for malicious mischief without arraignment of the accused, trial or hearing; that he had refused to act on a criminal complaint involving the death of Pat. Nonilon D. Lim, reasoning that he was planning to go on leave, but that when prevailed upon to act on the complaint, he required a P45,000.00 bail bond for the release of the accused who is an escapee; and that respondent Judge is seldom in his office.

In respondent Judge’s conviction beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Infidelity in the Custody of Prisoners, it was found that he had misused and abused the powers of his office in that, for a period of about five (5) months, he had asked for the assignment of detention prisoners to perform domestic chores and/or to do carpentry work in a store owned by him beside his house; that those prisoners were never under guard and went back and forth from respondent’s house to the jail, which was about 500 meters away from said place; that the entries in the logbook kept by the Norala Police Station showed that the custody of those prisoners were transferred to respondent Judge; that on December 1, 1979, in particular, after the conclusion of the work at his place, he ordered three detention prisoners to return to jail by themselves and that one of the three, against whom serious charges for Murder and Double Frustrated Murder were still pending preliminary investigation before the sala of respondent Judge, was thus able to escape. Such conduct on the part of respondent Judge was highly prejudicial to the service, gravely inimical to the interest of justice, and has rendered him miserably unfit for continuance in office.

It is rather obvious that the prayer for respondent Judge’s immediate relief from the service in Adm. Matter No. R-478-MTJ can and should be granted without need for delving into the reasons advanced therein.

WHEREFORE, respondent Judge is hereby ordered dismissed from the service, with forfeiture of all retirement benefits and pay, and with prejudice to reinstatement in any branch of the government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities.

This Decision is immediately executory.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee, C.J., Feria, Yap, Fernan, Narvasa, Melencio-Herrera, Alampay, Gutierrez, Jr., Cruz and Paras, JJ., concur.

Feliciano, J., on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1986 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-69137 August 5, 1986 - FELIMON LUEGO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39972 & L-40300 August 6, 1986 - VICTORIA LECHUGAS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72207 August 6, 1986 - DIVINE WORD HIGH SCHOOL, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 73206 August 6, 1986 - VIRGINIA V. BERMUDEZ, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47407 August 12, 1986 - SALUD DIVINAGRACIA, ET AL. v. JOSUE N. BELLOSILLO

  • G.R. No. L-51256 August 12, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDITO R. PETENIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-63070 August 12, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GIL JUMADIAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-64276 August 12, 1986 - CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD. v. MANUEL V. ROMILLO, JR.

  • G.R. Nos. L-70116-19 August 12, 1986 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FRANK ROBERTSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28138 August 13, 1986 - MATALIN COCONUT CO., INC. v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF MALABANG, LANAO DEL SUR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28161 August 13, 1986 - EUFEMIA ELPA DE BAYQUEN, ET AL. v. EULALIO BALAORO

  • G.R. No. L-46073 August 13, 1986 - HEIRS OF JUAN CUANO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47335 August 13, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERTO R. OCAMPO

  • G.R. No. L-48375 August 13, 1986 - JOSE C. CARIAGA, JR., ET AL. v. ANTONIO Q. MALAYA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71905 August 13, 1986 - MIDLAND INSURANCE CORPORATION v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71412 August 15, 1986 - BENGUET CONSOLIDATED, INC. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-31249 August 19, 1986 - SALVADOR VILLACORTA v. GREGORIO BERNARDO

  • G.R. No. L-41806 August 19, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERNARDO HERMOSADA

  • G.R. No. L-53703 August 19, 1986 - LILIA OLIVA WIEGEL v. ALICIA V. SEMPIO-DIY

  • G.R. No. L-55152 August 19, 1986 - FLORDELIZA L. VALISNO v. ANDRES B. PLAN

  • G.R. No. L-59551 August 19, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL M. NAVOA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-62619 August 19, 1986 - MANUEL IBASCO, ET AL. v. EDUARDO P. CAGUIOA

  • G.R. No. L-63861 August 19, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SABAS POYOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69236 August 19, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GENEROSO JO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-69741 August 19, 1986 - BROKENSHIRE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 70742 August 19, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO M. AGUIRRE

  • G.R. No. L-17630 August 19, 1986 - APOLLO M. SALUD v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71818 August 19, 1986 - METROPOLITAN WATERWORKS AND SEWERAGE SYSTEM v. BIENVENIDO S. HERNANDEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27239 August 20, 1986 - ROYAL LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46072 August 22, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PATROCINIO GERAPUSCO

  • G.R. No. L-54526 August 25, 1986 - METROPOLITAN WATERWORKS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 141-MTJ August 26, 1986 - RE: AMANDITO D. ARANETA

  • A.M. No. R-281-RTJ August 26, 1986 - PONCIANO A. ARBAN v. MELECIO B. BORJA

  • G.R. No. 73146-53 August 26, 1986 - ROSARIO LACSAMANA, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-69773-75 August 28, 1986 - HABIB ALI, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-44748 August 29, 1986 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHILS., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46765 August 29, 1986 - JOSEPH & SONS ENTERPRISES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47617 August 29, 1986 - LEONARDO CUEVAS, ET AL. v. GREGORIO G. PINEDA

  • G.R. Nos. L-60613-20 August 29, 1986 - ROLANDO MANGUBAT, ET AL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-62887 August 29, 1986 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINADOR CIERBO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-64048 August 29, 1986 - PETROPHIL CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-66597 August 29, 1986 - LEONARDO TIOSECO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.