Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1987 > May 1987 Decisions > G.R. No. L-69027 May 29, 1987 - NARCISO R. LACUNA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-69027. May 29, 1987.]

NARCISO R. LACUNA and FELISA P. LACUNA, Petitioners, v. THE HONORABLE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and CEFERINA S. ARGALLON, Respondents.


D E C I S I O N


PARAS, J.:


In a criminal case 1 brought against herein petitioner Narciso R. Lacuna before the Court of First Instance (CFI for short), now Regional Trial Court of Manila, Lacuna was accused of falsely selling to herein private respondent Ceferina Argallon (complainant therein) his rights to a house and lot located in Project 4, Quezon City for the sum of P5,000.00. After the usual preliminary investigation, trial was held with the CFI eventually acquitting Lacuna with an express finding that the fact from which the civil liability might arise did not exist.

In a civil case subsequently filed against Lacuna and his wife, Felisa P. Lacuna (his co-petitioner herein), the spouses were absolved from any liability, the CFI making use of the reference adverted to in the decision in the criminal case re the non-existence of any causative fact for liability.

On appeal the Intermediate Appellate Court (IAC), now the Court of Appeals 2 (CA) affirmed the judgment of the trial. The decretal part of the IAC decision reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, finding no reversible error in the decision appealed from, it being consistent with the facts and law applicable, the same is hereby AFFIRMED in toto.

Costs against the plaintiff-appellant.

SO ORDERED." (p. 55, Rollo)

However, on a Motion for Reconsideration, the IAC thru Mr. Justice Porfirio Sison, reversed itself, and made the LACUNAS civilly liable. The Motion for Reconsideration of the reversal having been denied, the LACUNAS filed the instant petition for certiorari (actually a petition for review), which We find impressed with merit.

In the aforementioned assailed resolution, the IAC ruled in reversing itself) that the LACUNAS are civilly liable because Narciso Lacuna had signed a receipt couched in the following terms:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Received the sum of P5,000.00 from Mrs. C. Argallon as payment of right of the house and lot in E. Evangelista St., Project No. 4." (Exhibit "E") (p. 6, Decision, CA)

We note however that the receipt was merely a simulated one to accommodate Argallon (so that she could pretend to her Chinese capitalist Chua Simeon, that she, Argallon, had really purchased a storage place for the sacks which constituted the business engaged in by her and the Chinese boyfriend).

We cannot give Our judicial imprimatur to the reversing resolution of the IAC. While factual findings of the IAC are generally binding on Us, one notable exception is when there are erroneous inferences made from facts apparently proved.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

In the instant case there are matters evidencing wrong inferences by the IAC. For instance the receipt itself should not be considered the equivalent of a deed of sale of realty. The alleged price of P5,000.00, although comparatively inadequate for the purchase of a house and lot in Project 4, Quezon City, was still in 1961 quite a sizeable amount, and businesswoman that she was, Argallon would not have accepted a mere receipt for such an important transaction. The receipt cannot of course even be the basis of the registration of the purchase in the Registry of Property. For another, the words "San Juan, Rizal" were crossed out in the receipt. Why? Argallon said (at the preliminary investigation) that this was because payment was effected by her inside the Security Bank branch at Sta. Mesa Boulevard, where she had intended to obtain the money on the same day. Said date however was a SUNDAY, and not therefore a banking day. At the trial itself, Argallon said the receipt was given in the warehouse of the NARIC Branch also on Sta. Mesa Boulevard. The fact of the matter is that the receipt was given in San Juan, Rizal (with no money changing hands precisely because of the intended simulation.)

Then there is the unrebutted allegation of Narciso that he and Argallon had a live-in relationship for several years. This explains why Narciso accommodated Argallon. No wonder the trial court in the criminal case not only acquitted Narciso but also categorically stated that the fact from which the civil liability would arise does not exist.

WHEREFORE, the IAC resolution dated July 20, 1984 is SET ASIDE, and a new one is hereby rendered reinstating the IAC decision dated January 17, 1984.

SO ORDERED.

Fernan (Chairman), Gutierrez, Jr., Padilla and Cortes, JJ., concur.

Bidin, J., took no part.

Endnotes:



1. Criminal Case No. 69027.

2. Penned by Court of Appeals Justice Porfirio V. Sison (Ponente), with Justices Abdulwahid A. Bidin, Marcelino R. Veloso, and Desiderio P. Jurado, concurring.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1987 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. Nos. L-35668-72 & L-35683 May 7, 1987 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. REPUBLIC CEMENT CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-46956 May 7, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO DECIERDO

  • G.R. No. L-47498 May 7, 1987 - PETRONILO LIGTAS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-47695 May 7, 1987 - CERTIFIED CLUBS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-56504 May 7, 1987 - POMPILLO VALERA, ET AL. v. SANCHO Y. INSERTO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-67220 May 7, 1987 - ILVINO AGALO-OS, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72746 May 7, 1987 - BERNARDA S. CANONIZADO v. REGINA ORDOÑEZ BENITEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 75919 May 7, 1987 - MANCHESTER DEV. CORP., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-68635 May 14, 1987 - IN RE: ATTY. WENCESLAO LAURETA

  • G.R. No. L-41642-45 May 15, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULITO DAVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-48738 May 18, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO P. SAAVEDRA

  • G.R. No. 73287 May 18, 1987 - INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER MACLEOD, INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-63558 May 19, 1987 - JOSE ABEJO, ET AL. v. RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40648 May 20, 1987 - MERCEDES S. MARASIGAN v. AMADEO H. CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-47720 May 20, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NEMESIO TUANDO

  • G.R. No. L-48664 May 20, 1987 - GLICERIA C. CASUMPANG v. EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-56265 May 20, 1987 - JOSE T. TOLENTINO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-56568 May 20, 1987 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. E.L. PERALTA

  • G.R. No. L-65831 May 20, 1987 - CELSO DEFALOBOS v. GREGORIO U. AQUILIZAN

  • G.R. No. 73275 May 20, 1987 - FLOCERFINA BARANDA v. EVANGELINA G. BARANDA

  • G.R. No. L-74848 May 20, 1987 - HOUDINI IBABAO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-55166 May 21, 1987 - ELISA R. MANOTOK v. NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY

  • G.R. No. L-55339 May 21, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEODEGARIO LADRERA

  • G.R. No. L-64334 May 21, 1987 - PHILAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 74652 May 21, 1987 - LUCIO DULPO v. SANDIGANBAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-54558 May 22, 1987 - EDUARDO B. OLAGUER v. MILITARY COMMISSION NO. 34

  • G.R. No. 75885 May 27, 1987 - BATAAN SHIPYARD & ENG’G CO., INC. v. PRES. COMMISSION ON GOOD GOV’T.

  • G.R. No. L-72873 May 28, 1987 - CARLOS ALONZO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • A.M. No. R-97-RTJ May 28, 1987 - COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. RODOLFO G. HERMOSO

  • G.R. No. L-29771 May 29, 1987 - CONSOLACION L. DE APARICIO v. HIPOLITO PARAGUYA

  • G.R. No. L-31890 May 29, 1987 - PEOPLE’S HOMESITE AND HOUSING CORP. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-35598 May 29, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONARDO DE LOS SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-36790 May 29, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE INOT

  • G.R. No. L-39805 May 29, 1987 - IFC-SERVICE LEASING & ACCEPTANCE CORP. v. SARMIENTO DISTRIBUTORS CORP.

  • G.R. No. L-40195 May 29, 1987 - VICTORIA R. VALLARTA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-44993 May 29, 1987 - ERIBERTO H. DECENA v. THE ADMINISTRATOR, PHIL. VETERANS AFFAIRS OFFICE

  • G.R. Nos. L-45492 & L-45493 May 29, 1987 - ERNESTO ASUNCION v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-46980 May 29, 1987 - AUGUSTO BALDE v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-49088 May 29, 1987 - JOSE V. IGNACIO v. BUENAVENTURA J. GUERRERO

  • G.R. No. L-49223 May 29, 1987 - PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BANK v. RODOLFO ORTIZ

  • G.R. No. L-50420 May 29, 1987 - REMEDIOS FERRER-LOPEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-51034 May 29, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELO M. VALDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-56249 May 29, 1987 - RAMONA B. VDA. DE ARANAS v. VICENTE B. ARANAS

  • G.R. No. L-58654 May 29, 1987 - AGUSTIN GUTIERREZ, JR. v. ANTONIA C. MACANDOG

  • G.R. Nos. L-59711-12 May 29, 1987 - PROGRESSIVE WORKERS’ UNION v. FLAVIO P. AGUAS

  • G.R. No. L-62741 May 29, 1987 - FILIPINAS MANUFACTURERS BANK v. EASTERN RIZAL FABRICATORS

  • G.R. No. L-68729 May 29, 1987 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHIL. v. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-69027 May 29, 1987 - NARCISO R. LACUNA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-69044 May 29, 1987 - EASTERN SHIPPING LINES, INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-69422 May 29, 1987 - DOMICIANO CABIGAO v. SANDIGANBAYAN

  • G.R. No. L-69477 May 29, 1987 - LETICIA GONZALES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. L-69494 May 29, 1987 - A.C. RANSOM LABOR UNION-CCLU v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 71049 May 29, 1987 - BERNARDINO JIMENEZ v. CITY OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. 72005 May 29, 1987 - PHILIPPINE BRITISH ASSURANCE CO., INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 72119 May 29, 1987 - VALENTIN L. LEGASPI v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-72370 May 29, 1987 - BF NORTHWEST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 72405 May 29, 1987 - PACMAC, INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 73140 May 29, 1987 - RIZAL EMPIRE INSURANCE GROUP v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 73804 May 29, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIPE BRAVANTE

  • G.R. No. 73271 May 29, 1987 - TIRSO I. VINTOLA v. INSULAR BANK OF ASIA AND AMERICA

  • G.R. No. 73349 May 29, 1987 - PHILSA CONSTRUCTION AND TRADING CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 73976 May 29, 1987 - CONSOLIDATED BANK and TRUST CORP. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 74113 May 29, 1987 - GREAT PACIFIC LIFE ASSURANCE CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 78492 May 29, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DICK OCAPAN