Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1989 > January 1989 Decisions > G.R. No. 81816 January 26, 1989 - NATIVIDAD Q. SALOMON v. NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 81816. January 26, 1989.]

NATIVIDAD Q. SALOMON, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION, represented by ADMINISTRATOR RODRIGO CABRERA; LA UNION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. represented by its directors, namely: MANUEL MANGASER, LEANDRO MUPAS JR., RAMON POSADAS, LUIS FONTANILLA and EDUARDO P. MARZAN; and ACTING DEPUTY SECRETARY SAMILO N. BARLONGAY, Respondents.

Jose A . Salomon for Petitioner.

The Solicitor General for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; INELIGIBILITY OF ELECTIVE OFFICIALS TO HOLD POSITIONS IN COOPERATIVE; LAW APPLIES TO AN APPOINTED MEMBER OF THE SANGGUNIANG PANLALAWIGAN. — Although the disqualification mandated by the provisions pertains to elective officers of the government, except barrio captains and councilors, the same is equally applicable to an appointed member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan which is an elective office. The prohibition should be construed to refer to a person holding an office, the assumption to which, while generally determined by an election, is not precluded by appointment. The purpose of the disqualification is to prevent incumbents of elective offices from exerting political influence and pressure on the management of the affairs of the cooperative. This purpose cannot be fully achieved if one who is appointed to an elective office is not made subject to the same disqualification.


D E C I S I O N


PARAS, J.:


The petitioner, Natividad Q. Salomon, seeks among others her reinstatement or Director for District II of respondent La Union Electric Cooperative, Inc., (LUELCO) by filing the instant petition for certiorari assailing the ruling of respondent National Electrification Administration (NEA) dated May 7, 1987, denying petitioner’s request to annul Resolution No. 150487 dated April 26, 1987 of respondent La Union Electric Cooperative, Inc., as well as the ruling of the Office of the President dated January 21, 1988, sustaining the NEA Ruling dated May 7, 1987.chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary

The antecedent facts, as narrated in public respondents’ Comment dated May 13, 1988 were affirmed by petitioner in her Reply dated May 26, 1988 except for the term of the petitioner as the elected Director for District II of respondent LUELCO which according to her would expire in April 1989 as sworn to by the petitioner in her Reply ("Rejoinder") dated May 26, 1988.

On July 20, 1986, petitioner Natividad Q. Salomon was elected Director of District II of respondent LUELCO for a term to expire in April 1988. However, Eduardo P. Marzan, who garnered the second highest number of votes in the election, filed an election protest with respondent National Electrification Administration (NEA).

On the basis of a finding that petitioner was not a bona fide member of the LUELCO at the time of her election, NEA decided the election protest against petitioner.

Petitioner filed a letter-appeal dated February 25, 1987, which was in the nature of a motion for reconsideration of the NEA ruling.

On February 27, 1987, being the Barangay Captain of Natividad (Poblacion), Naguilian, La Union, petitioner was appointed by the then Minister of Local Government Jaime N. Ferrer as member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of La Union, representing the barangay officials of the province. And on March 18, 1987, petitioner took her oath of office and thereafter assumed her duties as such.chanrobles.com:cralaw:red

In April 1987, respondent administrator Rodrigo Cabrera, in his capacity then as Deputy Administrator, ruled on behalf of the NEA that the designation of the petitioner to the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of La Union disqualified her from further acting as LUELCO Director and that the Board of Directors could appoint her successor for the unexpired portion of her term.

The ruling of the then NEA Deputy Administrator Rodrigo Cabrera was grounded on the provision of Section 21 of Presidential Decree No. 269 to the effect that "elective officers of the government; except barrio captain and councilors, shall be ineligible to become officers and/or directors of any (electric cooperative)." (Section 21 P.D. No. 269). That the said legal proviso is also incorporated in section 3, Article IV, of the LUELCO’s by-laws which runs: ‘No person shall be eligible to become or to remain a board member of the cooperative who holds an elective office in the government above the level of a barangay captain." (Rollo, p. 3)

Respondent NEA Deputy Administrator Rodrigo Cabrera, ruling on petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration, sent a radio message to the LUELCO Board of Directors stating that the letter appeal of the petitioner to the NEA dated February 25, 1987 had been rendered moot and academic and the Board may now avail of Article IV, Section 12 of the By-laws in filling up the vacancy in District II and pursuant to the said radio message, the LUELCO Board of Directors passed Resolution No. 15-04-87 on April 26, 1987 which provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"NOW THEREFORE, on Motion of Director Manuel Mangaser duly seconded by Director Ramon Posadas, be it:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"RESOLVED, as it is hereby resolved to appoint Mr. Eduardo P. Marzan as a member of the Board of this cooperative (LUELCO) to serve the unexpired portion of the term of Mrs. Natividad Salomon;

"RESOLVED, further, to notify NEA of the said appointment of Mr. Eduardo P. Marzan." (p. 68, Rollo)

On April 28, 1987, petitioner filed with NEA another letter appeal dated April 26, 1987 addressed to NEA Administrator Ernesto Tabios requesting that Resolution No. 15-04-87 be declared null and void.

In reply thereto, Editha S. Bueno, NEA Director for Cooperative Development, in a letter dated May 7, 1987, furnished the petitioner with a copy of the Memorandum dated October 7, 1980 of Atty. Manuel P. Senar, Chief Corporate Legal Counsel of NEA, which reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"In view of the above, it is the considered opinion of this office that a Barangay Captain who had been appointed to the Sangguniang Bayan, a position higher than a Barangay Captain, is disqualified to run for Director and if already elected, ceases to be a Director from the time he qualifies and assumes office." (Rollo, p. 69)

Said letter dated May 7, 1987 was in effect a denial of the request to annul Resolution No. 15-04-87.

On August 25, 1987, the petitioner wrote the President of the Philippines thru the Honorable Executive Secretary praying that she be reinstated as Director of LUELCO. (Petition, Annex "A"). The said letter appeal is in pursuance of Section 13 of P.D. No. 269 which provides that "all orders, rules and regulations promulgated by the NEA shall be subject to the approval of the Office of the President." (Rollo, p. 4)

On January 21, 1987, the office of the President, thru respondent acting Deputy Executive Secretary Samilo M. Barlongay, in its letter sustained the NEA ruling dated May 7, 1987.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

Hence, this petition.

Petitioner interposes her lone issue of whether or not she was legally disqualified from continuing as a duly elected Director for District II of respondent, La Union Electric Cooperative, Inc., (LUELCO) on account of her designation as a member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of La Union as the representative of the Barangay officials of the province.

What the petitioner would like to emphasize to this Court is that, her designation as a member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan falls under the other kind of membership in the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, which is definitely an appointive and not elective position as it is filled up by appointment (or designation) extended by the President of the Philippines (or by his or her alter ego), as provided for in Section 205(2) of the Local Government Code.

Petitioner adopts the view that since she is an appointed public official, having been designated by the then Minister of Local Government Jaime N. Ferrer as member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of La Union, the prohibition on elective officers of the government above the rank of Barangay Captain provided by the above quoted Section 21 of P.D. No. 269, as amended, and Section 3(c) Article IV of the By-laws of Electric Cooperative is not applicable to her.

This Court finds petitioner’s contention untenable.

Although the disqualification mandated by the provisions pertains to elective officers of the government, except barrio captains and councilors, the same is equally applicable to an appointed member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan which is an elective office. The prohibition should be construed to refer to a person holding an office, the assumption to which, while generally determined by an election, is not precluded by appointment. The purpose of the disqualification is to prevent incumbents of elective offices from exerting political influence and pressure on the management of the affairs of the cooperative. This purpose cannot be fully achieved if one who is appointed to an elective office is not made subject to the same disqualification.

A person appointed to an elective office can exercise all powers and prerogatives attached to said office. Thus, an appointed members of a Sangguniang Panlalawigan, like petitioner, can wield as much pressure and influence on an electric cooperative, as an elected member thereof.

Petitioner, having been appointed as member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of La Union, a position decidedly above the rank of Barangay Captain, cannot remain as Director of LUELCO without violating the spirit and intent of Section 21 P.D. No. 269, as amended, and Section 3(c) Article IV of the By-laws of Electric Cooperatives.

As aptly held in the case of Matabuena v. Cervantes 38 SCRA 284 (1971).." . . What is within the spirit of the law is as much a part of what is written. . . ." (p. 73, Rollo)

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the instant petition is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit.chanrobles.com:cralaw:red

SO ORDERED.

Melencio-Herrera, Padilla, Sarmiento and Regalado, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1989 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 78315 January 2, 1989 - COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 72806 January 9, 1989 - EPIFANIO CRUZ v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLANT COURT

  • G.R. No. L-74806 January 9, 1989 - SM AGRI AND GENERAL MACHINERIES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 76761 January 9, 1989 - ASST. EXECUTIVE SEC. FOR LEGAL AFFAIRS v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 77959 January 9, 1989 - RADIO COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PHILS. v. SEC. OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT

  • G.R. Nos. 79123-25 January 9, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMELIANO TRINIDAD

  • G.R. No. 78169 January 12, 1989 - BIBIANO REYNOSO IV v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORP.

  • G.R. No. 43862 January 13, 1989 - MERCANTILE INSURANCE CO. v. FELIPE YSMAEL, JR. & CO.

  • G.R. No. 47425 January 13, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. METODIO S. BASIGA

  • G.R. No. 51554 January 13, 1989 - TROPICAL HOMES, INC. v. WILLELMO C. FORTUN

  • G.R. No. 53955 January 13, 1989 - MANILA BANKING CORP. v. ANASTACIO TEODORO JR.

  • G.R. No. 54330 January 13, 1989 - JULIO E. T. SALES v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 66712 January 13, 1989 - CALIXTO ANGEL v. PONCIANO C. INOPIQUEZ

  • G.R. No. 66865 January 13, 1989 - MAGTANGGOL QUE v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 74047 January 13, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GRACIANO E. GENEVEZA

  • G.R. No. 75016 January 13, 1989 - PERLA C. BAUTISTA v. BOARD OF ENERGY

  • G.R. No. 76592 January 13, 1989 - ERDULFO C. BOISER v. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 77298 January 13, 1989 - ANGELES CENTINO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 79518 January 13, 1989 - REBECCA C. YOUNG v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 36187 January 17, 1989 - REYNOLDS PHILIPPINE CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 73835 January 17, 1989 - CHINA AIRLINES, LTD. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 33425 January 20, 1989 - PROCTER AND GAMBLE PHIL. MFG. CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. 42278 January 20, 1989 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 48008 January 20, 1989 - BARTOLOME MACARAEG v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 49739 January 20, 1989 - BONIFACIO LOPEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 55457 January 20, 1989 - FILOMENO QUILLIAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. Nos. 61167-68 January 20, 1989 - FIDEL A. DE GUZMAN v. THE INTESTATE ESTATE OF FRANCISCO BENITEZ

  • G.R. No. 66350 January 20, 1989 - ALBERTO DE GUZMAN v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 67115 January 20, 1989 - FILOIL MARKETING CORPORATION v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 74249 January 20, 1989 - CORNELIO T. RIVERA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 74679 January 20, 1989 - ROSITA DE ASIS v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 78524 January 20, 1989 - PLANTERS PRODUCTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 83616 January 20, 1989 - INDUSTRIAL TIMBER CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 72306 January 24, 1989 - DAVID P. FORNILDA v. BRANCH 164, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, PASIG

  • G.R. No. 78648 January 24, 1989 - RAFAEL N. NUNAL v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83882 January 24, 1989 - IN RE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS OF WILLIE YU v. MIRIAM DEFENSOR-SANTIAGO

  • A.C. No. 3277 January 24, 1989 - DAVID P. FORNILDA v. BRANCH 164, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, PASIG

  • G.R. No. 33955 January 26, 1989 - FORTUNATO DA. BONDOC v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

  • G.R. No. 34613 January 26, 1989 - ANTONIO J. CASTRO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 40778 January 26, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARCILLO MANLOLO

  • G.R. Nos. 44715-16 January 26, 1989 - ERLINDA BARRERAS v. GREGORIO N. GARCIA

  • G.R. No. 49410 January 26, 1989 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 51214 January 26, 1989 - EDGARDO DORUELO v. MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE

  • G.R. No. 66807 January 26, 1989 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MELITONA ALAGAD

  • G.R. No. 74246 January 26, 1989 - MARIWASA MANUFACTURING, INC. v. VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR.

  • G.R. No. 75079 January 26, 1989 - SOLEMNIDAD M. BUAYA v. WENCESLAO M. POLO

  • G.R. No. 75256 January 26, 1989 - JOHN PHILIP GUEVARRA v. IGNACIO ALMODOVAR

  • G.R. No. 75439 January 26, 1989 - SILVINO P. PIANO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 79347 January 26, 1989 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS v. PURA FERRER CALLEJA

  • G.R. No. 80680 January 26, 1989 - DANILO B. TABAS v. CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURING COMPANY

  • G.R. No. 81816 January 26, 1989 - NATIVIDAD Q. SALOMON v. NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION

  • A.M. No. R-225-RTJ January 26, 1989 - HIMINIANO D. SILVA v. GERMAN G. LEE, JR.

  • G.R. No. 29541 January 27, 1989 - CARLOS GABILA v. PABLO PEREZ

  • G.R. No. 47027 January 27, 1989 - BEATRIZ DE ZUZUARREGUI VDA. DE REYES v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 50041 January 27, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ILDEFONSO L. ABONADA

  • G.R. No. 56457 January 27, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIOSDADO PEDROSA

  • G.R. No. 56524 January 24, 1989 - RAMON ARENAS v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 79404 January 27, 1989 - FELICIANO BEJER v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 79955 January 27, 1989 - NELSON L. CERVANTES v. GINA C. FAJARDO

  • G.R. No. 29184 January 30, 1989 - BENEDICTO LEVISTE v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 37704 January 30, 1989 - ERLINDA TALAN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. 44466 January 30, 1989 - MAGDALENA V. ACOSTA v. ANDRES B. PLAN

  • G.R. No. 70149 January 30, 1989 - EUSEBIO C. LU v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 72222 January 30, 1989 - INT’L CATHOLIC MIGRATION COMMISSION v. NAT’L LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 74423 January 30, 1989 - EUSTAQUIO BAEL v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 78298 January 30, 1989 - WOLVERINE WORLDWIDE, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 42808 January 31, 1989 - ROSARIO VDA. DE SUANES v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 43602 January 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO PAILANO

  • G.R. No. 46807 January 31, 1989 - MAURO OMANA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. 48066 January 31, 1989 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. KALAHI INVESTMENTS, INC.

  • G.R. No. 56705 January 31, 1989 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. PROCTER AND GAMBLE PHIL. MFG CORP.

  • G.R. No. 58797 January 31, 1989 - ANTONIO QUIRINO v. NATHANAEL M. GROSPE

  • G.R. Nos. 65345-47 January 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HERMENEGILDO RAMIREZ

  • G.R. Nos. 66178-79 January 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOHN PELOTIN

  • G.R. No. 70446 January 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE ALVAREZ

  • G.R. No. 70926 January 31, 1989 - DAN FUE LEUNG v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 72828 January 31, 1989 - ESTELITA S. MONZON v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 73886 January 31, 1989 - JOHN C. QUIRANTE v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 73913 January 31, 1989 - JERRY T. MOLES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 75082 January 31, 1989 - JOSE F. PUZON v. ALEJANDRA ABELLERA

  • G.R. No. 75853 January 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANDRES BUGTONG

  • G.R. No. 76988 January 31, 1989 - GENERAL RUBBER AND FOOTWEAR CORP. v. FRANKLIN DRILON

  • G.R. No. 77116 January 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERDINAND CAMALOG

  • G.R. No. 78687 January 31, 1989 - ELENA SALENILLAS v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 79570 January 31, 1989 - GASPAR MEDIOS v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 80447 January 31, 1989 - BALIWAG TRANSIT, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 83268 January 31, 1989 - JOSEFINA B. CALLANGAN v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 84423 January 31, 1989 - JOSE B. NAVARRO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • A.M. No. P-88-181 January 31, 1989 - ROBERTO S. CHIONGSON v. MATEO MAGBANUA