Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1989 > July 1989 Decisions > G.R. No. 82489 July 27, 1989 - UNIVERSAL ROBINA CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 82489. July 27, 1989.]

UNIVERSAL ROBINA CORPORATION (UNIVERSAL CORN PRODUCTS), Petitioner, v. HON. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (SECOND DIVISION), FAUSTINO NICOLAS, SANTOS BARBIANA, FELIPE ADOLFO, APOLINARIO BECARME, ESPIRIDION BAUTISTA, RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ, LIBERATO ALFORQUE, RODOLFO ESTANISLAO, MANUEL AREVALO, MARTIN MUCHILLAS, FORTUNATO EMBALSADO, and RODOLFO ALDION, Respondents.

Leonidez M. Gonzales for Petitioner.


SYLLABUS


1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW; DUE PROCESS; RIGHT NOT DENIED IN HIS OWN BEHALF DESPITE AMPLE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO. — Private respondents were not denied due process when labor arbiter Lacandola S. Leaño issued the order dated January 20, 1981 dismissing the complaint of private respondents. Private respondents and their counsel were present during the investigation conducted by the Acting Chief of the Research and Information Unit. They were free to present their own evidence. They did not. It is explicit from the order of labor arbiter Lacandola S. Leaño that private respondents were not denied due process.


D E C I S I O N


GANCAYCO, J.:


Petitioner claims that public respondent National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) committed a grave abuse of discretion in affirming the decision of labor arbiter Teresita R. Domingo dated July 13, 1982 in NCR Case No. AB-4-5730-80, CA-4-338-80, the dispositive part of which reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered ordering respondent Universal Robina Corporation to pay the complainants the following:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

COMPLAINANTS TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

EACH COMPLAINANT

1. Martin Muchillas P 4,784.31

2. Faustino Nicolas 4,717.93

3. Santos Barbiana 4,693.76

4. Felipe Adolfo 4,775.58

5. Apolinario Becarme 4,711.89

6. Espiridion Bautista 4,778.43

7. Rodolfo Aldion 4,792.52

8. Liberato Alforque 4,734.96

9. Rodolfo Estanislao 4,767.30

10. Manuel Arevalo 4,787.57

11. Fortunato Embalasada 4,503.99

12. Rodolfo Rodriguez 4,730.00

TOTAL P56,778.24

SO ORDERED." 1

On April 11, 1988, this Court issued a restraining order and petitioner filed a bond in the amount of P50,000.00. 2

The pertinent facts are undisputed.

Private respondents, originally 22 individual workers, instituted a money claim for unpaid wage increases pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement against the petitioner in the Arbitration Branch of the NLRC, docketed as NCR-CA-4-338-80 (later AB-4-5730-80).chanrobles.com:cralaw:red

To determine whether or not the petitioner complied with the payment of the wage increases under the collective bargaining agreement, the parties agreed to refer the matter to the Acting Chief of the Research and Information Unit or any of its duly authorized representatives for the purpose of examining the payrolls and other pertinent records of the petitioner. On January 19, 1981, the Acting Chief prepared his report, stating that petitioner substantially complied with the provision of the collective bargaining agreement regarding the wage increase.

On the basis of that report labor arbiter Lacandola S. Leaño, to whom the case was assigned, issued an order dated January 20, 1981 dismissing the private respondents’ complaint. 3 The Report of the Acting Chief stated that the examination of the payrolls and payslips was made with the assistance of both parties and their counsel. The Acting Chief concluded that private respondents were not entitled to the first year wage increase provided for in the collective bargaining agreement because they became regular employees only after June of 1974; that private respondents were entitled to and were given wage increases effective at the beginning of the second year of the collective bargaining agreement not reflected in their individual payslips because petitioner made corresponding deductions from cash advances to the private respondents; and that petitioner complied with the stipulated wage increases in favor of the private respondents.

Private respondents appealed the said order on the ground that they were deprived of the opportunity to contest the findings in the report made by the Acting Chief. The First Division of the NLRC set aside the order dated January 20, 1981 and remanded the case to another labor arbiter for further proceedings. This time, only 12 complainants (private respondents) remained as parties.

Both parties submitted position papers, motions and manifestations, whereupon labor arbiter Teresita R. Domingo rendered her questioned decision dated July 13, 1982.

The petitioner brought an appeal to the NLRC. The same was docketed as Case No. RAB-IV-AB-4-5730-80. In a resolution dated March 23, 1987, the Second Division of the NLRC dismissed the appeal.

Hence, this petition anchored on the argument that the award in favor of private respondents has no legal basis.

The petition is meritorious.

The Court is convinced that petitioner had already complied with the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement regarding the payment of wage increases and that private respondents were not denied due process when labor arbiter Lacandola S. Leaño issued the order dated January 20, 1981 dismissing the complaint of private respondents. Private respondents and their counsel were present during the investigation conducted by the Acting Chief of the Research and Information Unit. They were free to present their own evidence. They did not. It is explicit from the order of labor arbiter Lacandola S. Leaño that private respondents were not denied due process, to wit:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"ORDER

In conformity with the agreement of the parties, the above-entitled case was referred to the Acting Chief, Research and Information Unit or any of his duly authorized representatives, for purposes of examining the payrolls and other pertinent records of the respondent to determine the entitlement of complainants, if any, to the wage increases provided for in the Collective Bargaining Agreements entered into by the Company and the collective bargaining agent of the workers. On January 19, 1981, a "Report" was submitted reading, among others as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"x       x       x

"The examination of the payrolls and the pay slips of complainants involved in this case was made by the undersigned with the assistance of representatives of both parties and their respective counsels.

"x       x       x

"Considering that verifications conducted by the Corporation Examiners of this Branch, of the payrolls, vouchers, and other pertinent records of the company were with the presence and assistance of the representatives of the parties, this Labor Arbiter adopts as its own the findings contained in the aforequoted "Report."

"Consequently, it appearing that respondent (herein petitioner) has complied with the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement in question, regarding payment of wage increases, let this case therefore be, as it is hereby dismissed.

"x       x       x. 4

Moreover, as correctly observed by petitioner, the decision rendered by labor arbiter Teresita R. Domingo does not show the basis of the computation in the total amount of P56,778.24. The individual awards to private respondents do not reflect the period covered, the amount due and the cash and bonus, if any, credited to petitioner. 5 As it is, the award appears to have been arrived at arbitrarily. The questioned resolution of the NLRC affirming the decision of the labor arbiter suffers from a serious flaw. It must be set aside.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

WHEREFORE, the petition is hereby GRANTED. The questioned resolution of the Second Division of the National Labor Relations Commission dated March 23, 1987 in Case No. RAB-IV-AB-4-5730-80 is hereby SET ASIDE. The complaint filed by private respondents against petitioner is hereby DISMISSED. No costs.

This decision is immediately executory.

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, Cruz, Griño-Aquino and Medialdea, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Page 30, Rollo.

2. Pages 67 to 69, Rollo.

3. Pages 19 to 20, Rollo.

4. Id.

5. Pages 27 to 30, Rollo.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1989 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 42449 July 5, 1989 - C & C COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 45322 July 5, 1989 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. CFI OF ILOILO BRANCH III, ILOILO CITY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 58494 July 5, 1989 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL OIL COMPANY-ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. VICENTE T. LEOGARDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 59075 July 5, 1989 - MERCEDES P. GUASCH v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 59241-44 July 5, 1989 - PEDRO TANDOC, ET AL. v. RICARDO P. RESULTAN

  • G.R. No. 69210 July 5, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUILLERMO LAYUSO

  • G.R. No. 77827 July 5, 1989 - MACARIO D. ZAPATA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78011 July 5, 1989 - RURAL BANK OF SARIAYA, INC. v. BENJAMIN YACON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78282 July 5, 1989 - BRIGIDO RAMOS, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78585 July 5, 1989 - JOSE ANTONIO MAPA v. JOKER ARROYO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 80141 July 5, 1989 - SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION, ET AL. v. PURA FERRER CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 80500 July 5, 1989 - ROBUSTA AGRO MARINE PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v. BALTAZAR GOROMBALEM, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 80544 July 5, 1989 - ROSEMARIE M. LEE v. JOSEFINA CRUZ RODIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 82113 July 5, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMULO CAÑETE

  • G.R. No. 82737 July 5, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AUREO G. ROJO

  • G.R. No. 84975 July 5, 1989 - ZENAIDA GALINDEZ, ET AL. v. RURAL BANK OF LLANERA, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85595 July 5, 1989 - MARIA ARCIAGA VDA. DE UMALI, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 28508-9 July 7, 1989 - ESSO STANDARD EASTERN, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. 70037 July 7, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEOFISTA BRAGAT VDA. DE CABANGAHAN

  • G.R. No. 70403 July 7, 1989 - SANTIAGO SYJUCO, INC. v. JOSE P. CASTRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84362 July 7, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO PEREZ

  • G.R. No. 85215 July 7, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUBEN AYSON

  • A.C. No. 1892 July 7, 1989 - LUIS V. ARTIAGA, JR. v. ENRIQUE C. VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. Nos. 82405-06 July 10, 1989 - BANQUE DE L’INDOCHINE ET DE SUEZ, ET AL. v. RAMON AM. TORRES

  • G.R. No. 83551 July 11, 1989 - RODOLFO B. ALBANO v. RAINERIO O. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78763 July 12, 1989 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84113 July 12, 1989 - FEDERICO N. TRISTE, JR. v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-87-141 July 12, 1989 - ASSOCIATION OF COURT EMPLOYEES OF PANABO, DAVAO v. MARIANO C. TUPAS

  • G.R. No. 47258 July 13, 1989 - ANTONIO R. BANZON, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72764 July 13, 1989 - STATE INVESTMENT HOUSE v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78596 July 13, 1989 - IN RE: LUCIEN TRAN VAN NGHIA v. RAMON J. LIWAG

  • G.R. No. 78742 July 14, 1989 - ASSOCIATION OF SMALL LANDOWNERS IN THE PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL. v. SEC. OF AGRARIAN REFORM

  • G.R. No. 72827 July 18, 1989 - LUCIA EUROPA v. HUNTER GARMENTS MFG. (PHIL.) INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 74170 July 18, 1989 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 43886 July 19, 1989 - IRENE DINO v. AUGUSTO L. VALENCIA

  • G.R. No. 54216 July 19, 1989 - PHILIPPINE AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. GREGORIO G. PINEDA

  • G.R. No. 64935 July 19, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CHARLIE R. REPE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 71499 July 19, 1989 - PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 74658 July 19, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EMETERIO VELASCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 75704 July 19, 1989 - RUBBERWORLD (PHILS.), INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 77133 July 19, 1989 - MARCIANO BANDOY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 77266 July 19, 1989 - ARTHUR PAJUNAR, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78755 July 19, 1989 - GOLDEN FARMS, INC. v. PURA FERRER-CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79913 July 19, 1989 - EDUARDO TALLA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 81269 July 19, 1989 - LIBERTY COMMERCIAL CENTER, INC. v. PURA FERRER CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 82260 July 19, 1989 - ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS v. PURA FERRER-CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 52081 July 21, 1989 - LUCIANA M. DE ALINO, ET AL. v. RAFAEL T. MENDOZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 54243 July 21, 1989 - INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, INC. v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 56481 July 21, 1989 - ANTONIO SORIAO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 59805 July 21, 1989 - LEONILA J. LICUANAN v. RICARDO D. DIAZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 68786 July 21, 1989 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 73678 July 21, 1989 - GUILLERMO CORTES, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 47981 July 24, 1989 - JUAN V. SABINOSA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 72282 July 24, 1989 - ANACLETO DE JESUS v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 86587-93 July 25, 1989 - LOLITO G. APARICIO v. ERMELINDO C. ANDAL

  • G.R. Nos. 74226-27 July 27, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MIZPAH R. REYES

  • G.R. No. 81817 July 27, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERNARD ALDANA

  • G.R. No. 82489 July 27, 1989 - UNIVERSAL ROBINA CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 80479 July 28, 1989 - AGUSTINA LIQUETTE TAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 84197 July 28, 1989 - PIONEER INSURANCE & SURETY CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85279 July 28, 1989 - SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85285 July 28, 1989 - DANVILLE MARITIME, INC. v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • G.R. No. 47924 July 31, 1989 - MARCIANO ASUNCION v. GREGORIO G. PINEDA

  • G.R. No. 67173 July 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN ESPERA

  • G.R. No. 67610 July 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGELINA R. MENDOZA

  • G.R. No. 70246 July 31, 1989 - FIRST INTEGRATED BONDING & INSURANCE CO., INC., ET AL. v. ASAALI S. ISNANI

  • G.R. No. 75277 July 31, 1989 - JOSE A. IBARRIENTOS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78148 July 31, 1989 - APOLINARIO BATACLAN, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 78170 July 31, 1989 - LUIS TIRSO RIVILLA, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79827 July 31, 1989 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AMALIA RESTERIO-ANDRADE, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 82823-24 July 31, 1989 - AGRO COMM’L. SECURITY SERVICES AGENCY, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 83414 July 31, 1989 - TONY CAUDAL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85692 July 31, 1989 - ANGELITO F. MAGLALANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.