Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1993 > August 1993 Decisions > G.R. No. 105214 August 30, 1993 - FRANCISCO JAVIER O. CARAM, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 105214. August 30, 1993.]

FRANCISCO JAVIER O. CARAM and the LABAN NG DEMOKRATIKONG PILIPINO, Petitioners, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS and ILOILO PROVINCIAL BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Respondents.

Josephine Abad for Petitioner.

The Solicitor General for Respondents.


D E C I S I O N


QUIASON, J.:


This is a petition for mandamus to compel the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to conduct special elections for the Sub-province of Guimaras, Province of Iloilo and in areas in the Second Congressional District of Iloilo, which were directly affected by the conversion of the Sub-province of Guimaras into a full-fledged province, for the purpose of electing the Governor, Vice-Governor, Members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan representing the Second District of the Province of Iloilo and the Congressman for the Second Congressional District of said province. The petition also asked for the issuance of a temporary restraining order to stop the Provincial Board of Canvassers of the Province of Iloilo from canvassing and proclaiming the results of the elections for the Office of the Governor, Vice-Governor, Members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan representing the Second District of the Province of Iloilo and the Congressman of the Second Congressional District of said province (Rollo, pp. 2-7).

The petition, in substance, alleged that the COMELEC had no authority to exclude the voters of the Sub-province of Guimaras to vote for the Governor, Vice-Governor and the Members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of the Province of Iloilo. It also alleged that the COMELEC failed to properly disseminate information regarding the right of the Sub-province of Guimaras to vote for a Congressman for the Second Congressional District of Iloilo with the result that almost one-third of the registered voters of the sub-province were not able to exercise the right to vote.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

The Local Government Code, which took effect on January 1, 1992, provided, inter alia, for the conversion of the Sub-province of Guimaras into a province and the holding of the plebiscite, wherein voters of the Province of Iloilo and the Sub-province of Guimaras were asked to resolve the issue of the conversion of the sub-province to a regular province, simultaneously with the national elections on May 11, 1992.

On May 11, 1992, when the official ballots of the three municipalities were distributed for the purpose of the 1992 national elections, the ballots did not contain any provisions for the election of the Governor, Vice-Governor and the Members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan representing the Second District of the Province of Iloilo.

Section 462 of the Local Government Code, providing for the conversion of the then existing sub-provinces into regular provinces, reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Sec. 462. Existing Sub-provinces. — Existing sub-provinces are hereby converted into regular provinces upon approval by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite to be held in the said sub-provinces and the original provinces directly affected. The plebiscite shall be conducted by the Comelec simultaneously with the national elections following the effectivity of this Code.chanrobles law library : red

The new legislative districts created as a result of such conversion shall continue to be represented in Congress by the duly-elected representatives of the original districts out of which said new provinces or districts were created until their own representatives shall have been elected in the next regular congressional elections and qualified.

The incumbent elected officials of the said sub-provinces converted into regular provinces shall continue to hold office until June 30, 1992. Any vacancy occurring in the offices occupied by said incumbent elected officials, or resulting from expiration of their terms of office in case of a negative vote in the plebiscite results, shall be filled by appointment by the President. The appointees shall hold office until their successors shall have been elected in the regular local elections following the plebiscite mentioned herein and qualified. After effectivity of such conversion, the President shall fill up the position of governor of the newly-created province through appointment if none has yet been appointed to the same as herein before provided, and shall also appoint a vice-governor and the other members of the sangguniang panlalawigan, all of whom shall likewise hold office until their successors shall have been elected in the next regular local elections and qualified.

All qualified appointive officials and employees in the career service of the said sub-provinces at the time of their conversion into regular provinces shall continue in office in accordance with civil service law, rules and regulations."cralaw virtua1aw library

On April 15, 1992, the COMELEC promulgated Resolution No. 2410, providing the rules and regulations to govern the conduct of the plebiscite in the Province of Iloilo and Sub-province of Guimaras.

Pursuant to Section 4 of the said Resolution, the official ballots used in the elections in the Province of Iloilo and Sub-province of Guimaras included at the bottom thereof the following question:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"DO YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE CONVERSION OF THE SUB-PROVINCE OF GUIMARAS INTO A REGULAR PROVINCE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 462, REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7160?"

The official ballots also provided an appropriate space for the voter’s response to the question.

The Provincial Board of Canvassers of Iloilo issued a certificate dated May 22, 1992, proclaiming that the conversion of the Sub-province of Guimaras to a regular province was ratified and approved by the voters in a plebiscite held in the Province of Iloilo and the Sub-province of Guimaras on May 11, 1992 by a vote of 283,224 against 42,524.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

In Grino v. Commission on Elections, 213 SCRA 672, we held that the COMELEC had no authority to exclude the voters of the Sub-province of Guimaras from voting for the positions of the Governor, Vice-Governor, and Members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan representing the Second District of the Province of Iloilo because under Section 462 of the Local Government Code, it was only in the case where the voters ratified the conversion of the Sub-province of Guimaras to a regular province that the President was empowered to appoint the officials of the newly created province. The Court noted that the lawmakers failed to foresee that in the event the negative vote in the plebiscite prevailed, the Sub-province of Guimaras would continue to be a part of the Province of Iloilo and be represented by the officials of the province elected in the May 11, 1992 elections. However, considering that the "Yes" votes in the plebiscite prevailed, we ruled that it would serve no useful purpose to undo what the COMELEC had done and that there would be no legal basis to call special elections to give a chance to the voters of the Sub-province of Guimaras to vote for the provincial officials of the Province of Iloilo.

Petitioners have not shown the basis of their claim that about one-third of the voters in the Sub-province of Guimaras were not able to vote for a Congressman.

The official ballots used in the Sub-province of Guimaras contained a space for the voting of a Congressman for the Second Congressional District of Iloilo. That was a clear indication that the Guimaras voters could vote for said official.

In allowing the voters in the Sub-province of Guimaras to vote for a Congressman for the Second Congressional District of Iloilo, the COMELEC merely followed to the letter the provisions of Section 462 of R.A. 7160 that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The new legislative districts created as a result of such conversion shall continue to be represented in congress by the duly-elected representatives of the original districts out of which said new provinces or districts were created until their own representatives shall have been elected in the next regular congressional elections and qualified."cralaw virtua1aw library

There was no evidence to show that one-third of the voters of the Sub-province of Guimaras were not able to vote for a Congressman for the Second Congressional District of Iloilo due to the lack of dissemination of information that they could do so. In the absence of such evidence, the only conclusion that can be deduced was that those who did not vote for the position of congressman, merely abstained from voting for the said position. The right to abstain from voting for a position deserves the same respect as the exercise of the right to vote. To compel the COMELEC to conduct a special election for the position of congressman as demanded by petitioners would be to nullify the decision of the voters who cast their votes in the May 1992 elections and who, according to petitioner constituted two-thirds of the voters in the sub-province.

WHEREFORE, the petition is DISMISSED, with costs against petitioner.

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, C.J., Cruz, Feliciano, Padilla, Bidin, Griño-Aquino, Regalado, Davide, Jr., Romero, Nocon, Bellosillo, Melo, Puno and Vitug, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1993 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 86939 August 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTOS DUCAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96988 August 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYNALDO BALAJADIA

  • G.R. No. 80645 August 3, 1993 - MARCELINO GALANG, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 89112 August 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANDRES M. LIWAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102725 August 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISMAEL N. RELORCASA

  • G.R. No. 103233 August 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PRIMO PELIGRO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-89-383 August 4, 1993 - ANTONIO G. MIRANO v. MARILYN O. SAAVEDRA

  • G.R. Nos. 74294-96 August 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGER LLABRES

  • G.R. No. 104513 August 4, 1993 - SILAHIS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106837 August 4, 1993 - HENRY MACION, ET AL. v. JAPAL M. GUIANI, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. RTJ-92-898 August 5, 1993 - EVANGELINE L. DINAPOL v. ISMAEL O. BALDADO

  • G.R. No. 85041 August 5, 1993 - GRACIANO BERNAS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 88475-96 August 5, 1993 - CRESENCIA L. TAN v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95145 August 5, 1993 - GUALBERTO R. ESTIVA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 98007-08 August 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NECEMIO JOAQUIN

  • G.R. No. 103303 August 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUGENIO E. GASPER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105138 August 5, 1993 - BANCO FILIPINO SAVINGS BANK v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-90-414 August 9, 1993 - BELEN P. FERRIOLS v. NORMA HIAM

  • A.M. No. MTJ-91-530 August 9, 1993 - TRINIDAD SUNGLAO VDA. DE CORONEL v. CONRADO T. DANAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94549 August 9, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICKY SUETA

  • G.R. No. 102657 August 9, 1993 - FELICIANO NITO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 93029 August 10, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VILLAMOR ACZON

  • G.R. No. 94093 August 10, 1993 - FAR EAST MARBLE (PHILS.), INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102411 August 10, 1993 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97873 August 12, 1993 - PILIPINAS BANK v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103302 August 12, 1993 - NATALIA REALTY, INC., ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104226 August 12, 1993 - CONCHITA ROMUALDEZ-YAP v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85985 August 13, 1993 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 90795-96 & 91125-26 August 13, 1993 - SHOEMART, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101583 August 13, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANOLITO TIDONG

  • G.R. No. 55343 August 16, 1993 - A & A CONTINENTAL COMM. PHIL., INC. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94644 August 17, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MICHAEL M. ALEJANDRO

  • G.R. No. 98468 August 17, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARMANDO VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103299 August 17, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LOPE VIENTE

  • G.R. No. 106164 August 17, 1993 - EDWIN V. SARDEA, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 90626 August 18, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO ALCORIZA LASCUNA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94955 August 18, 1993 - JUAN CORONADO v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109293 August 18, 1993 - HOME INSURANCE CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98472 August 19, 1993 - PHIL. ASS. OF SERVICE EXPORTERS, INC., ET AL. v. RUBEN D. TORRES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103059 August 19, 1993 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106953 August 19, 1993 - CESAR SAN JOSE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 74449 August 20, 1993 - IMELDA A. NAKPIL v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96306 August 20, 1993 - LORENZO BERICO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103072 August 20, 1993 - MOBIL OIL PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103295 August 20, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO SALAMAT

  • G.R. No. 104216 August 20, 1993 - TEODORO B. PANGILINAN v. GUILLERMO T. MAGLAYA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105083 August 20, 1993 - VIRGILIO CALLANTA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 75038 August 23, 1993 - ELIAS VILLUGA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85817 August 23, 1993 - PILAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108232 August 23, 1993 - ZONSAYDA L. ALINSUG v. RTC, Br. 58, San Carlos City, Negros Occ., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85073 August 24, 1993 - DAVAO FRUITS CORP. v. ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96541 August 24, 1993 - DEAN JOSE JOYA, ET AL. v. PRESIDENTIAL COMM. ON GOOD GOVT., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102973 August 24, 1993 - ROGELIO CARAMOL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103393 August 24, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIRGILIO MANZANO

  • G.R. No. 103403 August 24, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO ULILI

  • G.R. No. 104615 August 24, 1993 - EMILIANA MEDINA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108229 August 24, 1993 - DASMARIÑAS GARMENTS, INC. v. RUBEN T. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99299 August 26, 1993 - ROBERTO ULANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100592 August 26, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR ARMADA, JR.

  • G.R. No. 104995 August 26, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BALTAZAR DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107324 August 26, 1993 - APOLINARIO ESBER, ET AL. v. PATRICIA A. STO. TOMAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91889 August 27, 1993 - MANUEL R. DULAY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-91-565 August 30, 1993 - PATRICIO T. JUNIO v. PEDRO C. RIVERA, JR.

  • G.R. No. 97226 August 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BETHOVEN LIZADA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98443 August 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PAULINO NAPARAN, JR.

  • G.R. Nos. 103446-47 August 30, 1993 - MARIANO F. OCAMPO, IV v. OMBUDSMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105214 August 30, 1993 - FRANCISCO JAVIER O. CARAM, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105141 August 31, 1993 - SIGNETICS CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106915 August 31, 1993 - JARDINE DAVIES, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.