Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1993 > February 1993 Decisions > A.C. No. 2473 February 3, 1993 - AURORA M. GUIANG v. LEONARDO B. ANTONIO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[A.C. No. 2473. February 3, 1993.]

AURORA M. GUIANG, Petitioner, v. ATTY. LEONARDO B. ANTONIO, Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. LEGAL ETHICS; ATTORNEYS; NEGLECT IN FILING APPEAL ON TIME CONSTITUTES MALPRACTICE; PENALTY THEREFORE; CASE AT BAR. — The Bar Confidant found the respondent guilty of negligence and malpractice for violating Rule 18.03, Canon 18 of the Code of Professional Responsibility which provides: "A lawyer shall not neglect a legal matter entrusted to him and his negligence in connection therewith shall render him liable." Added to this offense are the highly improper statements in respondent’s pleadings describing his client’s case as "hopeless or beyond legal remedy" after neglecting to file the appeal on time. No formal, trial-like, hearing was conducted by the Bar Confidant wherein Atty. Leonardo B. Antonio could have been given an opportunity orally to explain his side. However, written comments on the administrative complaint clearly present to the Court his reasons for his omission in attending to his client’s cause. All the material facts are on record, thus this case can be decided without need for a trial-type hearing. We find the recommendation of the Bar Confidant holding the respondent guilty of negligence and malpractice, in violation of the code of Professional Responsibility, to be well-taken. Accordingly, the Court RESOLVED to suspend respondent from the practice of law for six (6) months effective upon receipt of this decision.


R E S O L U T I O N


PER CURIAM:


This is a petition for suspension and disbarment from the practice of law on the ground of negligence and malpractice of Atty. Leonardo B. Antonio who was admitted to the bar on March 12, 1971.

Sometime in May 1981, petitioner retained the services of Atty. Antonio as her counsel in connection with civil case docketed as CA-G.R. No. 62250, "Heirs of Rita Reyes v. Brigido Valencia", then on appeal with the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals had rendered a decision on February 27, 1981 adverse to plaintiffs, one of whom was the petitioner. The Court of Appeals granted Atty. Antonio’s motion for extension to file a Motion for Reconsideration on April 22, 1981 and giving petitioner up to May 27, 1981 to file the motion for extension which was granted. On June 26, 1981, respondent filed the Motion for Reconsideration which the Court of Appeals denied on July 27, 1981. Respondent failed to file the appeal within the 15-day period from receipt of the denial by the Court of Appeals. The adverse decision of the Court of Appeals became final: hence, this petition for disbarment.

The case was referred to the Bar Confidant as Adm. Case No. 2473 for evaluation, report and recommendation. In his comments to the petition for disbarment, respondent claimed that the appeal was not perfected within the 15-day period because:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(1) Petitioner failed to furnish and deliver to him all the necessary documents;

(2) Petitioner was nowhere to be found when she was needed and she could not be contracted;

(3) Respondent had to send petitioner to Davao City to get some documents, and by the time she returned, the period for appeal had expired.

A careful scrutiny of the records discloses the following:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

(1) Respondent claims that the records of the case were incomplete yet the complete records were turned over to respondent by the CLAO counsel when his services were retained by petitioner;chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

(2) Respondent asked for extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration because the records were voluminous;

(3) Respondent blames petitioner for not returning on time from Davao City yet in his Answer to the letter-complaint of petitioner, Guiang (petitioner) was in her house a week or so before the lapse of the period for appeal. He could have informed petitioner that the period for filing the appeal was soon to lapse or he could have adopted steps to prevent default.

(4) In his entry of appearance before the Court of Appeals, he complained that important documents were still with the CLAO lawyer in Manila, which was not true because the CLAO lawyer turned over the complete records to him.

If it were true that the records furnished by the CLAO counsel were incomplete, respondent should have requested for the copies of the missing records from the Court of Appeals, where the originals were kept.

We take note of the fact that the intended appeal to the Supreme Court could only raise questions of law, and petitioner may not raise questions of fact nor present new or additional facts which are evidentiary in nature.

The Bar Confidant found the respondent guilty of negligence and malpractice for violating Rule 18.03, Canon 18 of the Code of Professional Responsibility which provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"A lawyer shall not neglect a legal matter entrusted to him and his negligence in connection therewith shall render him liable."cralaw virtua1aw library

Added to this offense are the highly improper statements in respondent’s pleadings describing his client’s case as "hopeless or beyond legal remedy" after neglecting to file the appeal on time.

No formal, trial-like, hearing was conducted by the Bar Confidant wherein Atty. Leonardo B. Antonio could have been given an opportunity orally to explain his side. However, written comments on the administrative complaint clearly present to the Court his reasons for his omission in attending to his client’s cause. All the material facts are on record, thus this case can be decided without need for a trial-type hearing.

We find the recommendation of the Bar Confidant holding the respondent guilty of negligence and malpractice, in violation of the code of Professional Responsibility, to be well-taken.

Accordingly, the Court RESOLVED to suspend respondent from the practice of law for six (6) months effective upon receipt of this decision. Let this Resolution be spread on the personal record of respondent Atty. Leonardo B. Antonio in the Office of the Bar Confidant and copies thereof furnished to all courts of the land.cralawnad

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, C.J., Feliciano, Regalado, Nocon and Campos, Jr., JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1993 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 90707 February 1, 1993 - ONAPAL PHILIPPINES COMMODITIES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 92859 February 1, 1993 - SAN MIGUEL CORP. v. REYNALDO R. UBALDO

  • G.R. No. 96227 February 1, 1993 - TELESFORO OPENA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. Nos. 99338-40 February 1, 1993 - HEIRS OF NICOLAS Y. OROSA v. EUTROPIO MIGRINO

  • G.R. No. 101983 February 1, 1993 - HONORIO BULAO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 102570 February 1, 1993 - ST. GOTHARD PUB & RESTAURANT v. NLRC

  • G.R. No. 87085 February 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANOLITO TOLENTINO

  • G.R. Nos. 93518-19 February 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX M. PACAÑA

  • G.R. Nos. 95761-62 February 2, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TEODORO V. ANGELES

  • G.R. No. 101013 February 2, 1993 - ABRAHAM B. BLANCAFLOR v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 106208 February 2, 1993 - RICARDO V. TUGONON v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • A.C. No. 2473 February 3, 1993 - AURORA M. GUIANG v. LEONARDO B. ANTONIO

  • G.R. No. 94128 February 3, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSAURO SAN PEDRO

  • G.R. No. 95296 February 3, 1993 - INOCENCIA CENIZA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 97179 February 3, 1993 - VILLA ESPERANZA DEV’T. CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 45998 February 4, 1993 - CRISANTO B. AMORES v. ACTG. CHAIRMAN, COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • G.R. No. 77875 February 4, 1993 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. ALBERTO SANTOS, JR.

  • G.R. No. 99845 February 4, 1993 - PEOPLE OF PAOMBONG, BULACAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 100188 February 4, 1993 - JULIETA ILAO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 103592 February 4, 1993 - IRINEO F. LLORIN, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 80223 February 5, 1993 - B.E. SAN DIEGO, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 86339 February 5, 1993 - ARTURO S. LAGNITON, SR. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 90295 February 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENHUR A. TAHUYAN

  • G.R. No. 96776 February 5, 1993 - PABLO RETONI, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. Nos. 97437-39 February 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSUE MOLAS

  • G.R. No. 86134 February 8, 1993 - VERONICA I. BATONGBACAL v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 87236 February 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICTOR C. TANEO

  • G.R. No. 96646 February 8, 1993 - DELFIN PALAGPAG v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 97493 February 8, 1993 - PATRICIO B. MANALASTAS v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 98414 February 8, 1993 - FIRST QUEZON CITY INSURANCE CO. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 100149 February 8, 1993 - ASIAN CONSTRUCTION CORP. v. CONSTRUCTION ARBITRATION COM

  • G.R. Nos. 101211-12 February 8, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS ESLABAN

  • G.R. No. 105775 February 8, 1993 - BENITO D. CHUA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • A.M. No. MTJ-91-598 February 9, 1993 - CORNELIO C. CRUZ v. ROMULO C. BASA

  • A.M. No. P-92-675 February 9, 1993 - GLORIA R. CABANO v. EVELYN T. MONREAL

  • G.R. No. L-48766 February 9, 1993 - GODELIVA S. DULAY v. MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES

  • G.R. No. 55318 February 9, 1993 - ANGELES MALATE v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 56279 February 9, 1993 - ALLIED BANKING CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 70174 February 9, 1993 - JOSE TIPAIT v. JUAN Y. REYES

  • G.R. No. 81480 February 9, 1993 - STAYFAST PHIL. CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 83377 February 9, 1993 - BASILIO DE VERA v. MARIANO AGUILAR

  • G.R. No. 83436 February 9, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO OCAMPO

  • G.R. No. 83889 February 9, 1993 - SURIGAO CENTURY SAWMILL v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 85909 February 9, 1993 - TERESITA C. GERALES v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 91482 February 9, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULIAN ROSTATA, JR.

  • G.R. No. 92244 February 9, 1993 - NATIVIDAD GEMPESAW v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 92288 February 9, 1993 - BRITISH AIRWAYS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 95083 February 9, 1993 - SANTOS GUINSATAO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 97006 February 9, 1993 - ERNESTO F. ROLDAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 97520 February 9, 1993 - LETICIA MAMANSAG v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 97827 February 9, 1993 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 98154 February 9, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO W. WAGGAY

  • G.R. No. 101671 February 9, 1993 - ARTURO S. ESTEBAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 102356 February 9, 1993 - CALINICO B. ILOGON v. SANDIGANBAYAN

  • G.R. No. 103746 February 9, 1993 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 106291 February 9, 1993 - ALFONSO C. BINCE, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. 107036 February 9, 1993 - HEIRS OF JACOBO BOLUS v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 102185 February 15, 1993 - PHILTREAD TIRE AND RUBBER CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-44205 February 16, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO G. PINEDA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 3294 February 17, 1993 - MARIO S. MARIVELES v. ODILON C. MALLARI

  • G.R. No. 92009 February 17, 1993 - MASTER IRON LABOR UNION, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94012 February 17, 1993 - DOMINGO RAMONES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMM., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94733 February 17, 1993 - MUNICIPALITY OF BIÑAN, LAGUNA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96803 February 17, 1993 - HEIRS OF THE LATE FRANCISCO ABUEG v. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97471 February 17, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISABELO PUNO

  • G.R. No. 87367 February 19, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PETER ALFONSO

  • G.R. No. 94554 February 19, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANACLETO COLCOL, JR.

  • G.R. No. 97336 February 19, 1993 - GASHEM SHOOKAT BAKSH v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97610 February 19, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PERFECTO BRIONES

  • G.R. No. 102417 February 19, 1993 - MARINE CULTURE, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.