Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1993 > July 1993 Decisions > G.R. No. 96370 July 14, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CERVANDO V. PATONG:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 96370. July 14, 1993.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CERVANDO PATONG y VILLANUEVA, alias Nando, Accused-Appellant.

The Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lel M. Blanco for Accused-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; EVIDENCE; FINDINGS OF FACT OF THE TRIAL COURT, UPHELD ON APPEAL. — We find that Judge Celso L. Conol of the Regional Trial Court of Oroquieta City did not err in finding Cervando Patong guilty beyond reasonable doubt of raping Alda Malima Patong. We agree that in view of the aggravating circumstance of night-time, dwelling and abuse of confidence, he should suffer the sentence of RECLUSION PERPETUA with all the accessory penalties in accordance with the Revised Penal Code.

2. CIVIL LAW; CIVIL INDEMNITY GRANTED TO RAPE VICTIM RAISED TO P30,000.00. — We shall however, increase the civil indemnity to P30,000.00, conformably to existing doctrine.


D E C I S I O N


CRUZ, J.:


The complaining witness was at the time of the alleged rape a 25-year old mother of three children and five months pregnant. The accused-appellant is her uncle by affinity.

According to Alda Malima Patong, the incident happened at her own house in Jimenez, Misamis Occidental, at about 8 o’clock in the evening of March 22, 1990.

Cervando Patong had earlier that afternoon arrived from Siquijor and visited her husband Joseph Patong, who is his nephew. With three other friends, they drank a gallon of tuba until 5 p.m., when Cervando and the other guests left. Thereafter, following his daily routine, her husband went out to fish.

She said that later that night, Cervando returned to their house and asked if he could spend the night there. As he was a relative, she said he could and invited him in.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

She and the children were sleeping in the sala, so she spread a mat with a pillow and blanket for Cervando in the dining room. Only a curtain served as a divider between the two rooms.

Returning to the sala, she saw Cervando blow out the kerosene lamp in the dining room and supposed he would be going to sleep. She was surprised and incensed, however, when he crossed over to the sala and asked her to lie with him.

She angrily rejected his suggestion, but he pointed a knife at her stomach and snuffed out the other lamp. The suggestion was now a demand. He dragged her to the dining room. Then he forcibly laid her on the mat and pulled off her panty, all the while threatening her with the knife.

His lust insisted even harder as he kissed and sucked her mouth. Alda struggled and pleaded with him, but to no avail. Soon the ugly deed was done. He ejaculated into her. Apparently not yet sated, he continued feeling her body even as she still resisted and cried.

Finally releasing her, he insolently told her he would call her if he needed her again. Then he went to sleep.

At about 10 o’clock, when she heard Cervando snoring, Alda sneaked out of the house with her youngest child and went to the house of her neighbors, Victor and Nenet Sagang, about ten meters away. She told them she had been raped by Cervando.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

The spouses were immediately helpful. They notified Oscar Paye and Peter Junio, barangay councilors, and Francisco Patong, Alda’s father-in-law. Junio reported the matter to the police and Patrolmen Lou de la Vega, Romero Bomediano, Pablito Paredes and Amado Camposano came to investigate.

Alda and her neighbors surrounded her house in case their quarry should attempt to escape. When the policemen arrived, they went in and saw Cervando still asleep with the knife near his head. They got the knife and then roused him. He did not resist when they handcuffed him. Asked if he was the person who had attacked Alda, he said nothing. Alda positively identified him as her assailant but he remained silent.

The following morning, Alda submitted to medical examination, resulting in the finding that the vaginal smear was "positive of sperm cells." 1 She thereafter filed a criminal complaint for rape that became the basis of the information against Cervando.

The other witnesses for the prosecution were Victor Sagang, Oscar Paye, Romero Bomediano, Peter Junio, and Lou de la Vega, who all corroborated Alda.

In his defense, Cervando submitted an improbable tale. He averred that what happened that night was not a rape but a robbery. He was the victim. Peter Junio was one of the robbers and Alda herself was involved.

To begin with, he protested, it was not he who asked to stay in Alda’s house but Alda herself who invited him to sleep there. He was on his way to his sister-in-law’s house when Alda pulled him by the arm and practically forced him into her house.

He testified that while he was sleeping, he was awakened by a group of three men who were looking for a gun he was supposed to be carrying. Finding none, they took away the contents of his bag, including his clothes, a watch, and a pair of sunglasses.

According to him, Alda promised him that she and her husband would recover the stolen articles or make good their value. It was their responsibility because he had been robbed in their house. Thus assured, he went to sleep. But at about 11 o’clock, he was awakened and hit in the head with the barrel of a rifle by one of the patrolmen who arrested him. He was surprised when he was later charged by Alda with raping her.

Nobody corroborated him. He alleged that he was prevented from presenting his own witness but was unable to substantiate this complaint.

We have gone over the record of this case and must agree with the trial court that the defense offered by Cervando deserves little credence indeed. It is shot through and through with holes. It is plainly a fabrication and an inept one at that.

Implicating Alda in the robbery was an especially unbelievable concoction. Alda flatly denied it. Significantly, Cervando never mentioned the robbery at the time of his arrest or even when he was already in the police station. He also did not explain why, if he had really been robbed, the robbers did not get the bag itself and all its contents. Of the five pairs of trousers allegedly in the bag, four were not touched at all.

By contrast, Alda’s testimony was consistent and credible. Her narration of the rape was forthright if understandably strained because of the embarrassing details she had to recount. Her reaction to the offense was instant and natural: she fled her house as soon as she heard Cervando snoring and sought the help of her neighbors. She unhesitatingly told them what had happened. She reported the outrage to her husband immediately upon his return from the sea.

The presence of sperm cells in her violated organ affirmed her charge more than words or anger alone could prove. Even if it did not, the other evidence against Cervando was enough to prove that he had indeed repaid her hospitality by ravishing her in her own house.chanrobles lawlibrary : rednad

We find that Judge Celso L. Conol of the Regional Trial Court of Oroquieta City did not err in finding Cervando Patong guilty beyond reasonable doubt of raping Alda Malima Patong. We agree that in view of the aggravating circumstance of night-time, dwelling and abuse of confidence, he should suffer the sentence of RECLUSION PERPETUA with all the accessory penalties in accordance with the Revised Penal Code. We shall however, increase the civil indemnity to P30,000.00, conformably to existing doctrine.

Cervando Patong should have been grateful to Alda for allowing him the shelter of her home when he requested it. Instead, he sullied it by violating her. By thus degrading himself with his unspeakable lechery, he has earned his own condemnation to a life behind bars.

WHEREFORE, the appeal is DISMISSED and the appealed judgment is AFFIRMED as above modified, with costs against the Accused-Appellant.

SO ORDERED.

Griño-Aquino, Davide, Jr., Bellosillo and Quiason, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Exhibit "C."




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1993 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 92159 July 1, 1993 - LEDITA BURCE JACOB, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95863 July 1, 1993 - AUTOGRAPHICS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96505 July 1, 1993 - LEGASPI OIL CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101314 July 1, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOHN AMET G. BAELLO

  • G.R. No. 107921 July 1, 1993 - LEVY MACASIANO v. NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-89-270 July 5, 1993 - THELMA ARCENIO, ET AL. v. VIRGINIA PAGOROGON

  • A.M. No. P-91-549 July 5, 1993 - REYNALDO SEBASTIAN v. ALBERTO A. VALINO

  • A.M. No. RTJ-92-802 July 5, 1993 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. GENARO C. GINES

  • G.R. No. 74830 July 5, 1993 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79642 July 5, 1993 - BROADWAY CENTRUM CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION v. TROPICAL HUT FOOD MARKET, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 83373-74 July 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYNALDO CORDOVA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92000 July 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO LAGARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 95358-59 July 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO MORATO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96765 July 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERGIO M. CURARATON

  • G.R. No. 97032 July 5, 1993 - PROTAClO T. BACANI v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98270 July 5, 1993 - ALEJANDRO SY JUECO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99390 July 5, 1993 - LYSANDER P. GARCIA v. MANILA TIMES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100521 July 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HUGO C. YLARDE

  • G.R. No. 100898 July 5, 1993 - ALEX FERRER, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101313 July 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLITO E. USON

  • G.R. No. 103543 July 5, 1993 - ASIA BREWERY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104277 July 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BOBBY G. DE PAZ

  • G.R. No. 105180 July 5, 1993 - PANTRANCO NORTH EXPRESS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105540 July 5, 1993 - IRENEO G. GERONIMO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107809 July 5, 1993 - ERNESTO M. ABOITIZ, ET AL. v. TEODORO P. REGINO

  • G.R. Nos. 91865-66 & G.R. Nos. 92439-40 July 6, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS DE LA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. 95893 July 6, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEO PEREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98398 July 6, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAUL S. ROLDAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101762 July 6, 1993 - VERMEN REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105866 July 6, 1993 - VICTORIA D. BAYUBAY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108065 July 6, 1993 - SPS. FELIX BAES AND RAFAELA BAES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106473 July 12, 1993 - ANTONIETTA O. DESCALLAR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 96370 July 14, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CERVANDO V. PATONG

  • G.R. No. 91332 July 16, 1993 - PHILIP MORRIS, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107854 July 16, 1993 - SUKARNO S. SAMAD v. COMELEC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 94863 July 19, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REYNALDO S. NARIO

  • A.M. No. P-91-600 July 21, 1993 - EDILBERTO S. RAMOS v. DAMASO GREGORIO

  • G.R. Nos. L-48886-88 July 21, 1993 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 59771 July 21, 1993 - VICTORIO SANTOS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92357 July 21, 1993 - PHILIPPINE SCOUT VETERANS SECURITY & INVESTIGATION AGENCY, ET AL. v. RUBEN D. TORRES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98450 July 21, 1993 - PHILIPPINE MANPOWER SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 96086 & 100777 July 21, 1993 - URSULA OCDAMIA JAVIER, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 97008-09 July 23, 1993 - VIRGINIA G. NERI, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101187 July 23, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WALTER ABORDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102157 July 23, 1993 - GVM SECURITY AND PROTECTIVE AGENCY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 106677 & 106696 July 23, 1993 - HERMOGENES P. POBRE v. MARIANO E. MENDIETA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 103385-88 July 26, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELMA C. ROMERO

  • G.R. No. 106537 July 27, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARNEL ORACOY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 85247 July 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDWIN MARCELINO

  • G.R. No. 92269 July 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUCIO B. GARCIA

  • G.R. Nos. 97320-27 July 30, 1993 - VALLUM SECURITY SERVICES, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101083 July 30, 1993 - JUAN ANTONIO, ET AL. v. FULGENCIO S. FACTORAN, JR.

  • G.R. No. 101215 July 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO SALVADOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101374 July 30, 1993 - FORTUNE LIFE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102705 July 30, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOROTEO S. MEJORADA

  • G.R. No. 104166 July 30, 1993 - JULITA S. ZAMBO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106170 July 30, 1993 - PACIFIC TIMBER EXPORT CORPORATION, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.