Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1993 > October 1993 Decisions > A.M. No. P-93-825 October 20, 1993 - ABRAHAM PRINCIPE v. ROMEO R. FLORENDO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[A.M. No. P-93-825. October 20, 1993.]

JUDGE ABRAHAM PRINCIPE, Petitioner, v. ROMEO R. FLORENDO, DEPUTY SHERIFF, Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; SHERIFF; DELAY IN THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS; DESERVES SANCTION. — The facts show neglect in the performance of duty on the part of respondent sheriff. He failed to serve the summons in Sp. Proceedings Case No. 4234 for more than two (2) years. His failure cannot be justified by the excuse that on January 28, 1991 when the summons was assigned to him, he had to accompany his brother to the Makati Medical Center for a brain scan and had to request that it be served by his fellow sheriff, Crisanto Flora. Respondent sheriff then utterly neglected for two (2) years to inquire from sheriff Flora whether said summons had been served. Certainly, two (2) years is too long a time for respondent sheriff to claim confusion due to the sickness of his brother to justify his neglect. The omission of respondent sheriff delayed the disposition of Sp. Proc. Case No. 4234 to the prejudice of the right of the parties therein to speedy justice.


R E S O L U T I O N


PUNO, J.:


Respondent Romeo R. Florendo, Deputy Sheriff, RTC, Baguio City, is charged with delay in the service of summons.chanrobles.com:cralaw:red

The complaint was investigated by the Honorable Clarence J. Villanueva, Executive Judge, RTC, 1st Judicial Region, Baguio City. In his Report and Recommendation dated September 24, 1993, Judge Villanueva made the following factual findings, viz:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"It appears that on January 16, 1991, summons was issued in Special Proceedings Case No. 4234 entitled "Jesus Adarme and Jed Arisdan Adarme v. Dr. Edwin Adarme" for Support, pending at Regional Trial Court, Branch 2, Tuguegarao, Cagayan, presided by complainant Judge Abraham Y. Principe; said summons was sent to the City Sheriff of Baguio City for service, it appearing that the defendant Dr. Edwin Adarme was a resident of the Baguio General Hospital at Baguio City. The said summons was assigned to Deputy Sheriff Romeo R. Florendo (the herein respondent) who actually signed for it in the log book of the City Sheriff on January 28, 1991. On March 25, 1993, Judge Principe issued an Order requiring the City Sheriff of Baguio City to explain the unwarranted and unreasonable delay in making the return of the summons in Special Proceedings Case No. 4234. In his Explanation dated April 6, 1993, respondent Deputy Sheriff admitted having received the summons but that he handed the said summons to his fellow sheriff Crisanto T. Flora, also of the Office of the Clerk of Court, RTC, Baguio City for service as he had to accompany his brother to the Makati Medical Center for a brain scan. From February 28, 1991 until the time when he received the Court Order dated March 25, 1993, respondent never inquired from his fellow sheriff whether the summons was ever served, so that it was only after a period of more than two (2) years that he inquired from his fellow sheriff about the summons in question. Deputy Sheriff Crisanto T. Flora whom respondent Florendo pointed as the fellow sheriff to whom he handed the summons for service was then directed to appear before the investigation body for questioning. In his testimony, Deputy Sheriff Flora averred that he can no longer remember if the summons in question was ever served by him, and since there was no follow up or complaint for a long time, he presumed that said summons was served. However, when asked whether he remembers having been requested by respondent Florendo to serve the summons issued in Special Proceedings Case No. 4234, Deputy Sheriff Flora could not give a categorical answer although he said that in the past, respondent Florendo have (sic) asked him to serve court processes."cralaw virtua1aw library

These findings are supported by evidence and We adopt the same.

The facts show neglect in the performance of duty on the part of respondent sheriff. He failed to serve the summons in Sp. Proceedings Case No. 4234 for more than two (2) years. His failure cannot be justified by the excuse that on January 28, 1991 when the summons was assigned to him, he had to accompany his brother to the Makati Medical Center for a brain scan and had to request that it be served by his fellow sheriff, Crisanto Flora. Respondent sheriff then utterly neglected for two (2) years to inquire from sheriff Flora whether said summons had been served. Certainly, two (2) years is too long a time for respondent sheriff to claim confusion due to the sickness of his brother to justify his neglect. The omission of respondent sheriff delayed the disposition of Sp. Proc. Case No. 4234 to the prejudice of the right of the parties therein to speedy justice. Respondent sheriff cannot escape liability which, however, should be mitigated considering that the offense appears to be his first.

IN VIEW WHEREOF, the respondent deputy sheriff Romeo R. Florendo of the Office of the Clerk of Court, RTC, Baguio City is suspended from office for fifteen (15) days without pay, effective upon receipt of this Resolution.

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, C.J., Regalado and Nocon, JJ., concur.

Padilla, J., is on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1993 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.M. No. RTJ-91-762 October 1, 1993 - ERNESTO J. YUSON v. FEDERICO V. NOEL

  • G.R. No. 79090 October 1, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO C. JOYA

  • G.R. No. 96781 October 1, 1993 - EMILIANO MANUEL v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 98123 October 1, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. OSCAR M. RIVERA, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 101207 October 1, 1993 - COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 101711 October 1, 1993 - ROGELIO R. MACAPALAN v. BETHEL KATALBAS-MOSCARDON, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 103259 October 1, 1993 - ADELINA CALDERON-BARGAS, ET AL v. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF PASIG, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 77368 October 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE C. DE GUZMAN, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 92533 October 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EFREN N. NIMO, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 97307 October 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL B. DUSOHAN

  • G.R. No. 98433 October 5, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SOFIO G. MOHADO

  • G.R. No. 111511 October 5, 1993 - ENRIQUE T. GARCIA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • G.R. No. 102013 October 8, 1993 - DOMINGO R. DANDO v. NORMAN JAMES FRASER, ET AL

  • A.M. No. MTJ-93-753 October 12, 1993 - EDMUNDO S. ANCOG v. JOSE Z. TAN

  • G.R. No. 89319 October 12, 1993 - JENG EVANGELISTA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL

  • G.R. No. 102618 October 12, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GAUDENCIO BAUTISTA

  • G.R. No. 102927 October 12, 1993 - BIG COUNTRY RANCH CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 105803 October 12, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDWIN S. TAYAG

  • G.R. Nos. 105959-60 October 12, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BOBBY SENCIL, ET AL

  • A.M. No. 91-1-2421-MTC October 13, 1993 - INRE: ARTURO L. JULIANO

  • A.M. No. 93-7-428-MeTC October 13, 1993 - INRE: ENRIQUE A. CUBE

  • G.R. No. 96739 October 13, 1993 - DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY v. COMMISSIONERS OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100284 October 13, 1993 - NARCISO E. MAMARIL v. EUFEMIO C. DOMINGO

  • G.R. No. 103633 October 13, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELCHOR CRUZ

  • G.R. No. 105112 October 13, 1993 - LEAH Y. APURILLO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL

  • A.M. No. P-93-958 October 14, 1993 - HERMINIO VILLAMAYOR v. TOMAS VERA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. 102954 October 14, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO HANGAD, ET AL

  • A.M. No. RTJ-92-899 October 15, 1993 - LOLITA QUE LIM v. ROGER A. DOMAGAS

  • G.R. No. 98084 October 18, 1993 - NEMESIO C. VIDAD, ET AL v. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT NEGROS ORIENTAL, ET AL

  • G.R. Nos. 101000-01 October 18, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN DE LA CRUZ, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 101191 October 18, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIO A. BRAVO

  • G.R. No. 110295 October 18, 1993 - COCA-COLA BOTTLERS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • A.M. No. P-93-825 October 20, 1993 - ABRAHAM PRINCIPE v. ROMEO R. FLORENDO

  • G.R. No. 89667 October 20, 1993 - JOSEPHINE B. BELCODERO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107852 October 20, 1993 - GREGORIO N. ARUELO, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. Nos. L-31776-78 October 21, 1993 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. MANILA STAR FERRY, INC.,

  • G.R. No. 103973 October 21, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AURORA G. ESCALONA

  • G.R. No. 104813 October 21, 1993 - HEIRS OF JOSE OLVIGA, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 106454 October 21, 1993 - BENCIO CARAAN v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 110280 October 21, 1993 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES BOARD OF REGENTS, ET AL v. ELSIE LIGOT-TELAN

  • G.R. No. 93435 October 22, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO T. MADRIDANO

  • G.R. No. 97929 October 22, 1993 - LEONIDA LANTICAN, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 104498 October 22, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SATURNINO R. REMOLLO

  • G.R. No. 88539 October 26, 1993 - KUE CUISON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 100835 October 26, 1993 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. Nos. 101833-34 October 26, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALBERTO B. ARCE

  • G.R. No. 104731 October 27, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO A. PASTORES

  • G.R. No. 100776 October 28, 1993 - ALBINO S. CO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. L-48817 October 29, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF QUEZON, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 56768 October 29, 1993 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PABLO LACTAO

  • G.R. No. 76351 October 29, 1993 - VIRGILIO B. AGUILAR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL