Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1994 > February 1994 Decisions > A.M. No. P-93-824 February 7, 1994 - RE: PIOQUINTO VILLAPANA:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[A.M. No. P-93-824. February 7, 1994.]

REPORT OF BRANCH CLERK OF COURT INOCENCIO E. DUMLAO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 134, MAKATI, METRO MANILA, RE: DEPUTY SHERIFF, PIOQUINTO VILLAPANA, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MAKATI, METRO MANILA.


SYLLABUS


1. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; PUBLIC OFFICER; ACCEPTANCE OF GIFT IN GRATITUDE FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN THE COURSE OF THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS DUTIES; CONSTITUTES A CORRUPT PRACTICE UNDER R.A. NO. 3019. - The records show that the complainant delivered the monies to respondent because the latter demanded said amounts from him. It would defy understanding for complainant to gift respondent in gratitude for the latter’s services and then file charges against him for failing to account for the use of the monies. Respondent’s act of accepting the amounts, albeit given voluntarily, cannot be said to be made in good faith. Among the acts constituting corrupt practices under the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA No. 3019 as amended), is the receiving of any gift or present by a public officer in connection with any transaction between the Government and a private party (Sec. 3[b]). For a public servant to accept gifts and other payments from parties he assists in the course of the performance of his duties is inimical to the best interest of the service, as his office would be tainted with suspicion (Tan v. Herras, 195 SCRA 1 [1991]; Resolution Administrative Matter No. P-90-404, March 11, 1991). As we have often emphasized, the conduct and behavior of everyone connected with an office charged with the dispensation of justice should be circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility. Their conduct at all times must be characterized with propriety, decorum, and, must be above and beyond suspicion. For every employee of the judiciary should be an example of integrity, uprightness and honesty (Llanes v. Borja, 192 SCRA 288 [1990]; Annang v. Vda. de Blas, 202 SCRA 635 [1991]; Valenton v. Melgar, A.M. No. P-92-698, March 3, 1993).


D E C I S I O N


PER CURIAM:


In his Report dated 25 May 1993 and Supplemental Report dated June 1, 1993, addressed to Judge Salvador S. Abad Santos, Executive Judge, Regional Trial Court, Makati, Atty. Inocencio Dumlao, the Clerk of Court of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 134, Makati, charged Deputy Sheriff Pioquinto Villapana, with demanding and receiving money from Boris J. El-Khoury, the plaintiff in Civil Case No. 92-3658 entitled "Boris J. El-Khoury v. F. Domingo V. Sanchez," in the total amount of P52,200.00, (allegedly for expenses in connection with the procurement of an attachment bond) and in failing to account the amount of P43,000.00 thereof.chanrobles lawlibrary : rednad

The said Report alleges:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. On January 7, 1993, an Order was issued by the Court, setting for hearing on January 11, 1993 at 2:00 p.m., plaintiff’s prayer for the issuance of a Writ of Preliminary Attachment;chanrobles.com : virtual law library

2. On January 11, 1993, after the hearing, the Court issued an Order granting the prayer for a Writ of Preliminary Attachment on an Attachment Bond for P1.2 M;

3. On January 14, 1993, Deputy Sheriff Pioquinto Villapana received from plaintiff Boris J. El-Khoury in his Office, the amount of P30,000.00 supposedly as cash advance for premium to negotiate for the P1.2 M attachment bond, under Cash Voucher No. 004-93, (Annex "A" :);

4. On the same day January 14, 1993, Deputy Sheriff Pioquinto Villapana, likewise, received from plaintiff Boris J. El-Khoury in his office another amount of P9,200.00 as premium for the P1.2 M attachment bond, under Cash Voucher No. 033-93 (Annex "B");

5. On January 15, 1993, plaintiff received a copy of the Order of the Court dated January 11, 1993, granting the prayer for a Writ of Preliminary Attachment;

6. On the same day, January 15, 1993, Stronghold Insurance Attachment Bond No. SICI 00238 was issued, signed by the plaintiff and approved by the Court, and its premium for P9,157.75 paid under OR 3368 dated January 15, 1993 (Annex "C" issued by Armour Insurance Management. Note that the amount in Annex "B" almost corresponds to Annex "C");

7. On January 21, 1993, Deputy Sheriff Pioquinto Villapana received from plaintiff the amount of P8,000.00 as sheriff’s expenses for the attachment, as per Check Voucher No. 007-93, FEBTC Check No. 737296 (Annex "D", but encashed. No record of court approval appears for this expense);

8. On February 11, 1993, Deputy Sheriff Pioquinto Villapana, received from plaintiff the sum of P5,000.00 as sheriff’s expenses for the attachment, per Cash Voucher 026-93 (Annex "E." No record of court approval appears for this expense.

x       x       x


10. On March 3, 1993 at about 9:25 a.m., Deputy Sheriff Villapana, while on supposed leave of absence, filed a Partial Sheriff’s Return, dated January 23, 1993 (Saturday), and paid P50.00 as sheriff’s fee under O.R. No. 296772 (Annex "F") (Rollo, pp. 5-6).

In his Supplemental Report, Atty. Dumlao informed Judge Abad Santos of the willingness of Myrna L. Pingol, an employee of the complainant, to appear and to testify at the hearing to corroborate the charges against respondent (Rollo, p.15).chanrobles virtualawlibrary chanrobles.com:chanrobles.com.ph

In a resolution dated July 21, 1993, we resolved to refer the matter to Judge Abad Santos, for investigation, report and recommendation.

Judge Abad Santos conducted a hearing on September 14, 1993, where complainant affirmed the allegations contained in the report of Atty. Dumlao. Myrna L. Pingol affirmed the contents of the affidavit she had executed in support of the charge against respondent (TSN, September 14, 1993, p. 13). In that affidavit, Ms. Pingol stated that she prepared vouchers for the following amounts: P30,000.00, P9,200.00, P8,000.00, and P5,000.00 (Annexes "A", "B", "D" and "E" of the affidavit). She further stated that she personally gave the said amounts to Respondent.

At the hearing, respondent admitted having received P30,000.00 from Ms. Pingol, which he allegedly intended to give to an agent of the Armour Insurance Management Company to facilitate the processing of the attachment bond. He also admitted that he only gave P10,000.00 to the agent (TSN, September 14, 1993, p. 12). He was unable to account for the balance of P20,000.00.

In his counter-affidavit, respondent admitted receiving, aside from the amount of P30,000.00, the amount of P80,000.00 as "Initial Sheriff’s Expenses" and the amount of P5,000.00, as fees for the guards assigned to watch over the levied property, a Mitsubishi Galant car.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

As defense, respondent claimed that the monies were given to him voluntarily and was accepted by him in good faith and without malice.

In his report dated September 20, 1993, Judge Salvador S. Abad Santos recommended "that respondent be found guilty of grave misconduct and dishonesty prejudicial to the best interest of the service and acts unbecoming of a court employee."cralaw virtua1aw library

We agree with the said recommendation.

Respondent’s defense is not acceptable. The records show that the complainant delivered the monies to respondent because the latter demanded said amounts from him. it would defy understanding for complaint to gift respondent in gratitude for the latter’s services and then filed charges against him for failing to account for the use of the monies.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

Respondent’s act of accepting the amounts, albeit given voluntarily, cannot be said to be made in good faith. Among the acts constituting corrupt practices under the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA No. 3019 as amended), is the receiving of any gift or present by a public officer in connection with any transaction between the Government and a private party (Sec. 3 [b]). For a public servant to accept gifts and other payments from parties he assists in the course of the performance of his duties is inimical to the best interest of the service, as his office would be tainted with suspicion (Tan v. Herras, 195 SCRA 1 [1991]; Resolution Administrative Matter No. P-90-404, March 11, 1991). As we have often emphasized, the conduct and behavior of everyone connected with an office charged with the dispensation of justice should be circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility. Their conduct at all times must be characterized with propriety, decorum, and, must be above and beyond suspicion. For every employee of the judiciary should be an example of integrity, uprightness and honesty (Llanes v. Borja, 192 SCRA 288 [1990]; Annang v. Vda de Blas, 202 SCRA 635 [1991]; Valenton v. Melgar, A.M.. No. P-92-698, March 3, 1993).

WHEREFORE, respondent Deputy Sheriff Pioquinto Villapana is found guilty of grave misconduct. He is hereby DISMISSED from the service with forfeiture of any and all benefits that he may be entitled to under the law, and with prejudice to re-employment in any part of the government service, including government-owned or controlled corporations.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

SO ORDERED.

Narvasa, C.J., Cruz, Feliciano, Padilla, Bidin, Regalado, Davide, Jr., Romero, Bellosillo, Melo, Quiason, Puno and Vitug, JJ., concur.

Nocon, J., is on leave.

Kapunan, J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1994 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 102948 February 2, 1994 - JAIME T. PANIS v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104939 February 2, 1994 - EMILIANO LAGUNSAD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107595 February 2, 1994 - VIC B. MEDINA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 55201 February 3, 1994 - MARIANO T. LIM, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103277 February 3, 1994 - ASSET PRIVATIZATION TRUST v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104729 February 3, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VALTONY J. JAVIER

  • G.R. No. 93322 February 4, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO DAVATOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102845 February 4, 1994 - LOADSTAR SHIPPING CO., INC. v. GERARDO H. GALLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110347 February 4, 1994 - MENTANG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110936 February 4, 1994 - FRANCISCO A. TAN, JR. v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111616 February 4, 1994 - ARNULFO NATIVIDAD v. AUGUSTO N. FELIX, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-91-595 February 7, 1994 - PRISCILLA IMBING v. BENJAMIN C. TIONGSON

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-6-251 February 7, 1994 - EMERITO M. AGCAOILI v. JOSE O. RAMOS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-93-749 February 7, 1994 - SOTERO C. CANTELA v. RAFAEL S. ALMORADIE

  • A.M. No. P-93-824 February 7, 1994 - RE: PIOQUINTO VILLAPANA

  • A.M. No. 93-8-1204 February 7, 1994 - RE: JUDGE SILVERIO S. TAYAO, RTC, BR. 143, MAKATI

  • G.R. No. 95319 February 7, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO QUERIDO

  • G.R. No. 108180 February 8, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO L. DELA CRUZ

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-687 February 9, 1994 - EDGARDO C. GARCIA v. MELJOHN DE LA PEÑA

  • G.R. No. 93935 February 9, 1994 - FELIPA GUIEB v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103517 February 9, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDGARDO B. YAP, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106025 February 9, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS P. DE GUZMAN

  • G.R. No. 106724 February 9, 1994 - NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION v. SALVADOR DE GUZMAN, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106958 February 9, 1994 - AURORA GONZALES VDA. DE ZABALLERO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 55050 February 10, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SAMUEL T. JACALAN

  • G.R. No. 73210 February 10, 1994 - BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL. v. NICOLAS A. GEROCHI, JR., ET AL

  • G.R. No. 100755 February 10, 1994 - CRISTETA BAUTISTA, ET AL. v. MANGALDAN RURAL BANK, INC.

  • G.R. No. 101421 February 10, 1994 - CONSTANCIO C. TORRALBA v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106253 February 10, 1994 - ALEXANDER VAN TWEST, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106270-73 February 10, 1994 - SULTAN MOHAMAD L. MITMUG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97474 February 14, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALBERNI DUPALI

  • G.R. No. 101334 February 14, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EVANGELINE T. JUMAO-AS

  • G.R. No. 106169 February 14, 1994 - SAMSON T. SABALONES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108176 February 14, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RONITO P. PONSICA

  • G.R. No. 109490 February 14, 1994 - PATROCINIO E. MARGOLLES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-92-740 February 15, 1994 - DIONISIO AND LUZ SAKAY v. MAXIMO ANDAL

  • G.R. No. 96149 February 16, 1994 - CONCHITA S. HAUTEA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 94301-02 February 18, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RANILO M. BOSTRE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106635 February 18, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HILARIO GEMENTIZA

  • G.R. Nos. 105758-59 February 21, 1994 - GOLDEN DONUTS, INCORPORATED v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 107062 February 21, 1994 - PHILIPPINE PRYCE ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 107303 February 21, 1994 - EMMANUEL C. OÑATE, ET AL. v. ZUES C. ABROGAR

  • G.R. Nos. 108478-79 February 21, 1994 - ESTELITA HIPOLITO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110170 February 21, 1994 - ROLETO A. PAHILAN v. RUDY A. TALABA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-733 February 23, 1994 - ROSITA M. BARRETE v. VENANCIO J. AMILA

  • G.R. No. 96289 February 23, 1994 - SERGIO and MA. LOURDES ALUNAN v. TRADERS ROYAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103497 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERTO D. BULALAYAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104376 February 23, 1994 - ARTEMIO G. ILANO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104690 February 23, 1994 - ZENAIDA GACO v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104869 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICASIO GORNES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105390 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EXIQUIEL TALAVER

  • G.R. No. 105689 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO L. GONZALES

  • G.R. Nos. 105956-57 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DONATO LAGROSA, JR.

  • G.R. No. 107623 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGELITA P. MANALO

  • G.R. No. 108253 February 23, 1994 - LYDIA L. GERALDEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111749 February 23, 1994 - ROBERTO A. MIGUEL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-678 February 24, 1994 - OLIVIA BAMBO-JORIN v. ARNULFO A. SINGSON

  • G.R. No. 107112 February 24, 1994 - NAGA TELEPHONE CO., INC., ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111951 February 24, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO R. YANSON

  • G.R. Nos. 86159-60 February 28, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO PELONES

  • G.R. No. 96422 February 28, 1994 - FRANCISCO S. TANTUICO, JR. v. EUFEMIO DOMINGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103211 February 28, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIO C. BARTE

  • G.R. No. 104649 February 28, 1994 - PHILIPPINE BANKING CORPORATION v. SALVADOR S. TENSUAN

  • G.R. No. 105033 February 28, 1994 - PHILIPPINE VILLAGE HOTEL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105391 February 28, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENEDICTO CAMPA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106042 February 28, 1994 - RUFINA BAUTISTA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106090 February 28, 1994 - RICARDO FERNANDEZ v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 107509-11 February 28, 1994 - YUSOPH PAPANDAYAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110271 February 28, 1994 - RODOLFO R. PAULINO v. COURT OF APPEAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102948 February 2, 1994 - JAIME T. PANIS v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104939 February 2, 1994 - EMILIANO LAGUNSAD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107595 February 2, 1994 - VIC B. MEDINA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 55201 February 3, 1994 - MARIANO T. LIM, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103277 February 3, 1994 - ASSET PRIVATIZATION TRUST v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104729 February 3, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VALTONY J. JAVIER

  • G.R. No. 93322 February 4, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO DAVATOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102845 February 4, 1994 - LOADSTAR SHIPPING CO., INC. v. GERARDO H. GALLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110347 February 4, 1994 - MENTANG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110936 February 4, 1994 - FRANCISCO A. TAN, JR. v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111616 February 4, 1994 - ARNULFO NATIVIDAD v. AUGUSTO N. FELIX, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-91-595 February 7, 1994 - PRISCILLA IMBING v. BENJAMIN C. TIONGSON

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-6-251 February 7, 1994 - EMERITO M. AGCAOILI v. JOSE O. RAMOS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-93-749 February 7, 1994 - SOTERO C. CANTELA v. RAFAEL S. ALMORADIE

  • A.M. No. P-93-824 February 7, 1994 - RE: PIOQUINTO VILLAPANA

  • A.M. No. 93-8-1204 February 7, 1994 - RE: JUDGE SILVERIO S. TAYAO, RTC, BR. 143, MAKATI

  • G.R. No. 95319 February 7, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO QUERIDO

  • G.R. No. 108180 February 8, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO L. DELA CRUZ

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-687 February 9, 1994 - EDGARDO C. GARCIA v. MELJOHN DE LA PEÑA

  • G.R. No. 93935 February 9, 1994 - FELIPA GUIEB v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103517 February 9, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDGARDO B. YAP, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106025 February 9, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLOS P. DE GUZMAN

  • G.R. No. 106724 February 9, 1994 - NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION v. SALVADOR DE GUZMAN, JR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106958 February 9, 1994 - AURORA GONZALES VDA. DE ZABALLERO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 55050 February 10, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SAMUEL T. JACALAN

  • G.R. No. 73210 February 10, 1994 - BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL. v. NICOLAS A. GEROCHI, JR., ET AL

  • G.R. No. 100755 February 10, 1994 - CRISTETA BAUTISTA, ET AL. v. MANGALDAN RURAL BANK, INC.

  • G.R. No. 101421 February 10, 1994 - CONSTANCIO C. TORRALBA v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106253 February 10, 1994 - ALEXANDER VAN TWEST, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106270-73 February 10, 1994 - SULTAN MOHAMAD L. MITMUG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 97474 February 14, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALBERNI DUPALI

  • G.R. No. 101334 February 14, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EVANGELINE T. JUMAO-AS

  • G.R. No. 106169 February 14, 1994 - SAMSON T. SABALONES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108176 February 14, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RONITO P. PONSICA

  • G.R. No. 109490 February 14, 1994 - PATROCINIO E. MARGOLLES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-92-740 February 15, 1994 - DIONISIO AND LUZ SAKAY v. MAXIMO ANDAL

  • G.R. No. 96149 February 16, 1994 - CONCHITA S. HAUTEA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 94301-02 February 18, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RANILO M. BOSTRE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106635 February 18, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HILARIO GEMENTIZA

  • G.R. Nos. 105758-59 February 21, 1994 - GOLDEN DONUTS, INCORPORATED v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 107062 February 21, 1994 - PHILIPPINE PRYCE ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 107303 February 21, 1994 - EMMANUEL C. OÑATE, ET AL. v. ZUES C. ABROGAR

  • G.R. Nos. 108478-79 February 21, 1994 - ESTELITA HIPOLITO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110170 February 21, 1994 - ROLETO A. PAHILAN v. RUDY A. TALABA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-733 February 23, 1994 - ROSITA M. BARRETE v. VENANCIO J. AMILA

  • G.R. No. 96289 February 23, 1994 - SERGIO and MA. LOURDES ALUNAN v. TRADERS ROYAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103497 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERTO D. BULALAYAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104376 February 23, 1994 - ARTEMIO G. ILANO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104690 February 23, 1994 - ZENAIDA GACO v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104869 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICASIO GORNES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105390 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EXIQUIEL TALAVER

  • G.R. No. 105689 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO L. GONZALES

  • G.R. Nos. 105956-57 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DONATO LAGROSA, JR.

  • G.R. No. 107623 February 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGELITA P. MANALO

  • G.R. No. 108253 February 23, 1994 - LYDIA L. GERALDEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111749 February 23, 1994 - ROBERTO A. MIGUEL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-92-678 February 24, 1994 - OLIVIA BAMBO-JORIN v. ARNULFO A. SINGSON

  • G.R. No. 107112 February 24, 1994 - NAGA TELEPHONE CO., INC., ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111951 February 24, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO R. YANSON

  • G.R. Nos. 86159-60 February 28, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO PELONES

  • G.R. No. 96422 February 28, 1994 - FRANCISCO S. TANTUICO, JR. v. EUFEMIO DOMINGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 103211 February 28, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIO C. BARTE

  • G.R. No. 104649 February 28, 1994 - PHILIPPINE BANKING CORPORATION v. SALVADOR S. TENSUAN

  • G.R. No. 105033 February 28, 1994 - PHILIPPINE VILLAGE HOTEL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105391 February 28, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENEDICTO CAMPA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106042 February 28, 1994 - RUFINA BAUTISTA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106090 February 28, 1994 - RICARDO FERNANDEZ v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 107509-11 February 28, 1994 - YUSOPH PAPANDAYAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110271 February 28, 1994 - RODOLFO R. PAULINO v. COURT OF APPEAL, ET AL.