Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1994 > September 1994 Decisions > G.R. No. 98704 September 8, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARVEL SABALLE:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

THIRD DIVISION

[G.R. No. 98704. September 8, 1994.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARVEL SABALLE, alias BEBOT, alias BETROK, Accused-Appellant.


D E C I S I O N


MELO, J.:


Accused was charged with the crime of rape in an Information reading as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

That on or about the 1st day of March, 1989, in the Municipality of Tolosa, Province of Leyte, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable court, the above-named accused, with deliberate intent and with lewd designs, by means of force and intimidation, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously have carnal knowledge with Maricel Rendora, a six (6) year child, against her will and consent to her damage and prejudice.

(p. 5, Rollo.)

After trial, the court a quo found accused-appellant guilty as charged in a decision, the dispositive portion of which reads as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, this Court finds the accused Arvel Saballe alias "Bebot Saballe" alias "Betrok" guilty beyond reasonable doubt of statutory rape under Article 335, paragraph 3 of the Revised Penal Code, and hereby sentences him to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua and to pay the sum of P20,000.00 to the offended party Maricel Rendora and her family (People v. Simeon Mangalinio y Lumanoy, G.R. No. 79011, Feb. 15, 1990.)

(p. 29, Rollo.)

Accused-appellant appealed, raising the sole assigned error that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.chanrobles.com:cralaw:red

The evidence for the prosecution, as concisely set forth in the brief submitted by Solicitor General Raul I. Goco, Asst. Solicitor General Azucena R. Balanon-Corpuz, and Associate Solicitor Angelo R. Arizolsa, is as follows:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Imelda Rendora testified that on March 1, 1989 at about 5:00 p.m. in Barangay San Vicente, Tolosa, Leyte, she left her three (3) children, namely Maricel (6 years old), Michelle (4 years old) and Messanli (2 years old), alone inside their house while she went to the house of her own mother, about thirty (30) to forty (40) meters away, to obtain some rice and burning charcoals which she brought to her kitchen where she built a fire in preparation for supper. She went out again to the street about fifteen meters from the house and talked with the neighbors. (pp. 4-6, tsn, September 27, 1989).

Maricel testified that while her mother was outside their house, appellant entered and enticed her to play with him. While they were playing, appellant forced himself on top of Maricel and inserted his penis into the latter’s vagina (pp. 3-4, tsn, September 26, 1989) causing her extreme pain and instant bleeding (p. 13, tsn, August 29, 1989). Maricel cried (p. 7, tsn, September 27, 1989). Having finished with his bestial desires, appellant left through the window before Imelda came back to the house (p. 14, tsn, August 29, 1989).

When Imelda returned to the house after talking to her neighbors, she found Maricel sitting in the sala and crying. She found out that Maricel’s vagina was bleeding. Acting instinctively, she washed it with water and tried to find what was causing the bleeding. She discovered that the opening had widened and that the bleeding was coming from the inside of the vagina. Imelda went to her parent’s house and together with her father they chartered a motorcycle to proceed to the Rural Health Clinic. Since it was already 6:00 p.m., the tricycle driver advised them to proceed to the Leyte Provincial Hospital at Palo, Leyte (p. 8, tsn, September 27, 1989). Along the way, somewhere in Borac, Maricel informed her mother that it was "Betrok", the nickname of appellant, who caused the bleeding when he went on top of her. They reached the Leyte Provincial Hospital, at around 7:00 to 7:30 p.m. where Maricel was treated by two resident physicians, one of whom was Dr. Lydia B. Hayabo M.D., (p. 6, tsn, August 29, 1989). She came up with the following findings:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

MEDICO-LEGAL REPORT

NAME : RENDORA MARICEL

Age : 6; Female

Status : Child

Address : San Vicente, Tolosa, Leyte

Alleged Case : Allegedly raped by a known person

Alleged Date, Time and Place of Infliction:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

March 1, 1989

4:00 p.m.

San Vicente, Tolosa, Leyte

Purpose of Examination: Medicolegal

FINDINGS

P.E.: No gross P.E. Findings

— No pubic hairs,

— Hymen — fresh laceration with bleeding at the base of clitoris area.

— Vagina — admits 1 finger with ease.

— Vaginal smear for the presence of spermatozoa - negative

Time of examination: 7:30 p.m.

Date of examination: March 1, 1989

Remarks: Said patient was admitted on March 1, 1989 and discharged on the following day.

The same doctor concluded that the fresh laceration at the hymen was due to the penetration of the penis. Maricel was ordered to be confined for one day at the hospital (p. 6, tsn, August 29, 1989). For the duration of Maricel’s stay at the hospital, the medicines needed and all other expenses incurred, Imelda had to shell out P500.00 (p. 9, tsn, September 27, 1989).

The crime was reported to the Tolosa INP Station in the evening of March 1, 1989. Acting on such report, Station Investigator P. Cpl. Eufronio Malate, together with other police officers, went to Barangay San Vicente, apprehended appellant and brought him to the station (pp. 4-6, tsn, October 9, 1989) for investigation. The following day appellant was released from custody since no case was yet filed against him (p. 7, tsn, October 9, 1989). On March 3, 1989, however, appellant was re-arrested and brought to the hospital where he was positively identified by Maricel (p. 8, ibid).

(pp. 3-7, Appellee’s Brief, ff. p. 107, Rollo.)

Accused-appellant’s defense rests on denial and alibi.

Accused-appellant contends that the charge of rape is a sheer fabrication by Imelda Rendora, the mother of the victim, Maricel Rendora, to get back at the family of accused-appellant against whom she entertained animosities arising out of a land dispute. The contention of accused-appellant is patently unsustainable in the face of the prosecution evidence. The fact that the victim was sexually assaulted is patently established by the medical certificate (Exhibit A) issued by Dr. Lydia B. Hayabo who physically examined the victim which Dr. Hayabo later confirmed on the witness stand. The medical certificate clearly states that the victim’s vagina was lacerated and bleeding and easily admitted one finger with ease. Dr. Hayabo concluded that the fresh laceration of the vagina was caused by the penetration of a penis.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

As to who raped the victim, there can be no doubt. The victim categorically identified accused-appellant as the person who raped her. Her testimony is simple and straightforward, unshaken by a rigid cross-examination and unflawed by any inconsistency or contradiction. She is a guileless and artless 6-year old girl who can be expected to tell the truth without any embellishment. Her testimony must be given full faith and credit.

Accused-appellant’s protestation that the victim’s mother filed the charge to get back at the family of accused-appellant because of an existing enmity and antagonism between the victim’s and accused-appellant’s family arising out of an alleged land dispute is too unsubstantial and implausible to negate the actuality of the rape. As above demonstrated, the fact of rape as well as the identity of the malefactor have been clearly established by the evidence. Too, the misunderstanding between the family of accused-appellant and that of the victim happened three years before the rape and had been in fact already forgotten by the parties involved who have since become friends. Finally, we are totally appalled by accused-appellant’s posture view that a mother would willingly subject her daughter, one of very tender age at that, to the rigors of a rape trial just so she could satisfy her desire for revenge. As we stated in People v. Yambao, (193 SCRA 571 [1991]):cralawnad

It is inconceivable that a mother of a six-year old child would fabricate a rape charge, subject her daughter to physical examination and the embarrassment of a public trial. A mother would not sacrifice her daughter’s honor to give vent to a grudge knowing fully well that such an experience would damage her daughter’s psyche and tar her for life.

(p. 578, Rollo.)

The proffered alibi is likewise unavailing. Alibi is a weak defense for it is easy of fabrication (People v. Ragas, 44 SCRA 152 [1972]) and cannot prevail over the prosecution’s positive and clear identification of the accused as the perpetrator of the crime (People v. Rendoque, 205 SCRA 783 [1992]).

Accused-appellant was positively and categorically identified by the victim as her debaucher and defiler. Material to establishing alibi as a valid defense, it must be shown that it was physically impossible for the accused-appellant to have been present at the place of the crime at the time it was committed (People v. Cruz, 208 SCRA 326 [1992]). In the case at bench, Accused-appellant claimed that at the time of the commission of the crime he was harvesting palay at a ricefield owned by one Genoveva Cinco. However, by his own testimony said ricefiled is only 180 meters away from the house of the victim (pp. 2-3, tsn, March 7, 1990). At such a short distance, clearly it was not physically impossible for accused-appellant to have been at the place of the crime at the time of commission thereof.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is hereby affirmed in toto.

SO ORDERED.

Feliciano, Romero and Vitug, JJ., concur.

Bidin, J., is on leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-1994 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.M. No. MTJ-94-957 September 1, 1994 - CORAZON ALMA G. DE LEON v. TROADIO C. UBAY-UBAY

  • G.R. No. 83527 September 1, 1994 - JORGE ASPI, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 89967 September 1, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGELITO BAUTISTA

  • G.R. No. 106246 September 1, 1994 - CENTRAL NEGROS ELECTRIC COOP., INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106655 September 1, 1994 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106692 September 1, 1994 - MILA MANALO v. RICARDO GLORIA

  • G.R. No. 107075 September 1, 1994 - ARMANDO S. OLIZON v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 108310 September 1, 1994 - RUFINO O. ESLAO v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • G.R. No. 109761 September 1, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARMELITA PUERTOLLANO COMIA

  • G.R. No. 113092 September 1, 1994 - MARTIN CENTENO v. VICTORIA VILLALON-PORNILLOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115044 September 1, 1994 - ALFREDO S. LIM, ET AL. v. FELIPE G. PACQUING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 86720 September 2, 1994 - MHP GARMENTS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102007 September 2, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROGELIO C. BAYOTAS

  • G.R. No. 103047 September 2, 1994 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 103394 September 2, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERT N. REYES

  • G.R. No. 103584 September 2, 1994 - SUBO TANGGOTE v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106341 September 2, 1994 - DELFIN G. VILLARAMA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 94953 September 5, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARMANDO G. DE LARA

  • G.R. Nos. 105402-04 September 5, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOANES AGRAVANTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105538 September 5, 1994 - FERROCHROME PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 110995 September 5, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALVARO B. SAYCON

  • G.R. No. 66130 September 8, 1994 - DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. ISABEL TESALONA

  • G.R. No. 82490 September 8, 1994 - SEVERINO P. DE GUZMAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 98704 September 8, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARVEL SABALLE

  • G.R. No. 106370 September 8, 1994 - PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL, INC., v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • A.M. No. 93-9-249-CA September 12, 1994 - INRE: MARIA CORONEL

  • G.R. No. 92154 September 12, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTIAGO F. SERVILLON

  • G.R. No. 101383 September 12, 1994 - GAMALIEL B. PALMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105813 September 12, 1994 - CONCEPCION M. CATUIRA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108525 September 13, 1994 - RICARDO AND MILAGROS HUANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108784 September 13, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ADJUTOR TANDUYAN

  • G.R. No. 100995 September 14, 1994 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 101262 September 14, 1994 - ALBERTO GARRIDO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108430 September 14, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO L. TIONGCO

  • G.R. No. 108824 September 14, 1994 - DENNIS C. LAZO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 103225 September 15, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO BALANAG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106720 September 15, 1994 - ROBERTO AND THELMA AJERO v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 108493 September 15, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DANILO R. DANIEL

  • A.M. No. RTJ-92-876 September 19, 1994 - STATE PROSECUTORS v. MANUEL T. MURO

  • G.R. Nos. 107732-32 September 19, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDGARDO G. MANUEL

  • G.R. No. 104276 September 20, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO A. ALAPIDE

  • G.R. No. 108494 September 20, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SAMUEL Z. MARRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108878 September 20, 1994 - OLIVIA SEVILLA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108914 September 20, 1994 - STAR ANGEL HANDICRAFT v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 95013 September 21, 1994 - TRADE UNIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES/FEBRUARY SIX MOVEMENT v. BIENVENIDO LAGUESMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 100485 September 21, 1994 - SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION v. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108670 September 21, 1994 - LBC EXPRESS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110581 September 21, 1994 - TELENGTAN BROTHERS & SONS, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 93-9-1249-RTC September 22, 1994 - IN RE: REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MINDORO ORIENTAL

  • G.R. No. 95641 September 22, 1994 - SANTOS B. AREOLA v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 109145 September 22, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE D. CAPOQUIAN

  • G.R. No. 109783 September 22, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFONSO MENDOZA

  • G.R. No. 105597 September 23, 1994 - LISANDRO ABADIA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106213 September 23, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CRISANTA G. SANTOS

  • Adm. Matter No. RTJ-91-758 September 28, 1994 - ERNESTO B. ESTOYA, ET AL. v. MARVIE R. ABRAHAM SINGSON

  • G.R. No. 55380 September 26, 1994 - INRE: FLAVIANO C. ZAPANTA v. LOCAL CIVIL REGISTRAR

  • G.R. No. 76925 September 26, 1994 - V.V. ALDABA ENGINEERING v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 98149 September 26, 1994 - JOSE V. DEL ROSARIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 99042 September 26, 1994 - BLOOMFIELD ACADEMY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 100391-92 September 26, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIANO TIMPLE, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 104357-58 September 26, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDWIN GO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104372 September 26, 1994 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106705 September 26, 1994 - PHILIPPINE DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, ET AL. v. TITO F. GENILO

  • G.R. No. 107159 September 26, 1994 - AMADEO CUAÑO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107328 September 26, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EFREN DULOS

  • G.R. No. 107349 September 26, 1994 - SUNFLOWER UMBRELLA MANUFACTURING CO., INC. v. BETTY U. DE LEON

  • G.R. Nos. 111416-17 September 26, 1994 - FELICIDAD UY v. MAXIMO C. CONTRERAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111471 September 26, 1994 - ROGELIO R. DEBULGADO v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

  • Adm. Case No. 3232 September 27, 1994 - ROSITA C. NADAYAG v. JOSE A. GRAGEDA

  • G.R. No. 64948 September 27, 1994 - MANILA GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, INC. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

  • G.R. No. 94570 September 28, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMICIANO PERALTA

  • G.R. No. 97845 September 29, 1994 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NELIA N. CORONACION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115906 September 29, 1994 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-92-721 September 30, 1994 - JUVY N. COSCA, ET AL. v. LUCIO P. PALAYPAYON, JR.

  • G.R. No. 80887 September 30, 1994 - BLISS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION , ET AL. v. PURA FERRER CALLEJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111230 September 30, 1994 - ENRIQUE T. GARCIA, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.