Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1995 > July 1995 Decisions > G.R. No. 100912 July 6, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ZALDY A. CRISTOBAL:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 100912. July 6, 1995.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZALDY CRISTOBAL y ALBARIN, Accused-Appellant.

The Solicitor General for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Public Attorney’s Office for Accused-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; EVIDENCE; CREDIBILITY OF THE WITNESSES; PRINCIPLES IN THE PROSECUTION OF RAPE CASES. — The Court is aware of the difficulty of prosecuting cases of Rape with Homicide. The nature of the crime of rape, where it is usually only the victim and the rapist who are present at the scene of the crime makes prosecutions for the complex crime of rape with homicide particularly difficult since the victim can no longer testify against the perpetrator of the crime. In this cases, the evidence against the accused is usually circumstancial.

2. ID.; ID., FINDINGS OF TRIAL COURT; RULE; CASE AT BAR. — Witness Teresa Cantubira testified as an eyewitness to the stabbing of victim Edna Cantubira. The determination of this case therefore lies in the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses. The settled rule deeply imbedded in Philippine jurisprudence is that appellate courts will generally not disturb the findings of the trial court on the issue of credibility of witnesses. In the present case, the trial court gave more credence to the eyewitness testimony of Teresa Cantubira and the testimonies of the other prosecution witnesses who were able to establish the conduct of accused Zaldy Cristobal prior to the commission of the offense (i.e. having a drinking spree, stating that he was going to kill the victim and expressing his intention of going to the victim’s house at about 11:00 p.m. of 22 September 1989). We see no reason to disturb the findings of the trial court.

3. CRIMINAL LAW; RAPE WITH HOMICIDE; COMMISSION THEREOF, ESTABLISHED IN CASE AT BAR. — On the contention that the crime committed was only homicide, we find nothing to indicate that the trial court erred in convicting the accused of the complex crime of rape with homicide. The killing of the victim by the accused was established by the testimony of Teresa Cantubira which was corroborated by the autopsy report showing the wounds suffered by the victim. The rape contrary to accused’s ratiocinations, was also established by the testimony of Teresa to the effect that she saw the accused lying on top of the victim completely naked in the act of stabbing her. The autopsy report showed fresh hymenal lacerations on the sexual organ of the victim. Considering the above findings of the trial court, it is highly improbable, even ridiculous, to conclude that the accused undressed himself only forth purpose of killing the victim. The physical and testimonial evidence in this case clearly establish accused appellant’s guilt of the crime of rape with homicide beyond reasonable doubt.


D E C I S I O N


PADILLA, J.:


This is an appeal from a judgment * of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 46, Masbate, Masbate convicting accused-appellant Zaldy Cristobal y Albarin for the rape and killing of Edna Cantubira.

The Information dated 12 January 1990 reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about 22nd day of September 1989, in the evening thereof, at barangay Mabato-bato, Municipality of Mandaon, Province of Masbate, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, armed with [a] sharp instrument, by means of force and intimidation and with lewd design, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously have carnal knowledge with Edna Cantubira against the latter’s will and on the occasion of the rape the said accused with intent to kill did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault and stab said Edna Cantubira inflicting upon the latter serious wounds in the different parts of the body which caused her death.

Contrary to law." 1

Zaldy Cristobal y Albarin pleaded not guilty when arraigned on 12 March 1990. After trial, the judgment convicting Cristobal of Rape with Homicide was rendered on 18 March 1991, the dispositive part of which reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds accused Zaldy Cristobal y Albarin guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the complex crime of Rape with Homicide, penalized under Article 335, as amended, of the Revised Penal Code, and hereby sentences him to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua, the accessory penalties thereof, and to indemnify the heirs of the deceased in the amount of P30,000.00 without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency and to pay the cost.

It appearing that the accused is detained in the service of his sentence, he should be credited the full period of his detention.

SO ORDERED." 2

Appellant Cristobal assigns the following errors to the trial court:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . IN GIVING CREDENCE TO THE IMPROBABLE AND INCONSISTENT TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS TERESA CANTUBIRA.

. . . IN FINDING ACCUSED-APPELLANT GUILTY OF THE CRIME OF RAPE BASED ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

. . . IN FINDING ACCUSED-APPELLANT GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF THE CRIME OF RAPE WITH HOMICIDE." 3

The prosecution presented the following witnesses:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

1. Ruben Escota, who testified that at around 8:00 in the evening of 22 September 1989, he and certain Gerry Bisquillo attended a benefit dance at the town plaza of Mabato-bato, Mandaon, Masbate. At around 11:00 of the same evening, while he and accused-appellant Zaldy Cristobal were on their way home, Cristobal invited him to pass by the house of the victim Edna Cantubira since, according to the accused, Edna was all alone in their house. Escota stated that he refused the invitation since he noticed that Cristobal was quite drunk. He further stated that accused Cristobal was carrying a batangas (fan) knife. Escota testified that he just went straight home to sleep and the next morning, he learned from his sister-in-law that Edna Cantubira was killed the night before.

2. Pedra Cristobal, who testified that on 22 September 1989 at around 5:00 in the afternoon, she was inside in her house in Mabato-bato, Mandaon, Masbate when accused Cristobal arrived. She noticed that Cristobal was drunk having just come from a drinking spree. Cristobal then told her that he was going to kill somebody that night. Since Cristobal was her nephew by affinity, she tried to dissuade him from doing anything which, she said, would be shameful. Accused Cristobal apparently ignored her pleas and just left. The following day, she learned that her neighbor Edna Cantubira was killed the night before.

3. Conrado Monterola, who testified that on 22 September 1989 at around 11:00 in the morning, he and accused Cristobal were at the house of a certain Peryong Cumadero having a drinking spree. While Peryong was in the kitchen and only he and Cristobal were left at the table drinking, the latter told him, "Manoy, if something will happen tomorrow, I will kill Edna Cantubira to complete my (v)ow for amulet [sic]." Monterola advised Cristobal not to do it because Cantubira was a girl and she had not done him any wrong. He further testified that Cristobal drank with them until around 3:00 in the afternoon and left when other persons came from the drinking spree.

4. Teresa Cantubira, who testified that in the afternoon of 22 September 1989, she was in her house in Mabato-bato , Crossing Mandaon, Masbate with her four (4) children. Her husband was then away from home having been summoned by their landlord, Mr. Aribon, to harvest his "palay." Edna Cantubira was her sister-in-law who was then living in a house about forty (40) meters away. In the evening of that day, Edna’s two (2) brothers asked her to watch their sister since she would be left alone in their house because the two (2) of them would be attending the dance at the town plaza and their parents were then vacationing in Capiz. At about 11:00 in the evening of the same day, she heard a voice she recognized as that of Edna, shouting for help. She then proceeded to Edna’s house and, through an open door, she saw accused Zaldy Cristobal completely naked, lying on top of Edna. Teresa further stated that she saw Cristobal repeatedly stab Edna several times and even saw the accused slash the victim’s neck using batangas (fan) knife. She was able to clearly see the accused because a lit kerosene lamp was only about three (3) meters away from the accused. She immediately returned to her own house fearing that Cristobal would kill her. In the early morning of 23 September 1989, she accompanied Edna’s brothers to the house were they saw Edna already dead. They then reported the incident to their barangay captain and to a CAFGU member.

5. Dr. Luis L. Aguirre, the Municipal Health Officer of Mandaon, Masbate, who testified to his conducting an autopsy on the body of the victim. His findings which were summarized in his autopsy report 4 showed that the victim suffered no less than 18 incised wounds and 20 stab wounds particularly described as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"x       x       x

1. Incised wound, neck, anterior portion, about 6 inches in length, cutting the trachea and esophagus.

2. Stabbed wound, neck, left, 1 inch in width, 1 1/4 inches deep.

3. Stabbed wound, neck, right, 1 inch in width, 2 inches deep.

4. Incised wound, left mandible, 1 inch in length.

5. Incised wound, right mandible, 1 inch in length.

6. Stabbed wound, 5 in number, left in shoulder.

7. Stabbed wound, left breast 1 1/2 inches in length.

8. Stabbed wound, chest, right, 5 in number.

9. Stabbed wounds, right hypochondriac area, 2 in number, non-penetrating.

10 Stabbed wound, right arm, 1 inch in length.

11. Stabbed wound, right forearm, 4 in number, 1 inch in length,

12. Incised wound, right thumb.

13. Incised wound, left hand, 1/4 inch in length.

14. Incised wounds, left, pointing and middle fingers.

15. Incised wound, right thigh, 2 in number, 1 inch in length.

16. Incised wounds, right leg, 2 in number.

17. Incised wound, left thigh, about 5 inches in length midial portion.

18. Incised wound, left thigh, lateral part, about 2 inches long.

19. Incised wound, left leg, proximal 3rd, 2 in number. 5

The lone witness for the defense was the accused-appellant Zaldy Cristobal y Albarin. He denied any knowledge of the crime. He testified that on 22 September 1989, he went to the benefit dance at around 6:30 in the evening. He stated that he was operating sound system for the dance together with the victim’s brother Elvis Cantubira. He further testified that he stayed at the plaza until 5:00 the next morning when he went home with Elvis. Cristobal alleged that Teresa Cantubira testified falsely against him because he had caught her having sexual relations with Ruben Escota. In like manner, Cristobal contended that Pedra Cristobal held a grudge against him since he knew of the intimate relations between Pedra’s brother-in-law Ruben Escota and Teresa Cantubira. He also contended that prosecution witness Conrado Monterola had a grudge against him since he refused to sell him certain coconuts which were actually not his.

The prosecution presented Elvis Cantubira as a rebuttal witness. Elvis belied the accused’s statement that he was with Elvis operating the sound system for the dance. Elvis testified that at about 6:30 in the evening of 22 September 1989, he and his brother Amer Cantubira brought their sound system to the town plaza for the benefit dance. He stated that the last time he saw the accused at the dance that night was at about 10:00 in the evening.

The court is aware of the difficulty of prosecuting cases of Rape with Homicide. 6 The nature of the crime of rape, where it is usually only the victim and the rapists who are present at the scene of the crime, makes prosecutions for the complex crime of rape with homicide particularly difficult since the victim can no longer testify against the perpetrators of the crime. In these cases, the evidence against the accused is usually circumstantial.

The case at bench, however, is an exception. Witness Teresa Cantubira testified as an eyewitness to the stabbing of the victim Edna Cantubira. the determination of this case therefore lies in the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses.

The settled rule deeply imbedded in Philippine jurisprudence is that appellate courts will generally not disturb the findings of the trial court on the issue of credibility of witnesses. 7

In the present case, the trial court gave more credence to the eyewitness testimony of Teresa Cantubira and the testimonies of the other prosecution witnesses who were able to establish the conduct of accused Zaldy Cristobal prior to the commission of the offense (i.e. having a drinking spree, stating that he was going to kill the victim and expressing his intention of going to the victim’s house at about 11:00 p.m. of 22 September 1989). We see no reason to disturb the findings of the trial court.chanrobles law library

On the other hand, Accused Cristobal relied on his bare denial and alibi which belied by the testimony of rebuttal witness Elvis Cantubira.

On the contention that the crime committed was only homicide, we find nothing to indicate that the trial court erred in convicting the accused of the complex crime of rape with homicide. The killing of the victim by the accused was established by the testimony of Teresa Cantubira which was corroborated by the autopsy report showing the wounds suffered by the victim. The rape, contrary to accused’s ratiocinations, was also established by the testimony of Teresa to the effect that she saw the accused lying on top of the victim completely naked in the act of stabbing her. The autopsy report showed fresh hymenal lacerations on the sexual organ of the victim. Considering the above findings of the trial court, it is highly improbable, even ridiculous, to conclude that the accused undressed himself only for the purpose of killing the victim. The physical and testimonial evidence in this case clearly establish accused-appellant’s guilty of the crime of rape with homicide beyond reasonable doubt.

The amount of Thirty Thousand Pesos (P30,000.00) awarded by the trial court to the heirs of the victim should however be increased to Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) in accordance with prevailing jurisprudence.

WHEREFORE, the judgment convicting the accused-appellant Zaldy Cristobal y Albarin of the crime of rape with homicide is hereby AFFIRMED with the above stated modification in the amount of civil indemnity awarded to the victim’s heirs, which is raised to P50,000.00. Costs against the Accused-Appellant.

SO ORDERED

Davide, Jr., Bellosillo, Quiason and Kapunan, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



* Penned by Judge Florante A. Cipres.

1. Rollo, p. 5.

2. Rollo, p. 20.

3. Rollo, p. 57.

4. Original Records, Exhibit "E" .

5. Original Records, p. 69.

6. People v. Alvarez, G.R. No. 103464, 23 September 1993, 226 SCRA 683.

7. People v. Pamor, G.R. No. 108599, 7 October 1994, 237 SCRA 462.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1995 Jurisprudence                 

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-93-835 July 3, 1995 - GERARDO C. ALVARADO v. LILY A. LAQUINDANUM

  • G.R. No. 107748 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCIANO SAPURCO

  • G.R. No. 109248 July 3, 1995 - GREGORIO F. ORTEGA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110558 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CELEDONIO B. DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112279 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERT ALBAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114698 July 3, 1995 - WELLINGTON INVESTMENT AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. CRESENCIANO B. TRAJANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115304 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLAND L. MELOSANTOS

  • G.R. No. 110240 July 4, 1995 - ENJAY INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109036 July 5, 1995 - BARTOLOME F. MERCADO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Case No. 2747 July 6, 1995 - GODOFREDO A. VILLALON v. JIMENEZ B. BUENDIA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1008 July 6, 1995 - FLORENTINA BILAG-RIVERA v. CRISANTO FLORA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1026 July 6, 1995 - VICTOR BASCO v. DAMASO GREGORIO

  • G.R. No. 100912 July 6, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ZALDY A. CRISTOBAL

  • G.R. Nos. 103560 & 103599 July 6, 1995 - GOLD CITY INTEGRATED PORT SERVICE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109166 July 6, 1995 - HERNAN R. LOPEZ, JR. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 112973-76 July 6, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO PAGCU, JR.

  • G.R. No. 110321 July 7, 1995 - HILARIO VALLENDE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112629 July 7, 1995 - PHIL. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118644 July 7, 1995 - EPIMACO A. VELASCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102930 July 10, 1995 - BONIFACIO MONTILLA PEÑA v. CA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119055 July 10, 1995 - ROY RODILLAS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • CBD Case No. 251 July 11, 1995 - ADELINA T. VILLANUEVA v. TERESITA STA. ANA

  • G.R. No. 109370 July 11, 1995 - ROGELIO PARMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110015 July 11, 1995 - MANILA BAY CLUB CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112046 July 11, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTHONY ONG CO

  • G.R. No. 115245 July 11, 1995 - JUANITO C. PILAR v. COMMISSION ON ELECTION

  • G.R. No. 116008 July 11, 1995 - METRO TRANSIT ORGANIZATION, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79896 July 12, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DELFIN L. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114167 July 12, 1995 - COASTWISE LIGHTERAGE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114186 July 12, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR R. ERNI

  • Adm. Case No. 3283 July 13, 1995 - RODOLFO MILLARE v. EUSTAQUIO Z. MONTERO

  • Adm. Matter Nos. MTJ-93-806 & MTJ-93-863 July 13, 1995 - ERLINO LITIGIO, ET AL. v. CELESTINO V. DICON

  • Bar Matter No. 712 July 13, 1995 - IN RE: AL C. ARGOSINO

  • G.R. No. 106769 July 13, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO WEDING

  • G.R. No. 109573 July 13, 1995 - SEVEN BROTHERS SHIPPING CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110580 July 13, 1995 - MANUEL BANSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110930 July 13, 1995 - OSCAR LEDESMA AND COMPANY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116049 July 13, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTAQUIO Z. GACOTT, JR., ET AL.

  • Adm. Case No. 1048 July 14, 1995 - WELLINGTON REYES v. SALVADOR M. GAA

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-90-400 July 14, 1995 - SUSIMO MOROÑO v. AURELIO J.V. LOMEDA

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-93-818 July 14, 1995 - ENRIQUITO CABILAO, ET AL. v. AGUSTIN T. SARDIDO

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-932 July 14, 1995 - JESUS F. MANGALINDAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-963 July 14, 1995 - MARILOU NAMA MORENO v. JOSE C. BERNABE

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1012 July 14, 1995 - ERNESTO G. OÑASA, JR. v. EUSEBIO J. VILLARAN

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1030 July 14, 1995 - GABRIEL C. ARISTORENAS, ET AL. v. ROGELIO S. MOLINA, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1075 July 14, 1995 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. LOLITA A. GRECIA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1086 July 14, 1995 - ALFERO C. BAGANO v. ARTURO A. PANINSORO

  • G.R. Nos. L-66211 & L-70528-35 July 14, 1995 - ARTURO Q. SALIENTES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 82220, 82251 & 83059 July 14, 1995 - PABLITO MENESES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88384 July 14, 1995 - FEDERATION OF LAND REFORM FARMERS OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 89103 July 14, 1995 - LEON TAMBASEN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91494 July 14, 1995 - CONSOLIDATED BANK AND TRUST CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 92167-68 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE R. LEGASPI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92660 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIXTO MORICO

  • G.R. No. 96489 July 14, 1995 - NICOLAS G. SINTOS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 97251-52 July 14, 1995 - JOVENCIO MINA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 97435 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO TEVES

  • G.R. No. 98920 July 14, 1995 - JESUS F. IGNACIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101135 July 14, 1995 - TEODORO RANCES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101286 July 14, 1995 - GIL RUBIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101875 July 14, 1995 - CASIANO A. NAVARRO III v. ISRAEL D. DAMASCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102297 July 14, 1995 - NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH OF GOD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102993 July 14, 1995 - CALTEX REFINERY EMPLOYEES ASSOC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104639 July 14, 1995 - PROVINCE OF CAMARINES SUR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104682 July 14, 1995 - CAPITOL WIRELESS, INC. v. VICENTE S. BATE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105763 July 14, 1995 - LORENDO QUINONES, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106279 July 14, 1995 - SULPICIO LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108870 July 14, 1995 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109680 July 14, 1995 - DIEGO RAPANUT v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111515 July 14, 1995 - JACKSON BUILDING CONDOMINIUM CORP., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112399 July 14, 1995 - AMADO S. BAGATSING v. COMMITTEE ON PRIVATIZATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112679 July 14, 1995 - COUNTRY BANKERS INSURANCE CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113448 July 14, 1995 - DANILO Q. MILITANTE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113578 July 14, 1995 - SUPLICIO LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118597 July 14, 1995 - JOKER P. ARROYO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-997 July 17, 1995 - CHRISTOPHER CORDOVA, ET AL. v. RICARDO F. TORNILLA

  • G.R. No. 53877 July 17, 1995 - GREGORIO LABITAD, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91987 July 17, 1995 - A’ PRIME SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. FRANKLIN DRILON

  • G.R. No. 108891 July 17, 1995 - JRS BUSINESS CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 109613 July 17, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO MAHINAY

  • G.R. No. 109809 July 17, 1995 - VALLACAR TRANSIT, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110910 July 17, 1995 - NATIONAL SUGAR TRADING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111797 July 17, 1995 - CARLOS ANG GOBONSENG, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112060 July 17, 1995 - NORBI H. EDDING v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112127 July 17, 1995 - CENTRAL PHILIPPINE UNIVERSITY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112230 July 17, 1995 - NORKIS DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113917 July 17, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELICIA M. CABACANG

  • G.R. No. 118910 July 17, 1995 - KILOSBAYAN, INC., ET AL. v. MANUEL L. MORATO

  • G.R. No. 119326 July 17, 1995 - NARCISO CANSINO v. DIRECTOR OF NEW BILIBID PRISON

  • G.R. No. 106539 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TORTILLANO NAMAYAN

  • G.R. No. 108789 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ABE ROSARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114681 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RONALD AGUSTIN

  • G.R. No. 115115 July 18, 1995 - CONRAD AND COMPANY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107439 July 20, 1995 - MICHAEL T. UY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-114382 July 20, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTEBAN ACOB, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115884 July 20, 1995 - CJC TRADING, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117932 July 20, 1995 - AVON DALE GARMENTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 106425 & 106431-32 July 21, 1995 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110591 July 26, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIBURCIO E. BACULI

  • G.R. No. 107495 July 31, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLO Y. UYCOQUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110106 July 31, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO R. MONTIERO

  • G.R. No. 111905 July 31, 1995 - ORIENTAL MINDORO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.