Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1995 > July 1995 Decisions > G.R. No. 102297 July 14, 1995 - NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH OF GOD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 102297. July 14, 1995.]

THE NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH OF GOD, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, SPS. LAUREANO LUCAS and CONSUELO GONZALES, THE HON. PRESIDING JUDGE ARTEMIO R. ALIVIA, Regional Trial Court, Branch 19, CAUAYAN, ISABELA and THE SHERIFF of Branch 19, Regional Trial Court, CAUAYAN, ISABELA, Respondents.

De Leon De Leon Casanova & Associates for Petitioner.

Vivencio P. Guzman, Sr. for Private Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; EVIDENCE; PRESUMPTION THAT OFFICIAL DUTIES HAVE BEEN REGULARLY PERFORMED CANNOT BE OVERCOME BY SUSPICION AND CONJECTURES IN THE ABSENCE OF CONTRARY PROOF; CASE AT BAR. — In the case at bench, private respondents presented three geodetic engineers to testify on the issue of overlapping of titles. On the other hand, petitioner did not present any witness to rebut the findings of the three geodetic engineers. The decision of the Court of Appeals was arrived at based on the testimonial and documentary evidence presented at the trial. The argument — that the geodetic engineers would naturally testify in favor of private respondents since they were hired by the latter — has no merit. As admitted by petitioner, two of the geodetic engineers were officials of the Bureau of Lands in Isabela and Cagayan. The disputable presumption that official duties have been regularly performed has not been rebutted. Suspicion and conjectures cannot overcome such presumption in the absence of contrary proof.

2. ID.; ID.; FINDINGS OF FACT OF COURT OF APPEALS RESPECTED; EXCEPTION; CASE AT BAR. — This being a petition for certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court, this Court will review only errors of law committed by the Court of Appeals. It is not the function of this Court to re-examine the evidence submitted by the parties unless the findings of fact of the Court of Appeals is not supported by the evidence on record or the judgment is based on misapprehension of facts.


D E C I S I O N


QUIASON, J.:


This is a petition for certiorari to set aside the Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 09461 affirming the Decision of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 19, Cauayan, Isabela and its Resolution denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.

On October 26, 1940, respondent Laureano Lucas was issued by the Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources Homestead Patent No. 63351 covering a parcel of land situated at Barrio Dadap, Cauayan, Isabela with an area of 11.2329 hectares. Consequently, on July 31, 1946, Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 1-7270 was issued by the Register of Deeds of Isabela in the name of respondent Laureano Lucas covering said parcel of land.

On June 2, 1950, the Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources issued in favor of respondent Laureano Lucas Sales Patent No. V-392 covering a 24.1092-hectare land situated in the same barrio. The title for said tract of land (OCT No. P-1285) was issued in the name of respondent Laureano Lucas by the Register of Deeds of Isabela on October 21, 1950.

On June 19, 1956, petitioner bought from the spouses Fausto Atienza and Cleopatra L. Ordonez a parcel of land with an area of 15.6308 hectares located in Barrio Dadap, Cauayan, Isabela covered under OCT No. P-1252 in the name of the said spouses. Said parcel of land was acquired by the Ordonez couple through a homestead patent. On the basis of said transfer, OCT No. P-1252 was cancelled and Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. 7836 was issued in the name of petitioner.

Claiming that portions of the two parcels of land covered by Homestead Patent No. 63351 and Sales Patent No. V-392 were included in the homestead patent issued to petitioner’s predecessors-in-interest, private respondents sought the annulment of petitioners title insofar as it overlapped with their title.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

After trial, the court a quo rendered a decision in favor of private respondents. The dispositive portion of the decision reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. DECLARING the plaintiffs the lawful owners of all the lands embraced in and covered by OCT Nos. P-7270 and P-1258;

"2. DECLARING the defendant’s TCT No. T-7836 null and void and of no legal effect insofar as the same covers portions within the plaintiffs’ OCT Nos. P-7270 and P-1258, particularly Lots A, C, D and E (Exh. R), and ordering the defendant, its agents, representative or any other person acting on its behalf or stead to vacate said lots and to deliver the possession thereof to the plaintiffs;

"3. DECLARING the defendant’s title valid only insofar as the same covers lands situated outside the aforementioned titles of the plaintiffs" (Rollo, p. 20).

Aggrieved by the decision of the trial court, petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals.

On February 28, 1989, both petitioner and private respondents, through their respective counsels, agreed to have a relocation survey conducted over the parcels of land covered by TCT No. T-7836, OCT Nos. P-1252, P-1285 and I-7270 to determine whether portions of the parcels of land awarded to respondent Laureano Lucas pursuant to the sales and homestead patents had also been awarded to petitioner’s, predecessors-in-interest.chanrobles.com : virtual law library

On March 7, 1991, the Court of Appeals recalled its resolution for the conduct of a relocation survey because no action had been taken since then. The Court of Appeals resolved to decide the case on the basis of the evidence on record and the applicable law to avoid further delay in the disposition of the case.

On May 31, 1991, judgment was rendered affirming the decision of the trial court. Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration was denied. Hence, this petition.

II


The main issue to be resolved is whether petitioner’s lands overlap the lands of private respondents.

In Republic v. Court of Appeals, 204 SCRA 160 (1991), we held:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"In civil cases, the party having the burden of proof must establish his case by a preponderance of evidence. Stated differently, the general rule in civil cases is that a party having the burden of proof of an essential fact must produce a preponderance of evidence thereon. By preponderance of evidence is meant simply evidence which is of greater weight, or more convincing than that which is offered in opposition to it. . . ." (at p. 168).

In the case at bench, private respondents presented three geodetic engineers to testify on the issue of overlapping of titles. On the other hand, petitioner did not present any witness to rebut the findings of the three geodetic engineers. The decision of the Court of Appeals was arrived at based on the testimonial and documentary evidence presented at the trial.

The argument — that the geodetic engineers would naturally testify in favor of private respondents since they were hired by the latter — has no merit. As admitted by petitioner, two of the geodetic engineers were officials of the Bureau of Lands in Isabela and Cagayan. The disputable presumption that official duties have been regularly performed has not been rebutted. Suspicion and conjectures cannot overcome such presumption in the absence of contrary proof.cralawnad

Lastly, this being a petition for certiorari under Rule. 45 of the Revised Rules of Court, this Court will review only errors of law committed by the Court of Appeals. It is not the function of this Court to re-examine the evidence submitted by the parties unless the findings of fact of the Court of Appeals is not supported-by the evidence on record or the judgment is based on misapprehension of facts.(Constantino v. Mendez, 209 SCRA 18 [1992] citing Hernandez v. Court of Appeals, 149 SCRA 97 [1987]; Remalante v. Tibe, 158 SCRA 138 [1988]).

WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Padilla, J., Davide, Jr. Bellosillo and Kapunan, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1995 Jurisprudence                 

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-93-835 July 3, 1995 - GERARDO C. ALVARADO v. LILY A. LAQUINDANUM

  • G.R. No. 107748 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCIANO SAPURCO

  • G.R. No. 109248 July 3, 1995 - GREGORIO F. ORTEGA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110558 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CELEDONIO B. DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112279 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERT ALBAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114698 July 3, 1995 - WELLINGTON INVESTMENT AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. CRESENCIANO B. TRAJANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115304 July 3, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLAND L. MELOSANTOS

  • G.R. No. 110240 July 4, 1995 - ENJAY INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109036 July 5, 1995 - BARTOLOME F. MERCADO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Case No. 2747 July 6, 1995 - GODOFREDO A. VILLALON v. JIMENEZ B. BUENDIA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1008 July 6, 1995 - FLORENTINA BILAG-RIVERA v. CRISANTO FLORA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1026 July 6, 1995 - VICTOR BASCO v. DAMASO GREGORIO

  • G.R. No. 100912 July 6, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ZALDY A. CRISTOBAL

  • G.R. Nos. 103560 & 103599 July 6, 1995 - GOLD CITY INTEGRATED PORT SERVICE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109166 July 6, 1995 - HERNAN R. LOPEZ, JR. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 112973-76 July 6, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO PAGCU, JR.

  • G.R. No. 110321 July 7, 1995 - HILARIO VALLENDE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112629 July 7, 1995 - PHIL. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118644 July 7, 1995 - EPIMACO A. VELASCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102930 July 10, 1995 - BONIFACIO MONTILLA PEÑA v. CA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119055 July 10, 1995 - ROY RODILLAS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • CBD Case No. 251 July 11, 1995 - ADELINA T. VILLANUEVA v. TERESITA STA. ANA

  • G.R. No. 109370 July 11, 1995 - ROGELIO PARMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110015 July 11, 1995 - MANILA BAY CLUB CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112046 July 11, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANTHONY ONG CO

  • G.R. No. 115245 July 11, 1995 - JUANITO C. PILAR v. COMMISSION ON ELECTION

  • G.R. No. 116008 July 11, 1995 - METRO TRANSIT ORGANIZATION, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 79896 July 12, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DELFIN L. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114167 July 12, 1995 - COASTWISE LIGHTERAGE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114186 July 12, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR R. ERNI

  • Adm. Case No. 3283 July 13, 1995 - RODOLFO MILLARE v. EUSTAQUIO Z. MONTERO

  • Adm. Matter Nos. MTJ-93-806 & MTJ-93-863 July 13, 1995 - ERLINO LITIGIO, ET AL. v. CELESTINO V. DICON

  • Bar Matter No. 712 July 13, 1995 - IN RE: AL C. ARGOSINO

  • G.R. No. 106769 July 13, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO WEDING

  • G.R. No. 109573 July 13, 1995 - SEVEN BROTHERS SHIPPING CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110580 July 13, 1995 - MANUEL BANSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110930 July 13, 1995 - OSCAR LEDESMA AND COMPANY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116049 July 13, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTAQUIO Z. GACOTT, JR., ET AL.

  • Adm. Case No. 1048 July 14, 1995 - WELLINGTON REYES v. SALVADOR M. GAA

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-90-400 July 14, 1995 - SUSIMO MOROÑO v. AURELIO J.V. LOMEDA

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-93-818 July 14, 1995 - ENRIQUITO CABILAO, ET AL. v. AGUSTIN T. SARDIDO

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-932 July 14, 1995 - JESUS F. MANGALINDAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-963 July 14, 1995 - MARILOU NAMA MORENO v. JOSE C. BERNABE

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1012 July 14, 1995 - ERNESTO G. OÑASA, JR. v. EUSEBIO J. VILLARAN

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1030 July 14, 1995 - GABRIEL C. ARISTORENAS, ET AL. v. ROGELIO S. MOLINA, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1075 July 14, 1995 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. LOLITA A. GRECIA

  • Adm. Matter No. P-94-1086 July 14, 1995 - ALFERO C. BAGANO v. ARTURO A. PANINSORO

  • G.R. Nos. L-66211 & L-70528-35 July 14, 1995 - ARTURO Q. SALIENTES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 82220, 82251 & 83059 July 14, 1995 - PABLITO MENESES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 88384 July 14, 1995 - FEDERATION OF LAND REFORM FARMERS OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 89103 July 14, 1995 - LEON TAMBASEN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91494 July 14, 1995 - CONSOLIDATED BANK AND TRUST CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 92167-68 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE R. LEGASPI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 92660 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIXTO MORICO

  • G.R. No. 96489 July 14, 1995 - NICOLAS G. SINTOS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 97251-52 July 14, 1995 - JOVENCIO MINA, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 97435 July 14, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO TEVES

  • G.R. No. 98920 July 14, 1995 - JESUS F. IGNACIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101135 July 14, 1995 - TEODORO RANCES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101286 July 14, 1995 - GIL RUBIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 101875 July 14, 1995 - CASIANO A. NAVARRO III v. ISRAEL D. DAMASCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102297 July 14, 1995 - NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH OF GOD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102993 July 14, 1995 - CALTEX REFINERY EMPLOYEES ASSOC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104639 July 14, 1995 - PROVINCE OF CAMARINES SUR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104682 July 14, 1995 - CAPITOL WIRELESS, INC. v. VICENTE S. BATE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 105763 July 14, 1995 - LORENDO QUINONES, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106279 July 14, 1995 - SULPICIO LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108870 July 14, 1995 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109680 July 14, 1995 - DIEGO RAPANUT v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111515 July 14, 1995 - JACKSON BUILDING CONDOMINIUM CORP., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112399 July 14, 1995 - AMADO S. BAGATSING v. COMMITTEE ON PRIVATIZATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112679 July 14, 1995 - COUNTRY BANKERS INSURANCE CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113448 July 14, 1995 - DANILO Q. MILITANTE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113578 July 14, 1995 - SUPLICIO LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 118597 July 14, 1995 - JOKER P. ARROYO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, ET AL.

  • Adm. Matter No. MTJ-94-997 July 17, 1995 - CHRISTOPHER CORDOVA, ET AL. v. RICARDO F. TORNILLA

  • G.R. No. 53877 July 17, 1995 - GREGORIO LABITAD, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 91987 July 17, 1995 - A’ PRIME SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. FRANKLIN DRILON

  • G.R. No. 108891 July 17, 1995 - JRS BUSINESS CORPORATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. 109613 July 17, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO MAHINAY

  • G.R. No. 109809 July 17, 1995 - VALLACAR TRANSIT, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110910 July 17, 1995 - NATIONAL SUGAR TRADING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111797 July 17, 1995 - CARLOS ANG GOBONSENG, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112060 July 17, 1995 - NORBI H. EDDING v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112127 July 17, 1995 - CENTRAL PHILIPPINE UNIVERSITY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112230 July 17, 1995 - NORKIS DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113917 July 17, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELICIA M. CABACANG

  • G.R. No. 118910 July 17, 1995 - KILOSBAYAN, INC., ET AL. v. MANUEL L. MORATO

  • G.R. No. 119326 July 17, 1995 - NARCISO CANSINO v. DIRECTOR OF NEW BILIBID PRISON

  • G.R. No. 106539 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TORTILLANO NAMAYAN

  • G.R. No. 108789 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ABE ROSARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114681 July 18, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RONALD AGUSTIN

  • G.R. No. 115115 July 18, 1995 - CONRAD AND COMPANY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 107439 July 20, 1995 - MICHAEL T. UY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-114382 July 20, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ESTEBAN ACOB, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115884 July 20, 1995 - CJC TRADING, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117932 July 20, 1995 - AVON DALE GARMENTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 106425 & 106431-32 July 21, 1995 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110591 July 26, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIBURCIO E. BACULI

  • G.R. No. 107495 July 31, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARLO Y. UYCOQUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110106 July 31, 1995 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RENATO R. MONTIERO

  • G.R. No. 111905 July 31, 1995 - ORIENTAL MINDORO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.