March 1996 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1996 > March 1996 Decisions >
G.R. No. 121424 March 28, 1996 - IN RE: MAURO P. MAGTIBAY v. VICENTE VINARAO:
THIRD DIVISION
[G.R. No. 121424. March 28, 1996.]
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS OF MAURO MAGTIBAY y PENTNIO, Chairman SEDFREY A. ORDOÑEZ, Comm. NARCISO C. MONTEIRO, Comm. MERCEDES V. CONTRERAS, Comm. NASSER A. MAROHOMSALIC, Comm. VICENTE P. SIBULO, Director EMMANUEL C. NERI and the COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, Petitioners, v. Director VICENTE VINARAO, BUREAU OF CORRECTION, Respondent.
[G.R. No. 104992. March 28, 1996.]
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MAURO MAGTIBAY, Accused-Appellant.
The Solicitor General for Petitioner.
Eugenio E. Mendoza for Accused-Appellant.
SYLLABUS
1. CRIMINAL LAW; DANGEROUS DRUGS ACT; IMPOSABLE PENALTY IF THE QUANTITY OF THE PROHIBITED DRUGS INVOLVED IS LESS THAN 750 GRAMS; RULE UNDER R.A. NO. 7659. — By way of background: R.A. 7659, which took effect on December 31, 1993, partly amended R.A. No. 6425, by providing, inter alia, that if the quantity of the prohibited drugs involved is less than 750 grams, the penalty of imprisonment is reduced to a range of from prision correccional to reclusion perpetua depending on the quantity of marijuana involved; in contrast, Sec. 4, Art. II of R.A. 6425 formerly provided for imprisonment ranging from 12 years and one day to 20 years of prision mayor. Pursuant to the new legislation, this Court ruled in People v. Simon, (234 SCRA 555, 573 [July 29, 1994] and in People v. De Lara, (236 SCRA 291 [September 5, 1994]) that where the quantity of marijuana leaves involved is below 250 grams, the penalty to be imposed shall be prision correccional.
2. ID.; PENALTIES; ACCUSED MUST BE RELEASED HAVING UNDERGONE PREVENTIVE IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD OF MORE THAN THE IMPOSABLE MAXIMUM PENALTY. — Considering the report of Magdalena M. Mogridge, Chief, Documents Section of the Bureau of Corrections, appellant is now eligible for immediate release, pursuant to Article 29 of the Revised Penal Code, having undergone preventive imprisonment for a period of more than the possible maximum imprisonment to which he may be sentenced.
2. ID.; PENALTIES; ACCUSED MUST BE RELEASED HAVING UNDERGONE PREVENTIVE IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD OF MORE THAN THE IMPOSABLE MAXIMUM PENALTY. — Considering the report of Magdalena M. Mogridge, Chief, Documents Section of the Bureau of Corrections, appellant is now eligible for immediate release, pursuant to Article 29 of the Revised Penal Code, having undergone preventive imprisonment for a period of more than the possible maximum imprisonment to which he may be sentenced.
R E S O L U T I O N
PANGANIBAN, J.:
Before us is a Petition for Habeas Corpus filed by the Commission on Human Rights, for the immediate release of Mauro P. Magtibay, the accused-appellant in G.R. No. 104992, entitled "People v. Mauro Magtibay", pending before this Court. In the latter case (which has been consolidated with the instant case per Resolution of this Court dated September 4, 1995), Accused-appellant is contesting his conviction by the Regional Trial Court of Batangas City, Branch III for violation of Sec. 4, Art. II of R.A. No. 6425, otherwise known as the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972, as amended. The accused-appellant was caught in flagrante delicto selling ten (10) grams of dried marijuana leaves during a buy-bust operation conducted on August 21, 1989 in Cuenca, Batangas. Sentenced to suffer the penalty of life imprisonment, Accused-appellant has been under preventive detention at the New Bilibid Prison since August 21, 1989 or for more than six (6) years as the date of the Petition.
Petitioners now seek the immediate release of accused-appellant on the ground that the latter has already served the term of imprisonment applicable to his offense as provided under R.A. 7659, otherwise known as "An Act to Impose Death Penalty on Certain Heinous Crimes."cralaw virtua1aw library
By way of background: R.A. 7659, which took effect on December 31, 1993, partly amended R.A. No. 6425, by providing, inter alia, that if the quantity of the prohibited drugs involved is less than 750 grams, the penalty of imprisonment is reduced to a range of from prison correctional to reclusion perpetua depending on the quantity of marijuana involved; in contrast, Sec. 4, Art. II of R.A. 6425 formerly provided for imprisonment ranging from 12 years and one day to 12 years of prision mayor. Pursuant to the new legislation, this Court ruled in People v. Simon, (234 SCRA 555, 573 [July 29, 1994]) and in People v. De Lara, (236 SCRA 291 [September 5, 1994]) that where the quantity of marijuana leaves involved is below 250 grams. The penalty to be imposed shall be prison correctional.
On November 13, 1995, the First Division of this Court referred these consolidated cases to the Third. In response to the Resolution of this Court dated February 14, 1996, the Office of the Solicitor General filed its Manifestation in Lieu of Comment, averring that it interposes no objection to the immediate release of accused-appellant as prayed for in the Petition. The Solicitor General further declared: "Considering the report of Magdalena M. Mogridge, Chief, Documents Section of the Bureau of Corrections, (Annex "I" hereof), appellant is now eligible for immediate release, pursuant to Article 29 of the Revised Penal Code, having undergone preventive imprisonment for a period of more than the possible maximum imprisonment to which he may be sentenced."cralaw virtua1aw library
IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the Petition in G.R. No. 121424 is hereby GRANTED, and the accused-appellant Mauro P. Magtibay is hereby ORDERED RELEASED IMMEDIATELY, unless he is being detained on some other legal charge. The Petition in G.R. No. 104992 is DISMISSED for being moot and academic.
SO ORDERED.
Narvasa, C.J., Davide, Jr., Melo and Francisco, JJ., concur.
Petitioners now seek the immediate release of accused-appellant on the ground that the latter has already served the term of imprisonment applicable to his offense as provided under R.A. 7659, otherwise known as "An Act to Impose Death Penalty on Certain Heinous Crimes."cralaw virtua1aw library
By way of background: R.A. 7659, which took effect on December 31, 1993, partly amended R.A. No. 6425, by providing, inter alia, that if the quantity of the prohibited drugs involved is less than 750 grams, the penalty of imprisonment is reduced to a range of from prison correctional to reclusion perpetua depending on the quantity of marijuana involved; in contrast, Sec. 4, Art. II of R.A. 6425 formerly provided for imprisonment ranging from 12 years and one day to 12 years of prision mayor. Pursuant to the new legislation, this Court ruled in People v. Simon, (234 SCRA 555, 573 [July 29, 1994]) and in People v. De Lara, (236 SCRA 291 [September 5, 1994]) that where the quantity of marijuana leaves involved is below 250 grams. The penalty to be imposed shall be prison correctional.
On November 13, 1995, the First Division of this Court referred these consolidated cases to the Third. In response to the Resolution of this Court dated February 14, 1996, the Office of the Solicitor General filed its Manifestation in Lieu of Comment, averring that it interposes no objection to the immediate release of accused-appellant as prayed for in the Petition. The Solicitor General further declared: "Considering the report of Magdalena M. Mogridge, Chief, Documents Section of the Bureau of Corrections, (Annex "I" hereof), appellant is now eligible for immediate release, pursuant to Article 29 of the Revised Penal Code, having undergone preventive imprisonment for a period of more than the possible maximum imprisonment to which he may be sentenced."cralaw virtua1aw library
IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the Petition in G.R. No. 121424 is hereby GRANTED, and the accused-appellant Mauro P. Magtibay is hereby ORDERED RELEASED IMMEDIATELY, unless he is being detained on some other legal charge. The Petition in G.R. No. 104992 is DISMISSED for being moot and academic.
SO ORDERED.
Narvasa, C.J., Davide, Jr., Melo and Francisco, JJ., concur.
