Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1998 > November 1998 Decisions > G.R. No. 111854 November 24, 1998 - BARANGAY BLUE RIDGE "A" OF QUEZON CITY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 111854. November 24, 1999.]

BARANGAY BLUE RIDGE "A" OF QUEZON CITY, represented in this suit by its Punong Barangay and Sangguniang Barangay, who also are suing in their personal/individual capacities as Barangay residents/homeowners EDUARDO OCHOA, TERESITA OCHOA, PACITA ALMARIO, RAFAEL ESTRADA, SR., ALONSO ANCHETA, DELY LAGUMBAY, RAFAEL ESTRADA, JR., JAIME M. ALFONSO and FRANCIS NG, BABY LYN GODARZI, BLUE RIDGE "A" residents/homeowners suing in their behalf and in behalf of other residents/homeowners of Barangay Blue Ridge "A", who are so numerous that bringing all of them in as parties-plaintiffs would be impractical/impossible, Petitioners, v. THE COURT OF APPEALS, THE HON. TIRSO D.C. VELASCO, Presiding Judge, Branch 88, Regional Trial Court, NCJR, Quezon City, and PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Respondents.


R E S O L U T I O N


YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.:


On March 2, 1992, petitioners filed a complaint for injunction plus damages against private respondent, 1 Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation in the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City. 2 On March 20, 1992, private respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. 3 The trial court granted the motion to dismiss on January 6, 1993 4 and denied petitioners’ motion for reconsideration on June 3, 1993. 5chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

Alleging grave abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court judge, petitioners filed a petition for certiorari with the Court of Appeals and prayed for the annulment of the trial court orders of January 6, 1993 and June 3, 1993. 6 Petitioners also prayed for the inhibition of respondent judge on the grounds of "unmistakable bias, prejudice and hostility." 7

In a resolution dated July 26, 1993, the Fifth Division of the Court of Appeals denied the petition on the ground that the proper remedy was appeal under Rule 41, Section 2 of the Rules of Court and not a special civil action for certiorari and prohibition under Rule 65. 8

Subsequently, the Court of Appeals, in a Resolution dated September 13, 1993, denied petitioners’ motion for reconsideration for lack of merit. 9 The Court of Appeals went so far as to describe the petition as a "patay na kabayo" (dead horse). As held by the Court of Appeals, "If we are to give in to such argument (i.e. that under the facts, ordinary appeal is not a plain, speedy or adequate remedy), we might as well abolish appeal as a remedy." 10

Aggrieved, petitioners appealed under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court. 11 The sole question is whether or not the Court of Appeals erred when it denied the petition. We find that it did not. Accordingly, the petition must be denied.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

A basic requisite for the special civil action of certiorari to lie is that "there be no appeal nor plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law." 12 Certiorari is a remedy of last recourse and is a limited form of review. 13 Its principal function is to keep inferior tribunals within their jurisdiction. 14 It cannot be used as a substitute for a lost appeal. 15 It is not intended to correct errors of procedure or mistakes in the judge’s findings or conclusions. 16chanrobles virtualawlibrary chanrobles.com:chanrobles.com.ph

In resolving the motion to dismiss, the trial court enumerated and discussed the elements of a cause of action. 17 As regards the first cause of action, the trial court held that while plaintiffs had a clear legal right created by law, defendant Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation was covered by the exception provided for by MMA Ordinance No. 81-01. 18 Anent the second element, the trial court ruled that defendant "was not remiss in its obligation to respect the right of plaintiffs under MMA Ordinance No. 81-01" as the records showed that defendant fell under the ordinance’s exception. 19 Having discussed the first two elements and having decided that their concurrence in this case was not established by plaintiffs, the trial court saw no need to discuss the last element of a cause of action. 20

In resolving petitioners’ motion for reconsideration, the trial court held that while it "recognized the rules mentioned by plaintiff . . . the court doubts their absolute application in the case at bar. Indeed, while correct as general rules, they are not without exceptions." 21

Jurisprudence provides that there is grave abuse of discretion where the power is exercised in an arbitrary or despotic manner by reason of passion, prejudice, or personal hostility amounting to an evasion of positive duty or to a virtual refusal to perform the duty enjoined or to act in contemplation of law. 22 Not every error in proceeding, or every erroneous conclusion of law or of fact, is abuse of discretion. 23

In any case, if ever there was any error committed, such was error of judgment and not of jurisdiction.

Well settled is the rule that "jurisdiction" is the authority to hear and determine a cause. It is the right to act in a particular case. Its existence does not depend upon the regularity of its exercise or upon the correctness or righteousness of the decision or ruling made by the court. 24 Any error that the court may commit in the exercise of its jurisdiction is merely an error of judgment which should be reviewed by ordinary appeal.

WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED and the resolutions of the Court of Appeals dated July 26, 1993 and September 13, 1993 are AFFIRMED.

Without costs.chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary:red

SO ORDERED.

Davide, Jr., C.J., Puno, Kapunan and Pardo, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Court of Appeals Records, p. 23.

2. The complaint filed in the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City pleaded that the construction by private respondent, Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation, of a gasoline filling service station in petitioners’ residential subdivision violated certain barangay ordinances and resolutions.

3. Court of Appeals Records, p. 33.

4. Rollo, p. 86.

5. Rollo, p. 113.

6. Court of Appeals Records, p. 6.

7. Court of Appeals Records, p. 15.

8. Rollo, pp. 132-133.

9. Rollo, pp. 147-148.

10. Rollo, p. 148.

11. Rollo, p. 7.

12. Cochingyan, Jr. v. Cloribel, 76 SCRA 361 (1977); Building Care Corporation v. National Labor Relations Commission, 268 SCRA 666 (1997).

13. Bernardo v. Court of Appeals, 275 SCRA 413 (1997).

14. Lalican v. Vergara, 276 SCRA 518 (1997).

15. Esguerra v. Court of Appeals, 267 SCRA 380 (1997).

16. Ilacad v. Court of Appeals, 78 SCRA 301 (1977).

17. To wit: (1) a right in favor of the plaintiff by whatever means and under whatever law it arises or is created; (2) an obligation on the part of the named defendant to respect or not to violate such right; (3) an act or omission on the part of such defendant violative of the right of the plaintiff or constituting a breach of the obligation of the defendant to the plaintiff (Court of Appeals Records, p. 451, citing ACCFA v. Alpha Insurance and Surety Co., Inc., 24 SCRA 151).

18. The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, March 18, 1981.

19. Court of Appeals Records, p. 70.

20. Ibid.

21. Court of Appeals Records, p. 105.

22. People v. Marave, 11 SCRA 618 (1964); Maritime Co. of the Phils. v. Paredes, 19 SCRA 569 (1967); Panaligan v. Adolfo, 67 SCRA 176 (1975).

23. Villa Rey Transit, Inc. v. Bello, 7 SCRA 735 (1963).

24. Palma v. Q.S., Inc., 17 SCRA 97 (1966).




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1998 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.M. No. P-99-1315 November 3, 1998 - JESUSA MANINGAS, ET AL. v. CARLITO C. BARCENAS

  • G.R. No. 136448 November 3, 1998 - LIM TONG LIM v. PHIL. FISHING GEAR INDUSTRIES

  • G.R. No. 137136 November 3, 1998 - NORTHWEST AIRLINES v. CAMILLE T. CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 135913 November 4, 1998 - VICTORIANO B. TIROL v. CIPRIANO A. DEL ROSARIO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-98-1425 November 16, 1998 - DOMINGO G. PANGANIBAN v. PABLO B. FRANCISCO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-99-1504 November 16, 1998 - ANG KEK CHEN v. AMALIA R. ANDRADE

  • G.R. No. 106593 November 16, 1998 - NAT’L HOUSING AUTHORITY v. MAURO T. ALLARDE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 106795 November 16, 1998 - STATE INVESTMENT HOUSE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 113638 November 16, 1998 - A. D. GOTHONG MANUFACTURING CORP. EMPLOYEES UNION-ALU v. NIEVES CONFESOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115180 November 16, 1998 - FILIPINO PIPE AND FOUNDRY CORP. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 123045 November 16, 1998 - DEMETRIO R. TECSON v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 123686 November 16, 1998 - APOLINARIO MELO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 124166 November 16, 1998 - BENGUET CORP. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 125814-15 November 16, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SAMSON PATALINGHUG

  • G.R. No. 126332 November 16, 1998 - LAND BANK OF THE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL

  • G.R. No. 128361 November 16, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MOROY "SONNY" GALLO

  • G.R. No. 128452 November 16, 1998 - COMPANIA MARITIMA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 128957 November 16, 1998 - ANTONIO PARE v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 131235 November 16, 1998 - UST FACULTY UNION (USTFU) v. BENEDICTO ERNESTO R. BITONIO JR.

  • G.R. No. 131777 November 16, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSALINDA ARIOLA

  • G.R. No. 132497 November 16, 1998 - LUIS MIGUEL YSMAEL, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 5170 November 17, 1998 - LILIA FERRER TUCAY v. MANUEL R. TUCAY

  • ADM. MATTER No. RTJ-95-1324 November 17, 1998 - EVARISTO MANAHON v. ALVIN I. TAN

  • G.R. No. 123152 November 17, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODRIGO LASOLA

  • G.R. No. 129169 November 17, 1998 - NIA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 129256 November 17, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOEL PINCA

  • G.R. No. 130591 November 17, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARMELO LACABA

  • G.R. No. 130607 November 17, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RUSTICO RIVERA

  • G.R. No. 131499 November 17, 1998 - HERMIE M. HERRERA, ET AL. v. COMELEC

  • G.R. Nos. 132216 & 133479 November 17, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR TORIO

  • G.R. No. 132238 November 17, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LITO BAYGAR

  • G.R. No. 133148 November 17, 1998 - J.R. BLANCO v. WILLIAM H. QUASHA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 134467 November 17, 1998 - ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING & DEV’T. CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • A.M. No. P-99-1326 November 18, 1998 - MARIVIC T. BALISI-UMALI v. SIXTO A. PEÑALOSA

  • A.M. No. P-99-1338 November 18, 1998 - ESTELA P. VALLES v. NILA ARZAGA-QUIJANO

  • G.R. No. 103476 November 18, 1998 - CODIDI MATA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. 106531 November 18, 1998 - FERNANDO GARCIA, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109371 November 18, 1998 - JOSE GAUDIA v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 122240 November 18, 1998 - CRISTONICO B. LEGAHI v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 127167 November 18, 1998 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. NLRC, ET AL

  • A.M. No. P-94-1080, P-95-1128 & P-95-1144 November 19, 1998 - DINAH CHRISTINA A. AMANE, ET AL. v. SUSAN MENDOZA-ARCE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 110048 November 19, 1998 - SERVICEWIDE SPECIALISTS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114198 November 19, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MATEO BALUDDA

  • G.R. No. 114508 November 19, 1998 - PRIBHDAS J. MIRPURI v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 115412 November 19, 1998 - HOME BANKERS SAVINGS AND TRUST COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 126932 November 19, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PASCUA GALLADAN

  • G.R. No. 127768 November 19, 1998 - UNITED AIRLINES v. WILLIE J. UY

  • G.R. No. 128797 November 19, 1998 - FIRST NATIONWIDE ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 129096 November 19, 1998 - MARIVIC ZARATE v. COMELEC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 129732 November 19, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIO BASCO

  • G.R. No. 130772 November 19, 1998 - WALLEM MARITIME SERVICES v. NLRC, Et. Al.

  • G.R. No. 130922 November 19, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO REQUIZ

  • G.R. No. 131479 November 19, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO GASPAR

  • G.R. No. 131732 November 19, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WILSON CATAMPONGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 132474 November 19, 1998 - RENATO CENIDO v. AMADEO APACIONADO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 132644 November 19, 1998 - ERNESTO DAVID, ET AL. v. CRISTITO MALAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 134685 November 19, 1998 - MARIA ANTONIA SIGUAN v. ROSA LIM

  • A.M. No. P-94-1076 November 22, 1998 - ENRIQUE M. ALMARIO v. JAMESWELL M. RESUS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. P-99-1341 November 22, 1998 - JULITO BIAG v. LUALHATI GUBATANGA

  • G.R. No. 97914 November 22, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOEL BROMO

  • G.R. No. 122279 November 22, 1998 - C & A CONSTRUCTION CO. v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 127566 November 22, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EULALIO PADIL

  • G.R. No. 135562 November 22, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENITO BRAVO

  • Administrative Case No. 5169 November 24, 1998 - ELMO S. MOTON v. RAYMUNDO D. CADIAO

  • A.M. No. P-99-1351 November 24, 1998 - RENATO G. CUNANAN v. ARTURO C. FLORES

  • G.R. No. 66508 November 24, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FORTUNATO SIOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102648 November 24, 1998 - DRS. ALENDRY and FLORA P. CAVILES v. EVELYN and RAMON T. BAUTISTA

  • G.R. No. 110559 November 24, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO SABAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111854 November 24, 1998 - BARANGAY BLUE RIDGE "A" OF QUEZON CITY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114671 November 24, 1998 - AURELIO SALINAS v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119492 November 24, 1998 - ROLANDO MALINAO, ET AL. v. NLRC

  • G.R. No. 122006 November 24, 1998 - ALLIED INVESTIGATION BUREAU v. SECRETARY OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT

  • G.R. No. 132748 November 24, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO PATRIARCA

  • G.R. No. 135864 November 24, 1998 - AUGUSTO TOLEDO v. COMELEC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 138876 November 24, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EGMEDIO LAMPAZA

  • A.M. No. 99-9-141-MTCC November 25, 1998 - HOLD DEPARTURE ORDER ISSUED BY JUDGE FELIPE M. ABALOS

  • A.M. No. MTJ-99-1236 November 25, 1998 - GERMAN AGUNDAY v. NIETO T. TRESVALLES

  • A.M. No. MTJ-99-1237 November 25, 1998 - ALFONSO LUMIBAO, ET AL. v. MAMERTO C. PANAL

  • G.R. No. 109024 November 25, 1998 - HEIRS OF MARCIANO SANGLE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 109307 November 25, 1998 - TEODORA SALTIGA DE ROMERO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 114262 November 25, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. QUIRINO QUIJADA

  • G.R. No. 119466 November 25, 1998 - SALVADOR and LIGAYA ADORABLE. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 122823 November 25, 1998 - SEA COMMERCIAL COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 123059 November 25, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO CAPILLO

  • G.R. No. 124140 November 25, 1998 - BERNARDO B. RESOSO v. SANDIGANBAYAN

  • G.R. No. 127347 November 25, 1998 - ALFREDO N. AGUILA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 128389 November 25, 1998 - DON ORESTES ROMUALDEZ ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 129958 November 25, 1998 - MIGUEL MELENDRES v. COMELEC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 134340 November 25, 1998 - LININDING PANGANDAMAN v. COMELEC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 116616 November 26, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO EMBERGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117929 November 26, 1998 - CORA VERGARA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 129955 November 26, 1998 - MARIANO and JULIETA MADRIGAL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 134229 November 26, 1998 - LITO and JERRY LIMPANGOG. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 99-10-10-SC November 29, 1998 - RE: DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST ANTONIO LAMANO

  • G.R. No. 116320 November 29, 1998 - ADALIA FRANCISCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 119341 November 29, 1998 - EDUARDO FONTANILLA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 119350-51 November 29, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAURO SUBA

  • G.R. No. 123307 November 29, 1998 - SAMUEL BARANGAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 124640 November 29, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JERRY A. CAPCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 126800 November 29, 1998 - NATALIA P. BUSTAMANTE v. RODITO F. ROSEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 127840 November 29, 1998 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLAND PARAISO

  • G.R. No. 128743 November 29, 1998 - ORO CAM ENTERPRISES v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 133750 November 29, 1998 - APEX MINING, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 133927 November 29, 1998 - MA. AMELITA C. VILLAROSA v. COMELEC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 135423 November 29, 1998 - JESUS L. CHU v. COMELEC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 136191 November 29, 1998 - JESUS O. TYPOCO v. COMELEC, ET AL.