ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™  
Main Index Law Library Philippine Laws, Statutes & Codes Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Jurisprudence
Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan's The Labor Code of the Philippines, Annotated Labor Standards & Social Legislation Volume I of a 3-Volume Series 2019 Edition (3rd Revised Edition)
 

 
Chan Robles Virtual Law Library
 









 

 
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

 
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
 

   
July-2001 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.M. No. MTJ-99-1188 July 2, 2001 - JOSE E. GURAY v. FABIAN M. BAUTISTA

  • A.M. No. P-01-1481 July 5, 2001 - RCBC v. NOEL V. QUILANTANG

  • G.R. No. 135199 July 5, 2001 - CRISOSTOMO MAGAT, ET AL. v. ALBERT M. DELIZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 141285 July 5, 2001 - CEBU INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE, ET AL. v. CEBU INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE EMPLOYEES’ UNION

  • G.R. No. 141947 July 5, 2001 - ISMAEL V. SANTOS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 144275 July 5, 2001 - NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 97-2-53-RTC July 6, 2001 - RE: FERDINAND J. MARCOS

  • G.R. No. 132318 July 6, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO F. MUERONG

  • G.R. No. 134114 July 6, 2001 - NESTLE PHIL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 134779 July 6, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HERSON FLORAGUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 137608-09 July 6, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REMEGIO TAGANNA

  • G.R. No. 143375 July 6, 2001 - RUTH D. BAUTISTA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 131856-57 July 9, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WILLIAM MONTINOLA

  • G.R. Nos. 85494, 85496 & 195071 July 10, 2001 - CHOITHRAM JETHMAL RAMNANI, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 126166 July 10, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL v. ALLAN TEJADA

  • G.R. No. 133928 July 10, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NECESARIO HIJAPON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 136267 July 10, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FIDEL ABRENICA CUBCUBIN, JR.

  • G.R. Nos. 142801-802 July 10, 2001 - BUKLOD NG KAWANING EIIB, ET AL. v. RONALDO B. ZAMORA, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. MTJ-00-1253 July 11, 2001 - KIAT REAPORT, ET AL. v. EFREN S. MARIANO

  • A.M. No. P-01-1452 July 11, 2001 - FERMA C. PORTIC v. MARIO B. LOPEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. P-01-1479 July 11, 2001 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR v. RUBEN B. ALBAYTAR

  • G.R. No. 104802 July 11, 2001 - AURELIA S. LLANA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 108301 & 132539 July 11, 2001 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 108346 July 11, 2001 - MARIANO Z. VELARDE, ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 135210 July 11, 2001 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ISABELA CULTURAL CORP.

  • G.R. No. 137050 July 11, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GEORGE CORTES

  • G.R. No. 137891 July 11, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS PATRIARCA

  • G.R. No. 140365 July 11, 2001 - CESAR P. UY, ET AL v. VICTORINO P. EVANGELISTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 140974 July 11, 2001 - RAMON ORO v. GERARDO D. DIAZ

  • A.M. No. MTJ-01-1349 July 12, 2001 - BERNADETTE MONDEJAR v. MARINO S. BUBAN

  • G.R. No. 101974 July 12, 2001 - VICTORIA P. CABRAL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 102313 July 12, 2001 - R. F. NAVARRO & CO. v. FORTUNATO A. VAILOCES, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 102696, 102716, 108257 & 120954 July 12, 2001 - ALBERTO LOOYUKO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104223 July 12, 2001 - TIBURCIO SAMONTE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 104383 July 12, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VALERIANO AMESTUZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 112590 July 12, 2001 - STATE INVESTMENT HOUSE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 131638-39 July 12, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORETO D. MEDENILLA

  • G.R. No. 138737 July 12, 2001 - FINMAN GEN. ASSURANCE CORP., v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 138576-77 July 13, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JIMMY JACOB

  • A.M. No. MTJ-00-1322 July 17, 2001 - RENATO H. SANCHEZ v. GEMINIANO A. EDUARDO

  • A.M. No. P-01-1484 July 17, 2001 - JOSE R. ASTORGA v. NICOLASITO S. SOLAS

  • G.R. Nos. 103550 & 103551 July 17, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL v. ROMERICO PORRAS

  • G.R. No. 133814 July 17, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANDRES ORTIZ

  • G.R. Nos. 134540-41 July 18, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL v. DIONISIO BATALLER

  • G.R. Nos. 109559 & 109581 July 19, 2001 - BERNARDO P. ABESAMIS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 111535 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEJANDRO CAMPOS

  • G.R. Nos. 113255-56 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO S. GONZALES

  • G.R. No. 125698 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO E. HAPA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 128153-56 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE P. BUISON

  • G.R. No. 131216 July 19, 2001 - LEONARDO A. QUISUMBING, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 132177 July 19, 2001 - JOSE F. CAOIBES v. OMBUDSMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 133190 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTOS LOR

  • G.R. No. 135145 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAYMOND G. MAXION

  • G.R. No. 137545 July 19, 2001 - TERESITA D. GAITE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 139789 July 19, 2001 - POTENCIANO ILUSORIO, ET AL. v. ERLINDA K. ILUSORIO BILDNER, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 139967 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL TALAVERA

  • G.R. Nos. 141011 & 141028 July 19, 2001 - CITYTRUST BANKING CORP. v. ISAGANI C. VILLANUEVA

  • G.R. No. 144179 July 19, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMSHAND C. THAMSEY

  • A.M. No. MTJ-01-1350 July 20, 2001 - LORENZO PASCUAL, ET AL. v. CESAR M. DUMLAO

  • G.R. No. 110263 July 20, 2001 - ASIAVEST MERCHANT BANKERS (M) BERHAD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 117187 July 20, 2001 - UNION MOTOR CORP. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 120176 July 20, 2001 - MA. VALENTINA SANTANA-CRUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 124442 July 20, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARMANDO S. COMPACION

  • G.R. No. 132926 July 20, 2001 - ELVIRA AGULLO v. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 133580 July 20, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAXIMO GENEBLAZO

  • G.R. Nos. 135030-33 July 20, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MERCY LOGAN

  • G.R. No. 135666 July 20, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELCHOR B. GARCIA

  • G.R. No. 135865 July 20, 2001 - NAGKAKAISANG KAPISANAN KAPITBAHAYAN SA COMMONWEALTH AVE. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 138501 July 20, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO M. LAXA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 139150 July 20, 2001 - PABLO DELA CRUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 142024 July 20, 2001 - GUILLERMO SARABIA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. 145838 July 20, 2001 - NICASIO I. ALCANTARA v. COMMISSION ON THE SETTLEMENT OF LAND PROBLEMS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 146079 July 20, 2001 - KANEMITSU YAMAOKA v. PESCARICH MANUFACTURING CORP., ET AL.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-00-1564 July 26, 2001 - MARISSA M. GORDON, ET AL. v. FRISCO T. LILAGAN

  • G.R. Nos. 132325-26 July 26, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMEO ESPINA

  • G.R. No. 133225 July 26, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDWIN CONCEPCION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 113176 & 113342 July 30, 2001 - HANIL DEVELOPMENT CO. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. Nos. P-00-1381 & A.M. No. P-00-1382 July 31, 2001 - EFREN B. MALLARE v. RONALD ALLAN A. FERRY

  • G.R. No. 105647 July 31, 2001 - ERNESTO BIONA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 121298 & 122123 July 31, 2001 - GENARO RUIZ, SR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 129329 July 31, 2001 - ESTER M. ASUNCION v. NLRC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 130707 July 31, 2001 - VERONICA ROBLE, ET AL. v. DOMINADOR ARBASA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 134634 July 31, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LAZARO CLARIÑO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. 134831-32 July 31, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON N. LOGMAO

  • G.R. Nos. 136827 & 136799 July 31, 2001 - SECRETARY OF AGRARIAN REFORM, ET AL. v. TROPICAL HOMES

  • G.R. No. 136847 July 31, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL v. RODULFO P. VILLARIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 138289 July 31, 2001 - GRACIANO PALELE v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 139180 July 31, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO RIVERA

  • G.R. No. 139529 July 31, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIMOTEO BRACERO

  • G.R. No. 139622 July 31, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO PERRERAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 142616 July 31, 2001 - PHIL. NATIONAL BANK v. RITRATTO GROUP INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 143687 July 31, 2001 - RAMON ESTANISLAO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 144702 July 31, 2001 - U.I.C. ET AL. v. U.I.C. TEACHING AND NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYEES UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 145389 July 31, 2001 - ANIANO A. DESIERTO, ET AL. v. RONNIE C. SILVESTRE

  •  





     
     

    G.R. No. 137891   July 11, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS PATRIARCA

     
    PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

    THIRD DIVISION

    [G.R. No. 137891. July 11, 2001.]

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESUS PATRIARCA, Accused-Appellant.

    D E C I S I O N


    VITUG, J.:


    The case under review is an appeal from the 18th February 1999 decision 1 of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 16, 2 of Kabacan, Cotabato, in Criminal Case No. 965, convicting Jesus Patriarca of the crime of murder and sentencing him to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua and to indemnify the heirs of Melchor Gulmayo P50,000.00 civil indemnity, P50,000.00 moral damages, and P1,500.00 and P800.00 representing, respectively, reimbursement of the cost for embalming and the coffin used.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    The Information filed before the trial court which indicted Patriarca for murder read:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "That on the 24th day of December 1993 at about 7:00 o’clock in the evening, more or less at Barangay Pag-asa, Municipality of Mlang, Province of Cotabato, Philippines, the above-named accused, armed with a 22 magnum revolver, with intent to kill, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and with evident premeditation and treachery, attack, assault and shot therewith the person of MELCHOR GULMAYO, thereby hitting him in the different parts of his body, which caused his instantaneous death thereafter." 3

    The accused pled "not guilty" to the charge.

    The evidence for the prosecution consisted basically of the testimony of witnesses Romy Gulmayo, Ervin Gulmayo, Alicia Gulmayo, Dr. Candida Paracha, Rodrigo Elvas and Francisco Pastolero.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    Romy Gulmayo, a nine-year old son of Melchor, testified that on 24 December 1993 he was at home at Pag-asa, Mlang, Cotabato, together with his brother Ervin, his mother Alicia, and his father Melchor. At around seven-thirty in the evening, he and Ervin were resting at the "lawting," an elevated portion of the house, when, suddenly, they heard a gunshot. He looked through an opening and, at a distance of about 5 meters, saw the accused, armed with a short firearm, running away from their house. The accused was wearing a pair of short pants and had an orange shirt wrapped around his hand. His mother, brother Ervin and he ran towards the kitchen, located in the annex of their house, where they saw Melchor screaming in pain ("Agoy") from a gunshot wound. Moments later, Melchor died. Romy identified in court the accused who had been a long time neighbor.

    Ervin Gulmayo, the twelve-year old son of the victim, corroborated the testimony of Romy. The two were resting in the "lawting" when they heard the gunshot. He then saw the accused running away from their house with a shirt wrapped around his right hand. He was able to identify the accused because of the light coming from the kitchen. The accused, he said, was a neighbor whose house was only about 250 meters away from the Gulmayos. The following day, Ervin, along with some neighbors, surveyed the scene of the incident. The group was able to retrieve an orange t-shirt a few meters away from their house. It was the same shirt Ervin saw wrapped around the accused’s hand on the night of the incident.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    Alicia Gulmayo declared that on 24 December 1993, she was at their residence in Pag-asa, Mlang, Cotabato, when her husband was shot and killed. Shortly after hearing the gunshot, she, with her sons Romy and Ervin, rushed to help Melchor. She said her family spent P1,500.00 for embalming and P800.00 for the coffin. She also testified on the moral anguish they had suffered due to the untimely death of her husband.

    Dr. Candida Paracha, the resident physician of Mlang District Hospital at Mlang, Cotabato, conducted an autopsy on the body of Melchor. She found Melchor to have sustained a gunshot wound with entry at the back of the ribs which caused his death.

    Rodrigo Elvas, a resident of Pag-asa, Mlang, Cotabato, was at home on 24 December 1993 when he heard a gunshot coming from the direction of the house of Melchor Gulmayo and his family. He later learned that Melchor was shot to death. The next day, he went to the Gulmayo residence to survey the place, where he saw footprints which led him to an orange t-shirt near the creek. The shirt appeared to be the same shirt the accused was seen to have been wearing around five-thirty in the afternoon on the day of the incident when he and his friends were drinking tuba and beer at Erning Idobingco’s nearby store.

    Francisco Pastolero, also a resident of Pag-asa, Mlang, Cotabato, corroborated the testimony of Rodrigo that the accused was wearing an orange t-shirt the day Melchor was shot and killed, the same shirt which was later found at the creek near Melchors house the following day.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    The defense, on its part, presented the testimony of accused Jesus Patriarca and its witnesses Rex Faro, Rodolfo Perseverancia, PS1 Noemi Austero and SPO4 Joel Burgos.

    The accused claimed that at around seven o’clock in the evening of 24 December 1993, he was in his house at Pulang-lupa, Mlang, Cotabato, with his nephew, Rex Fare, and Rodolfo Perseverancia. Earlier, he and Rex were at Inggo Tababa’s residence in Pulang-lupa from three o’clock until five o’clock in the afternoon fetching water in preparation for the wedding of one of Inggo’s daughters. At about five o’clock, he and Rex went home to meet with Rodolfo Perseverancia who spent the night in his house. He denied having shot and killed Melchor. He also denied having owned the orange colored t-shirt found near Melchor’s house after the incident. He admitted having had a drinking spree at Erning Idobingco’s store but that it was, he said, on 20 December 1993 and not on 24 December 1993.

    Rex Fare, a nephew of the accused, averred that he and the accused were together on the afternoon and night of 24 December 1993. He asserted that the accused did not own any orange colored t-shirt. He added that neither he nor the accused had a drinking spree at Erning Idobingco’s store on 24 December 1993.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    Rodolfo Perseverancia, a resident of La Fortuna, Mlang, Cotabato, confirmed that at about five o’clock in the afternoon of 24 December 1993, he went to the house of the accused to borrow rice palay. He claimed that he spent the whole night with the accused.

    SPO4 Jocel Burgos of the Provincial Crime Laboratory Office 12, Kidapawan City, conducted a paraffin test on the accused following the incident. The cast taken from the accused was then forwarded to the PNP Crime Laboratory for examination.

    PSI Noemi Austero, a forensic chemist of the PNP Crime Laboratory, Regional Unit II, Ecoland, Davao City, testified that the pair of paraffin cast taken from both hands of Jesus Patriarca yielded negative results for gun-powder nitrates.

    On the basis of the evidence before it, the trial court, in its decision on 18 February 1999, found the accused guilty of murder. It held:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "WHEREFORE, in the light of all the foregoing, the court finds and so holds that the prosecution was able to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The court, therefore, declares the accused JESUS PATRIARCA, 31 years old (born May 31, 1967), GUILTY of MURDER, defined and punished under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, and he is hereby punished as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "1) To the penalty of RECLUSION PERPETUA;chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    "2) To pay to the heirs of Melchor Gulmayo the sum of P50,000.00 in concept of indemnity;

    "3) To pay to the heirs of Melchor Gulmayo the sum of P50,000.00 by way of moral damages;

    "4) To pay to the heirs of Melchor Gulmayo the sum of P1,500.00 and P800.00 as reimbursement for the embalming and for the coffin, respectively of Melchor Gulmayo;

    "5) Whether or not the accused will file a notice of appeal, let the records be forwarded to the Supreme Court for review." 4

    In the appeal brief, the defense contended that —

    "1) The trial court a quo erred in convicting the accused considering that his constitutional rights were violated when he was arrested without a warrant under circumstances which do not warrant the Application of Rule 113, Section 5 of the 1985 Rules of Criminal Procedure allowing warrantless arrest under exceptional circumstances;

    "2) The trial court a quo erred in convicting the accused considering that the guilt of the accused was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    "3) In the alternative, the trial court a quo erred in convicting the accused of the crime of murder, qualified by treachery considering that this qualifying circumstance was not proved beyond reasonable doubt." 5

    The trial court convicted appellant on the basis of circumstantial evidence testified to by the victim’s two sons, Romy and Ervin Gulmayo, who swore that they had seen appellant running away from their house after their father, Melchor, was shot and killed. Appellant was holding a gun and had an orange colored shirt wrapped around his hand. Prosecution witnesses Rodrigo Elvas and Francisco Pastolero stated that an orange t-shirt was found at a nearby creek, the same shirt that appellant was seen wearing on the day of the incident while appellant and his friends were drinking tuba and beer at a nearby store.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    The Court finds the prosecution’s evidence to be insufficient to sustain the conviction of appellant beyond reasonable doubt.

    The criminal complaint for murder against appellant was filed on 27 December 1993 before the Municipal Circuit Trial Court of Mlang, Matalam, Cotabato. The Information against appellant for murder was subsequently filed before the Regional Trial Court of Kabacan, Cotabato, on 18 February 1994. The filing of the criminal complaint and Information for murder against appellant were premised at the time solely on the sworn statements of Rodrigo Elvas and Francisco Pastolero, together with the sworn statements of Ernie Idobingco and Dr. Candida Paracha, about the incident. The sworn statements of Ervin and Romy Gulmayo were procured only on 21 February 1994 after the complaint and the information were filed and two months after the incident. Why the statements of the two sons were not taken earlier considering that their testimony clearly appeared to be vital to the case was not aptly explained. Was it possible that the substance of the testimony of Romy and that of Ervin Gulmayo were put up merely to dovetail the theory of the prosecution?

    Romy and Ervin claimed that they were able to identify the accused because of the light coming from the kitchen. The records, however, would show the kitchen’s location to be in a separate portion of the Gulmayo house that could make it doubtful that the beam coming therefrom provided sufficient illumination to the area. The incident occurred around seven-thirty in the evening in December in a barrio whose surroundings were not shown to have been well-lighted.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    What would then appear to be the primary evidence linking appellant to the crime was an orange colored t-shirt, he was seen to have been wearing on the day of the incident, found the day after at a nearby creek. No motive was imputed to appellant; the firearm used was not recovered, and appellant was, in fact, negative for gun-powder nitrates when a paraffin test was conducted on him.

    In a criminal case, the accused is entitled to an acquittal unless his guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt. Here, the Court entertains serious doubt on the guilt of appellant upon the strength of circumstantial evidence. In order to warrant a conviction, the circumstantial evidence shown should constitute an unbroken chain which leads to but one fair and reasonable conclusion that points to the defendant, to the exclusion of all others, as being the guilty person. 6 This species of evidence should be considered and weighed with great caution for our jurisprudence is built around the precept that it would be preferable for the guilty to remain unpunished than for an innocent person to suffer unjustly. 7

    Acquittal being its verdict, the Court need not delve into appellant’s other claim that his arrest is illegal for having been immediately and summarily done on the basis of a mere "call" or "report" by police officers who did not have personal knowledge of the circumstances of the crime.chanrob1es virtua1 1aw 1ibrary

    WHEREFORE, the decision of the Regional Trial Court of Kabacan, Cotabato, Branch 16, is REVERSED. Appellant Jesus Patriarca is ACQUITTED of the crime of murder on the ground of the failure of the prosecution to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. He is ordered released forthwith unless there are other lawful reasons for his continued detention. The Director of the Bureau of Prisons is directed to inform this Court forthwith of the action taken by him in this respect. Cost de oficio.

    SO ORDERED.

    Melo, Panganiban and Sandoval-Gutierrez, JJ., concur.

    Gonzaga-Reyes, J., is on leave.

    Endnotes:



    1. Rollo, pp. 23-38.

    2. Judge Francisco G. Rabang, Jr., presiding.

    3. Rollo, p. 8.

    4. Rollo, p. 38.

    5. Rollo, pp. 74-75.

    6. U.S. v. Villos, 06 Phil. 510.

    7. People v. Salangoste, 188 SCRA 422.

    G.R. No. 137891   July 11, 2001 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JESUS PATRIARCA


    Back to Home | Back to Main

     

    QUICK SEARCH

    cralaw

       

    cralaw



     
      Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
    ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
     
    RED