Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2008 > September 2008 Decisions > G.R. No. 181631 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JOSE BALINAS, JR.:




G.R. No. 181631 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JOSE BALINAS, JR.

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. NO. 181631 : September 30, 2008]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. JOSE BALINAS, JR., Appellant.

D E C I S I O N

TINGA, J.:

Before us on appeal is the Decision1 of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment2 of the Regional Trial Court3 of Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental in Criminal Case No. 2000-2445 finding Jose Balinas, Jr. (appellant) guilty of the crime of murder.

Appellant was charged with murder under the following Information:

That on or about the 7th day of [January 2000], in the Municipality of Ilog, Province of Negros Occidental, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, armed with a bladed weapon, with evident premeditation and treachery and with intent to kill, did then and there, willfully, unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault and stab one COLUMBAN M. SAYSON, thereby inflicting stab wounds upon him which caused his death.4

The facts, as narrated by Romeo Mateo (Mateo), the prosecution's lone witness, follow.

On 7 January 2000, Mateo was watching a cara y cruz game in Sitio Bailan, Brgy. Dancalan, Ilog, Negros Occidental at around 2:00 a.m. He noticed appellant and the latter's father, Jose Balinas, Sr. (Balinas, Sr.), exchanging words over a bet. Mateo overheard Balinas, Sr. that his bet was P300.00 while appellant was insisting that it was only P200.00. Afterwards, Columban Sayson (Sayson) inquired from Balinas, Sr. about the incident. Upon learning the cause of the argument, Sayson suggested that the difference be taken from the collection.5 Sensing an impending conflict, Mateo went to a nearby store6 while appellant went back to his house. Later, he saw Sayson, accompanied by Tongtong Gomez, run into appellant in the store.

Thereat, appellant confronted Sayson about the latter's intervention earlier inside the gambling place. Sayson replied that he wanted to settle things for the sake of peace. Thereafter, Sayson and Gomez left the store but appellant overtook the duo and stabbed Sayson twice on the chest. Appellant immediately ran away while Sayson shouted for help. During the entire stabbing incident, Mateo was situated four arms length from the trio.7

Sayson died as a result. The death certificate shows that he died from cardio-respiratory arrest, hypovolemic shock due to stab wounds in the chest and hemathorax and pneumothorax.8

Although appellant admitted the stabbing, he invoked self-defense. He related that on 7 January 2000 at around 2:00 a.m., Sayson waylaid him by the store and started beating him. He was hit on the chest, left cheek and other body parts. When Sayson persisted in punching him, appellant fought back and stabbed Sayson. After stabbing him, appellant ran towards his house, told his parents about the incident, and surrendered to the police.9 In support of his

testimony, appellant presented an entry in the police blotter to prove that he voluntarily surrendered. The said entry reiterated appellant's claim that he stabbed Sayson because the latter boxed him several times.10

After a thorough examination of the evidence presented by the parties, the trial court rendered a decision convicting appellant, the dispositive portion of which reads:

WHEREFORE, the Court finds accused Jose Balinas, Jr. y Gomez, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of murder as charged qualified by treachery and considering the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender thereby sentences him to suffer the penalty of imprisonment of reclusion perpetua and to pay the heirs of [the] victim Columban M. Sayson the amount of P50,000.00 by way of indemnity by reason of his death, P15,000.00 by way of moral damages, P40,000.00 by way of actual damages, P150,000.00 by way of loss of income and to pay the costs.

It is further ordered that accused be immediately remitted to the National Penitentiary.

SO ORDERED.11

The trial court relied on the testimony of the sole prosecution witness and found him to be candid, categorical and straightforward. Furthermore, it observed that the lack of improper motive on the part of the witness lent greater credence to his testimony. It also

discredited appellant's claim of self-defense. It held that such defense was not only uncorroborated by any separate competent evidence but is in itself extremely doubtful. The trial court concluded that the suddenness of the attack on the victim constitutes treachery qualifying the crime to murder.12

Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal to this Court on 2 February 2004.13

In a Resolution dated 6 September 2004 and pursuant to our ruling in People v. Mateo,14 the case was transferred to the Court of Appeals. The appellate court affirmed in toto the trial court's ruling. Undaunted, appellant filed a notice of appeal.15

On 2 April 2008, the parties were required to simultaneously file their respective supplemental briefs but they opted to adopt their briefs passed upon by the Court of Appeals.16

Appellant interposes two arguments to exculpate himself from criminal liability. He first invokes self-defense by insisting that it was Sayson, the victim, who initiated the attack. He justifies the use of a bladed weapon as he could not be expected to coolly choose the less deadly weapon in the face of an impending danger. He also avers that he did not give any cause for the aggression of the victim. Appellant also contends that the lower court erred in appreciating the qualifying circumstance of treachery for lack of concrete evidence to prove its presence.17

For the appellee, the Office of the Solicitor-General (OSG) argues that appellant failed to corroborate his claim of self-defense. It considers appellant's version of the facts as self-serving and highly suspect. It asserts that treachery attended the commission of the crime considering that the attack on Sayson was sudden and unexpected. Moreover, the OSG points out, the execution of the attack made it impossible for Sayson to defend himself.18

The arguments proferred by both parties can be summarized into two issues: (1) whether appellant acted in self-defense and (2) whether the killing was attended by treachery. Essentially, it boils down to the issue of credibility.

It is doctrinal that when the credibility of a witness is in issue, the findings of fact of the trial court, its calibration of the testimonies of the witnesses and its assessment of the probative weight thereof, as well as its conclusions anchored on said findings are accorded high respect if not conclusive effect. This is because the trial court has the unique opportunity to observe the demeanor of a witness and is in the best position to discern whether he is telling the truth. It is likewise settled that when the trial court's findings have been affirmed by the appellate court, said findings are generally conclusive and binding upon this Court.19

There appears to be no cogent reason to deviate from the findings of the lower courts with respect to the credibility of the lone eyewitness in the instant case.

Mateo, despite being the lone eyewitness to the crime, gave a positive and categorical account of the incident, thus:

Q: How long if you can estimate and recall their exchanging of words of Jose Balinas and Columban Sayson?cralawred

A: Just for a short while Jose Balinas, Jr. confronted Columban Sayson why he intervened and then Columban Sayson answered just to settle those things for peace.

Q: What happened after that?cralawred

A: After some sort of exchanging words Columban said - many talks many mistakes and then he went away together with Tongtong Gomez and then Jose Balinas, Jr. went ahead of them, went around the store and overtook them and then he stabbed Columban Sayson.

Q: Where was Columban Sayson hit?

x x x

A: He was hit in front of his body on the chest.

Q: What was the position of Columban Sayson when he was stabbed by Jose Balinas, Jr.?cralawred

A: When Jose Balinas, Jr. stabbed him for the first time Columban Sayson asked him - Jr., you are going to [kill] me and then Junior answered, I am not joking and then he stabbed him again.

x x x

Q: What happened to this Columban Sayson after he was stabbed for the second time by Jose Balinas, Jr.?cralawred

A: He shouted for help.

Q: How about Jose Balinas, Jr.? After his second stabbed [sic] made on Columban Sayson, what did he do, if any?cralawred

A: He ran away, sir.

x x x

Q: When Columban Sayson was stabbed by Jose Balinas, Jr., how far were you from them?cralawred

A: Very near them.

Q: How near?cralawred

A: Four (4) arms[,] length.20

Time and again, this Court has ruled that the testimony of a sole eyewitness is sufficient to support a conviction so long as it is clear, straightforward and worthy of credence by the trial court.21

Mateo is considered a disinterested witness and not a whit of ill-motive was attributed to him by appellant.

In light of the established evidence against appellant, his theory of self-defense falters. While the cardinal rule in criminal law is that the prosecution has the burden of proving the guilt of the accused, the rule is reversed where the accused admits committing the crime, but ςηαñrοblεš �νιr†υαl �lαω �lιbrαrÿ only in defense of one's self. In interposing self-defense, appellant admits authorship of the killing and the burden of proof is shifted to him to establish that killing was justified.22

Appellant's account of the incident and his subsequent plea of self-defense hardly deserve consideration. His testimony is not only uncorroborated but extremely doubtful. We quote with approval the pertinent portion of the appellate court's decision, to wit:

In the case at bench, We find that based on appellant's version of the events leading up to the killing of Columban, there is no clear and convincing proof that he acted in defense of his life, especially since his life was never in danger in the first place. According to appellant, Columban box[ed] him repeatedly, causing him to almost lose consciousness. However, appellant failed to advance or explain any reason why Columban box[ed] him.

And if it is true that appellant almost lost consciousness because of the beatings he suffered from Columban's fist blows, his claim that he was able to wrest away from this situation and stabbed [sic] Columban twice becomes doubtful. Certainly, a person who almost blacked out would be groggy and have a hard time keeping his balance, let alone stab another to death.

Furthermore, appellant's claim is uncorroborated. He failed to present another witness who could testify to the reasons why Columban would attack appellant, the manner in which he attacked appellant and how the latter was able to bounce back and defend himself by stabbing Columban.

Since Dancalan, Ilog, Negros Occidental was then celebrating its fiesta, there were people on the road and yet not one of them stood up and intervened while the incident was going on. Appellant did not even call anyone on the stand to support his claim. As such, [appellant's] version becomes self-serving and highly suspect.

In contrast, the prosecution had Romeo Mateo who positively [unidentified] appellant as the one who stabbed Columban twice. Romeo is familiar with appellant and he was only about four arms['] length away from the two when the incident happened. During the entire course of the proceedings in the trial court and even in his appeal brief, appellant never once attempted to ascribe or prove ill will on the part of Romeo Mateo for testifying as he did. The presumption that he is not actuated by any malice or base motive and that he merely testified to help bring Columban's assailant before the bars of justice remain unrebutted.

All told, the trial court correctly gave full weight and credit to the [prosecution's] case which led to the conviction of appellant.23

The courts below correctly appreciated the circumstance of treachery. The essence of treachery is the sudden and unexpected attack on an unsuspecting victim by the perpetrator of the crime, depriving the victim of any chance to defend himself or repel the aggression, thus insuring its commission without risk to the aggressor and without any provocation on the part of the victim.24 While the stabbing was preceded by a brief argument between appellant and Sayson, it cannot be gainsaid that the attack was indeed sudden and unexpected. Moreover, the fact that appellant went around the store in order to catch up with Sayson showed his tenacity to execute the crime.

In line with recent jurisprudence, we find the award of civil indemnity http://elibrary.supremecourt.gov.ph/DOCUMENTS/SUPREME_COURT/Decisions/2008/FEB2008.zip%3E59,df%7CFEB2008/169877.htm - _ftn22 in the amount of P50,000.00 for the death of Sayson correct and proper without any need of proof other than the commission of the crime. We increase the award of moral damages to P50,000.00 in accordance with our ruling in People v. Sison.25 http://elibrary.supremecourt.gov.ph/DOCUMENTS/SUPREME_COURT/Decisions/2008/FEB2008.zip%3E59,df%7CFEB2008/169877.htm - _ftn23 The award of exemplary damages of P25,000.00 is likewise warranted because of the presence of the aggravating circumstance of treachery. Exemplary damages are awarded when the commission of the offense is attended by an aggravating circumstance, whether ordinary or qualifying.26 Although the prosecution presented evidence that the heirs had incurred expenses, no receipts were presented. The award of temperate damages, in the amount of P25,000.00, to the heirs of the victim is justified. Temperate damages are awarded where no documentary evidence of actual damages was presented in the trial because it is reasonable to presume that, when death occurs, the family of the victim incurred expenses for the wake and funeral. http://elibrary.supremecourt.gov.ph/DOCUMENTS/SUPREME_COURT/Decisions/2008/MAR2008.zip%3E5f,df%7CMAR2008/179278.htm - _ftn42

However, we delete the award of P40,000.00 in actual damages and P150,000.00 for loss of income granted by the trial court for it cannot simply rely on speculation, conjecture or guesswork as to the fact and amount of damages, but is required to depend upon competent proof that the claimant had suffered and on evidence of the actual amount thereof.27

WHEREFORE, the appealed judgment is AFFIRMED WITH MODIFICATION. Appellant Jose Balinas, Jr. is found GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of murder qualified by treachery and sentenced to suffer reclusion perpetua.

Appellant is ordered to pay the heirs of Columban Sayson the amounts of P50,000.00 as civil indemnity, P50,000.00 as moral damages, P25,000.00 as temperate damages, and P25,000.00 as exemplary damages.

SO ORDERED.

ARTURO D. BRION


Chairperson, Second Division


Endnotes:


1 Rollo, pp. 7-12; penned by Associate Justice Agustin S. Dizon, and concurred in by Associate Justices Pampio A. Abarintos and Stephen C. Cruz.

2 CA rollo, pp. 16-21.

3 Presided by Judge Henry D. Arles.

4 Records, p. 1.

5 TSN, 6 August 2001, pp. 4-7.

6 Id. at 12.

7 Id. at 8-10.

8 Records, p. 61.

9 TSN, 4 June 2003, pp. 4-6.

10 Records, p. 80.

11 Id. at 90.

12 Id. at 89-90.

13 Id. at 92.

14 G.R. NOS. 147678-87, 7 July 2004, 433 SCRA 640.

15 Id. at 92.

16 Rollo, pp. 19-26.,

17 CA rollo, pp. 61-65.

18 Id. at 104-107.

19 People v. Beltran, Jr., G.R. No. 168051, 27 September 2006, 503 SCRA 715, 730.

20 TSN, 6 August 2001, pp. 9-10.

21 People v. Rivera, 458 Phil. 856, 873 (2003).

22 People v. Herrera, 422 Phil. 830, 850 (2001).

23 Rollo, pp. 9-10.

24 People v. Gutierrez, 426 Phil. 752, 767 (2002).

25 G.R. No. 172752, 18 June 2008.

26 People v. Segobre, G.R. No. 169877, 14 February 2008.

27 Villafuerte v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 134239, 26 May 2005, 489 SCRA 58.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






September-2008 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.C. No. 6737 - FLOCERFIDA S. LANUZO v. ATTY. JESUS B. BONGON

  • A.C. No. 7902 - TORBEN V. OVERGAARD v. ATTY. GODWIN R. VALDEZ

  • A.M. No. MTJ-06-1631 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 05-1744-MTJ) - FENINA R. SANTOS v. JUDGE ERASTO D. TANCIONGCO

  • A.M. No. 08-8-11-CA - RE: LETTER OF PRESIDING JUSTICE CONRADO M. VASQUEZ, JR. ON CA-G.R. SP NO. 103692 [Antonio Rosete, et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, et al.]

  • A.M. no. P-06-2137 - RE: UNAUTHORIZED ABSENCES FROM THE POST OF PEARL MARIE N. ICAMINA ETC.

  • A.M. No. P-06-2233 Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 05-2268-P - Judge Henry B. Basila v. Yolanda L. Ricafort

  • A.M. No. P-07-2380 Formerly A.M. No. 06-10-613-RTC - Absence without leave of Ms. Lydia Ramil etc.

  • A.M. No. RTJ-08-2127 Formerly OCA IPI No. 07-2697-RTJ - Cita Borromeo-Garcia v. Judge Ernesto P. Pagayatan etc.

  • G.R. No. 123238, September 22, 2008 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. COURT OF APPEALS AND SPOUSES MANUEL S. BUNCIO AND AURORA R. BUNCIO, MINORS DEANNA R. BUNCIO AND NIKOLAI R. BUNCIO, ASSISTED BY THEIR FATHER, MANUEL S. BUNCIO, AND JOSE

  • G.R. No. 138823, September 17, 2008 - CARIDAD MAGKALAS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent.

  • G.R. 139047 and G.R. NO. 139365 - SPOUSES EMMA H. VER REYES AND RAMON REYES, Petitioners, v. DOMINADOR SALVADOR, SR., EMILIO FUERTE, FELIZA LOZADA, ROSALINA PADLAN, AURORA TOLENTINO, TRINIDAD L. CASTILLO, ROSARIO BONDOC, MARIA Q. CRISTOBAL AND DULOS REALT

  • G.R. No. 142977 - LEONOR CAMCAM, ET AL. v. HON. CA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 148433 - ZAMBOANGA BARTER TRADERS KILUSANG BAYAN, INC. ETC. v. HON. JULIUS RHETT J. PLAGATA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 149189 - LETICIA T. FIDELDIA v. SPS. RAUL and ELEONOR MULATO

  • G.R. No. 150536, September 17, 2008 - BIENVENIDO GOMBA, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 150635 - DR. ROSALINA G. HILARIO v. MODESTO PRUDENTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 151110, September 11, 2008 - SPL. POL. LT. RAMON . TORREDES, Petitioner, v. CARLOS VILLAMOR, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 151854 - PHILUX, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 153077, September 19, 2008 - DOLORES SALINAS, ASSISTED BY HER HUSBAND, JUAN CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. SPS. BIENVENIDO S. FAUSTINO AND ILUMINADA G. FAUSTINO, Respondents.

  • G.R. NO. 154464, September 11, 2008 - FERDINAND A. CRUZ, 332 EDANG ST., PASAY CITY, Petitioner, v. JUDGE PRISCILLA MIJARES, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 108, PASAY CITY, METRO MANILA, PUBLIC, Respondents. BENJAMIN MINA, JR., 332 EDANG ST.

  • G.R. No. 154716, September 16, 2008 - FAR EAST BANK AND TRUST CO., TRUST AND INVESTMENT GROUP, AND FEB INVESTMENT, INC., Petitioners, v. TRUST UNION SHIPPING CORP., SWEET LINES, INC., AND THE VESSEL M/V "SWEET GLORY" (EX M/V "SWEET RORO 2"), RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. No. 155491, September 16, 2008 - SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner, v. THE CITY OF DAVAO, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS MAYOR HON. RODRIGO R. DUTERTE, AND THE SANGGUNIANG PANLUNGSOD OF DAVAO CITY, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 155703 - THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. DOMINADOR SANTUA

  • G.R. No. 156076, September 17, 2008 - SPS. JESUS CHING AND LEE POE TIN, Petitioners, v. SPS. ADOLFO & ARSENIA ENRILE, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 156208, September 17, 2008 - NPC DRIVERS AND MECHANICS ASSOCIATION (NPC DAMA), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT ROGER S. SAN JUAN, SR., NPC EMPLOYEES & WORKERS UNION (NEWU) - NORTHERN LUZON REGIONAL CENTER, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL PRESIDENT JIMMY

  • G.R. No. 156364 - Jacobus Bernhard Hulst v. PR Builders, Inc.

  • G.R. No. 156482, September 17, 2008 - PEDRO GABRIEL, FERNANDO JAMIAS, ALFREDO NIEDO, MABINI JAMIAS, BRAULIO TANGO, MARIANO ECHAVARI, ISIDRO RECITES, BERNARDO BAQUIRIN, FERMIN JAMIAS, FRANCISCO NIEDO, GAVINO JAMIAS, JULIANO ORBILLO, ROSENDO NIEDO, PACITA A

  • G.R. No. 157106 - ROMULO TINDOY v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. 157125, September 19, 2008 - ILUMINADA "LUMEN" R. POLICARPIO, Petitioner, v. ACTIVE BANK (FORMERLY MAUNLAD SAVINGS AND LOAN BANK), Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 158642, September 22, 2008 - THE ESTATE OF DON FILEMON Y. SOTTO, REPRESENTED BY ITS DULY DESIGNATED ADMINISTRATOR, SIXTO SOTTO PAHANG, JR., Petitioner, v. MATILDE S. PALICTE, SUBSTITUTED BY HER HEIRS, VIDYA PALICTE BRIOL, JUSTICIA PALICTE JUMAMIL

  • G.R. No. 159220, September 22, 2008 - MA. DARLENE DIMAYUGA-LAURENA, Petitioner, v. COURT OF APPEALS AND JESSE LAURO LAURENA, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 159308 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ETC. v. PAGADIAN CITY TIMBER CO. INC.

  • G.R. No. 159808 - LEOPARD INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. AND/OR JOSE POE v. VIRGILIO MACALINAO

  • G.R. No. 160725, September 12, 2008 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. PUREFOODS CORPORATION, SOLID DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JOSE ORTEGA, JR., SILVESTRE BAUTISTA, ALFREDO CABANDE, HEIRS OF VICTOR TRINIDAD, AND MOLDEX REALTY INCORPORATED, Respond

  • G.R. No. 161032, September 16, 2008 - ERWIN TULFO, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES AND ATTY. CARLOS T. SO, Respondents. - G.R. NO. 161176 - SUSAN CAMBRI, REY SALAO, JOCELYN BARLIZO, AND PHILIP PICHAY, Petitioners, v. COURT OF APPEALS, PEOPLE OF T

  • G.R. No. 161057, September 12, 2008 - BETTY GABIONZA AND ISABELITA TAN, Petitioners, v. COURT OF APPEALS, LUKE ROXAS AND EVELYN NOLASCO, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 162525 - ASEAN PACIFIC PLANNERS, ET AL. v. CITY OF URDANETA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 163749 - Spouses Julian santiago, Sr. et al. v. Bank of the Philippines Islands etc.

  • G.R. No. 163838 - Wallem Maritime Services, Inc. et al. v. NLRC, et al.

  • G.R. No. 164614 - Securities and Exchange Commission v. Picop Resources Inc.

  • G.R. No. 164850 - Reynaldo Q. Agullano v. Christian Publishing, et al.

  • G.R. No. 165012, September 16, 2008 - RACHEL BEATRIZ RUIVIVAR, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND DR. CONNIE BERNARDO, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 165153, September 23, 2008 - CARLOS C. DE CASTRO, Petitioner, v. LIBERTY BROADCASTING NETWORK, INC. AND EDGARDO QUIOGUE, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 165275, September 23, 2008 - GORETTI ONG, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 165896, September 19, 2008 - RUSTICO ABAY, JR. AND REYNALDO DARILAG, Petitioners, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 165993 - MERIDA WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO BACARRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 166096, September 11, 2008 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner, v. RAMON BRIGIDO L. VELASCO, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 166676, September 12, 2008 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. JENNIFER B. CAGANDAHAN, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 166996 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, ET AL. v. BERNARDIN J. ZAMORA

  • G.R. No. 167383, September 22, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMADEO TINSAY, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 167560, September 17, 2008 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. DOMINADOR MENGUITO, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 167671 - RICARDO S. SANTOS, JR. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. 167691, September 23, 2008 - CAMARINES SUR IV ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Petitioner, v. EXPEDITA L. AQUINO, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 167709, September 19, 2008 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF PASCUAL OCARIZA, REPRESENTED BY CO-HEIR REMEDIOS BACALSO, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 167962, September 19, 2008 - ANTAM PAWNSHOP CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. CHAMBER OF PAWNBROKERS OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC., PETITIONER-IN-INTERVENTION.

  • G.R. No. 168050, September 19, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BERNARDINO GAFFUD, JR., Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 168074 - Empire East Land Holdings Inc. v. Capitol Industrial Construction Groups, Inc.

  • G.R. No. 168309 - Office of the Ombudsman v. Marian D. Torres, et al.

  • G.R. No. 168561 - Tacloban II Neighborhood Association Inc. v. Office of the President, et al.

  • G.R. No. 168578 - NIETO A. RACHO v. HON. PRIMO C. MIRO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 168742 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. NORMA ROYALES

  • G.R. No. 168787 / G.R. No. 169271 - DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, ETC. v. POLO COCONUT PLANTATION CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 168852 - SHARICA MARL L. GO-TAN v. SPOUSES PERFECTO C. TAN & JUANITA L. TAN

  • G.R. No. 169400, September 12, 2008 - NAPOLEON G. RAMA, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES EDUARDO AND CONCHITA JOAQUIN, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 169444, September 17, 2008 - PABLITO T. VILLARIN AND P.R. BUILDERS DEVELOPERS & MANAGERS, INC., Petitioners, v. CORONADO P. MUNASQUE, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 169549 - JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, ET AL. v. JOANNA CANTRE DAVIS

  • G.R. No. 169558 - PHILIPPINE CROP INSURANCE CORP. v. CA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 169657, September 12, 2008 - LT. (RET.) EDUARDO DE OCAMPO, Petitioner, v. PO3 EUZUETO R. REY, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 170247, September 17, 2008 - HEIRS OF BENJAMIN MENDOZA, NAMELY: PACITA MENDOZA, VICTOR MENDOZA, JOSE MENDOZA, CESAR MENDOZA, EFREN MENDOZA, EDWARDO MENDOZA, EDNA MENDOZA AND BEVERLY MENDOZA, Petitioners, v. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS AND J.A. DEVE

  • G.R. No. 170266, September 12, 2008 - ENGRACIO A. GUERZON, JR., LILIAN E. CRUZ and JOSEFINA O. BAUYON, Petitioners, v. PASIG INDUSTRIES, INC., MASAHIRO FUKADA and YOSHIKITSU FUJITA, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 170325 - Philippines National Bank v. Erlando T. Rodriguez, et al.

  • G.R. No. 170415, September 19, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESUS CASTRO, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 170569 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. NORBERTO MATEO Y DIZON

  • G.R. No. 170738, September 12, 2008 - RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. MARCOPPER MINING CORPORATION, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 170852, September 12, 2008 - SPOUSES NOE AND CLARITA QUIAMCO, Petitioners, v. CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC., Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 170943, September 23, 2008 - PEDRO T. SANTOS, JR., Petitioner, v. PNOC EXPLORATION CORPORATION, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 171827, September 17, 2008 - TERESITA MONZON, Petitioner, v. SPS. JAMES & MARIA ROSA NIEVES RELOVA AND SPS. BIENVENIDO & EUFRACIA PEREZ, RESPONDENTS. VS. ADDIO PROPERTIES, INC., Intervenor.

  • G.R. No. 172129, September 12, 2008 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. MIRANT PAGBILAO CORPORATION (FORMERLY SOUTHERN ENERGY QUEZON, INC.), Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 172238, September 17, 2008 - MA. LIZA FRANCO-CRUZ, Petitioner, v. THE COURT OF APPEALS, VICTORY LINER, INC., MARITES M. GANELO, CATHERINE C. SANTOS, AND MA. THERESA Q. FABIAN, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 172248, September 17, 2008 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, JJ. ELLA GAGARANI, ISAGANI, ADRIAN, NATHANIEL, NIEVA, JONATHAN, DIONESIO, FLORENCE AND JEREMIAS, ALL SURNAMED ASOK, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 172306 - MICHAEL V. SANTOS v. SHING HUNG PLASTICS CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 172677, September 12, 2008 - ISAGANI YAMBOT AND LETTY JIMENEZ-MAGSANOC, Petitioners, v. RAYMUNDO A. ARMOVIT AND HON. FRANCISCO R. RANCHES, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF BRANCH 21 OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF VIGAN, ILOCOS SUR, Respo

  • G.R. No. 172744 - Marvin Angeles v. People of the Philippines

  • G.R. No. 172871, September 16, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLEMENTE CASTA Y CAROLINO, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 173106 - COSME NACARIO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. 173114 - JAYSON DANDAN v. ARFEL REALTY & MANAGEMENT CORP., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 173242 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ESPERIDION BALAIS

  • G.R. No. 173283, September 17, 2008 - SCENARIOS, INC. AND/OR RHOTZIV BAGO, Petitioners, v. JELLY VINLUAN, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 173318, September 23, 2008 - U-BIX CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. MILLIKEN & COMPANY, SYLVAN CHEMICAL COMPANY, WILFREDO BATARA, PROJEXX CREATOR, INC. AND ONOFRE ESER, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 173375 - Leoncio D. Mangahas, et al. v. The Hon. Court of Appeals, et al.

  • G.R. No. 173483, September 23, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. MERLIE* DUMANGAY Y SALE, Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 173808, September 17, 2008 - FERNANDA ARBIAS, Petitioner, v. THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 173891 - HEIRS OF THE LATE SPS. LUCIANO P. LIM & SALUD NAKPIL BAUTISTA ETC. v. THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE RTC OF Q.C. ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 174098, September 12, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REYNALDO TECZON Y PASCUAL, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 174312, September 22, 2008 - CAPT. ERNESTO S. CABALLERO, Petitioner, v. PHILIPPINE COAST GUARD EFFICIENCY AND SEPARATION BOARD (PCG-ESB), COMM. ELPIDIO B. PADAMA, CAPT. ALEJANDRO N. FLORA, CAPT. ANTONIO LALISAN, CAPT. CESAR A. SARILE, CDR. EDUARD

  • G.R. No. 174346, September 12, 2008 - FERNANDA GEONZON VDA. DE BARRERA AND JOHNNY OCO, JR., Petitioners, v. HEIRS OF VICENTE LEGASPI, REPRESENTED BY PEDRO LEGASPI, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 174569 - Leopoldo Jeremias, et al. v. The Estate of the Late Irene P. Mariano etc.

  • G.R. No. 174711, September 17, 2008 - SALLY SUENO, Petitioner, v. LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 174899, September 11, 2008 - RAMON L. UY, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 175175 - Land Bank of the Philippines v. Heirs of Eleuterio Cruz

  • G.R. No. 175550, September 17, 2008 - DASMARIÑAS WATER DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, JJ. MONTEREY FOODS CORPORATION,** Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 175573, September 11, 2008 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, Petitioner, v. JOEL S. SAMANIEGO, Respondent.

  • G.R. No. 175995, September 23, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. EDWIN FUENTES Y CARSON, Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 176159, September 11, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEE RODRIGO, JOHN DOE @ BUNSO, AND PETER DOE @ LYN-LYN, ACCUSED. LEE RODRIGO, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 176504 - FERDINAND A. CRUZ v. THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. 177297, September 12, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLAUDIO ZULUETA, SR., Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 177571 - People of the Philippines v. Dean Martin Y Savida @ Denden, et al.

  • G.R. No. 177667, September 17, 2008 - CLEODIA U. FRANCISCO AND CEAMANTHA U. FRANCISCO, REPRESENTED BY THEIR GRANDMOTHER DRA. MAIDA G. URIARTE AS THEIR ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, Petitioners, v. SPOUSES JORGE C. GONZALES AND PURIFICACION W. GONZALES, Respondents.

  • G.R. No. 177785 - RANDY ALMEDA, ET AL. v. ASAHI GLASS PHILIPPINES, INC.

  • G.R. No. 177874 - Jaime D. Ang v. Bruno Soledad

  • G.R. No. 178505 - CHERRY J. PRICE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 179402 - NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS IN HOTELS, ET AL. v. ACESITE PHILIPPINE HOTEL CORP.

  • G.R. No. 178545 Formerly G.R. No. 135972 - People of the Philippines v. Leo Barriga, et al.

  • G.R. No. 179718, September 17, 2008 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. LOURDES V. LEGASPI, Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 179939 - People of the Philippines v. Geraldine Magat Y Paderon

  • G.R. No. 180394 - Marjorie B. Cadimas, Represented by her Atty-In-Fact, Venancio Z. Rosales v. Marites Carrion, et al.

  • G.R. No. 180500, September 11, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MEDARDO CRESPO Y CRUZ, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 180557 - Heirs of Roque F. Tabuena, et al. v. Land Bank of the Philippines

  • G.R. No. 180643 - ROMULO L. NERI v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS AND INVESTIGATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 180643 - ROMULO L. NERI, in his capacity as Chairman of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and as former Director General of the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS &

  • G.R. No. 180643 - ROMULO L. NERI, in his capacity as Chairman of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and as former Director General of the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA), Protestant v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OF

  • G.R. No. 180643 - ROMULO L. NERI, in his capacity as Chairman of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and as former Director General of the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS &

  • G.R. No. 180643 - (Romulo L. Neri, petitioner, v. Senate Committee on Accountability of Public Officers and Investigations, Senate Committee on Trade and Commerce, and Senate Committee on National Defense and Security, respondents.)

  • G.R. No. 181546 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. RICARDO ALUNDAY

  • G.R. No. 181631 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JOSE BALINAS, JR.

  • G.R. No. 181632 - People of the Philippines v. Jesse Ballesta

  • G.R. No. 181633, September 12, 2008 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGER UGOS, Accused-Appellant.

  • G.R. No. 181747 - People of the Philippines v. Narciso Agulay y Lopez

  • G.R. No. 182548 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. CESARIO OSIANAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 182718 - Julio B. Purcon, Jr. v. MRM Philippines, Inc., et al.