ChanRobles Virtual law Library










GO TO FULL LIST OF LATEST DECISIONS and RESOLUTIONS


chanrobles.com - PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS - ON-LINE

cralaw_scdecisions_separator.NHAD


Manila
SECOND DIVISION

 

RAFAELA G. VDA. DE CASTRO,
            Petitioner,

G. R. No. L-42399


January  30, 1976

      -versus-

MAJOR GENERAL FABIAN VER,
AS COMMANDING OFFICER 
OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
SECURITY AGENCY [NISA];
JUAN PONCE ENRILE,
AS SECRETARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE;
MAJOR GENERAL FIDEL RAMOS,
CHIEF OF CONSTABULARY;
and THE COMMANDING OFFICER,
CAMP CRAME STOCKADE,
              Respondents.
 
 

RESOLUTION

ANTONIO, J;


On January 15, 1976, Rafaela G. Vda. de Castro, on behalf of her son, Rolando G. Castro, 42 years of age, single and government employee, presented the present petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus for the release of her son from custody of respondents, asserting that her son was arrested on January 13, 1976, at their residence, without "any warrant or any arrest, search and seizure order", by Lt. Batac, and thereafter brought to the Camp Crame stockade where he is now detained and kept incommunicado, which "detention is illegal and without any justification and/or legal authority".

Acting on said petition, this Court, on January 16, 1976, issued the Writ, commanding the respondents, or their authorized representatives. (a) to appear and produce the body of Rolando G. Castro before this Court, and (b) to show the cause of imprisonment or restraint, both acts to be done on Wednesday, January 21, 1976 at 10:30 a.m., at which date and time the parties will be heard. Upon urgent motion of the Solicitor General on behalf of respondents, the filing of the return and the hearing was postponed to January 23, 1976.cralaw:red

On the date of hearing, the respondents produced the person of Rolando G. Castro, subject of the writ, and informed this Court, in the return, that said detainee was arrested by elements of the 5th Constabulary Security Unit and is being detained in Camp Crame, Quezon City, by virtue of Arrest, Search and Seizure Order No. 3140, dated January 10, 1976, issued by the Secretary of National Defense, "for knowingly, wilfully and by overt act joining the Communist Party of the Philippines in violation of the Anti-Subversion Act [Rep. Act No. 1700]", and in connection with his arrest, "a .32 cal. Mauser pistol and 77 rounds of amunition were seized from him after he failed to produce a license to possess the same". It was also asserted that in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Chief, Philippine Constabulary, Capt. Virgilio G. Saldajeno, Legal Officer of the 5th Constabulary Security Unit, called up the detainee's residence within seventy-two [72] hours of the arrest and informed the latter's relatives of his whereabouts and of the fact that they can visit him in Camp Crame, Quezon City. Attached to the return was an affidavit of Rolando G. Castro, in which he states, among other things, that he is not being held incommunicado, and he does not agree with the filing of the present petition, as he, as a lawyer and aware of his rights, would rather clear his name in the investigation being conducted by the P.C.cralaw:red

This petition, as well as several others acted upon by this Court, sufficiently indicate the availability of the writ of habeas corpus during martial rule. Thus, it must be recognized that while instances of unjustified and unwarranted detention may occur, it has so far been shown that either the top officials of the defense establishment or the courts of justice can. step in to right matters. It is only with respect to persons arrested or detained for acts related to the basic objective of the proclamation of martial rule who are precluded from utilizing this remedy to put an end to their deprivation of freedom.cralaw:red

Considering, however, that the person detained has voluntarily moved for the withdrawal of this petition, and since it is his personal liberty that is at stake, the Court has voted to allow such withdrawal.cralaw:red

WHEREFORE, the petition for habeas corpus is considered withdrawn and the case terminated.


Fernando, Barredo, Aquino, and Concepcion, Jr., JJ ., concur.


 Back to Top   -   Back to Main Index   -   Back to Table of Contents -1976 SC Decisions   -   Back to Home
 




































chanrobles.com




ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com