THIRD
DIVISION
CASIANO
A.
ANGCHANGCO,
JR.,
Petitioner,
G.
R.
No. 122728
March
21, 1997
-versus-
THE
HON.
OMBUDSMAN,
ZALDY TAMAYO,
GILDA NAVARRA,
ODELIA
LEGASPI,
SALVADOR TAMAYO,
GASPAR ABORQUE,
ROEL ABAS, REMEDIOS
OLITA, ET AL.,
TEODOBO TORREON,
ET AL., JIMMY MARTIN,
MENRADO ALLAWAN,
MARGARITO ESCORIAL,
NORBERTO OCAT AND
ALEJANDRO ERNA,
Respondents.
R
E S O L U
T I O N
MELO, J.:
On February 13, 1997,
this Court rendered a decision granting petitioner's petition for mandamus,
the decretal portion of which reads as follows:
WHEREFORE, the Court
RESOLVED to give DUE COURSE to the petition and to GRANT the same.
Ombudsman
Cases No. MIN-3-90-0671, MIN-90-0132, MIN-90-0133, MIN-90-0138,
MIN-90-0188,
MIN-90-0189, MIN-90-0190, MIN-90-0191, and MIN-90-0192 are ordered
DISMISSED.
The Office of the Ombudsman is further directed to issue the
corresponding
clearance in favor of petitioner. [p. 111, Rollo]
Upon receipt, petitioner
immediately proceeded to the Office of Ombudsman, Manila to secure the
corresponding clearance as mandated in the February 13, 1997 Decision.
Petitioner, however, was informed that the clearance can not be issued
due to the fact that the decretal portion of the February 13, 1997
Decision
failed to mention 4 cases which were also subject of the petition
for
mandamus, namely, MIN-90-0185, MIN-90-0193, MIN-90-0186, and
MIN-90-0187.
Petitioner was likewise advised by the Office of the Ombudsman to file
the corresponding manifestation before this Court for clarification of
the decretal portion of the February 13, 1997 Decision to include the
said
4 cases.
Hence, this instant
motion.cralaw:red
Indeed, the 4 cases,
namely, MIN-90-0185, MIN-90-0193, MIN-90-0186, and MIN-90-0187 were
likewise
subject of the petition but were inadvertently excluded from the list
of
the cases ordered to be dismissed.cralaw:red
WHEREFORE, the decretal
portion of the February 14, 1997 Decision is hereby amended to include
MIN-90-0185, MIN-90-0193, MIN-90-0186 and MIN-90-0187, to wit:
WHEREFORE, the Court
RESOLVED to give DUE COURSE to the petition and GRANT the same.
Ombudsman
Cases Nos. MIN-3-90-0671, MIN-90-0132, MIN-90-0133, MIN-900-138,
MIN-90-0185,
MIN-0-0193, MIN-90-0186, MIN-90-0187, MIN-90-0188, MIN-90-0189,
MIN-90-0190,
MIN-90-0191, and MIN-90-0912 are ordered DISMISSED. The Office of the
Ombudsman
is further directed to issue the corresponding clearance in favor of
petitioner.
[p. 114, Rollo]
Narvasa, C.J.,
Davide,
Jr., Francisco and Panganiban, JJ., concur. |