|
|
|
|
|
CASIANO
A.
ANGCHANGCO,
JR., G.
R.
No. 122728
March
21, 1997
-versus- THE
HON.
OMBUDSMAN,
ZALDY TAMAYO, MELO, J.:
On February 13, 1997,
this Court rendered a decision granting petitioner's petition for mandamus,
the decretal portion of which reads as follows:
Upon receipt, petitioner
immediately proceeded to the Office of Ombudsman, Manila to secure the
corresponding clearance as mandated in the February 13, 1997 Decision.
Petitioner, however, was informed that the clearance can not be issued
due to the fact that the decretal portion of the February 13, 1997
Decision
failed to mention 4 cases which were also subject of the petition
for
mandamus, namely, MIN-90-0185, MIN-90-0193, MIN-90-0186, and
MIN-90-0187.
Petitioner was likewise advised by the Office of the Ombudsman to file
the corresponding manifestation before this Court for clarification of
the decretal portion of the February 13, 1997 Decision to include the
said
4 cases.
Hence, this instant motion. Indeed, the 4 cases, namely, MIN-90-0185, MIN-90-0193, MIN-90-0186, and MIN-90-0187 were likewise subject of the petition but were inadvertently excluded from the list of the cases ordered to be dismissed. WHEREFORE, the decretal portion of the February 14, 1997 Decision is hereby amended to include MIN-90-0185, MIN-90-0193, MIN-90-0186 and MIN-90-0187, to wit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|