ChanRobles Virtual law Library








RULES AND REGULATIONS ON
INVENTIONS
FULL TEXT
 

Read the full text in one webpage of the
RULES AND REGULATIONS ON INVENTIONS



 
PART 3 
RIGHT TO A PATENT


Rule 300. Right to a patent.   The right to a patent belongs to the inventor, his heirs, or assigns.  When two (2) or more persons have jointly made an invention, the right to a patent shall belong to them jointly. [Sec. 28, IP Code]  
 

Rule 301. Who may be named in an application as an applicant.  The application may be filed by the actual inventor(s) or in the name of his heirs, legal representative or assigns.  
 
  
Rule 302.  Inventions created pursuant to a commission.  The person who commissions the work shall own the patent, unless otherwise provided in the contract.  [Sec. 30.1, IP Code]  
 

Rule 303.  Inventions made in the course of employment.  In case the employee made the invention in the course of his employment contract, the patent shall belong to:  

    (a)  The employee, if the inventive activity is not a part of his regular duties even if the employee uses the time, facilities and materials of the employer  

    (b) The employer, if the invention is the result of the performance of his regularly-assigned duties, unless there is an agreement, express or implied, to the contrary.  [Sec. 30.2, IP Code] 


Rule 304. First to file rule.  If two (2) or more persons have made the same invention separately and independently of each other, the right to the patent shall belong to the person who filed an application for such invention, or where two or more applications are filed for the same invention, to the applicant who has the earliest filing date or, the earliest priority date.  [Sec. 29, IP Code]  

Where two or more applications for the same invention made separately and independently of each other have the same filing date, on priority-date the patent will be issued jointly to the applicants of all such applications.  
 

Rule 305. Right of priority.  An application for patent filed by any person who has previously applied for the same invention in another country which by treaty, convention, or law affords similar privileges to Filipino citizens, shall be considered as filed as of the date of filing of the foreign application: Provided, That: (a) the local application expressly claims priority; (b) it is filed within twelve (12) months from the date the earliest foreign application was filed and (c) a certified copy of the foreign application together with an English translation is filed within six (6) months from the date of filing in the Philippines.  [Sec. 31, IP Code]  

This six (6) month-period may be extended by the Director for a maximum of six (6) months upon showing of good cause or in compliance with treaties to which the Philippines is or may become a member.  


Rule 306.1.  Multiple priorities.  An application can claim more than one priority even from different countries.  If more than one patent priority is claimed, time limits computed from the priority date will be based upon the earliest priority date.  

    Rule 306.2.  If one or more priorities are claimed, the right of priority shall cover only those elements of the application which are included in the application or applications whose priority is claimed.  

    Rule 306.3.  If certain elements of the invention for which priority is claimed do not appear among the claims formulated in the previous application, priority may nonetheless be granted, provided that the previous application as a whole specifically disclose such elements.  

    Rule 306.4.  Where an application could have claimed the priority of an earlier application, but when filed, did not contain such priority, the applicant shall be given two (2) months from the filing date to submit priority claim. 

Submission of priority claim after the filing of the application shall be accompanied by a declaration of the applicant stating that the delay in submitting the priority claim was unintentional.   



Rule 307. Certified copy of the foreign applications.  The certified copy of foreign applications mentioned in Rule 302 shall be the copy of the priority application(s) as duly certified to be a true or faithful reproduction thereof by the Industrial Property Office which received it or any other office which has official custody of the foreign application.  


 
 

Back to Top   -  Back to Home   -  Back to IPR Index   -  Back to Rules on Invention Index

 
  

 chanroblesvirtualawlibrary





































chanrobles.com




ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com