SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-2257  May 5, 1906

CHANG HANG LING, ET AL.,Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. THE CITY OF MANILA, ET AL.,Defendants-Appellees.

Bishop and O'Brien, for appellants.
Modesto Reyes, for appellees.

ARELLANO, C.J.: chanrobles virtual law library

The plaintiffs in their complaint prayed for a preliminary injunction, which was granted, and asked that the same be made perpetual, restraining the defendants, their officers, agents, and servants from tearing down or destroying a stone fence which was then being built upon a certain tract of land owned by them, adjoining the estero de a Quinta and the Pasig River. This stone fence was being built upon the bank of the said estero at its junction with the river, the land in question extending to that point. The city engineer, however, threatened to tear down and destroy the said fence, and the plaintiffs alleged that they had been in the quiet and peaceful possession of the land since the year 1874.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which said demurrer was sustained by the court and the preliminary injunction was dissolved. From this order the plaintiffs appealed.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The order appealed from was based upon the provisions of article 553 of the Civil Code which it is claimed subjects the land in question to an easement of a towpath, 3 meters in width.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The present case is governed by the case of Ayala vs. the City of Manila, ¹ No. 3144.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

For the reasons stated in the decision in that case we hereby reverse the order appealed from without special condemnation as to costs. Let the proceedings in this case be remanded to the court below with direction to that court to overrule the said demurrer, requiring the defendant to answer within the time prescribed by law and to try the case upon its merits.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

After the expiration of twenty days let judgment be entered in accordance herewith, and ten days thereafter the case remanded to the court below as above directed. So ordered.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Torres, Mapa, Carson and Willard, JJ., concur.

¹ Not reported.