ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE


ChanRobles Intellectual Property | www.debtkollect.com

politics.chanrobles.com

ChanRobles™ LawTube

laws.chanrobles.com

jurisprudence.chanrobles.com

Congratulations to the FIRST BATCH OF SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers!

LIST OF THE 2 TOPNOTCHERS AND 137 SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers in the 2011 Bar Exams!

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence


www.chanrobles.com

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-4052  August 2, 1907

ENRIQUE F. SOMES, plaintiff, vs. A.S. CROSSFIELD, ET AL., defendants.

WILLARD, J.: chanrobles virtual law library

The plaintiff, in an action brought by himself in the Court of First Instance of Manila, made a motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from selling certain property upon execution. After a hearing upon the motion, the court, after saying that the plaintiff was not entitled to the preliminary injunction, made the following order:

Accordingly, the petition for a preliminary writ of prohibits is denied, and it is hereby further ordered that the proceeds of the sales under the executions already issued,, and pending, either in this court or in the hands of the sheriff of the province of Albay, be deposited in this court, subject to the further orders thereof, upon a bond of 10,000 pesos being filed by the plaintiff to answer for any loss resulting from the failure to apply said proceeds as ordered in the executions issued.

The plaintiff thereupon commenced this original action of certiorari in this court, claiming that the court below, in making the order in question, exceeded its jurisdiction. The defendants have demurred to the complaint, and the case is now before us for decision upon which demurrer.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

It is not stated in the complaint in this action that the plaintiff gave the bond mentioned in the order of the court below. That part of the order, therefore, which relates to the deposit of the proceeds of the sale in the clerk's office never became operative. The order in effect, therefore, is one denying the motion for the preliminary injunction.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

That the court below did not exceed its jurisdiction in making that order is free from doubt. (Rubert & Guamis vs. Sweeney, 4 Phil. Rep., 473.)chanrobles virtual law library

The demurrer is sustained, and the plaintiff is given five days from the date of this decision in which to amend the complaint. If no amended complaint is filed within that time, the clerk, without further order of this court, will enter a judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, with costs. So ordered.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson, and Tracey, JJ., concur.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

FEATURED DECISIONScralaw




google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

cralaw


QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 

  Copyright©1998-2011 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED