ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE


ChanRobles Intellectual Property | www.debtkollect.com

politics.chanrobles.com

ChanRobles™ LawTube

laws.chanrobles.com

jurisprudence.chanrobles.com

Congratulations to the FIRST BATCH OF SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers!

LIST OF THE 2 TOPNOTCHERS AND 137 SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers in the 2011 Bar Exams!

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence



www.chanrobles.com

EN BANC

G.R. Nos. L-21156 and L-21187     July 30, 1966

LOURDES R. OSME�A, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, HON. VALERIANO A. DEL VALLE, LEONARDO QUIMA and FILOMENO OLDOG, Respondents.

BENGZON, J.P., J.: chanrobles virtual law library

On April 17, 1961, Lourdes R. Osme�a filed separate complaints for ejectment in the Court of Agrarian Relations, at Bacolod City, against Leonardo Quima (Case No. 1558) and Filomeno Oldog (Case No. 1559). She alleged that she is the owner of parcels of land in Bago, Negros Occidental, known as the Hacienda Esperanza; that Leonardo Quima is the lessee-tenant of field No. 16 of said hacienda (5 hectares) and Filomeno Oldog is the lessee-tenant of field No. 110 (2.4 hectares) therein; and, that said Lessees-tenants failed to pay the agreed yearly rentals in palay for the past three crop years, in the following amount:

Crop YearLeonardo QuimaFilomeno Oldog
1958-5922 cavans8 gantas9 cavans10� gantas
1959-6032 cavans5 gantas18 cavans
1960-6132 cavans13 gantas18 cavans
Total87 cavans1 ganta   45 cavans10� gantas

On May 5, 1961, Filomeno Oldog filed all answer with counterclaim for damages at 45 cavans, alleging that petitioner' unlawfully prevented him from planting for the 1960-61 agricultural year. Petitioner, on May 16, 1961, answered the counterclaim.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Leonardo Quima filed his answer on May 21, 1961, with a counterclaim for damages at 120 cavan alleging that petitioner illegally prevented him from planting during the 1960-61 crop year. And petitioner, on May 31, 1961, likewise answered the counterclaim.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The parties in both cases, however, reached an amicable settlement on December 14, 1961, which they, together with their counsels, signed and submitted to the aforementioned court for approval and basis of a decision.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Reproduced hereunder are the terms and conditions of the amicable settlement.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

FEATURED DECISIONScralaw




google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

cralaw


QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 

  Copyright©1998-2011 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED