SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-22065 February 10, 1967

FRANCISCO ORTIZ, Petitioner, vs. HON. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, PRIMITIVO R. PASTA, ET AL., Respondents.

Jose W. Diokno for petitioner.
Ramon Barrios for respondents.

R E S O L U T I O N

DIZON, J.:chanrobles virtual law library

This is a petition to review and annul the resolution of the respondent Commission on Elections of October 17, 1963 denying petitioner's petition to declare invalid the certificates of candidacy filed by the other respondents herein, for failure to comply with the provisions of Section 32 of the Revised Election Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 3522, in that said certificates of candidacy did not contain a waiver of the privilege from public disclosure of said respondent's income tax returns and tax census statements for the years 1961 and 1962. Instead, said Commission advised its co-respondents to file, immediately, amended certificates of candidacy including said waiver, even after the lapse of the period for the filing thereof.chanroblesvirtualawlibrarychanrobles virtual law library

Considering the possibility that the respondents - except the Commission on Election - failed to be elected in the elections held in 1963 - which, if true, would render the present case academic - the petitioner, Francisco Ortiz, is hereby required to show cause, within five days from notice, why the petition for review should not be dismissed.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Regala, Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Sanchez and Castro, JJ., concur.