SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

G.R. No. L-36949 February 25, 1975

BIBIANO M. VIÑA and ANUNCIACION REYNOSO, Petitioners, vs. PASTOR BRAVO and HON. COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents.

R E S O L U T I O N

FERNANDEZ, J.:

The parties have submitted to this Court the following:chanrobles virtual law library

COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

At the hearing here this morning before the Honorable Justices of the Second Division of the Supreme Court a definite compromise agreement had been arrived at, as follows:chanrobles virtual law library

1. The private respondent Pastor Bravo will not seek the execution of the disputed order of Judge Miguel Navarro in Civil Case No. T-329, provided that the petitioners shall desist, as they hereby desist from having the judgment in said case executed, pending the finality of the judgment of Judge Alfredo Rebueno in Civil Case No. T-528 annulling the decision in Civil Case No. T-329, both of the Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur, Branch IV;chanrobles virtual law library

2. By way of further clarification, the notice of levy on the execution of the real properties of the petitioners in Civil Case No. T-528 shall remain. No levy or execution shall be issued on the personal properties of the petitioners in this case in connection with the decision in Civil Case No. T-528;chanrobles virtual law library

3. That the temporary restraining order issued by the Supreme Court in this case dated August 6, 1974, shall be made permanent, subject to the final outcome of Civil Case No. T-528;chanrobles virtual law library

4. That Atty. Luis General, Jr., has full authority from the private respondent to enter into this agreement, and he hereby undertakes to submit a written sworn authority of the private respondent within five (5) days.chanroblesvirtualawlibrarychanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE the parties pray for judgment based on the foregoing compromise agreement.chanroblesvirtualawlibrarychanrobles virtual law library

Manila, November 4, 1974.chanroblesvirtualawlibrarychanrobles virtual law library

(t/s) Atty. PORFIRIO C. DAVID (t/s) Atty. LUIS GENERAL, Jr.
Attorney for the Petitioners Attorney for the Respondentchanrobles virtual law library

CONFORME:

(t/s) BIBIANO M. VIÑA
Petitioner

andchanrobles virtual law library

CONFIRMATION OF COMPROMISE AGREEMENT

COMES NOW the private respondent herein, Pastor T. Bravo, and hereby confirms the Compromise Agreement entered and signed by his counsel, Atty. Luis General, Jr., during the oral argument before the Honorable Supreme Court on 4 November 1974, he having been fully authorized by me to enter into such amicable agreement which in his judgment was to my best interest.chanroblesvirtualawlibrarychanrobles virtual law library

Naga City, for Manila, 5 November 1974.

(t/s) PASTOR T. BRAVO
Private Respondent

WHEREFORE, the foregoing Compromise Agreement is hereby approved and the parties are hereby ordered to comply with the same, without costs.chanroblesvirtualawlibrarychanrobles virtual law library

SO ORDERED.