ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE


ChanRobles Intellectual Property | www.debtkollect.com

politics.chanrobles.com

ChanRobles™ LawTube

laws.chanrobles.com

jurisprudence.chanrobles.com

Congratulations to the FIRST BATCH OF SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers!

LIST OF THE 2 TOPNOTCHERS AND 137 SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers in the 2011 Bar Exams!

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence



Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila

SECOND DIVISION

 

G.R. No. L-25849 March 26, 1975

ROBERTO LAPERAL, applicant-appellee, vs. PACIFICO CRUZ, x

R E S O L U T I O N

 

AQUINO, J.:

Pacifico Cruz appealed from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, dated May 20, 1965, declaring Roberto Laperal as the owner of Lot 3, described in the plan Psu-174263-B (Exh. F-2 with an area of seven hundred fifty-six (756) square meters, located at Barrio Tambo, Paraaque, Rizal (Land Registration Case No. 2499, LRC Case No. N-17572).chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

It is stated in Cruz's notice of appeal that the decision is "contrary to the evidence and the law in this case." chanrobles virtual law library

According to the application for registration the disputed land has a market value of five pesos a square meter (5, 22 Record on Appeal).chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Cruz contends in his brief that the trial court erred in not finding that Lot 3 was formed by artificial means and not by accretion and in not declaring him as the true owner of the land.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

A court's jurisdiction depends upon the state of facts existing at the time it is invoked (People vs. Pegarum 58 Phil. 715).chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

When the appeal was interposed in this case on September 9, 1965, the law applicable was section 17 of the Judiciary Law as amended by Republic Act No. 2613 which vested this Court with appellate jurisdiction over civil cases wherein the value of the real estate involved exceeded two hundred thousand pesos. Considering that the value of the land in litigation is less than two hundred thousand pesos and that factual issues are raised by the appellant, this case falls within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, this case, which was erroneously appealed to this Court, is transferred to the Court of Appeals (Sec. 31, Judiciary Law).chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

SO ORDERED.

Fernando (Chairman), Barredo, Antonio and Fernandez, JJ., concur.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

FEATURED DECISIONScralaw




google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

cralaw


QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 

  Copyright©1998-2011 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED