PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE

|

Search for www.chanrobles.com

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila

SECOND DIVISION

JUAN B. CASTILLO, Provincial Fiscal of Batanes, Complainant, vs. TEOFILO A. BARSANA, Municipal Judge of Mahatao, Batanes, Respondent.

R E S O L U T I O N

ANTONIO, J.:

Considering that the resignation of respondent Teofilo A. Barsana, Municipal Judge of Mahatao, Batanes, was accepted on June 5, 1973 by the President of the Philippines, under Letter of Instruction No. 11, and, as a consequence, this case had already become moot and academic, ¹the dispositive portion of the Resolution of this Court on April 18, 1975 should, therefore, be, as it is hereby, amended to read as follows: chanrobles virtual law library

"WHEREFORE, this case, having become moot and academic, is hereby dismissed."

1 See Memorandum of the President to the Secretary of Justice, dated Dec. 14, 1972, stating, among others, that administrative cases pending against officials whose resignations are accepted under Letter of Instruction No. 11 should be deemed moot and academic; Adm. Matter No. 351-MJ, Anastacio Bangate vs. Municipal Judge Ludolfo Muoz, July 11, 1972, en banc; Adm. Matter No. 368-MJ, Esteban, et al. vs. Santiago Andres, Dec. 5, 1973 en banc; Adm. Matter No. 529-MJ, R. Tan vs. Celestino Tomenes, Dec. 19, 1973, en banc; Adm. Matter No. 65-CJ, E. de la Victoria vs. Vicente Felarca, Jan. 9, 1974, en banc; Adm. Matters Nos. 397, 398, 399, 400, A. Dizon, C. Tan vs. Porras, et. al., J. Arro & See Bun King vs. CFI Judge Alfredo Gonzales, Feb. 6, 1974, en banc, all of which held that the acceptance of respondents' resignations render their respective cases moot and academic.