PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE

|

Search for www.chanrobles.com

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila

SECOND DIVISION

IN RE: PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS APOLINARIO MALOLOS, LUCENA LALAP and VICTORIAL JAVIER in behalf of POLICARPIO NAVARES, OLIMPIO LALAP and RODOLFO JAVIER, respectively, Petitioners, vs. GEN. FIDEL RAMOS, Chief, Philippine Constabulary; The Chief, JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL, PC, and the Warden, HPC Stockade No. 2, Camp Crame, Quezon City, Respondents.

R E S O L U T I O N

AQUINO, J.: chanrobles virtual law library

On July 19, 1977, the petitioners filed a petition for habeas corpus praying for the immediate release of Policarpio Navares, Olimpio Lalap and Rodolfo Javier from Stockade No. 2 of Camp Crame, Quezon City where they were allegedly illegally detained by the respondents since February, 1977.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The Solicitor General, as counsel for the respondents, explained in his return that Olimpio Lalap, Policarpio Navares and Rodolfo Javier were detained as suspects in the crime of robbery with homicide which was committed on February 6, 1977 at Barrio Bagong Silang, Los Ba�;os, Laguna. (One Mateo Villegas, Jr. was killed as a result of that holdup.) The suspects were Identified by an eyewitness, Cornelio Villegas, the victim's son.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The respondents alleged that the detention of Javier and Lalap was effected by virtue of Commitment Order No. 50-57 dated march 3, 1977 and that of Navares, by virtue of Commitment order No. 51-77. The commitment orders were issued by constabulary Judge Advocate Colonel, now General, Hamilton B. Dimaya, pursuant to paragraph 19 of General Order No. 2-A in relation to section 1[c] of General Order No. 54.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The three detainees were apprised of the cause of their detention. Lalap and Javier executed sworn statements dated February 28 and March 1, 1977, respectively.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

After investigation of the case, the Criminal Investigation Service (CIS) at Camp Crame accomplished "Booking Sheets and Arrest Reports" for the said detainees, wherein the offense of "Holdup Robbery with Homicide" was charged. Javier and Lalap signed the said papers. Navares did not sign the same.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The case was referred to the Constabulary Judge Advocate. A summary preliminary investigation was conducted by Lieutenant Dionisio Daga. At the hearings held on June 17, and 29, 1977 the detainees were assist ed by their counsel.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The Solicitor General dated that, pursuant to General order No. 59, the case will be transferred to the appropriate civil authority.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

At the hearing of this case on July 29 the detainees were produced in court. Their counsel argued in their behalf. Counsel for the respondents, elaborating on the contents of their return, justified the detention of Lalap, Javier and Navares. The case was submitted for decision.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The Solicitor General in a manifestation dated August 1, 1977 informed this Court that Navares, Javier and Lalap were released by order of respondent Major General Fidel V. Ramos, Chief of Constabulary, dated July 30, 1977, pursuant to General Orders No. 59 and 60, both dated June 24, 1977, as respectively implemented in Department of National Defense Orders Nos. 94 and 95 both dated July 16, 1977. The case against the said persons was transferred to the municipal court of Los Ba�;os, Laguna presumably for preliminary investigation.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, the instant case is dismissed for having become moot and academic. No costs.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

SO ORDERED.