ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE


ChanRobles Intellectual Property | www.debtkollect.com

politics.chanrobles.com

ChanRobles™ LawTube

laws.chanrobles.com

jurisprudence.chanrobles.com

Congratulations to the FIRST BATCH OF SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers!

LIST OF THE 2 TOPNOTCHERS AND 137 SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers in the 2011 Bar Exams!

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence



Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila

SECOND DIVISION

A.M. No. 2128-JC August 31, 1978

CONSTANTE PIMENTEL, Petitioner, Request for the designation of another judge to hear the Motion for Reconsideration and/or Petition for Relief from the decision rendered in Criminal Case No, 310-C, People vs. Ruben de la Cruz, of the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Sur, Branch IV, Candon, Ilocos Sur.

R E S O L U T I O N

 

CONCEPCION JR., J.:

On June 24, 1975, a vehicular accident took place in Candon, Ilocos Sur, involving a jeep driven by Rizal Tilan, and a passenger bus operated by Ruben de la Cruz, which resulted in the death of Kin Sang Lim and physical injuries upon Natividad Que Lim, both passengers of the jeep. As a consequence thereof, Ruben de la Cruz was prosecuted for the crime of Homicide with Serious Physical Injuries and Damage to Property Thru Reckless Imprudence. 1 After appropriate proceedings, Ruben de la Cruz was acquitted of the charges.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

On November 25, 1977, the private prosecutor, petitioner herein, filed a notice of appeal from the decision insofar as the civil liability of the accuse is concerned, but which he withdrew on December 5, 1977. 2 chanrobles virtual law library

On January 9, 1978, the private prosecutor, in contemplation of the filing of a motion for the reconsideration of the decision rendered in the case upon the ground that one of the exhibits presented therein had been falsified, and in lieu of filing a motion to disqualify the judge, which procedure he considered cumbersome, requested the Court to designate another judge or to order the return of Judge Alfredo Lazaro to Branch IV, to hear and resolve the motion for reconsideration for the reason that the incumbent Judge Daniel C. Macaraeg had induced and encouraged the falsification complained of.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

On January 13, 1978, the private prosecutor filed the proposed motion for reconsideration based upon the ground that the English translation (Exh. K-1) of the custodial declaration of Rizal Tilan ('Exit. K) had been falsified in that there had been added the phrase "beside the jeep" between the words "following" and "bumped" (Line 24 of said exhibit) which materially changed the real meaning of the affidavit of Rizal Tilan and setting at naught all the testimonial and documentary evidence presented, and prayed that the judgment be set aside insofar as the civil liability of the accused is concerned and enter another condemning the said accused to pay the damages incurred by the offended party. 3 chanrobles virtual law library

The procedure prescribed for the disqualification of judges (Rule 137) must be substantially followed. Objection to the competency of the judge should be filed with him in writing, and the judge shall determine his qualification. 4 The mere allegation in an unverified letter that Judge Daniel C. Macaraeg had committed an act of falsification is not sufficient for this Court to designate another judge to hear the petitioner's motion for reconsideration and/or petition for relief from judgment.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

For the same reason, the Court cannot give due course to the complaint for falsification or misconduct against Judge Macaraeg. Besides, the petitioner stated that "the complaining witness and surviving spouse of the deceased is presently preparing the corresponding charge of falsification and administrative case against the judge as well as the court interpreter which may be filed before the end of the week," 5 which indicates that his letter should not be considered as an administrative complaint.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, the request should be, as it is hereby, DENIED.

Fernando (Chairman), and Santos, JJ., concur.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Aquino J., took no part.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Antonio, J., concurs in the result.

  chanrobles virtual law library

 

Separate Opinions

 

BARREDO, J., concurring: chanrobles virtual law library

Concurs in that the motion should be denied by Us because it should first be addressed to the respondent judge.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

 

 

Separate Opinions

BARREDO, J., concurring:

Concurs in that the motion should be denied by Us because it should first be addressed to the respondent judge.





Endnotes:

1 Criminal Case No. 310-C of the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Sur, Branch IV.chanrobles virtual law library

2 Rollo, p. 104.chanrobles virtual law library

3 Rollo, p. 106.chanrobles virtual law library

4 Moran, Rules of Court, Vol. 6, p. 198, citing Joaquin vs. Barretto, 25 Phil. 281 and Government of P.E. vs. Heirs of Abella, 49 Phil. 374.chanrobles virtual law library

5 Rollo, p. 3.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

FEATURED DECISIONScralaw




google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

cralaw


QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 

  Copyright©1998-2011 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED