ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE


ChanRobles Intellectual Property | www.debtkollect.com

politics.chanrobles.com

ChanRobles™ LawTube

laws.chanrobles.com

jurisprudence.chanrobles.com

Congratulations to the FIRST BATCH OF SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers!

LIST OF THE 2 TOPNOTCHERS AND 137 SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers in the 2011 Bar Exams!

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence



Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila

FIRST DIVISION

G.R. No. L-38315 August 22,1978

PHILIPPINE RABBIT BUS LINES, INC. Petitioner, vs. DOMINGO MANIEGO, REGIONAL OFFICE NO. 4, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION SECTION, MANILA and WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION SATION COMMISSION, Respondents.

R E S O L U T I O N

 

MUÑOZ PALMA, J.:

The sole issue posed in this Petition for Review is one of alleged denial of procedural due process.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Petitioner asserts that without having been served with copy of a claim of Domingo Maniego and without having been given an opportunity to be heard, Acting Chief Referees Ernesto H. Cruz, Regional Office No. 4, Workmen's Compensation Commission, issued on October 10, 1973, an award for compensation against it.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

We gave due course to the Petition and directed respondent Commission to forward the original records of the case of Domingo Maniego.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The records forwarded to the Court by the defunct Workmen's Compensation Commission do not show: (1) that a "claim for injury or sickness" of Domingo Maniego was filed against Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc.; (2) that copy of said claim was served on the employer; (3) that a notice was issued by Regional Office No. 4 to the employer concerning the filing of the aforesaid claim; and (4) that a notice of hearing was sent to the parties.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, considering that from the records of respondent Commission there is no factual and/or legal basis for an outright award in favor of Domingo Maniego, We resolve to remand this case to the Secretary, now Minister of Labor, for proper action on the alleged claim of Domingo Maniego, giving the latter and the employer, Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. an opportunity to present their respective evidence. We particularly invite the Minister's attention to the assertion of petitioner herein that a similar claim for compensation was previously filed by the claimant which was properly disposed of by the Department of Labor at the time. In the meanwhile, the award in question is hereby set aside.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

So Ordered.

Teehankee (Chairman), Makasiar, Fernandez and Guerrero, JJ., concur.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

FEATURED DECISIONScralaw




google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

cralaw


QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 

  Copyright©1998-2011 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED