SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

G.R. No. L-27130 August 21, 1982

PAULINA SANTOS DE PARRE�O, assisted by her husband FERNANDO PARRE�O, and ESTATE OF THE LATE AURORA R. SANTOS, petitioner
vs.
HONORABLES JULIO VILLAMOR, RAMON NOLASCO, and JESUS Y. PEREZ, as Associate Justices of the COURT OF APPEALS, Fifth Division and GREGORIA ARANZANSO, DEMETRIA VENTURA, PACITA PASION and CONSUELO PASION, Respondents.chanrobles virtual law library

R E S O L U T I O N

&

ABAD SANTOS, J.:

This is a petition for certiorari to quash the temporary restraining orders dated August 25, 1966 and January 9, 1967, which were issued by the Court of Appeals in CA -G.R. No. 37884-R, Aranzanso, et al. vs. Santos de Parreno et al.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

It appears from the answer of the respondents herein that the aforesaid case was dismissed on December 12, 1966, and a motion for reconsideration was denied on February 20, 1967. The manifestation of the petitioners herein dated June 2, 1967, confirms the information given by the respondents and also states that the dismissal of the case has become final and unappealable.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

It thus appears that there is no need for a decision in this case in view of the fact that the temporary restraining orders were dissolved upon the dismissal of the case by the Court of Appeals.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, the case is dismissed for being moot and academic. No special pronouncement as to costs.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

SO ORDERED.