ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE


ChanRobles Intellectual Property | www.debtkollect.com

politics.chanrobles.com

ChanRobles™ LawTube

laws.chanrobles.com

jurisprudence.chanrobles.com

Congratulations to the FIRST BATCH OF SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers!

LIST OF THE 2 TOPNOTCHERS AND 137 SUCCESSFUL ChanRobles Internet Bar Review Passers in the 2011 Bar Exams!

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence



Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila

SECOND DIVISION

Adm. Case No. 1660 June 29, 1982

TEOFISTA G. FLORES VDA. DE CHENG, Complainant, vs. BENJAMIN O. CARLOS, Respondent.chanrobles virtual law library

 

AQUINO, J.: chanrobles virtual law library

Teofista G. Flores Vda. de Cheng in a verified complaint dated August 26, 1976 prayed that disciplinary action be taken against lawyer Benjamin O. Carlos (admitted to the bar in 1957) for not having complied with this commitment made in January, 1976 to work for the reacquisition of complainant's Philippine citizenship notwithstanding the fact that he had already been paid his professional fee of P1,500.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Respondent Carlos in his answer alleged that with Mrs. Cheng's consent he delegated to his associate, Arturo C. Zialcita, the task of working for her repatriation papers and Zialcita allegedly performed that task but was not able to complete the work because of his death. Carlos manifested that he was willing to finalize the proceedings for Mrs. Cheng's repatriation.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The case was referred to the Solicitor General for investigation, report and recommendation. The investigator set the case for hearing several times but no hearing was held.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

On May 5,1977, Mrs. Cheng, assisted by counsel, submitted an affidavit of desistance wherein she stated that her complaint resulted from a misunderstanding and that she and Carlos had patched up their differences.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

In view of that desistance, the complainant rendered it impossible for this Court to take any disciplinary action against the respondent. There is no evidence in the record that he had committed any wrongdoing justifying his disbarment or suspension.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, this case is dismissed and considered closed.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

SO ORDERED.

Barredo, Concepcion, Jr., Guerrero, Abad Santos, De Castro and Escolin, JJ., concur.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

FEATURED DECISIONScralaw




google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

cralaw


QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 

  Copyright©1998-2011 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED