Philippine Supreme Court Resolutions


Philippine Supreme Court Resolutions > Year 2008 > August 2008 Resolutions > [A.M. No. 08-1-11-MeTC : August 11, 2008] OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, PETITIONER, VS. MYRENE C. BALISI, COURT STENOGRAPHER II, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT (METC), BRANCH 29, MANILA, RESPONDENT.:




SECOND DIVISION

[A.M. No. 08-1-11-MeTC : August 11, 2008]

OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, PETITIONER, VS. MYRENE C. BALISI, COURT STENOGRAPHER II, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT (METC), BRANCH 29, MANILA, RESPONDENT.

R E S O L U T I O N


BRION, J.:

A Report of Tardiness submitted by the Leave Division of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) on November 28, 2007, shows that Myrene C. Balisi, Court Stenographer II, Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Branch 29, Manila, had been tardy in going to her office, eleven (11) times in February and fourteen (14) times in April 2007.

Required to comment on the Report, Ms. Balisi admitted her tardiness.  She, however, reasoned out that before she could leave for the office, she has to attend to her 5-year old daughter whose nanny left and went home to the province.  She could report for work on time only when she leaves her daughter to the care of her mother.

In her evaluation report, Court Administrator Zenaida N. Elepa�o found that respondent "had indeed violated the rule on tardiness."  According to her, Ms. Balisi's explanation does not merit consideration to justify her tardiness. Hence, Court Administrator Elepa�o submitted the following recommendation:

Respectfully submitted for the consideration of the Honorable Court recommending that this be RE-DOCKETED as a regular administrative matter; that Ms. Myrene C. Balisi, Court Stenographer II, MeTC, Branch 29, Manila, be REPRIMANDED for habitual tardiness and WARNED that a repetition of the same or similar offense will warrant the imposition of a more severe penalty.


Under CSC Memorandum Circular No. 04, Series of 1991, an officer or employee of the civil service is considered habitually tardy if he incurs tardiness regardless of the number of minutes, ten (10) times a month for at least two (2) months in a semester or for at least two (2) consecutive months.[1]  To ensure its observance, it was circularized in the Court on May 5, 1998 for the information and guidance of all its officials and employees.

The policy on absenteeism and tardiness was reiterated by the Court with the issuance of Administrative Circular No. 2-99 dated February 15, 1999 which provides that: Absenteeism and Tardiness, even if such do not qualify as "habitual" or "frequent" under CSC Memorandum Circular No. 04, S. 1991, shall be dealt with severely, and falsification of daily time records to cover-up for such absenteeism and/or tardiness shall constitute gross dishonesty and serious misconduct.  This was further reiterated by the Court in Administrative Circular No. 14-2002, dated March 18, 2002.

In a long line of cases involving employees of the Court, the respondents offered varied excuses for coming late to their offices.  However, the Court had consistently ruled that non-office obligations, household chores, and domestic concerns are not sufficient reasons to excuse or justify habitual tardiness.[2]  Hence, Ms. Balisi's reason for her tardiness, that she has to attend to the need of her 5-year old daughter before going to her office, cannot free her from her infractions. The Court cannot countenance such infraction as it seriously compromises efficiency and hampers public service.  By being habitually tardy, Ms. Balisi has fallen short of the stringent standard of conduct demanded from everyone connected with the administration of justice.[3]

We have repeatedly reminded officials and employees of the Judiciary that by reason of the nature and functions of their office, they must be role models in the faithful observance of the constitutional canon that public office is a public trust.[4]  A way of doing this is through the strict observance of prescribed office hours and the efficient use of every working moment, if only to give back the true worth of what the Government, and ultimately, the people, pay in maintaining the Judiciary.[5]  Thus, to inspire public respect for the justice system, court officials and employees are at all times behooved to strictly observe official time, as punctuality is a virtue, absenteeism and tardiness are impermissible.[6]

Under Section 52(c)(4), Rule VI of CSC Memorandum Circular No. 19, Series of 1999, habitual tardiness is penalized as follows:  first offense, reprimand; second offense, suspension for 1 to 300 days; and third offense, dismissal from the service.

WHEREFORE, we find respondent Myrene C. Balisi, Court Stenographer II, Branch 29, MeTC, Manila GUILTY of habitual tardiness.  This being Ms. Balisi's first offense, she is hereby REPRIMANDED with WARNING that a repetition of the same or similar offense in the future will be dealt with more severely.

SO ORDERED.

Quisumbing, (Chairperson) Corona, Carpio Morales, and Velasco, Jr., JJ., concur.

Endnotes:


* Designated additional member of the Second Division per Special Order No. 512 dated July 16, 2008.

[1]  Re: Imposition of Corresponding Penalties for Habitual Tardiness Committed During the Second Semester of 2002, A.M. No. 00-6-09-SC, August 14, 2003, 409 SCRA 1, 8.

[2] Ibid, citing Re: Imposition of Corresponding Penalties on Employees of this Court for Habitual Tardiness Committed During the Second Semester of 2000, 393 SCRA 9 (2002).

[3] Ibid.

[4] 1987 Constitution, Article XI, Section 1; Re:Imposition of Corresponding Penalties for Habitual Tardiness Committed During the Second Semester of 2002, supra note 1.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.



Back to Home | Back to Main


chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-2008 Jurisprudence                 

  • [G.R. No. 183591 : August 29, 2008] THE PROVINCE OF NORTH COTABATO, REPRESENTED BY GOVERNOR JESUS SACDALAN, ET AL. VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GACIA ET AL. [G.R. NO. 183752] CITY GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBOANGA, REPRESENTED BY HON. CELSO L. LOBREGAT, CITY MAYOR OF ZAMBOANGA, ET AL. VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GACIA ET AL. [G.R. NO. 183893] CITY OF ILIGAN, REPRESENTED BY CITY MAYOR LAWRENCE LLUCH CRUZ VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GACIA ET AL. [G.R. NO. 183951] THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE, AS REPRESENTED BY HON. ROLANDO E. YEBES, ET AL. VS THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE NEGOTIATING PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, REPRESENTED BY HON. RODOLFO GACIA AND HERMOGENES ESPERON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON PEACE PROCESS [G.R. NO. 183962] ERNESTO M. MACEDA, JEJOMAR C. BINAY AND AQUILINO L. PIMENTEL III VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN RODOLFO C. GARCIA, AND THE MORO ISLAMIC LIBERATION FRONT PEACE NOGIATING PANEL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN MOHAGHER IQBAL

  • [Adm. Case No. 5000 : August 27, 2008] ENGR. CRISOLOGO R. OMAGUING V. ATTY. BORROMEO B. PATANGAN

  • [G.R. No. 173612 : August 27, 2008] DOMINADOR MALANA AND RODEL TIAGA V. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. 169535 : August 27, 2008] REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V. SPS. DIEGO AND PRAXIDES CULTIVO AND THE REGISTER OF DEEDS, ALBAY

  • [A.M. OCA IPI No. 08-132-CA-J : August 26, 2008] ALMABELLA E. SALVADOR V. JUSTICE RAMON M. BATO, JR., COURT OF APPEALS, MANILA

  • [G.R. No. 183591 : August 22, 2008] THE PROVINCE OF NORTH COTABATO, REPRESENTED BY GOVERNOR JESUS SACDALAN, ET AL. VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ET AL. [G.R. NO. 183752] CITY GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBOANGA, REPRESENTED BY HON. CELSO L. LOBREGAT, CITY MAYOR OF ZAMBOANGA, ET AL. VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ET AL. [G.R. NO. 183893] CITY OF ILIGAN, REPRESENTED BY CITY MAYOR LAWRENCE LLUCH CRUZ VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ET AL. [G.R. NO. 183951] THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE, AS REPRESENTED BY HON. ROLANDO E. YEBES, ET AL. VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE NEGOTIATING PANEL, AS REPRESENTED BY HON. RODOLFO C. GARCIA AND HERMOGENES ESPERON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON PEACE PROCESS

  • [A.M. No. MTJ-02-1463 : August 22, 2008] NOEMI V. PROTACIO V. JUDGE ROLANDO B. DE GUZMAN, PRESIDING JUDGE, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT, MANILA, BRANCH 2

  • [G. R. No. 183246 : August 20, 2008] SPOUSES STEPHEN VILLAROYA AND AILEEN VILLAROYA V. YELLOW GROUP FIRE VICTIMS NEIGHBORHOOD COOPERATIVE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, DOMINGO MACANAS; THE CITY HOUSING OFFICE, OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, DAVAO CITY, REPRESENTED BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY

  • [G.R. No. 160202 : August 19, 2008] CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, PETITIONER VERSUS SALVADOR D. GARLIT, RESPONDENT

  • [A.M. No. P-06-2113 [Formerly A.M. No. 05-12-357-MTC] : August 19, 2008] (OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR VS. EFREN F. VARELA) AND A.M. OCA IPI NO. 05-2195-P (COMMISSION ON AUDIT, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. NAPOLEON MONTEJO VS. EFREN F. VARELA, INTERPRETER AND ACTING CLERK OF COURT, CATBALOGAN, SAMAR)

  • [G.R. No. 183591 : August 19, 2008] THE PROVINCE OF NORTH COTABATO, DULY REPRESENTED BY GOVERNOR JESUS SACDALAN AND/OR VICE-GOVERNOR EMMANUEL PIÑOL, FOR AND IN HIS OWN BEHALF VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN [GRP], REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ATTY. LEAH ARMAMENTO, ATTY. SEDFREY CANDELARIA, MARK RYAN SULLIVAN AND/OR GEN. HERMOGENES ESPERON JR., THE LATTER IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESENT AND DULY-APPOINTED PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON THE PEACE PROCESS [OPAPP] OR THE SO-CALLED OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON THE PEACE PROCESS) AND [G.R. NO. 183752] CITY GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBOANGA, AS REPRESENTED BY HON. CELSO L. LOBREGAT, CITY MAYOR OF ZAMBOANGA, REP. MA. ISABELLE G. CLIMACO, DISTRICT 1 AND REP. ERICO BASILIO A. FABIAN, DISTRICT 2, CITY OF ZAMBOANGA VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE NEGOTIATING PANEL (GRP), AS REPRESENTED BY RODOLFO C. GARCIA, LEAH ARMAMENTO, SEDFREY CANDELARIA, MARK RYAN SULLIVAN, AND HERMOGENES ESPERON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON PEACE PROCESS [G.R. NO. 183893] (FORMERLY UDK-14059) (CITY OF ILIGAN, DULY REPRESENTED BY CITY MAYOR LAWRENCE LLUCH CRUZ VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN [GRP], REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ATTY. LEAH ARMAMENTO, ATTY. SEDFREY CANDELARIA, MARK RYAN SULLIVAN, GEN. HERMOGENES ESPERON JR., IN HIS CAPACITY AT THE PRESENT AND DULY APPOINTED PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON THE PEACE PROCESS, AND/OR SEC. EDUARDO ERMITAM IN HIS CAPACITY AS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY.

  • [Bar Matter No. 1993 : August 19, 2008] 2008 BUDGET AND PUBLICATION, 2008 BAR EXAMINATIONS

  • [A.M. No. P-01-1499 : August 19, 2008] OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR VS. ATTY. MARILOU DUREZA-ALDEVERA, CLERK OF COURT, RTC, DAVAO CITY AND TERESITA M. ELEGINO, CASH CLERK III, SAME COURT

  • [G.R. No. 162243 : August 13, 2008] HON. HEHERSON ALVAREZ SUBSTITUTED BY HON. ELISEA G. GOZUN, IN HER CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES V. PICOP RESOURCES, INC.) [G.R. NO. 164516] (PICOP RESOURCES, INC. V. HON. HEHERSON ALVAREZ SUBSTITUTED BY HON. ELISEA G. GOZUN, IN HER CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES) [G.R. NO. 171875] (THE HON. ANGELO T. REYES [FORMERLY HON. ELISEA G. GOZUN], IN HIS CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES [DENR] V. PAPER INDUSTRIES CORP. OF THE PHILIPPINES [PICOP]

  • [A.M. No. 08-8-12-CA : August 12, 2008] RE: REQUEST OF THE JUSTICE RODRIGO V. COSICO, CA-MANILA, TO PURCHASE ONE (1) PC. SENIOR EXECUTIVE CHAIR AND ONE (1) UNIT STEEL FILING CABINET

  • [A.M. No. 08-7-429-RTC : August 12, 2008] RE: QUERIES AND COMMENTS OF JUDGES ON ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 125-2007 GUIDELINES ON THE SOLEMNIZATION OF MARRIAGE BY THE MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY

  • [G.R. No. 160197 : August 12, 2008] CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION V. BIENVENIDO MAPAYE, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE RTC, BR. 55, FOURTH JUDICIAL REGION, LUCENA CITY, AND THE CITY GOVERNMENT OF LUCENA, REPRESENTED BY CITY MAYOR RAMON V. TALAGA, JR.

  • [A.M. No. 08-1-11-MeTC : August 11, 2008] OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, PETITIONER, VS. MYRENE C. BALISI, COURT STENOGRAPHER II, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT (METC), BRANCH 29, MANILA, RESPONDENT.

  • [A.M. OCA IPI No. 08-132-CA-J : August 08, 2008] (ALMABELLA E. SALVADOR V. JUSTICE RAMON M. BATO, JR., COURT OF APPEALS, MANILA)

  • [A.M. No. P-08-2518 [Formerly A.M. OCA I.P.I. No. 07-2560-P] : August 06, 2008] EXECUTIVE JUDGE EDGARDO LLOREN, RTC CAGAYAN DE ORO V. WILLIAM M. PONFERRADA, CLERK III, AND MONETTE C. ABADINES, UTILITY I, RTC-OCC CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY

  • [G.R. No. 160367 : August 06, 2008] EVELYN S. CABUNGCAL, ELVIRA J. CANLAS, MARIANITA A. BULANAN, REMEDIOS S.B. DE JESUS AND NUNJLONJ. MABLNI V. SONLA R. LORENZO, IN HER CAPACITY OF MUNICIPAL MAYOR OF SAN ISIDRO, NUEVA ECIJA, CECILLO DE GUZMAN, VICE-MAYOR, CESARJO LOPEZ, JR., EMILLO PACSON, BONIFACIO CASERES, JR., NAPOLEON OCAMPO, MARIO CRUZ, PRISCILA REYES, ROLANDO ESQUIVEL, CRISENCIANO CABLAO, IN THEIR CAPACITY AS MEMBERS OF THE SANGGUNIANG BAYAN OF SAN ISIDRO, NUEVA ECIJA, AND EDUARDO N. JOSON IV, VICE- GOVERNOR, BELLA AURORA A. DULAY, BENJAMIN V MORALES, CHRISTOPHER L. VILLAREAL, JOSE T, DEL MUNDO, SOLITA C. SANTOS, RENATO C. TOMAS, JOSE BERNARDO V. YANGO, IRENEO S. DE LEON, NATHANIEL B. BOTE, RUDY J DE LEON, RODOLFO M. LOPEZ, MA. LOURDES C. LAHOM, JOSE FRANCIS STEVEN M. DIZON, IN THEIR CAPACITY AS SANGGUNIANG PANLALAWIGAN OF THE PROVINCE OF NUEVA ECIJA

  • [A.M. No.RTJ-08-2108 [Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 08-2-93-RTC : August 06, 2008] JUDICIAL AUDIT OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 34, CABADBARAN, AGUSAN DEL NORTE

  • [G.R. No. 172889 : August 05, 2008] JOSE MA. JAVELLANA V. COURT OF APPEALS

  • [A.M.NO. 07-4-11 SC : August 05, 2008] RE INFORMATION ON ATTY. JAIME VELASCO LOPEZ.

  • [G.R. No. 172889 : August 05, 2008] JOSE MA. JAVELLANA V. COURT OF APPEALS

  • [G.R. No. 183591 : August 04, 2008] THE PROVINCE OF NORTH-COTABATO, DULY REPRESENTED BY GOVERNOR JESUS SACDALAN AND/OR VICE-GOVERNOR EMMANUEL PIÑOL, FOR AND IN HIS OWN BEHALF VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN [GRP], REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ATTY. LEAH ARMAMENTO, ATTY. SEDFREY CANDELARIA, MARK RYAN SULLIVAN AND/OR GEN. HERMOGENES ESPERON JR., THE LATTER IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESENT AND DULY-APPOINTED PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON THE PEACE PROCESS G.R. NO. 183752 CITY GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBOANGA, AS REPRESENTED BY HON. CELSO L. LOBREGAT, CITY MAYOR OF ZAMBOANGA, REP. MA. ISABELLE G. CLIMACO, DISTRICT 1 AND REP. ERICO BASILIO A. FABIAN, DISTRICT 2, CITY OF ZAMBOANGA VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN [GRP], REPRESENTED BY SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ATTY. LEAH ARMAMENTO, ATTY. SEDFREY CANDELARIA, MARK RYAN SULLIVAN AND/OR GEN. HERMOGENES ESPERON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER ON THE PEACE PROCESS