Philippine Supreme Court Resolutions


Philippine Supreme Court Resolutions > Year 2011 > October 2011 Resolutions > [A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-188-CA-J : October 04, 2011] VERIFIED COMPLAINT DATED 8 AUGUST 2011 OF JOHNNY PERALTA, WILFREDO POMBO, VICTOR D. SINGSON, JR., CARMENCITO A. CAPUYAN, SANITO C. OSMA AND DOMINGO ESCOBAR, AGAINST HON. RODRIGO F. LIM, JR., ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY :




EN BANC

[A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-188-CA-J : October 04, 2011]

VERIFIED COMPLAINT DATED 8 AUGUST 2011 OF JOHNNY PERALTA, WILFREDO POMBO, VICTOR D. SINGSON, JR., CARMENCITO A. CAPUYAN, SANITO C. OSMA AND DOMINGO ESCOBAR, AGAINST HON. RODRIGO F. LIM, JR., ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY

Sirs/Mesdames:

Please take notice that the Court en banc issued a Resolution dated OCTOBER 4, 2011, which reads as follows:

"A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-188-CA-J (Verified Complaint dated 8 August 2011 of Johnny Peralta, Wilfredo Pombo, Victor D. Singson, Jr., Carmencito A. Capuyan, Sanito C. Osma and Domingo Escobar, against Hon. Rodrigo F. Lim, Jr., Associate Justice, Court of Appeals, Cagayan de Oro City). - The instant case is an administrative complaint against Court of Appeals Justice Rodrigo F. Lim, Jr., that was filed by complainants Johnny Peralta, Wilfredo Pombo, Victor D. Singson, Jr., Carmencito A. Capuyan, Sanito C. Osma and Domingo Escobar. These six Filipino agricultural workers were allegedly exposed to some pesticide chemical used in banana plantations and joined a class action suit in the United States against Shell Oil Company (Shell Oil) and other multinational corporations for damages. These cases were later on dismissed on the ground of forum non conveniens and all the plaintiffs were directed to file actions in their respective home countries.

In accordance with the resolution of the class action suit abroad, four domestic civil cases were filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Davao del Norte against Shell Oil and the other multinational companies. The six Filipino agricultural workers herein were among the plaintiffs in one of the cases, Civil Case No. 94-45. During the pendency of these cases, Shell Oil entered into a global compromise settlement with all of the plaintiffs, including the six complainants. The RTC approved the settlement and a judgment based on the compromise was entered that eventually became final and executory.

Thereafter, the six complainants herein filed a Motion for Execution against Shell Oil on the ground that they had not yet received the payments under the compromise agreement. In reply, Shell Oil explained that the amount under the compromise had already been placed in an escrow account, which was to be administered and distributed by the chosen mediator in accordance with the Compromise Agreement.

The trial court ordered the execution of its earlier judgment against Shell Oil and its unnamed subsidiaries and affiliates for a total amount of US$ 17 Million. The trial court thereafter amended its Order of Execution and issued an Alias Writ of Execution, specifically naming Shell Oil's subsidiaries and affiliates, including Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation (Pilipinas Shell).

Shell Oil filed a Rule 65 Petition with the Court of Appeals to prohibit the execution of the judgment on the compromise and to declare the civil case executed. It also prayed for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a writ of preliminary injunction. The CA issued a 60-day TRO and proceeded to conduct a hearing on the propriety of the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction.

In an Urgent Motion for Clarification, complainants asked whether the other multinational corporations could benefit from the TRO granted in favor of Shell Oil. In a Resolution dated 06 October 2009, the CA clarified that it only had jurisdiction over Shell Oil and not over the other companies. Thus, the TRO issued applied only to Shell Oil.

On 16 October 2009, the CA's 23rd Division - composed of Justices Lim (Chairperson), Ruben C. Ayson (ponente) and Leoncia Real-Dimagiba (on leave) - granted the writ of preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the trial court's Alias Writ of Execution against Shell Oil and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including Pilipinas Shell.

On 26 October 2009, Pilipinas Shell filed a separate Rule 65 Petition, also to prohibit the implementation of the execution ordered by the trial court, on the ground that Pilipinas Shell had never been included as a party to the proceedings in the civil cases.

On 17 August 2011, the instant administrative Complaint was filed against Justice Lim alone for gross ignorance of the law, grave abuse of authority, and conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice. He was faulted for allegedly allowing the preliminary injunction to cover even the execution on the assets of Pilipinas Shell, when the latter was not yet subject of the CA's jurisdiction at that time.

To be considered to have been grossly ignorant of the law, a judge must have ignored, contradicted or failed to apply settled law and jurisprudence. (Marcos v. Pinto, A. M. No. RTJ-09-2180, 27 July 2010, 625 SCRA 652) To warrant a finding of gross ignorance of the law, it must be shown that the error is "so gross and patent as to produce an inference of bad faith." (Joaquin v. Madrid, A. M. No. RTJ-04-1856, 30 September 2004, 439 SCRA 567)

In this instance, there is no prima facie case of gross ignorance of the law on the part of Justice Lim, based merely on the Court of Appeals' Writ of Preliminary Injunction. In the trial court's Amended Order and Alias Writ of Execution, the properties of Pilipinas Shell and other subsidiaries and affiliates of Shell Oil were specifically mentioned and included even though they were never party to the proceedings. Thus, when Justice Lim, who was not even the ponente  of the case, voted to grant the writ of preliminary injunction, the Court of Appeals simply enjoined the amended order and alias writ of execution in accordance with what was included therein.

Thus, even assuming arguendo that the appellate court had not yet attained jurisdiction over Pilipinas Shell (even if, the latter subsequently filed its own Rule 65 Petition), the preliminary injunction granted by it was directed at the trial court's order, which was within the scope of Shell Oil's request and the appellate court's authority. That the Court of Appeals' injunction benefited Pilipinas Shell and Shell Oil's other subsidiaries was merely incidental. It was not by any means a clear indication of gross ignorance or grave abuse of discretion.

The acts of judges, pertaining to their judicial functions are not subject to disciplinary action, unless these are tainted with fraud, dishonesty, corruption or bad faith. (Eda�o v. Asdala, A. M. No. RTJ-06-2007, 06 December 2010, 636 SCRA 466) Whether the appellate court committed grave abuse of discretion or serious reversible error in including Pilipinas Shell in the grant of its injunctive relief is a preliminary matter that the parties can raise as an issue on appeal after the Petitions are finally resolved. Absent any extrinsic evidence of fraud, dishonesty or corruption, the Court presumes that Justice Lim performed his judicial functions in good faith, even if the grant of a preliminary injunction is later on reversed, whether by the appellate court itself or by this Court on appeal.

WHEREFORE, the Verified Complaint against Court of Appeals Justice Rodrigo F. Lim, Jr., is hereby DISMISSED. There exists no prima facie case to warrant the conduct of further administrative proceedings against him."

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) ENRIQUETA E. VIDAL
Clerk of Court




Back to Home | Back to Main


chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-2011 Jurisprudence                 

  • [G.R. No. 198239 : October 03, 2011] POLYMAX WORLDWIDE LIMITED V. NPC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 172058 : October 03, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. CAPT. GARY ALEJANO, LTSG. JAMES A. LAYUG, LTSG. MANUEL G. CABOCHAN, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 182614 : October 03, 2011] SPOUSES MARCIANO CALIBARA AND CARMELITA CALIBARA V. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS FORMER SEVENTH DIVISION, AND SPOUSES REYNALDO S. DE BELEN AND NORMA DE BELEN

  • [A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-188-CA-J : October 04, 2011] VERIFIED COMPLAINT DATED 8 AUGUST 2011 OF JOHNNY PERALTA, WILFREDO POMBO, VICTOR D. SINGSON, JR., CARMENCITO A. CAPUYAN, SANITO C. OSMA AND DOMINGO ESCOBAR, AGAINST HON. RODRIGO F. LIM, JR., ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY

  • [G. R. No. 198298 : October 04, 2011] NASRA KAHAL, THROUGH HER FATHER LADJA KAHAL V. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND ALIYA U. AKMARI, THROUGH HER GUARDIAN HAMSATUL AKMARI

  • [G. R. No. 197636, October 04, 2011] ARTEMIO T. BINARAO V. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT OF RIZAL-SIBUTAD, ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE, AND BIENVENIDO E. SUMAGANG

  • [A.M. No. 11-9-177-RTC : October 04, 2011] RE: REQUEST FOR DESIGNATION OF AN ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT IN THE RTC, ANTIPOLO CITY, RIZAL

  • [A.M. No. 13806-Ret. : October 04, 2011] RE: APPLICATION FOR SURVIVORSHIP BENEFITS UNDER REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9946 OF MRS. CRESENCIA P. BENGZON, WIDOW OF COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICE EDUARDO R. BENGZON

  • [A.M. No. 14069-Ret. : October 04, 2011] RE: COMPULSORY RETIREMENT UNDER REPUBLIC ACT NO. 910 OF JUSTICE MARIO L. GUARIÑA III, COURT OF APPEALS, MANILA

  • [A.M. No. 11-9-182-RTC : October 04, 2011] RE: REQUEST THAT THE NEWLY ORGANIZED BRANCHES 95 TO 98 OF THE RTC, ANTIPOLO CITY BE AUTHORIZED TO HOLD OFFICE AND COURT SESSIONS AT TAYTAY, RIZAL

  • [G.R. No. 198283 : October 04, 2011] RENATO M. FEDERICO V. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND OSMUNDO M. MALIGAYA

  • [A.M. No. 10-8-261-RTC : October 04, 2011] REQUEST OF METROBANK'S COUNSEL THAT THE FILING FEES PAID TO THE RTC-MAKATI CITY IN ITS FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTRA-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE BE APPLIED TO THE 2ND EXTRA-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE

  • [G.R. No. 197778 : October 04, 2011] NASSER DIKI LAGUINDAB V. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, HADJI SORAYA CALI DATUMANONG, ET AL.

  • [A.M. No. RTJ-11-2284 : October 05, 2011] SPOUSES SUR AND RITA VILLA AND LETICIA GOREMBALEM VALENZUELA VS. PRESIDING JUDGE ROBERTO L. AYCO, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 182288 : October 05, 2011] FREDDIE URBANO AND SALVADOR URBANO V. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. No. 192255 : October 05, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. PANGILINAN Y VICTORINO

  • [G.R. No. 180468 : October 05, 2011] EDWIN FARI�AS V. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. No. 198652 (Formerly UDK-14559) : October 05, 2011] EDUARDO CEJO V. BENJAMIN C. MACEDA, JR., MANUEL C. MACEDA, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 197290 : October 05, 2011] COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE V. COURT OF TAX APPEALS EN BANC AND PANAY POWER CORPORATION

  • [G.R. No. 197762 : October 05, 2011] CAREER EXECUTIVE SERVICE BOARD, REP. BY CHAIRPERSON BERNARDO P. ABESAMIS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MA. ANTHONETTE VELASCO-ALLONES, AND DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ARTURO M. LACHICA V. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, REP. BY CHAIRPERSON FRANCISCO T. DUQUE III, AND PUBLIC ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, CHIEF PUBLIC ATTORNEY PERSIDA V. RUEDA-ACOSTA, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 197463 : October 05, 2011] STRONGHOLD INSURANCE CO., INC. V. ALCATEL PHILIPPINES, INC.

  • [G.R. No. 188613 : October 10, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. ANSELMO LORENZO Y DE GUZMAN

  • [G.R. No. 197430 : October 10, 2011] NAGKAKAISANG MANGGAGAWA NG SORECO II (NAMAS), RONALDO AFABLE, ET AL. V. SORSOGON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (SORECO II), EDWIN DESTAJO, ET AL.

  • [A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-189-CA-J : October 11, 2011] COMPLAINT OF MR. DOMINGO C. GAMALINDA AGAINST HON. JOSE C REYES, JR., ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS

  • [G.R. No. 194868 : October 11, 2011] ARVIN IAN V. ALIT VS. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, SIGFRIDO R. TINGA AND ANGELITO R. REYES

  • [A.M. OCA IPI NO. 10-174-CA-J : October 11, 2011] LETTER-COMPLAINT AGAINST JUSTICE MARIO LOPEZ, COURT OF APPEALS

  • [G.R. No. 183711 : October 11, 2011] EDITA T. BURGOS V. GENERAL HERMOGENES ESPERON, JR., ET AL.

  • [A.M. No. 11-10-3-SC : October 11, 2011] RE: REQUEST OF JUSTICE JOSE P. PEREZ FOR AUTHORITY TO ATTEND THE ADVANCED ROUNDTABLE FOR THE JUDICIARY ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUES AND ENFORCEMENT" TO BE HELD IN BANGKOK, THAILAND, OCTOBER 31, 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2, 2011

  • [A.M. No. 11-9-185-RTC : October 11, 2011] RE: REQUEST FOR REFUND OF FILING FEES PAID TO THE RTC, OCC, MARIKINA CITY BY MOTHER GEMMA A. SILVERIO, MSH, IN F-10-2027-MK

  • [G.R. No. 197850 : October 12, 2011] RITA TAN MANDANE V. CAROLINA G. BANDOY AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [A.C. No. 5862 : October 12, 2011] DALISAY CAPILI, COMPLAINANT, V. ATTY. ALFREDO L. BENTULAN, RESPONDENT.

  • [G.R. No. 198345 : October 12, 2011] JACQUELINE S. GAW AND MA. LEAH ONESIMA M. MALLARI V. FITNESS FIRST PHILIPPINES, INC. AS REPRESENTED BY MA. THERESA LLAMAS

  • [G.R. No. 198106 : October 12, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. SAMUEL FABI Y BADIDLAS

  • [G.R. No. 198320 : October 12, 2011] GILBERT BAGUIO V. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. No. 179957 : October 17, 2011] ASSET POOL A (SPV-AMC) INC. AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS V. SPOUSES CRISTOBAL AND NEMENCIANA SYBICO, DOING BUSINESS AS OPERATOR OF SYBICO PETRON SERVICE STATION

  • [A C. No. 6332, October 17, 2011] RE: SUPREME COURT RESOLUTION DATED APRIL 28, 2003 IN G. R. NO. 145817 AND G. R. NO. 145822 [ATTY. MAGDALENO M. PEÑA, RESPONDENT]

  • [G.R. No. 187215 : October 17, 2011] JULIANA B. CRUZ V. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. No. 195945 : October 17, 2011] VICTOR R. DIDULO, SUBSTITUTED BY HIS HEIRS, REPRESENTED BY ROMEO R. DIDULO V. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. No. 198064 : October 17, 2011] ROBINSON'S INCORPORATED AND ROBINSON'S SUPERMARKET V. EUSEBIA ENGLIS

  • [G.R. No. 195844 : October 17, 2011] MANUEL L. SIQUIAN V. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES AND CELIA SINGSON SIQUIAN

  • [G.R. No. 145817 : October 17, 2011] URBAN BANK V. MAGDALENO M. PE�A

  • [G.R. No. 198396 : October 17, 2011] CESAR ARANAS V. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. No. 197950 : October 18, 2011] PROSPERO A. PICHAY, JR. VS. GOVERNANCE COMMISSION FOR GOVERNMENT-OWNED OR -CONTROLLED CORPORATIONS, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, JR. AND DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT SECRETARY FLORENCIO B. ABAD

  • [G.R. No. 197422 : October 18, 2011] REPRESENTATIVE EDCEL C. LAGMAN VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, JR. AND DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT SECRETARY FLORENCIO B. ABAD

  • [G.R. No. 196870 : October 18, 2011] BORACAY FOUNDATION, INC. VS. PROVINCE OF AKLAN, REPRESENTED BY GOVERNOR CARLITO S. MARQUEZ, THE PHILIPPINE RECLAMATION AUTHORITY AND THE DENR-EMB REGION VI

  • [G.R. No. 196123 : October 18, 2011] NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY VS. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • [G.R. No. 197417 : October 18, 2011] OMBAY BAGUMBUNG HADJI MALIK, ET AL. VS. ELECTION OFFICER ALIREZA MACARAYA, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 195290 : October 18, 2011] LAND REFORM BENEFICIARIES ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, REBECCA DULAWAN VS. HON. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO OCHOA, JR., HON. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, RAMON PAJE, AND PHILIPPINE MILITARY ACADEMY

  • [G.R. No. 197676 : October 18, 2011] REMMAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND CHAMBER OF REAL ESTATE AND BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION VS. PROFESSIONAL REGULATORY BOARD OF REAL ESTATE SERVICE AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COMMISSION

  • [G.R. No. 196452 : October 18, 2011] MARIA BLANCA KIM B. LOKIN VS. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL AND LEOPOLDO N. BATAOIL

  • [A.C. No. 2304 : October 18, 2011] ROMULO P. UNTALAN VS. ATTY. ARTEMIO SACAGUING, ET AL.

  • [A.C. No. 8589 : October 18, 2011] JUSTICE DANTE O. TINGA [RET.] VS. SENATOR ALAN PETER S. CAYETANO

  • [G.R. No. 196355 : October 18, 2011] BIENVENIDO WILLIAM D. LLOREN VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND ROGELIO PUA, JR.

  • [G.R. No. 187167 : October 18, 2011] PROF. MERLIN M. MAGALLONA, ET AL. VS. HON. EDUARDO ERMITA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 197466 : October 18, 2011] JOEL QUI�O, MARY ANTONETTE DANGOY, JOSEPHINE T. ABING, JOY ANN P. CABATINGAN, TESSA P. CANG, WILFREDO T. CALO, HOMER C. CANEN, JOSE L. CAGANG, ALBERTO CABATINGAN AND FRANCISCO OLIVERIO VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND RITCHIE WAGAS

  • [G.R. No. 197469 : October 18, 2011] ROLANDO GAMOGAMO VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, HON. RODOLFO D. OBNAMIA, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE, RTC, BRANCH 64, MAUBAN, QUEZON AND LIBERTY BELTRAN

  • [G.R. No. 197878 : October 18, 2011] GEMMA C. DELA CRUZ, ET AL. VS. MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, BARANGAY CHAIRPERSON CESAR S. TOLEDANES, BARANGAY 183, ZONE 20, VILLAMOR, PASAY CITY, ET AL.

  • [G.R. Nos. 197975-76 : October 18, 2011] NILA G. AGUILLO AND BENJAMIN C. DEL ROSARIO VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ISIDRO L. HEMEDES, JR. AND ROMMEL A. GECOLEA

  • [G.R. No. 189155 : October 18, 2011] MELISSA C. ROXAS VS. PRESIDENT GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 191806 : October 18, 2011] THE GLOBAL LEGAL ACTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE, A CITIZENS' GROUP REPRESENTED BY PRIVATE CITIZENS ANTONIO A. OPOSA, ET AL. VS. THE PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT, PARTICULARLY THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 193007 : October 18, 2011] RENATO V. DIAZ AND AURORA MA. F. TIMBOL VS. THE SECRETARY OF FINANCE, ET AL.

  • [G.R. No. 195488 : October 18, 2011] MIGUEL M. LLAMZON VS. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, PHILIPPINE ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY [PEZA], LILIA DE LIMA AND PEZA-CENTRAL BOARD OF INQUIRY, INVESTIGATION AND DISCIPLINE [COMPOSED OF ALMA FLORENCE LOGRONIO, NESTOR HUN NADAL AND NICANOR OLIVAR]

  • [G.R. No. 195649 : October 18, 2011] CASAN MACODE MAQUILING VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS [COMELEC], ROMMEL ARNADO Y CAGOCO AND LINOG G. BALUA

  • [G.R. No. 195949 : October 18, 2011] MACAUNDAS M. MANGOTARA VS. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, AUTONOMOUS REGION IN MUSLIM MINDANAO

  • [G.R. No. 193773 : October 18, 2011] TERESITA L. SALVA VS. FLAVIANA M. VALLE

  • [G.R. No. 195395 : October 18, 2011] ENGINEER MANOLITO P. MENDOZA VS. COMMISSION ON AUDIT

  • [G.R. Nos. 197372-78 : October 18, 2011] JAIME S. DOMDOM VS. SANDIGANBAYAN [THIRD DIVISION], COMMISSION ON AUDIT AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • [G.R. No. 195894 : October 18, 2011] SALINA ULAY VS. RENATO M. OMANIO

  • [A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-181-CA-J : October 18, 2011] COMPLAINT OF MR. DIONISIO A. LOPEZ, AGAINST HON. ISAIAS P. DICDICAN, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS AND HON. RENATO D. MU�EZ, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 60, CADIZ CITY, NEGROS OCCIDENTAL

  • [A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-179-CA-J : October 18, 2011] RE: VERIFIED COMPLAINT OF MR. PETER CLASICO R. TAJANLANGIT AGAINST HON. RODRIGO L. LIM, JR., HON. ANGELITA A. GACUTAN, AND HON. NINA G. ANTONIO-VALENZUELA, CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS, RESPECTIVELY, TWENTY-THIRD (23RD) DIVISION, COURT OF APPEALS, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY

  • [A.M. No. 11-10-06-CTA : October 18, 2011] RE: REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A DAY CARE CENTER AND LACTATION FACILITY IN THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS

  • [A.M. No. 13795-Ret. : October 18, 2011] RE: APPLICATION FOR SURVIVORSHIP BENEFITS UNDER REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9946 OF MRS. HENEDINA C. BARRIOS, WIDOW OF COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICE ROBERTO A. BARRIOS

  • [A.M. No. P-11-2887 : October 18, 2011] OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR VS. MARISSA U. ANGELES, CLERK OF COURT II, MTC, PANTABANGAN, NUEVA ECIJA

  • [A.M. No. RTJ-09-2189 [Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 08-2837-RTJ] : October 18, 2011] VICTORIANO SY VS. JUDGE OSCAR E. DINOPOL, RTC, BR. 24, KORONADAL CITY

  • [G.R. No. 188563 : October 19, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. ROMEO REGALARIO

  • [G.R. No. 188605 : October 19, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. MICHAEL CALISO Y VICENTE

  • [G.R. No. 198105 : October 19, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. JESSIE DARUCA Y PILAPIL

  • [G.R. No. 197936 : October 19, 2011] ALBERT M.G. GARCIA V. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL-INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

  • [G.R. No. 190320 : October 19, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. NORA BASHER Y USMAN AND LINDA BARAMBAGAN

  • [G.R. No. 188968 : October 19, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. MARICAR MA�UZO Y PLAZA AND NORBERTO MA�UZO Y GALARDE

  • [G.R. No. 198002 : October 19, 2011] AMALIA D. SALCEDO V. DLSU-PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS, INC.

  • [G.R. No. 185842 : October 19, 2011] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. CATALINO GONZALES, PEDRING TALPE, AND JOSE VALENCIA