ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 136111. April 7, 1999]

HEIRS OF ERLINDA REYES, et al. vs. CA, et al.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated APR 7, 1999.

G.R. No. 136111 (Heirs of Erlinda Reyes, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al.)

Acting on the motion of petitioners for reconsideration of the resolution of 14 December 1998 which denied their motion for extension of time to file petition for review on certiorari as well as on their manifestation and motion dated 29 March 1999 stating that the resolution dated 8 February 1999 which denied the petition for review on certiorari for late filing was apparently issued prior to the Court's consideration of petitioners' aforesaid motion for reconsideration of the resolution of 14 December 1998, and praying that said petition be admitted as having been filed on time, the Court RESOLVES to TREAT the said manifestation and motion dated 29 March 1999 as a motion for reconsideration of aforesaid resolution of 8 February 1999 and to DENY with FINALITY both the motion for reconsideration of the resolution of 14 December 1998 and the manifestation and motion, no compelling reason having been adduced to warrant the reliefs sought.

The copy of the resolution of 14 December 1998 addressed to Atty. Marciano Cagatan, counsel for respondent, at Suite 418 FEMII Bldg., Aduana St., Intramuros, Manila, which was returned to this Court unserved with notation "Unclaimed." Is deemed SERVED on Atty. Cagatan by substituted service pursuant to Section 8, Rule 13 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended.

Very truly yours,

TOMASITA M. DRIS
Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE